0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views5 pages

MATH219 Lecture 20

Uploaded by

oğuz cantürk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views5 pages

MATH219 Lecture 20

Uploaded by

oğuz cantürk
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

MATH 219

Fall 2017
Lecture 20
Lecture notes by Özgür Kişisel

Content: Series Solutions Near A Regular Singular Point


Suggested Problems:
§5.5: 4,10,11,12,13
Suppose that x0 is a regular singular point for the equation

p(x)y 00 + q(x)y 0 + r(x)y = 0 (∗)

Suppose that

(x − x0 )q(x) (x − x0 )2 r(x)
lim = α, lim = β.
x→x0 p(x) x→x0 p(x)

Then we regard the Cauchy-Euler equation

(x − x0 )2 y 00 + α(x − x0 )y 0 + βy = 0 (∗∗)

as being “close” to the equation (∗) in the sense that the first Taylor series terms
of the coefficients of the ODE’s agree. We have seen how to solve Cauchy-Euler
equations. A reasonable guess is that if we perturb a solution of the Cauchy-Euler
equation (∗∗) by multiplying it with an appropriate power series, then we can obtain
a solution for (∗). This strategy turns out to be reasonably succesful, as detailed
below:
Strategy for solving and ODE near a regular singular point

• Check that x0 is a regular singular point and find the limits α, β above.

• Find the roots r1 , r2 of the indicial equation r2 + (α − 1)r + β = 0. We


will assume the roots are real for simplicity, but the complex case is also
manageable.

1
• Say r1 ≥ r2 . If r1 − r2 is not an integer, then one can obtain two linearly
independent power series solutions for (*)

X ∞
X
y1 = |x − x0 |r1 an (x − x0 )n , y2 = |x − x0 |r2 bn (x − x0 )n
n=0 n=0

• If r1 − r2 is an integer, then a solution y1 as above still exists, but y2 above


need not exist. Instead, usually one needs to have a logarithmic term in the
second solution (we will not cover the details for such a second solution here).

• In the solutions above, the coefficients a0 and b0 will be free, so they can be
taken to be 1 without loss of generality.

Example 0.1 Solve the equation 2x2 y 00 + 3xy 0 + (2x2 − 1)y = 0, centered at x0 = 0.
3x
Solution: The function 2x 2 is not analytic at 0, therefore x0 = 0 is not an ordinary
2 2 −1)
point. The functions 2x2 and x ·(2x
x·3x
2x2
are both analytic near 0, so the singularity
is regular. The limits of the two functions are α = 23 and β = − 12 respectively.
The indicial equation is
1 1
r2 + r − = 0
2 2
1
The two roots of this equation are r1 = 2 and r2 = −1. Their difference is not an
integer, so we should have two solutions of the form
∞ ∞
1
X X
y1 = |x| 2 an x n , y2 = |x|−1 bn x n
n=0 n=0

Let us assume from now on that x > 0, so that we can remove the absolute values.
The case x < 0 is similar.

1
X
y1 = an xn+ 2
n=0

X 1 1
y10 = (n + )an xn− 2
n=0
2

X 1 1 3
y100 = (n + )(n − )an xn− 2
n=0
2 2

2
Notice that the initial terms in the sums are non-constant, hence they should be still
kept after taking derivatives. Putting these terms in the ODE, we get
∞ ∞ ∞
2
X 1 1 n− 32
X 1 n− 12 2
X 1
2x (n + )(n − )an x + 3x (n + )an x + (2x − 1) an xn+ 2 = 0
n=0
2 2 n=0
2 n=0
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
X 1 1 1
X 1 1
X 5
X 1
2(n + )(n − )an xn+ 2 + 3(n + )an xn+ 2 + 2an xn+ 2 − an xn+ 2 = 0
n=0
2 2 n=0
2 n=0 n=0
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
X 1 1 1
X 1 1
X 1
X 1
2(n + )(n − )an xn+ 2 + 3(n + )an xn+ 2 + 2an−2 xn+ 2 − an xn+ 2 = 0
n=0
2 2 n=0
2 n=2 n=0
1 1 1 1 3 1 3 3
(2 · · (− ) · a0 + 3 · · a0 − a0 )x 2 + (2 · · a1 + 3 · a1 − a1 )x 2 +
2 2 2 2 2 2

X 1 1 1 1
[2(n + )(n − )an + 3(n + )an + 2an−2 − an ]xn+ 2 = 0
n=2
2 2 2

We now equate the coefficient of each power of x in the above expression to 0. First
1 3
of all, the coefficient of x 2 is 0, therefore a0 is free. Next, the coefficient of x 2 shows
a1 = 0. The coefficient in the final summand gives, for n ≥ 2,

(2n2 + 3n)an + 2an−2 = 0.

Therefore, we obtain the recursion relation


2
an = − an−2 .
2n2 + 3n
We immediately get a1 = a3 = a5 = . . . = 0. The first few of the even indexed terms
are
a0 a2 a0 1 a0
a2 = − , a4 = − = , a6 = − a4 = −
7 22 154 45 6930
Taking a0 = 1, we get

x2 x4 x6
 
1
y1 = x 2 1 − + − + ...
7 154 6930

3
We will now carry out the same steps for the second solution y2 :

X
y2 = bn xn−1
n=0

X
y20 = (n − 1)bn xn−2
n=0

X
y200 = (n − 1)(n − 2)bn xn−3
n=0

Put these terms in the ODE:



X ∞
X ∞
X
2 n−3 n−2 2
2x (n − 1)(n − 2)bn x + 3x (n − 1)bn x + (2x − 1) bn xn−1 = 0
n=0 n=0 n=0

X ∞
X ∞
X X∞
2(n − 1)(n − 2)bn xn−1 + 3(n − 1)bn xn−1 + 2bn xn+1 − bn xn−1 = 0
n=0 n=0 n=0 n=0

X ∞
X ∞
X ∞
X
2(n − 1)(n − 2)bn xn−1 + 3(n − 1)bn xn−1 + 2bn−2 xn−1 − bn xn−1 = 0
n=0 n=0 n=2 n=0
(2 · (−1) · (−2)b0 + 3 · (−1)b0 − b0 )x−1 + (2 · 0 · (−1)b1 + 3 · 0 · b1 − b1 )x0 +
X∞
[2(n − 1)(n − 2)bn + 3(n − 1)bn + 2bn−2 − bn ]xn−1 = 0
n=2

Again, equate all coefficients of powers of x in the above expression to 0. We see


that b0 is free and b1 = 0. The coefficient in the last summand gives, for n ≥ 2,

(2n2 − 3n)bn + 2bn−2 = 0.

Therefore, the recursion relation is


2
bn = − bn−2 .
2n2 − 3n
We get b1 = b3 = b5 = . . . = 0. The first few even indexed terms are:
b2 b0 b4 b0
b2 = −b0 , b4 = − = , b6 = − =−
10 10 27 270

4
Taking b0 = 1, we get

x4 x6
 
−1 2
y2 = x 1−x + − + ...
10 270

Finally, the general solution is

y = c1 y 1 + c2 y 2

where c1 , c2 are arbitrary constants and y1 , y2 are as above.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy