Chapter 6 Auditing
Chapter 6 Auditing
6.0. Introduction
The ultimate goal of auditing is to express opinion on the fair presentation of financial
statements. Audit opinion is expressed in an audit report - the final phase of a financial
statement audit. The auditor must comply with relevant Auditing Standards when reporting on
audited financial statements. Depending on the circumstances, the auditor may issue an
unqualified audit report; a qualified audit report that expresses one of three other types of
opinion; or an unqualified opinion with an emphasis of matter. When expressing a qualified
opinion, the report must contain a clear statement as to the reasons for the qualification and the
effect thereof. The auditor must exercise due care in conducting the audit so as to obtain a
reasonable basis for an opinion and to express the opinion justified by the findings.
This chapter deals with the nature of audit reports, purpose and forms of audit reports, and the
types of opinions in an audit report.
Dear learner! Before you directly go to study the chapter, let me give you definition of some key
words which are helpful to understand it. The following table provides the definitions.
Going Concern – (of an enterprise) expected to continue to operate at a profit in the foreseeable
future
1
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
6.1. Nature and forms of Audit Reports
Auditing is an attest function. Auditors provide their own objective opinion on the fair
presentation of financial statements. Audit opinion is provided in an audit report – a report that
communicates the results of the audit work to interested parties.
Financial statements are not the responsibilities of auditors; they are the responsibilities of the
client's management. Management is primarily responsible for the fairness and completeness
of all disclosures contained in the financial statements. The auditor may suggest changes on
financial statements which, he thinks, are required by IFRS. But the client is not bound to make
those changes. However, the auditor may note this issue, in her/his report, if the client refuses to
make such changes.
Another important point is that audit reports use cautious languages such as "reasonable",
"we believe", "our opinion" etc. Why?
This indicates that the auditor didn’t examine each and every aspect of the statements. In
essence she/he is never 100% sure that the financial statements are "correct". The reason for this
is that it costs too much to examine each and every aspect of the statements. It is up to the
auditor to decide when he has done enough work to be sure enough about the financial
statements – which is the art of auditing.
3
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
ii. Short form Audit Report: this form of report is commonly issued to non –
administrative stockholders, creditors, analysts etc. The short form of audit report will be
discussed latter in this chapter.
Based on the findings of an audit, auditors may issue a report containing, basically, four types of
opinions. These types of opinions are: Unqualified Opinion; Qualified Opinion; Adverse
Opinion, and Disclaimer Opinion.
What impression do you get from the phrase "unqualified opinion" (positive or negative) on the
fairness of financial statements?
As you can understand from the definitions of words given earlier, unqualified opinion conveys
a positive sense as to the financial statements. Unqualified opinion, also called the standard
unqualified opinion is provided when all of the following conditions are fulfilled.
Another question can be asked at this point. "What are the reasons for explanation?"
4
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
There are five causes of explanation on unqualified opinion. These are lack of consistent
application of IFRS, substantial doubt about going concern, the auditor agrees with promulgated
departure from IFRS, emphasis of a matter, repots involving other auditors. Let you study each
cause.
Here should note that the auditor should state doubt about going concern even though the
financial statement are fairly presented.
iii. The auditor agrees with promulgated departure from IFRS: under this reason, the
client is found to depart from IFRS but the auditor agrees with the departure. The auditor
should, therefore, state adhering to the principle would have been misleading and why.
iv. Emphasis of a matter: this includes anything that the auditor felt the users of the
statements need to know that doesn’t fit the other three situations. It requires, more than
others, the auditor's professional judgment. Let me give you an example.
Related party transactions: the fact that the company audited is a subsidiary of a larger
entity
Events that occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date
v. Reports involving other auditors: sometimes an audit work may be performed by two
auditors. For example if a client had a branch in distant areas, where the cost of travel is
5
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
very high, an auditor in the nearby area may perform the audit work of the branch. In
such cases, the two audit firms first determine which of them a primary auditor is. Once
determined, the primary auditor will decide if the other auditor's work is material. If it is
found to be immaterial, the primary auditor makes no mentions of the other auditor's
work in the report.
