0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views3 pages

Correction Oral Presentation 2431031

Uploaded by

gtristanyang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views3 pages

Correction Oral Presentation 2431031

Uploaded by

gtristanyang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

ORAL PRESENTATION GRADING RUBRIC

Oral presentation: How actions of teachers and cis-gendered peers affect TNB students
Presenters: Kamryn Goldberg, Chelsea Noonoo, Tristan Goon, Elena Chen-Yun-Lin - 85%

Acceptable Good Very good Excellent


Content 20 or less 21 - 23 24- 26 27 - 28 29-30
(30p) Presentation Presentation Presentation Presentation Presentation
content shows content shows content shows content shows a content shows an
26.5 a lack of general an adequate solid exceptional
understanding understanding of understanding of understanding of understanding of
of the topic. the topic. There the topic. the topic. the topic and
There is is limited Research effort is Substantive research articles.
inadequate evidence of largely evident in research effort is Outstanding
evidence of research effort in finding relevant evident in research effort is
research finding relevant information and finding relevant evident in
effort and information and facts. Content is information and finding relevant
insufficient facts. Content mostly accurate facts. Content is information and
relevant contains some and somewhat accurate and facts. Content is
information inaccuracies, integrated. May integrated in a accurate and
and facts. inconsistencies, contain some clear, logical integrated in a
Content is misinterpretation inconsistencies way. All clear, logical,
confusing , and/or is in content or required and sophisticated
and/or somewhat some elements are manner. All
inaccurate. unclear. A connections included, and required
Required required element made may not sources are elements are
elements are may be missing be supported. properly cited. included, and
m1ssmg and/or some Required sources are
and/or sources may be elements are properly cited.
sources are improperly cited. included and
improperly sources are
cited. properly cited for
the most part.
Structure 6 or less 7 8 9 10
(lOp) The The presentation The presentation The presentation The presentation
presentation is somewhat is well- is well- is exceptionally
8 is not well-structured, structured, for structured. It is well-structured.
effectively though the the most part. It organized in a It is organized in
structured, is organized in a logical and a logical and
organization
which generally logical largely cohesive cohesive manner
could be more
impedes manner, though manner. that promotes
comprehensio logical and Transitions comprehension.
it may lack some
n. The cohesive. cohesion in between sections Transitions
organization Transitions places. are effective and between sections
lacks logical between sections Transitions the presentation are seamless and
sequencing, and/or flow between sections generally flows the presentation
cohesion, across speakers are present and smoothly across flows smoothly
transitions, may be missing. effort to promote speakers. The across speakers.
and/or flow. The presentation flow across time-limit is The time-limit is
The is somewhat speakers is respected, and respected, and
presentation evident. The the presentation the presentation
over/under the
IS time-limit is is balanced is well-balanced
substantially time limit and/or respected, and between group between group
over/under some members the presentation members. members.
the time limit present is close to
and/or some noticeably balanced
more/less than
members others. between group
present members.
significantly
more/less
than others.

Oral 10 or less 11 12 13 14-15


component- Ineffective Somewhat Generally Highly effective Outstanding
individual delivery, effective in effective in i n delivering the delivery of a
(15p) problematic delivering the delivering the oral presentation, well-polished
communicati oral presentation, oral presentation, demonstrating. oral
on skills demonstrating demonstrating very good presentation.
13 communication Spoke clearly
overall. Lack average good
of preparation communication communication skills; spoke and audibly; was
was evident. skills; lacked skills; spoke clearly and enthusiastic and
clarity, clearly; was audibly; good encouraging;
enthusiasm, enthusiastic; kept pace; and kept a good
pacing, etc. in a fair pace; and enthusiastic and pace; and did not
their speech. did not rely engaging; kept a. rely too much on
good pace; and did notes
More preparation heavily on notes.
not rely too much preparation was
was needed. Preparation was
on notes. evident.
largely evident.
Preparation was
evident.

Oral 6 or less 7 8 9 10
component- Lack of Somewhat Teammates Teams Team members
team (lOp) cohesion effective demonstrate effectively work function as a
among group delivery of good together to synchronous
members, information. communication. unit
8.5
inappropriate Teammates seem Some minor deliver a referring to
transitions to work together overlap and presentation that previous
between but there is a awkward flows across teammates work,
group lack of practice switching presenters. linking ideas
members. as a group. between Practice is across the
Team teammates. apparent. presentation.
members Transitions
seem to lack between team
awareness of members are
other sections seamless.
Lack of Practice is
practice as a clearly evident.
group.
Presentation: 16 or less 18 - 19 20 - 21 22 - 23 24 - 25
Visual Slides Slides are Slides are Slides are well- Slides are
Component generally lack somewhat effectively designed, extremely well-
(25p) visual appeal effectively designed with visually designed, with
and are text designed with visual appeal, appealing, and outstanding
heavy. some visual and minimal text include minimal visual appeal and
20 Graphics are appeal but are for the most part. text. Graphics minimal text on
used poorly somewhat text Graphics are are used each slide.
or not at all. heavy. Graphics used effectively. No Graphics are
Presentation are used appropriately. errors (spelling, used effectively
appears somewhat Minor errors formatting, etc.) to convey
disjointed appropriately. (spelling, appear on the relevant
rather than Some errors formatting, etc.) slides. information. No
unified and/or (spelling, may appear on errors (spelling,
frequent formatting, etc.) the slides. formatting, etc.)
errors appear on the appear on the
(spelling, slides. slides.
formatting,
etc.) appear
on the slides.
Discussion 6 or less 7 8 9 10
Period (lOp) Team Team members Team members Team members Team members
members invited questions encouraged encouraged fostered a
9 made little and provided discussion, discussion, dynamic
effort to responses. actively listened actively listened discussion,
encourage Responses were to questions, and to questions, and encouraged
discussion. not all clear provided clear provided clear questions,
Responses and/or insightful. and helpful responses. actively listened,
were unclear Interactions with responses. Interactions with and provided
and/or lacked the audience Interactions with the audience clear and
insight. were, for the the audience were open and sophisticated
Interactions most part, open were open and professional. responses.
with the and professional. professional. Additional
audience insights or
were not open context were
and/or provided.
professional. Interactions with

NOTE.
Your grade for the group oral presentation may be adjusted (i.e., lowered) where deemed appropriate
(e.g., if you did not contribute your fair share to the group, if you were not a respectful audience member
for other groups, etc.)

Team feedback:
Overall, your team seemed to work well together and seems to share work and the presentation fairly. You
delivered a professional presentation. In which you all seemed to speak approximately equally. Your
background was simple without being overly so and was consistent throughout. However, there were many
differences throughout your presentation. For instance, there are changes in title and content font, use and
type of referencing, approximate amount of text per slide, etc. Strive to strike a balance between too little
and too much information on your slides. For instance, on the introduction slide it would have been nice to
see and hear some discussion of the difference between the 3 terms. Make sure to review referencing. Your
reference slide only contains 2 articles, you use more than this throughout. Also, your style of citing
sources on each slide changes. In some cases, you do not include the source, in some cases you use an in-
text citation style (make sure to review; initials should not be included) and in some cases you use a full
reference (review; this is not in correct APA format). Remember, for teamwork each team member is
expected to review all work.

Individual feedback: In general, you are a good presenter and were respectful of your teammates and class
peers when they presented. During your presentation you spoke clearly and made good engagement with
the audience.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy