Jcom 1306 López Pérez
Jcom 1306 López Pérez
COM
Reimagining science communication in the age of AI
DOI https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23010601
One morning, you wake up, and Alexa is no longer by your side. That day, no one
turns on the bedroom light at 5%, congratulates you for achieving training
challenges or warns you that the coffee is ready. At that moment, you realise that
artificial intelligence (AI) has changed your life.
Conferences, like books, leave their mark on you through the sensations you
experience while you enjoy them. I will remember this conference as a comfortable
and open space that enhanced participation and dialogue between researchers,
professionals, educators, social agents and students.
Artificial The opening lecture set the social tone of the meeting with a presentation on
intelligence and ‘Responsible Artificial Intelligence’. The AI expert and professor at the University
ethics of Umea, Virginia Dignum, spoke about the human dimension of technology and
linked it with the need to promote quality and inclusive education to inform
citizens about its impact on their daily lives and personal development. Similar
observations were already pointed out by authors such as Holmes, Persson,
Chounta, Wasson and Dimitrova [2022], as well as Miao, Holmes, Huang and
Zhang [2021].
Participation and dialogue were, once again, the protagonists at the Gutenberg
Campus with the organisation of an open debate for the development of a
proposed guide to good practices in the use of AI in science communication. The
result is sure to be of interest to the practical and scientific community.
The science of I especially enjoyed the open workshop dedicated to the science of science
science communication. Through a participatory methodology, three researchers leading
communication this work [Revuelta, Llorente & Saladié, 2023] presented the results of the study.
They promoted dialogue to share knowledge and experiences around research,
training and practice.
The barriers and challenges for the incorporation of professionals are another of the
main topics. Not only was it the focus of debate in one of the plenary conferences
through the voices of researchers and practitioners in science communication
Ángela Monasor, Rubén Permuy, Nuria Saladié, Jordi Más and Concepción Sanz,
but it was also present in the informal conversations.
As described by several authors [Metcalfe, 2022; Gerber et al., 2020; Bucchi &
Trench, 2021; Davies et al., 2021], there is a worrying disconnect between theory
and practice; that is, between the people who research science communication and
those who are professionally engaged in it.
With the impact of AI on communication, now is the time for academics in the field
to listen to science communicators and the social sectors involved to adapt their
study priorities to the challenges demanded by today’s society. Likewise, practice
must be supported by evidence that favours effective and inclusive knowledge
dissemination and public dialogue.
For now, I remain encouraged about the development and future of this young
profession in Spain that is currently consolidating and occupying a relevant place
in society. Many of the delegates were young people who had chosen this career as
a dedication to the future. Those of us fortunate enough to dedicate ourselves to
this work have the ethical and moral obligation to work together to guarantee the
right to information and quality education and thus favour the generation of a freer
and happier society.
Acknowledgments I would like to thank to the Parque de las Ciencias de Andalucía-Granada (Spain)
and its director, Luis Alcalá, for supporting and enhancing my participation in the
Campus Gutenberg — Museo de Ciencia CosmoCaixa 2023.
References Bucchi, M. & Trench, B. (2021). Rethinking science communication as the social
conversation around science. JCOM 20 (03), Y01. doi:10.22323/2.20030401
Davies, S. R., Franks, S., Roche, J., Schmidt, A. L., Wells, R. & Zollo, F. (2021).
The landscape of European science communication. JCOM 20 (03), A01.
doi:10.22323/2.20030201
Gerber, A., Broks, P., Gabriel, M., Lorenz, L., Lorke, J., Merten, W., . . . Warthun, N.
(2020). Science communication research: an empirical field analysis.
doi:10.5281/zenodo.4028704
Holmes, W., Persson, J., Chounta, I.-A., Wasson, B. & Dimitrova, V. (2022). Artificial
intelligence and education: a critical view through the lens of human rights,
democracy and the rule of law. Council of Europe. Strasbourg, France. Retrieved
from https://rm.coe.int/artificial-intelligence-and-education-a-critical-view-
through-the-lens/1680a886bd
Ley 17/2022, de 5 de septiembre, por la que se modifica la Ley 14/2011, de 1 de
junio, de la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación. Artículo 15. (2022).
«BOE» núm. 214, de 06/09/2022. Retrieved from
https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2022/09/05/17/con
Author Lourdes López-Pérez is Head of Outreach Science Section at the science museum
Parque de las Ciencias de Andalucía-Granada and she is researcher in the the
research group “Access and evaluation of scientific information” of University of
Granada. She holds a Ph.D. in Social Sciences and she graduated in Journalism.
Also, she has a Master degree in Science Information and Communication at the
University of Granada and another of Marketing at the ESIC. She has published
more than twenty book chapters and articles about public engagement in science in
national and international journals with a certified quality index (JCR, SJR, RESH).
Her scientific profile is completed with research stays at American Museum of
Natural History of New York; Natural History Museum of London and Science
Communication Unit of University of Western of England.
# llopez@parqueciencias.com
How to cite López-Pérez, L. (2024). ‘Reimagining science communication in the age of AI’.
JCOM 23 (01), R01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23010601.
⃝c The Author(s). This article is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution — NonCommercial — NoDerivativeWorks 4.0 License.
ISSN 1824-2049. Published by SISSA Medialab. jcom.sissa.it