Sample Industry Report
Sample Industry Report
Bruce Belfiore
Senior Research Executive
Alan Pottkotter
Technical Producer
2023 Report
Copyright © 2023 BenchmarkPortal, LLC. V060123 DR
“Note: In order to offer the latest information and metrics, content and material in this document
may be updated without prior notice.”
This report may not be copied, scanned or reproduced without the written permission of
BenchmarkPortal, LLC. Additional copies may be purchased by e-mailing
Surveys@BenchmarkPortal.com
or by calling ++(800) 214-8929, extension 1.
For internal use only. Distribution beyond purchasing company is strictly prohibited.
2
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements 5
Chapter 1: Introduction 6
Chapter 3: Methodology 11
3
List of Charts and Graphs
Page | 4
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
We wish to extend our thanks to the many contact center managers who have
contributed to our database over the years. We would also like to acknowledge the
contribution of colleagues who have provided both inspiration and perspiration to
make this effort useful to managers all over the world. In particular, we note the
founding contributions of our former partners, Dr. Jon Anton and David Machin, and the
constant support of retired Professor Richard Feinberg of Purdue University.
We also thank our report team, especially Michael Feinberg, Alan Pottkotter and Sergio
Ramazzina for their untiring efforts to make these reports the best value available for the
contact center industry.
5
Chapter 1: Introduction
Page | 6
Chapter 1: Introduction
1. Chapter 1: Introduction
“Every enterprise, in every sector, can benefit from comparing itself to other
similar operations. This promotes a process of creative soul-searching regarding
comparative strengths and weaknesses, which, in turn, leads to identification
and adoption of best practice improvements. We have repeatedly seen the
transformative power of systematic benchmarking for customer contact
centers.” ~ Bruce Belfiore, BenchmarkPortal
Please Note: We take the opportunity in our 2023 Industry Reports to signal the impact caused
by the recent COVID-19 pandemic and post Pandemic years, in addition to the effect that
advancements in contact center technology have had on contact center performance metrics.
These elements have had significant impacts on the collecting of KPI data and on the data as
well. Some metrics have changed noticeably as a result.
Benchmarking has proven to be an important tool for managers. Comparing operating
metrics and methodologies with other enterprises in the same industry has provided
managers a structured approach to contact center performance issues with useful
insights, resulting in a fact-based process of discovery, action and improvement that
leads to superior performance.
Superior performance in customer contact is more important today than ever. As
products become commoditized, it is the service aspect which determines loyalty and
repeat sales in more and more industries. Knowing your competitive position on the
customer service you provide is key.
Contact centers are ideal operations for benchmarking for several reasons:
They all have software service platforms that automatically capture large
quantities of data on key performance metrics. Unlike industries where gathering
apples-to-apples data is a long and laborious process, gathering data for
contact centers is easier and can now be substantially automated under a
patented process pioneered by BenchmarkPortal.
Senior managers look to contact centers to prove their value to the organization
on a regular basis. Regular benchmarking of the contact center provides
management the performance-based information needed to make decisions
on staffing, training, technology acquisition, and other investment and budget-
related matters.
7
Chapter 1: Introduction
Why BenchmarkPortal?
Since beginning its benchmarking activities on the campus of Purdue University in 1995,
BenchmarkPortal has gained a reputation as the source for the broadest and most
reliable database for the contact center industry. Data we receive goes through a
multi-layered scrubbing process to ensure accuracy. This includes both automated
statistical parameters, as well as human quality control. In addition, BenchmarkPortal
was awarded a patent for its advanced benchmarking process. As a result,
BenchmarkPortal is considered the gold standard for data in our sector.
By monitoring competitive position with the help of BenchmarkPortal benchmarking,
and identifying areas that require improvement, contact centers can make continuous
improvement a part of their culture. The ROI that results from this approach provides
quantifiable proof of efficiency and effectiveness, as well as a source of self-funding for
technology and process improvement initiatives.
BenchmarkPortal has developed a balanced scorecard process which is explained in
Appendix B (The Tonchev Performance Index) and which lies at the heart of the
benchmark reports we create for individual companies (called Contact Center
Benchmark Reports).