However, if the other auditor's work is found to be material, the primary auditor needs to decide
whether to take responsibility for the other auditor's work. This decision requires considerations
on the competence and reputation of the other auditor, personal visits and/or reviewing the other
auditor's audit programs and working papers. Therefore, dear learner! The primary auditor has
two options – to take the responsibility for the work of the other or not to take.
If the primary auditor takes the responsibility for the work of the other, an unqualified
opinion with explanation is provided. Hence, the other auditor's work (but not name) is
mentioned in each of the three paragraphs of the standard unqualified report.
If the primary auditor, however, doesn’t want to take any responsibility for the work of the other
auditor, she/he would qualify her/his report.
The second type of opinion is qualified opinion. Issuing a qualified opinion is serious (harm full
to the client). For example if the client applied to get a loan from a bank, the bank may deny to
provide the loan to the client whose financial statements contain audit report with qualified
opinion.
Here you may ask an important question. "On what circumstances does an auditor issue a report
with qualified opinion?
Basically, there are two reasons that lead to give a qualified opinion. These are scope restriction,
and a departure from IFRS. Let me explain each one.
i. Scope Restriction: is first reason that leads to qualification of opinion. An audit is said to
have scope restriction if the auditor couldn’t accumulate sufficient evidence to form an
opinion. Scope restriction can be caused by two things. The first one if the client’s
management refuses to give the required information, known as client imposed
restriction. And the second one is scope restriction caused by circumstances.
6
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
Which of the two restrictions do you think is more serious?
Good! A client imposed restriction is more serious than those caused by circumstances. Because
the auditor, generally, concludes that the client is trying to conceal fraud. An example of client
imposed restriction can be:
Scope restriction imposed by circumstances also calls for qualification of opinions. Of course it
is less serious than client imposed restriction. Such restrictions are not necessarily caused by the
client. An example of this type of restriction can be:
If an NGO (client) has a branch such as a clinic in a remote area where regular
commercial transportation doesn’t exist, the auditor may fail to examine the operations
of the clinic
An audit that was engaged after the end of the fiscal period
In those circumstances the auditor should use alternative methods of examining accounts,
operations, etc in question. But if she/he is still unsatisfied, her/his opinion is qualified.
Note: scope restriction leads to qualification only if is not sever. A very sever scope restriction
results in a disclaimer opinion – to be discussed latter on.
ii. Departure from IFRS: it is the second reason that requires issuing a report containing a
qualified opinion. That means if the financial statements are not prepared in accordance
with IFRS. And the departure is material. For example,
Note: not all departures from IFRS require qualification of opinions. Qualification is necessary
only for material departures. However if the departure from IFRS is really bad, an adverse
opinion is issued. Adverse opinions will be discussed shortly.
Well! An adverse opinion is issued when the effect of a departure from IFRS is so material and
pervasive to the financial statements that the auditor concludes that a qualification of the report is
not adequate to disclose the misleading or incomplete nature of the financial statements. So, how
do we choose between a qualified and adverse opinion?
Good! Of course, deciding to issue an opinion other than the standard unqualified opinion as well
as choosing between the two is difficult. It requires determining the materiality of the matter.
However, the following should be considered in determining materiality:
i. The magnitude (dollar or Birr amount) of the item: a standard rule of thumb is
anything over 10% of net income (for income statement items) and over 10% of total
assets for balance sheet items is considered to be material
ii. The nature of the item: the following items generally, have a lower materiality
threshold (i.e. a lower misstatement is considered material):
illegal or fraudulent transactions compared to honest mistakes
a transaction that makes a difference between a small net income and small net loss
iii. The significance of the item to the client: some items are more important than other
items depending on situations. For example if a client wants to use receivables as
collateral, the materiality level for receivable can be 10% of total receivables. In this
case receivables are more important to the client so that lower materiality threshold is
set.
iv. The effect on financial statements as a whole: an item that has a significant effect
on the financial statements as a whole will have lower materiality threshold. In this
case, the auditor should read the statements as if she/he were a user. Items that have
significant influence of her/his decisions are considered to have higher effect on the
statements as a whole.
