156 Anthony VS Dighe
156 Anthony VS Dighe
Age-………, Occ-Service
VERSUS
4. The Complainant states that the Complainant upon believing Mr. Sandesh
Dighe’s words and assurances had delivered peaceful possession of the said
room premises to Mr. Sandesh Dighe for redevelopment and Mr. Sandesh
Dighe had accepted the possession.
6. The Complainant states that the Complainant was shocked and surprised
that Mr. Sandesh Dighe had demolished the Complainant’s room premises
however Mr. Sandesh Dighe have not started any kind of construction work
on the plot area of said room premises.
7. That the Complainant had given possession of his room premises to Mr.
Sandesh Dighe in month of 2018 but till today he has not given many alternate
accommodation whereas he had executed agreement with other members of
the vicinity and given them compensation and accommodation hence it clearly
reflects that Mr. Sandesh Dighe has ill motive and intention to deceive the
Complainant from the beginning therefore Mr. Sandesh Dighe had not signed
any agreement with the complainant and had taken possession of said room
premises without any compensation to the Complainant.
8. The Complainant states that the Complainant time and again requested Mr.
Sandesh Dighe for alternate accommodation and compensation but Mr.
Sandesh Dighe had given evasive replies and had threatened the Complainant
that “tujhko jo karna hai kar le koi kucch nahi ukhad sakta mera…mere picche
nete log ka hath hai” and also threatened the Complainant by “abhi tu dubara
mere idhar aaya to tereko aur tere gharvalo gayab kar dalunga….galti se bhi
idhar dikhne ka nahi mereko kucch puchhne ka nahi”
9. The Complainant states that the Complainant has suffered wrongful loss
due to Mr. Sandesh Dighe’s intentional negligence and suffering from mental
distress, Mr. Sandesh Dighe have cheated and duped the Complainant on the
basis of false promises and assurances.
10. The Complainant states that the specific performance of Mr. Sandesh
Dighe’s agreement which are violated or breached significantly are to be
rectified by Mr. Sandesh Dighe thus the Complainant has suffered loss of
property and consideration.
11. The Complainant states that he has sent notice to Mr. Sandesh Dighe
on …………………. for compensation and informed him about the offence
committed by the Mr. Sandesh Dighe. Hereto annexed the copy of Notice
as Exhibit-A.
12. The Complainant states that, the accused given false assurances and
promises for the redevelopment of the said room premises and has wrongfully
gained from the complainant and used the said room premises for his own
benefits which is serious offence and hence detail investigation is required to
be conducted / necessary from instance of accused and the persons
interrogation as who are involved in the present crime.
13. The Complainant states that the Accused neither replied nor paid any
compensation to the Complainant has ignored the notice of the
complainant thus crystal clear that the accused willfully and
intentionally caused wrongful loss and cheated the complainant on the
pretext of redevelopment of the said room premises.
b) Any other relief being granted as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and
proper.
COMPLAINANT
C.C.No. of 2023
....Complainant
VERSUS
***********************************************
WRITTEN COMPLAINANT U/S.156(3) OF CR.P.C.
***********************************************
Dated this ____ day of _____, 2023
VERSUS
INDEX
Place : Mumbai
Date : Complainant
IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE 31 st COURT AT VIKHROLI AT MUMBAI
C. C. No. of 2023
VERSUS
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLAINANT
1. I say that I have filed the present case before this Hon’ble Court
against above said accused. I say that I am conversant with the facts of the
present case.
2. I say that I have not filed any other case other than present case on
same subject matter.
VERIFICATION
VERSUS
VAKALATNAMA
I/We Mr.Rahat Ali Khan, hereby appoint SHRI DEEPAK KUMAR J. GIRI &
SHRI DILIP L. INKAR Advocates, High Court, Mumbai to act, appear and plead
In the witness where I/We have set my/our hand/s to this writing
Witness :
Accepted
IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE 31 st COURT AT VIKHROLI
AT MUMBAI
C. C. No. of 2023
VERSUS
LIST OF WITNESSES
1. Complainant
Place: Mumbai
VERSUS
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
Place : Mumbai
Date : ___-__-2023 Complainant