A Balanced Scorecard Identifies Gaps Compared with Your Peer Industry
Your Industry Your Industry
Effectiveness Metrics Efficiency Metrics
Value Average Value Average
Top Box Caller Satisfaction in Percent Contacts per Agent per Hour
Bottom Box Caller Satisfaction in Percent Cost per Inbound Call in Dollars
Top Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent Average Talk Time in Minutes
Bottom Box Agent Satisfaction in Percent Average After-Call Work Time in Minutes
Calls Closed on First Call in Percent Average Occupancy in Percent
Average Speed of Answer in Seconds Average Utilization in Percent
Calls Transferred in Percent Adherence to Schedule in Percent
Average Hold Time in Seconds Average Agent Attendance in Percent
Average Time in Queue in Seconds Auxiliary Time in Percent
Average Calls Abandoned in Percent Turnover of Full-Time Agents in Percent
Our industry reports evolve over time and continue to do so in order to provide a robust and
current view of the Customer Service industry. We have also, over time, launched our Multi-
Channel Benchmark Performance Survey, which includes more data from the email, chat, social
media and other channels. It takes time to develop enough validated data to provide these
alternative channel metrics on an industry-specific basis. In the meantime, we include here
metrics that are gathered from all industries combined.
Please Note: We take the opportunity to signal the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has
had on contact centers - - on the gathering of data and on the data itself. Naturally, there
have been some metrics that have changed noticeably as a result in many sectors.
We hope that you find this report useful and a stimulant for improvement. If comparing your
metrics to your industry causes you to take just one important action to improve your
operations, we will feel we have done our job. Please contact us with any questions or
requests for further assistance. Contact centers are our passion, and we are happy to
share our insights with you.
8
Chapter 2: User Guide
9
2. Chapter 2: User Guide
Most users of our Industry Reports fall into one of two categories:
This Industry Report is a great first step into benchmarking for many contact center
managers. They want to become familiar with the Key Performance Indicator metrics
of the contact center sector, without making the commitment to assemble all of their
own metrics. For these purchasers we offer a complimentary one-hour session with one
of our experts, to walk through the report and discuss the metrics and what they can
mean to managers.
Ultimately, we hope that managers will consider becoming one of our In-depth
Benchmarking Assessment clients and database contributors. In fact, if you decide to
join our large community of data contributors within 90 days of buying this Industry
Report, we will offer you one free individual Multi-channel Contact Center
Benchmarking Report, which shows your metrics side-by-side with your industry peers.
Most consultants and analysts buy our Industry Reports to allow them to benchmark
their clients as part of a larger engagement. We understand that you are primarily
interested in the numbers, so we have made them easy to find and to use.
You may use them in your analyses and presentations to clients, with proper attribution
to BenchmarkPortal as your data source.
However, we would also like you to know that we may be available, under appropriate
circumstances, to work with you on your consultant teams. We have a very collegial
group of contact center experts who can add experience and depth to your teams
and add value to your client engagements.
If you would like to discuss the possibility of having BenchmarkPortal work with you as a
consulting partner on your engagements, please contact us at:
CLICK HERE
10
Chapter 3: Methodology
11
3. Chapter 3: Methodology
Our data is gathered on a continuous basis using one of three means:
The majority of our BenchmarkPortal data points are gathered from the many
Contact Center Benchmark Questionnaires (CCBQ) submitted by clients as a
critical part of the benchmark assessment and Report process.
Participants can download the benchmarking survey from the BenchmarkPortal
website. They can print and complete the survey by hand and then scan or fax
it to us for insertion into our database.
Participants can also subscribe to iBenchmark, our automated process that
receives many metrics directly from the participants’ systems and enters them
into our database. Data that does not come directly from systems data (such as
budget and agent turnover) are input manually once or twice a year by the
participants via a survey portal.
Data that is submitted by survey participants are subject to three levels of rigorous
quality checking, to ensure that our database remains accurate. The first level involves
static parameters, which are set by our statistical experts. The second level of quality
assurance involves a series of cross-check formulae, which utilize the data provided to
validate key pieces of data. For example, if the sum of the average talk time plus the
average after call work time multiplied by the average number of calls per agent per
hour yields a number over 60 minutes, the anomaly will result in a red flag for our
database department. We will then reach out and work with the participant to
identify the proper metric from their management reports. The third level of scrutiny is
provided directly by our Research team members, who review each survey report
individually.
All individual metrics are held as completely confidential and are never revealed with
the name of the participant to third parties. Only aggregated data are published in our
Industry Reports, such as the one you are reading now.
The data sets are all tagged by industry sector, as well as by other characteristics, such
as country of origin. This allows us to create reports that are drawn entirely from one
industry sector. Custom reports can be generated by using parameters agreed with
the client. The report generator accesses the data and calculates the industry
12
averages. It also segregates the top quartile (25%) of the data sets and shows the
average for these top-performing centers under the “Upper-Quartile” column.
To determine which centers to include in the Upper Quartile calculation, we do the
following:
● The two groupings of metrics are put through separate expert formulae to
calculate two coefficients: the cost index (indicating overall efficiency) and the
quality index (indicating relative overall effectiveness).