8
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
Note: Generally, determining materiality for scope restriction qualification is more difficult than
qualification for departure from IFRS.
Dear learner! The final type of opinion is a disclaimer opinion. An auditor’s report containing a
disclaimer opinion should be expressed when the auditor doesn’t know enough to give an
opinion. This opinion is less serious than adverse opinion but more serious than qualified
opinion.
What are the conditions that lead to issue a disclaimer opinion? Well! There are two conditions
that lead to disclaimer opinion. Those are scope restriction and auditor is not independent. Let
me explain each of them.
10
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
Auditor's report on financial statements of XYZ Corporation title
In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly the financial position of XYZ Opinion
Corporation as of December 31, 2011 and the results of operation as well as cash paragraph
Flows for the year then ended, in accordance with the international accounting
standards.
January 15, 2023 Date of the report
ABC auditors
04 kebelle, Asella, Ethiopia Auditors Name and Address
Signature _________________ Auditors Signature
11
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
As stated earlier, this report contains standard unqualified opinion. Hear you may ask important
questions "are the ways unqualified opinion with explanation, qualified opinion, adverse opinion,
and disclaimer opinion differ in the way they are reported?" How are those opinion reported?
Well! The answer for the first question is yeas. Departures from the standard unqualified reports
are presented differently. And to answer the second one, please study the following:
i. Unqualified opinions with explanation: those opinions are reported in an audit report
by adding a fourth paragraph after the opinion paragraph. This fourth paragraph is used
to write further comments. But this comment doesn’t mean the opinion is qualified.
Unqualified opinion with explanation is reported in this way only if it is caused by the
first four causes of explanation. However, for the forth cause of explanation (reports
involving other auditors), no additional paragraph is added. The fact is stated on each of
the three paragraphs of the standard unqualified report.
We believe the statements are ok. But we have something we want to say about them. …
ii. Qualified Opinions: A scope restriction results in a change in the scope paragraph, a
change in the opinion paragraph and needs an additional paragraph (explanatory
paragraph) between the scope and opinion paragraphs. It is stated as "except for …" and
refers to the potential effect of the particular area not adequately examined.
Example of opinion: I believe the statements are ok, except that we were not able to [count
inventories]
Material departure from IFRS requires no change in the scope paragraph. But an additional
paragraph (explanatory paragraph) between the scope and opinion paragraph is inserted. It
explains the departure and its effects on the financial statements. The opinion paragraph says,
"except for … " and refers to the explanatory paragraph.
Example of opinion: We believe the statements are ok, except that [fixed assets are not recorded
according to IFRS]
iii. Adverse Opinion: an adverse opinion is the worst of all opinions. Just like qualified due to
departure from IFRS, it is reported by adding a fourth paragraph. And the opinion states
that the statements don’t present fairly.
12
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.
Example of opinion: we believe the statements don’t present fairly the financial position and
results of operation of the company.
iv. Disclaimer Opinion: remember this opinion is issued if there was sever limitation of scope
and/ or if the auditor is not independent. In the case of disclaimer due to scope limitation,
the introductory paragraph is altered to read as "we were engaged to audit … and our
opinion is our responsibility". Besides, the scope paragraph is omitted from the report and
an explanatory paragraph is added in its place.
Example of an opinion: we don’t know, we didn’t see enough to form an opinion.
If disclaimer opinion is provided because the auditor is not independent, there will be no
introductory and no scope paragraph. A paragraph that states the disclaimer is used.
Example of an opinion: I will not express my opinion because I am not independent.
13
Auditing Principles and Practice I, By Tefera B.