Group 5 - Case Study - Citigroup Inc. 2015
Group 5 - Case Study - Citigroup Inc. 2015
By:
De Castro, Abegail
Edaño, Kyla
Martinez, Jadelyn
2024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. CASE BACKGROUND
II. ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS
A. GENERAL ENVIRONMENT
A.1 OPPORTUNITIES
A.1.1. SOCIO-CULTURAL-DEMOGRAPHIC FORCES
A.1.2. TECHNOLOGICAL FORCES
A.1.3. ECONOMIC FORCES
A.1.4. ENVIRONMENTAL FORCES
A.1.5. POLITICO-LEGAL FORCES
A.2 THREATS
A.2.1. SOCIO-CULTURAL-DEMOGRAPHIC FORCES
A.2.2. TECHNOLOGICAL FORCES
A.2.3. ECONOMIC FORCES
A.2.4. ENVIRONMENTAL FORCES
A.2.5. POLITICO-LEGAL FORCES
B. OPERATING ENVIRONMENT
B.1 OPPORTUNITIES
B.1.1. RIVALRY AMONG COMPETING FIRMS
B.1.2. POTENTIAL ENTRANTS
B.1.3. SUBSTITUTE PRODUCTS
B.1.4. BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
B.1.5. BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
B.1.6. INDUSTRY GROWTH
B.1.7. SHAREHOLDERS’ ACTIONS
B.1.8. CREDITORS’ ACTIONS
B.1.9. COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS
B.2 THREATS
B.2.1. RIVALRY AMONG COMPETING FIRMS
B.2.2. POTENTIAL ENTRANTS
B.2.3. SUBSTITUTE PRODUCTS
B.2.4. BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS
B.2.5. BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS
B.2.6. INDUSTRY GROWTH
B.2.7. SHAREHOLDERS’ ACTIONS
B.2.8. CREDITORS’ ACTIONS
B.2.9. COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS
C. INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
C.1 STRENGTHS
C.1.1. MARKETING
C.1.2. PRODUCTION/OPERATIONS
C.1.3. FINANCE
C.1.4. ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT
C.1.5. HUMAN RESOURCES
C.1.6. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
C.1.7. INFORMATION SYSTEMS
C.2 WEAKNESSES
C.2.1. MARKETING
C.2.2. PRODUCTION/OPERATIONS
C.2.3. FINANCE
C.2.4. ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT
C.2.5. HUMAN RESOURCES
C.2.6. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
C.2.7. INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Citigroup Inc., headquartered in New York City, is a global company that offers financial
services. It is the largest banking enterprise in the world providing quality services to over 1,000
cities, 160 countries, and millions of people and striving to create the best outcomes with
financial solutions that are simple, creative, and responsible.
Citigroup is divided into two (2) segments: Citicorp (Global Consumer Banking and
Institutional Clients Group) and Citi Holdings (Non-core Businesses). Between the two
segments, Citi Holdings comprises only 6% of the company’s overall balance sheet. Citicorp has
two divisions: Global Consumer Banking (GCB) and Institutional Clients Group (ICG). The GCB
division comprises four (4) of Citigroup's Regional Consumer Banking (RCB) businesses and
these banks provide financial services such as credit cards, commercial banking, and more. On
the other hand, the ICG division focuses on providing products and services to public sectors,
high-net-worth individuals, and corporations. It also offers lending, prime brokerage, derivative
securities, and other services.
The company faced various ethical issues where they incurred charges to cover costs
such as legal, restructuring, and investigations costs. In December 2014, Citigroup was called
out for alleged unethical behavior by Senator Elizabeth Warren. She highlighted that two out of
the top five economic advisors, President Bush and Obama, were associated with the company.
It also encountered issues in its Mexican operations which included falsified invoices and fraud.
Citigroup Inc. has resolved much of its mortgage litigation, cutting Citi Holdings' annual
loss by 50%. CEO Corbat is now prioritizing cost-cutting over asset sales in Citi Holdings to
achieve break-even. Additionally, all 101 countries where Citi does business are categorized
into four buckets for better resource allocation.
II. ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS
A. GENERAL ENVIRONMENT
A.1 OPPORTUNITIES
A.1.1 SOCIO-CULTURAL-DEMOGRAPHIC FORCES
● The increase in the demands in mergers and acquisitions results to a
growth in profit for financial institutions to provide financial services. The
country's shifting growth rate and emerging trend on consumer behavior
creates an opportunity for banks to build new revenue streams and
modify their offers to venture into various product categories cater to the
diverse tastes of their clients.
A.2 THREATS
A.2.1 TECHNOLOGICAL FORCES
● Cybersecurity threats that can cause money losses and reputational
damage.
● Investments in new technologies have the potential to jeopardize a
company's profitability because they need significant resources for
product innovation and development. The budget will be impacted
whether new technologies are bought or existing ones are upgraded.
Socio-Cultural-Demographic Forces ✔️
Technological Forces ✔️ ✔️
Economic Forces ✔️ ✔️
Environmental Forces ✔️
Politico-Legal Forces ✔️ ✔️
B. OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
B.1 OPPORTUNITIES
B.1.1 RIVALRY AMONG COMPETING FIRMS
● Dominated the investment banking and securities business operation in
the United States.
● Largest banking enterprise in the world based on geographic coverage.
B.2 THREATS
B.2.1 RIVALRY AMONG COMPETING FIRMS
● Major rivalry exists among prominent firms like J.P. Morgan, Bank of
Industry Growth ✔️
Shareholders’ Action ✔️
Creditors’ Action
Community Perceptions ✔️
C. INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT
C.1 STRENGTHS
C.1.1. MARKETING
● As the biggest bank in the world, Citigroup serves millions of customers in
more than 1,000 locations across 160 countries with high-quality financial
services.
● With more than 900 million retail accounts across several well-known
brands, Citigroup is the biggest credit card provider in the world.
● The four regional consumer banking (RCB) divisions of Citigroup are part
of the company's Global Consumer Banking (GCB) segment, which has
the most revenue of any other sector.
C.1.2. PRODUCTION/OPERATIONS
● Citigroup is operating in 160 countries, more than 16,000 locations
globally, and 251,000 full-time employees.
● Citicorp is primarily focused on offering worldwide banking services to
businesses and individuals. The company has strong ties to several
emerging regions, particularly in Latin America.
● Citigroup provides global banking, advisory services, derivative services,
brokerage, mortgages, auto loans, and etc.
C.1.3. FINANCE
● Citi Holdings continued to turn a profit in the second quarter of 2015,
helping Citigroup post net income of $4.8 billion as opposed to $181
million in the same time the previous year. At $17.8 billion, Citicorp's
revenues, net of interest expenditure, climbed by 2% over the same time
last year.
C.2 WEAKNESSES
C.2.1. MARKETING
● Citigroup’s 2014 Income has decreased by 53% compared to 2013.
● The business has lost some market share in the specialized categories as
a result of its inability to meet the difficulties posed by the recent arrivals
into the industry.
C.2.2. PRODUCTION/OPERATIONS
● Citi Holdings is currently cutting costs due to the loss of $3.3 billion in
2014.
● Citigroup raised more capital to invest in the channel due to high days
inventory compared to other competitors.
C.2.3. FINANCE
● Citigroup incurred charges of $3.5 billion in Q4 of 2014 to cover legal and
restructuring costs.
● The bank allocated $2.7 billion of that amount to cover legal costs
associated with investigations into currency trading, the manipulation of a
key interest rate, as well as anti-money laundering and related probes.
Marketing ✔️ ✔️
Production/Operations ✔️ ✔️
Finance ✔️ ✔️
Organization & Management ✔️ ✔️
Human Resources ✔️
Research & Development ✔️ ✔️
Information Systems ✔️ ✔️
Critical Success Factors Weight Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score
Citigroup Inc. is performing relatively low on the Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM). J.P
Morgan Chase has the highest total score with 3.55 due in part to J.P Morgan Chase’s Product
Quality and its Financial Position. Citigroup Inc. must elevate its strategic planning to adjust the
company’s trajectory.
G. ASSUMPTIONS
G.1 GENERAL ENVIRONMENT STABILITY
● The general environment is stable because economic forces bring about some
change, giving financial institutions regular chances to innovate, adapt, and
strategically align their products with the increasing socio-cultural, technological,
economic, and politico-legal forces. Opportunities in that environment show the
business is capable of defending despite its threat.