● The two indices are added together for each center, and the centers are stack
ranked by their combined scores.
● The averages for each metric are calculated from this upper quartile of centers.
Note that use of this methodology means that not every upper quartile average will be
better than the overall industry average. Centers that perform better overall may be
less strong (compared with the industry) for specific metrics.
Thank you for acquiring this report. Please let us know if you have any questions or
comments or wish to discuss purchase of a customized report.
13
Chapter 4: Highlights and Comments of Computer – Insurance - Health
Industry Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
Page | 14
4. Chapter 4: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
This chapter provides focus on individual metrics of interest to contact center managers
and analysts. The metrics are grouped according to the following categories:
15
Section One: Contact Center Classification
In this section we graphically depict the survey results of selected contact center
classification questions.
16
Section Two: Contact Center Costs
This section graphically depicts survey results regarding contact center cost
performance.
Question: What is your average cost per inbound Agent and IVR handled Voice call?
This is the sum of all costs for running the call center (Total Accounting Department
reported Contact Center Budget) for the period times divided by the number of calls
handled in the call center for the same period. This includes all calls for all reasons
whether handled by an agent or technology, such as IVR. You can also just calculate
the cost per call for agent-handled calls as follows = Budget times the percentage of
Agent time spent handling Inbound Voice calls divided by the number of Agent-
Handled calls. The number of Agent–handled calls will be captured by the ACD.
17
There are 10 additional highlight charts &
interpretations included in this chapter.
18
Chapter 5: Detailed Benchmark Results – All Metrics – All channels
19
Chapter 5: Detailed Benchmark Results – All Metrics – All channels
"Sample Industry"
"Sample Industry" All Industries
Classification Questions Average
Upper Quartile
Average
Average
"Sample Industry"
"Sample Industry" All Industries
Financial Average
Upper Quartile
Average
Average
"Sample Industry"
"Sample Industry" All Industries
Agent Time Per Channel Average
Upper Quartile
Average
Average
"Sample Industry"
"Sample Industry" All Industries
Voice Channel Performance Metrics Average
Upper Quartile
Average
Average
21
Chapter 5: Detailed Benchmark Results – All Metrics – All Channels
"Sample Industry"
"Sample Industry" All Industries
Human Resources Metrics Average
Upper Quartile
Average
Average
"Sample Industry"
"Sample Industry" All Industries
Caller Satisfaction Metrics Average
Upper Quartile
Average
Average
22
Chapter 5: Detailed Benchmark Results – All Metrics – All Channels
Average Cost Per Social Media (US Dollars) ******* ******* *******
23
Chapter 5: Detailed Benchmark Results – All Metrics – All Channels
Average Cost Per Web Chat (US Dollars) ******* ******* *******
Average Cost Per Postal Mail (US Dollars) ******* ******* *******
24
Chapter 5: Detailed Benchmark Results – All Metrics – All Channels
25
Chapter 6: Trends in Selected Contact Center Metrics
Introduction
As heir to the industry’s first call center benchmark studies, launched at Purdue
University over two decades ago, BenchmarkPortal has a wealth of data of interest to
contact center managers and consultants. The statistical trends in this section reflect
yearly changes in contact center KPIs across All Industries, with focus on the past
decade.
The first groups of graphics look at quality-related items, while the second group
considers cost-related metrics over time.
Page | 26
Chapter 7: Frequently Asked Questions
27
Chapter 7: Frequently Asked Questions
How current is the data contained The reports are updated annually.
in your Industry Reports?
Can I get a list of the contact Our confidentiality policy prevents us
centers that participated in your from disclosing the identity/contact
Industry Report(s)? information for any individual
participant. A copy of the
confidentiality agreement can be
found at the following Web address:
www.benchmarkportal.com/cs.pdf
Where can I purchase additional Additional reports can be purchased
Industry Reports? via our Web site at
www.BenchmarkPortal.com (then click
on Benchmarking / Industry Reports)
What format does the report come Industry Reports are delivered
in? electronically in Adobe PDF format
28
Chapter 7: Frequently Asked Questions
29
Appendix B: Tonchev Performance Index
Page | 30
Appendix B: Tonchev Performance Index
31
Appendix B: Tonchev Performance Index
Indexes have been widely used to measure the market performance of companies
active in diverse industry sectors. However, as the business processes become more
complex and inter-dependent there is an emerging need for a structural analytical
methodology that thoroughly examines all the aspects of the company’s performance.
In response to this challenge, the Tonchev Performance Index (TPI) was developed to
match the performance requirements of the Contact Center Industry. The index’s
objectives, structure, calculation and characteristics are briefly described in this paper
to facilitate its understanding and utilization.
