443-MP-2024 jUDGEMENT
443-MP-2024 jUDGEMENT
New Delhi
Petition No. 443/MP/2024
Coram:
Shri Jishnu Barua, Chairperson
Shri Ramesh Babu V., Member
Shri Harish Dudani, Member
Miscellaneous Petition under Regulation 102 ‘Power to Relax’ and under Regulation
103 ‘Power to Remove Difficulty’ of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
(Terms and Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2024 read with Regulations 65 and 69
of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Conduct of Business) Regulations,
2023 for relaxation of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Terms and
Conditions of Tariff) Regulations, 2024 as detailed in the Petition.
And
In the matter of:
Vs.
ORDER
The Petitioner, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, has filed the instant
Petition seeking an extension of 180 days from 30.11.2024 to file the truing up
Regulations’). Besides this, the Petitioner has also prayed for certain other reliefs as
required to file the tariff Petitions for the existing transmission assets for the
2024-29 tariff period and truing up of tariff for the 2019-24 period by
30.11.2024. There are around 540 tariff Petitions in total for the existing
transmission assets for the 2024-29 tariff block, which are to be filed in terms
under the 2024 Tariff Regulations for the new assets being progressively
Petitions as per the directions of the Commission due to the high volume of
assets consumes significant time, and the Petitioner is making its best
efforts to compile the same as per the timeline prescribed in Regulation 9(2)
b) In terms of Regulation 8(1) (i) of the 2024 Tariff Regulations, in the case of
transmission system covering all the assets which are declared under
associated with the said transmission system. For the execution of this,
tariff filing forms are required to be prepared after due reconciliation with
Communication System) for the determination of tariff under the 2024 Tariff
Reasons (SOR) for the 2024 Tariff Regulations in July 2024. Consequently,
the Petitioner was required to introduce the required changes in its system
and software to align them with the revised Tariff Filing Forms. After
introducing the required changes in its system, the Petitioner started filing
d) Despite the above constraints, the Petitioner has already filed around 230
tariff Petitions in the Commission, and about 100 more Petitions are
expected to be filed by the end of November 2024. Thus, out of the total of
around 460 Petitions for which orders are already available, around 330
e) In addition to filing the true-up tariff Petitions, the Petitioner has to file fresh
tariff block within the stipulated period of 90 days from the COD as per
f) The Petitioner's assigned team attends hearings and submits replies and
other relevant information for various tariff Petitions. However, due to lack
of time, the Petitioner is struggling to file the approximately 130 true-up tariff
Petitions for which orders have been received by the deadline of 30.11.2024
grant of the following relaxation in the timeline provided under Regulation 9(2) of the
b) In cases where the Commission has issued a tariff order after 1.4.2024
or is yet to issue final tariff orders, an extension may be granted up to 31.5.2025
or 180 days from the date of issuance of the order, whichever is later.
4. The matter was heard on 14.11.2024. During the course of the hearing, the
Petitioner’s representative submitted that after notifying the tariff Forms in June 2024
and SOR to 2024 Tariff Regulations in July 2024, it made the required changes in its
system/software in July 2024 and thereafter started filing the transmission tariff
Petitions in July 2024. He also submitted that the tariff filing formats require detailed
reconciliation with accounting records that consume significant time and urged the
Commission to grant an additional 180 days’ time from 30.11.2024 or extend the
Relax’ and ‘Power to Remove Difficulty’ under Regulations 102 and 103 respectively
as per the 2024 Tariff Regulations read with Regulations 65 and 69 of the Central
For disposal of the present Petition, it is necessary for us to refer to Regulations 9(2)
6. On perusing of Regulation 9(2) of the 2024 Tariff Regulations, we find that the
tariff Petitions for the existing assets must be filed by 30.11.2024. The Petitioner has
indicated that, in total, 540 tariff Petitions need to be filed by 30.11.2024. According to
the Petitioner, it has received orders in 460 of these tariff Petitions. As against this,
the Petitioner has already filed 230 tariff Petitions, and it expects to file an additional
100 Petitions by 30.11.2024, which will take the total number of filed Petitions to 330,
7. The Petitioner has sought an extension of time by 180 days from 30.11.2024
for filing the Petitions in the case of existing assets in which orders have already been
issued up to 31.3.2024 and for cases where the Commission issued tariff orders after
1.4.2024 or has not yet issued final tariff orders, an extension up to 31.5.2025 or 180
days is sought from the issuance of the order, whichever is later. In a single project
involving multiple tariff Petitions, the Petitioner has sought the liberty to file the true-up
tariff block. The Petitioner has prayed that in cases where the APTEL has remanded
the matters back to the Commission for consideration, the true-up Petitions may be
allowed to be filed within 180 days from the date of passing of such orders on these
8. The Petitioner has pointed out the difficulties being faced by it in filing the tariff
Petitions within the stipulated time. The Petitioner is required to consolidate the
detailed information regarding a large number of assets before making the tariff
Petitions which involve considerable time. Besides this, tariff orders in approximately
80 Petitions pertaining to the 2019-24 tariff period are yet to be issued. Considering
the practical difficulties being faced by the Petitioner, we are of the view that the
person. In view of problems faced by the petitioner as brought out in the submissions
and similar problems being faced by other petitioners, in the exercise of power under
Regulation 102 of the 2019 Tariff Regulations, we hereby relax the provisions of
a) The tariff Petitions of the existing assets for the truing-up of the tariff of
the 2019-24 tariff period and the determination of tariff for the 2024-29 period
may be filed by the Petitioner by 28.2.2025 where final orders for the 2019-24
tariff period have already been issued till 31.03.2024. The applicable fees shall
be paid along with the Petition. However, it is clarified that except for this period
the Petitions till the date of order shall be allowed. Further, in case, the Utility
cost shall be applicable for the delayed period also till the date of issuance of
the order.
b) In the case of the existing assets, where the final orders for the 2019-24
tariff period are yet to be issued as on 31.3.2024, the tariff Petitions for truing-
up of the tariff for the 2019-24 tariff period and the determination of tariff for the
2024-29 tariff period may be filed by the Petitioner within six months from the
date of issue of the final order for the 2019-24 tariff period. The fees for these
already determined for the 2019-24 tariff period. The balance fee shall be paid
along with the tariff Petitions for the 2024-29 tariff period.
to 1.4.2024, may be filed within the period of six months from the date of
issuance of the last order of the Commission. The fees for these Petitions shall
determined for the 2019-24 tariff period. The balance fee shall be paid along
d) In cases where the APTEL has remanded the matter back to the
Commission and the Commission has yet not issued the remand order, the
by the Commission.
10. The above order shall also be applicable to the generating companies (including
Petitions for input price of coal/Lignite) and other transmission licensees whose tariff
11. This order disposes of Petition No. 443/MP/2024 in terms of the above