Vikas Katariya
Vikas Katariya
STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
CONTENTS
Abstract..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Keywords............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
4. Conclusion .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
References.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Abstract:
Structural elements play a critical role in architecture, as they are the load-bearing components of a building that support
its form and function. There are various types of structural
elements, such as post and beam, steel frame, and tension
structures, each with its own properties and uses. The Sydney
Opera House is an example of a building that has a unique and
innovative architecture, and its structural elements play a
significant role in achieving its aesthetics and functionality. The
project aims to understand the significance of structural
elements in architectural design and to show the relationship
between form and function. The design and configuration of a
building's structural elements will influence its intended use and
visual appeal and can contribute to the overall way the building
affects the environment. Structural elements can provide an open plan space, creating a modern, user-friendly
environment, or load-bearing walls that can effectively create segregated spaces within a building. The use of structural
elements can help establish a building's identity, providing something different and interesting compared with similar
designs.
1. Introduction
Theoretical frameworks facilitate a methodical approach to comprehend the significance of structural elements. These
elements are characterized as possessing 'a quality of being constrained by a structure' (Mitrovic and Radovic, 1991).
Moreover, the concept of structures and their behavior under specific conditions has been elucidated by Hambly (1976),
who defined it as an analysis of the 'way a structure supports or transfers a load,' which is the primary function of any
building structure. It is crucial to understand the essence of how a structure is formed and put in place to appreciate the
importance of structural elements in architecture. Bouchon (1996) defined an element as "the basic building block or unit
of a structural system." By combining an understanding of what constitutes a structure and the primary ways structures
behave, an architect can begin to appreciate the importance of each structural element and how to manipulate them to
achieve a desired form of architecture.
Structural elements are the components that support the building loads and transfer them to the ground. One of the
earliest and simplest systems is the post and beam method, which uses large wooden sections made from a single tree.
This method is still used in many rural buildings today. In the late 19th century, steel frame construction was introduced,
representing a significant shift in building design and construction methods. This system uses a series of vertical posts and
horizontal beams to create a rigid structural frame that can support a lighter non-structural curtain wall. This allows for
building designs that respect gravity and use a continuous and planar space frame system. This type of system provides
internal and external spatial enclosure using load-bearing walls, which are typically compression elements that require
sufficient strength to support the building loads. Tension structures are rare in building due to the poor tensile behavior of
common building materials, but there are buildings that use tensile elements to provide lateral load resistance or a tensile
skin to support gravity loads. The latest building methods and materials provide various structural options, some of which
have not been thoroughly tested or implemented.
Structural components are of paramount importance in architectural design, as they determine the practicality and visual
appeal of a building. The kind and layout of structural components utilized in a building depend on its intended function, and
can impact the building's environmental influence. Architects have a wide range of structural components to choose from,
each with its own benefits and applications. For instance, beams and girders can produce open spaces and offer a
contemporary, user-friendly atmosphere. On the other hand, load-bearing walls can effectively partition space within a
building, and are useful for domestic and office designs that require different zones. Load-bearing walls can also contribute
to a building's identity by providing something unique and intriguing, such as the exposed concrete and masonry load-
bearing walls in the University of East Anglia's Ziggurats, designed by Denys Lasdun. The Ziggurats' configuration resembles
an ancient temple complex, and the buildings stand alone both literally and visually. Lasdun utilized load-bearing walls to
divide spaces and establish an identity for the buildings, which were designed as a student village with each building serving
as a separate dwelling.
When construction of physical structures is completed, they possess a unique character that arises from the way in which
the various components are proportioned and shaped. Is it the quality that we refer to when we discuss the appeal of a
well-designed structure? The elegance of a solution achieved with economy of means? The answer is, of course, both.
Quality must permeate and underpin all that we do. It is the essential element that distinguishes architecture, engineering,
and art from mere building and drawing. Over the past few years, the aesthetics of products have gained significant
attention, with design leading to success through increased product sales. Quality is always a crucial feature in well-
designed products, regardless of the target market. A high-quality product is well-designed in both functional and aesthetic
terms. A successful blending of both will result in a product with real market appeal. Architecture and engineering are not
exempt from such considerations. All types of structure are, in some sense, a product, and it is reasonable to assume that
a well-designed building or piece of infrastructure has a much higher chance of survival in the built environment than one
that is poorly designed. If we pause to consider the built structures that surround us at present, it is possible to
differentiate between the well-designed ones and those that are not as successful. We may even be inclined to conclude
that there are some structures that we would prefer were not there. Although there are several factors that can influence
the appearance of the built environment, the aim of this paper is to define and control one of the more fundamental aspects
of structure, with the hope of improving the overall aesthetic of civil and building engineering works in their environment.
Structural engineers play a crucial role in shaping the functionality of a building through their design of space layout and
planning. The precise positioning and dimensions of structural components, such as walls, beams, and columns, have a
direct impact on the spaces surrounding them, which are the areas where we reside and work. By removing walls, open-
plan living spaces can be created, while the size of rooms can be increased through small extensions or by supporting the
floor above with a larger span, thereby creating additional space below.
(Ouda & Mousa, 2024)
Designing functional spaces requires the creation of building environments that serve their intended purpose effectively
and efficiently. Modernist structures exemplify power and energy efficiency, as their designs are based on the principles of
doing more with less (Neufert, 1976). Although some individuals may perceive these designs as lacking soul, they prioritize
ease of construction and maintenance, which reflects the current culture of disposability. Nevertheless, designing
functional spaces does not necessarily result in uninspired buildings. On the contrary, many of the world's most captivating
structures are spatially efficient and can be achieved through innovative and creative design.
One of the central concerns in the sustainability discourse is the notion of a "throw-away" society, which has endured for
several decades. This lifestyle entails utilizing items once and then disposing of them and acquiring cheaper, lower-quality
alternatives. When applied to buildings, this concept is particularly worrisome, as substantial quantities of energy are
consumed in the production of building materials and construction. To mitigate this, it is proposed that buildings should be
designed and constructed with a predetermined lifespan in mind, such as 60 years for an office block, 40 years for a
residence, and 30 years for a hospital. This approach aims to prevent the scenario where functional yet outdated buildings
are demolished and replaced with new ones, resulting in a significant waste of energy and resources. Establishing a time
frame for building longevity could serve as a helpful tool in achieving this objective. It would not mean that a building must
be demolished once it reaches its designated lifespan, but rather, it would motivate designing buildings that can be adapted
and renovated for continued use as functions and user needs change over time.
Cantilevers, which were first proposed by architect Frank Lloyd Wright in the early 20 th century, have long challenged
conventional architectural notions. These projecting beams or structures are supported at only one end and defy the
traditional vertical support system. Through the use of counterbalancing techniques, modern cantilevers aim to achieve
perfect equilibrium of weight, thereby enabling them to be both structurally and visually strong. The history of cantilevers
is extensive, encompassing both built and unbuilt structures that have pushed the boundaries of structural engineering.
One of the most daring cantilevers is the Rolling Stone’s House designed by
John Lautner. This house features a slab that projects 7.6 meters over a cliff,
with its roof serving as the sole support on the projecting side. The slab,
constructed with a steel frame, wooden underlayer, and concrete topping, is
designed in the shape of an umbrella.
Steel beams are commonly employed in building construction to support wood structures. In larger buildings, steel beams
and columns are utilized to create a framework for concrete slabs. Steel beams are an excellent choice for their fire
resistance and can be left exposed with a fire-resistant finish. The J. Paul Getty Center in Los Angeles, designed by Richard
Meier and partners, is a prime example of exposed steel beams and scaffolding.
A truss is a structural element made up of interconnected
components, often used in roof design. There are various
types of trusses, with the most common being the planar
truss used in residential construction. Another type is the
space truss, which features multiple triangles forming a
three-dimensional structure, often utilized in large spanning
areas such as airplane wings or gymnasium roofs.
Glassboro’s gymnasium showcases how a space truss can be
left exposed as a decorative element. High tensile strength
steel cables can also be used to form a cable truss.
4. Conclusion
Architecture, which has its roots in the earliest civilizations, has long relied on structural elements as the cornerstone of
its designs. However, as technology and materials have advanced in the 21st century, there is a growing concern that the
importance of structural elements is being overlooked. This has sparked debates on the aesthetic significance of structural
design and underscores the need for a resurgence of appreciation for these elements in contemporary architectural
practice.
