23 Farmer Interview
23 Farmer Interview
Farmer Interview
23
Background
Farmers—the hands-on managers of agroecosystems—have enormous stores of knowledge about what
works and what does not and why. They understand the locality in which they farm, the variations and
extremes in its weather, the pests that must be contended with, the crops that respond best, the soil and what
it needs to remain productive. Regardless of how sustainable an individual farmer’s practices are, his or her
knowledge is an important resource, and his or her concerns and point of view are something the agroecolo-
gist must take into account. For these reasons, a central tenet of agroecology is that local, farmer-based
knowledge is a key starting point in the movement toward sustainability.
A farmer’s knowledge and practices, however, must also be understood within the larger context of the
food system. Farming is an economic activity, and so a farm’s place in the web of food production, distri-
bution, and consumption relationships affects everything a farmer does on the farm. It matters who buys a
farm’s products, what price the farmer gets, and how far the food travels to get to the consumer’s table.
Many farmers feel helpless in the face of globalization and the increasing power of the food processing,
transporting, marketing, and retailing “middlemen.” Some farmers, however, are shifting their marketing
strategies in ways that let them retain control over their economic fates. Many farmers moving in this direc-
tion are making their farms the primary building blocks of alternative food systems that eschew globaliza-
tion and work to re-create more direct connections between the growers and consumers of food.
Textbook Correlation
Chapter 19: Sustainability and Its Assessment
Chapter 21: Bringing Farmers and Consumers Closer Together
Synopsis
A farmer (or farming team) is interviewed to learn about the farming practices, knowledge, motivations,
major challenges, role in the food system, and goals for the future. The information gained from the inter-
view may be used for later collaborative problem solving.
Objectives
• Learn interviewing techniques.
• Understand the human element of agriculture.
• Investigate farming as “ethnoscience.”
• Gain a baseline of local knowledge.
• Explore the role that local farmers play as components of regional and global food systems.
• Take steps toward transforming the relationship between farmers and agroecological researchers into one that
is more participatory, with information flowing in both directions.
Timing Factors
This investigation can be completed in a relatively short amount of time, with little preparation. It can be
done any time of the year, but it may be best to avoid times that would be especially busy for local farmers.
Advance Preparation
• Contact local farmers and ascertain their interest in being interviewed. When you talk to a farmer, make it clear
you value his or her knowledge and point of view and want to learn from them. Try to represent a variety of
farm sizes, types of practices, types of crops, and geographic areas in your choice of initial contacts. Attempt to
obtain commitments from as many farmers as there are teams.
• Arrange times for interviews. Make it clear that an interview may take an hour or more. Obtain permission from
each interviewee to record the interview.
Ongoing Maintenance
No maintenance is required.
Investigation Teams
Form two-person interview teams, each of which will interview a different farmer. If the number of willing
farmers is limited, team size can be increased to three; teams larger than three persons may have greater
difficulty establishing rapport with the interviewee.
Procedure
Data Collection
1. Before the interview, learn as much as possible about the farmer being interviewed: crops grown, farm size,
market conditions, problems related to the geographic area, and so on. This knowledge will help you form more
intelligent questions.
2. Make a list of questions to ask. Keep in mind the following:
a. The questions should be adapted to the individual you are interviewing (the questions you would ask a
small-scale organic farmer, e.g., are somewhat different from those you would ask a larger-scale conven-
tional farmer).
b. Many farmers are used to being treated by researchers and extension agents as receivers of information, not
sources.
c. The interview has two basic objectives: (1) learning about the farmer’s practices, problems, motivations,
marketing strategies, and farming history at a descriptive level and (2) understanding the logic and knowl-
edge that underlies the farmer’s practices and goals. These dual objectives mean that for every practice
listed in “Areas to Investigate,” you should learn what the farmer does and how and why he or she does it.
d. You will get more interesting information and establish better rapport if you let the farmer’s point of view
control the agenda. It may be best to find out about certain practices or rationales with indirect questions,
rather than direct ones. A direct question such as “Do you use integrated pest management?” can be inter-
preted as “Do you control pests the right way or the wrong way?” and is best avoided.
e. As the interviewee gets to know and trust you during the interview, you may be able to ask more probing or
potentially sensitive questions.
Areas to Investigate
• Pest management
• Maintenance of soil health and organic matter management
• Cultivation
• Weed management and use of “good weeds”
• Cover cropping and use of fallow cycle
• Crop combining and polyculture
• Farm diversity and integration with natural vegetation
• Use of animals
• Erosion control
• Use of energy
• Soil moisture management and irrigation
• Use of trees and other perennials
• Connection with the local community
• Marketing and economics of the farming enterprise
Either before or after reports are written, it may be instructive to hold an informal roundtable discussion in
which interview teams share their experiences and findings. Consider the possibility of delivering copies of
the completed reports—after instructor critique and revision—to the farmers.