2. Objectives
The Tonchev Performance Index (TPI) has the following six objectives:
1. Business Performance Measurement: to quickly and quantitatively describe a
company’s Contact Center as compared with its industry peers.
2. Effectiveness and Efficiency Balance: to take into consideration the balance needed
between effectiveness (quality) and efficiency (productivity).
3. Industry and Operations Sensitivity: to evaluate the Contact Center’s performance
based on both industry and business criteria.
4. Mathematical Normalization: to normalize all key performance indicators so that
metrics are expressed in identical and comparative units.
5. Simplified Calculation: to be easily comprehended, calculated and believed
6. Adjustment Allowances: to allow adjustments and updates without major re-design.
3. Index Structure
Considering the above-mentioned objectives, the TPI index has a multi-level division of
its composite metrics. The first division is by types of Contact Centers. Here, there are
three possibilities: inbound, outbound, and both. For each of these three categories,
there is a further split into equal amounts of effectiveness and efficiency key
performance indicators. The idea behind this separation is to achieve a balanced
model that realistically measures a Contact Centers’ performance. Finally, the last
metrical division is by industry types. (Please, see the two figures below.)
32
Appendix B: Tonchev Performance Index
4. Index Calculation
Q = Effectiveness Metrics
P = Efficiency Metrics
k = “Out-of-Balance” Penalty Factor
33
Appendix B: Tonchev Performance Index
34
Appendix B: Tonchev Performance Index
The TPI index differs substantially from the conventional performance indexes. Its main
advantages and limitations can be summarized as follows:
Advantages:
Limitations:
Pair Principle – Since the index’s effectiveness-efficiency balance must exist, the
addition of new effectiveness metrics always has to correspond with the inclusion of
equal amounts of efficiency metrics.
Penalty Factor – Even though the penalty factor has a logical justification its value
can be biased.
In Conclusion
The TPI index is a performance benchmark tool that gives a numerical value of the
Contact Centers’ performance. It is a balanced index that can be used for
comparisons of different types of Contact Centers with various business operations. The
strength of the TPI index is its simplicity and dynamic nature. It can help organizations to
identify their weak areas and show the path leading to improved financial and market
results. In conclusion, just as the finish time determines the performance of the long-
distance runner, the TPI index is a single aggregate value that measures a Contact
Center’s competitive performance.
35
Appendix D: Community Resources from Benchmark Portal
Page | 36
Principal Investigators
Bruce Belfiore
37
Jose (Joe) Perez
Jose (Joe) Perez, CCCM, CCCA has over 40 years of managing and
operating support call centers nationally and internationally.
Mr. Perez spent several years managing the technical support/field
operations group for Digital Equipment Corp. in San Diego (later
acquired by HP) as well as directing the technical support group for
three of the largest refineries in South America.
Prior to joining BenchmarkPortal, Mr. Perez was the Director of
Operations, Technical Support Group, for a large communications company in NY and
CT with a staff of over 900 customer services representatives.
As the Dean of BenchmarkPortal’s College of Excellence and its Senior Instructor for
over 11 years, Mr. Perez has developed and delivered the Call Center Management
Certification course while demonstrating his effectiveness in training call center’s staff in
Strategic Planning, Data Analytics, Metrics, Quality Assurance and Workforce
Management among other areas.
Currently, Mr. Perez is also a Certified Call Center Auditor, a Certified Call Center
Manager and Senior Consultant for BenchmarkPortal.
Mr. Perez is fluent in English and Spanish.
38
David Raia
39
Alan Pottkotter
40
Appendix D: Community Resources
from BenchmarkPortal
41
Appendix D: Community Resources from Benchmark Portal
1. BenchmarkPortal’s Mission
At BenchmarkPortal, we believe every contact center professional can make a
difference for each customer experience. Everything we do is about discovering and
sharing better ways to optimize those experiences.
To fulfill this mission, we conduct original research on the contact center sector and
offer a menu of products and services that have proven useful to managers around the
world.
Page | 42
Appendix D: Community Resources from Benchmark Portal
43
Appendix D: Community Resources from Benchmark Portal
8. iBenchmark
iBenchmark automates the process of benchmarking,
transforming a valuable but time-consuming, manual
process into an automated, user-friendly service that
allows managers to monitor performance on a monthly basis. Monitoring your Contact
Center performance on a monthly basis will allow you to make decisions and select
improvement initiatives that will have measurable impacts on the financial and
operational performance of the contact center. iBenchmark thus represents a major
step forward for Contact Center decision-makers.
44