Defining a lasting aesthetic quality for structural elements is a daunting task due to the wide variety of cultures and time
periods that contribute to an extensive range of architectural designs. The Pantheon, a temple dedicated to all gods, is an
outstanding example of a structure that successfully integrates architecture and structural design to create a harmonious
whole. The unreinforced concrete dome with its central oculus and coffering is an engineering marvel that defies gravity,
showcasing bold and innovative architectural form. The Pantheon has stood the test of time for over 2000 years, not as a
museum piece, but as an architectural entity with timeless relevance. The Structural Artistry of The Pantheon immortalizes
a moment in construction history and epitomizes architectural progress. According to Vitruvius' Trifold Definition of
firmitas, utilitas, venustas, a good building should be solid, useful, and beautiful. High aesthetic quality requires structural
integrity of the highest order. The enduring impact of buildings that successfully combine great architecture and structural
artistry is evident in the many structures that have transcended their functional purpose and remain culturally and
architecturally relevant today.
This essay examines the lasting impact of structural components in architecture and their beneficial influence, as
demonstrated through various case studies. The primary purpose of a structure is to bear the weight of a building, and it
should be regarded as a long-term investment. The Reyner Banham inflatable and Weaver Temporary Building System case
studies demonstrate that alternative solutions might not always be successful, and sometimes structures are viewed
merely as a means to support other architectural elements. The lack of understanding of structure in architecture is
exemplified by the UK Pavilion at Expo 92, Seville, which turned out to be a disaster, while the Mies Barcelona Pavilion, a
product of understanding structural fundamentals, is a prime example of successful architectural design. This building
epitomizes the continuous evolution of form, space, and architectural parti, with structure serving as the foundation of
each iteration.
Architecture's primary feature is creating space, form, and order through structural elements, which have long-lasting
effects. Structures are long-term investments, designed to endure well into the future. Due to this, they must be designed
with a comprehension of their long-term effects, durability, and potential for reuse, adaptation, and change. The
understanding of structure's impact on architecture is dynamic, allowing architects to manipulate form, space, and order,
express themselves, and contribute to the built environment.
References:
Bajaber, M. A. & Hakeem, I. Y. (2021). UHPC evolution, development, and utilization in construction: A review. Journal of
Materials Research and Technology. sciencedirect.com
Rabi, M., Shamass, R., & Cashell, K. A. (2022). Structural performance of stainless steel reinforced concrete members: A
review. Construction and Building Materials. lsbu.ac.uk
Kara, H., Asensio-Villoria, L., & Georgoulias, A. (2024). Architecture and Waste: A (re) planned Obsolescence. [HTML]
Mazur, Ł., Bać, A., Vaverková, M. D., Winkler, J., Nowysz, A., & Koda, E. (2022). Evaluation of the quality of the housing
environment using multi-criteria analysis that includes energy efficiency: a review. Energies, 15(20), 7750. mdpi.com
Watchorn, D. J., Cowan, M. A., Driscoll, D. A., Nimmo, D. G., Ashman, K. R., Garkaklis, M. J., ... & Doherty, T. S. (2022). Artificial
habitat structures for animal conservation: design and implementation, risks and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and
the Environment, 20(5), 301-309. wiley.com
Ouda, M. & Mousa, A. (2024). Eco–Empathic Design: How the Built Environment Can Affect our Brains and Behavior. Fayoum
University Journal of Engineering. researchgate.net
Alimohammadi, H., & Memon, A. A. (2023). Case Study of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Retaining Wall Failure in the
State of Tennessee; Recommendations for Future Design and Constructions. Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 5(1),
52-65. journals-researchers.com
Shareef, S. S. (2023). Earthquake consideration in architectural design: Guidelines for architects. Sustainability. mdpi.com
Abed, J., Rayburg, S., Rodwell, J., & Neave, M. (2022). A Review of the Performance and Benefits of Mass Timber as an
Alternative to Concrete and Steel for Improving the Sustainability of Structures. Sustainability. mdpi.com
Giles-Corti, B., Foster, S., Lynch, B., & Lowe, M. (2023). What are the lessons from COVID-19 for creating healthy,
sustainable, resilient future cities?. npj Urban Sustainability. nature.com
Katsavounidou, G. (2021, November). Urban playgrounds as potential green infrastructure: The case of Thessaloniki. In IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 899, No. 1, p. 012016). IOP Publishing. iop.org
Elliott, H., Eon, C., & Breadsell, J. K. (2020). Improving City vitality through urban heat reduction with green infrastructure
and design solutions: A systematic literature review. Buildings. mdpi.com