● Citigroup Inc. is a leading industry growth opportunity due to its extensive global
The major problem of Citigroup is that the company is facing the lack of innovation impacting
adaptability as evidence by following:
1. Citigroup’s lack of investment in technology for global expansions.
2. The company does not have publicly available vision statements.
3. Citigroup organizational structure is only applicable to the current strategy.
4. Citigroup’s 2014 income decreased compared to the last year (2013).
IV. ALTERNATIVE COURSES OF ACTION
A. TOWS MATRIX
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES
1. Citigroup is the largest
banking enterprise in the
world providing quality 1.Citigroup faced various ethical
services to over 1,000 issues
cities, 160 countries, and
millions of people.
2.Citigroup has a complex
2. Citigroup is the world's
organizational structure that is only
largest credit card issuer
applicable to the current business
with over 900 million retail
strategy which prevents it from
accounts with various
expanding the market adjacent
well-known brands.
categories.
3. As there are expansions
3.Citigroup has established
worldwide, there is a lack of
large
investment in technology for more
market in the United States
integration of processes.
4. Citigroup’s Global
Consumer Banking (GCB)
segment is the largest in
terms of revenues of any 4. Scandals which heavily affected
other segment Citigroup's image
OPPORTUNITIES SO Strategies: WO Strategies:
1. The emergence of digital
banking presents an
opportunity for financial
institutions to provide and
create more effective and
convenient services.
2. Reaching out to markets
with diverse cultures,
demographics, and values
Product Development (S2,
can help financial Product Development (W3, O1, O3)
S4, O1, O3)
institutions to develop their
customer base by taking
advantage of the country's
shifting growth rate. Banks
might modify their offers to
provide customized goods
and services that cater to
the diverse tastes of their
clients.
3. Changes or new
regulations create
opportunities to adapt and
Market Development (S1,
innovate potentially leading Market Penetration (W2, W4, O1)
S3, O2, O4)
new products or services
that comply with evolving
regulatory requirements.
4. The adoption of new
technology standards and
government free trade
Market Penetration (S1,
agreements has provided
S2, S3, 01)
Citigroup Inc. an
opportunity to enter a new
emerging market.
THREATS ST Strategies: WT Strategies:
1. Cybersecurity threats
that can cause money
losses and reputational
damage to financial
institutions include
ransomware, phishing,
viruses, and data
breaches.
2. The continuous changes
and fluctuation in the
interest rates and the
unstable condition of the
economy provides
uncertainty and fear to all Product Development (S2, Product Development (W3, T1, T3,
including the banking S4, T1, T4) T4)
industry and its customers.
There will always be
survival threats as long as
the financial markets are
unstable.
3. Rivalry between big
banks such as J.P. In the
US investment banking and
securities market, Morgan, Market Penetration (S2,
Bank of America, Citigroup, S4, T2)
Morgan Stanley, and
Goldman Sachs are the
most prominent firms.
4. The expansion of
Internet banks as
alternatives to conventional
brick-and-mortar kbanks is
mentioned in the text. It
Market Development (S1,
also runs over the possible
S3, T3, T4)
effects of Bitcoin and
PayPal as well as recent
entrants into the credit card
market, including Apple
and Google.
The IE matrix shows that Citigroup should grow and build its position. The EFE and IFE
scores of Citigroup are 3.24 and 2.68 respectively. This illustrates that the company shows
strong ability to respond to the external environment and that they have an average internal
environment. Citigroup should focus on intensive strategies such as product development.
C. GRAND STRATEGY MATRIX
The bank sector is clearly in a phase of rapid market growth. Citigroup reported higher
revenues in 2014 than in 2013, while J.P Morgan Chase and Bank of America reported lower
revenues in 2014. Citigroup has also been afflicted by dependence on foreign markets,
securities and trading business, and ethical issues that have affected their performance and
resulted in significant fines. As Citigroup attempts to restructure with a more US focus, and less
dependent on securities and trading, the strategies should include approaches in terms of
development.
D. SUMMARY OF STRATEGIES
A. INTEGRATION STRATEGIES
1. Forward Integration 1 1
2. Backward Integration 1 1
3. Horizontal Integration 1 1
B. INTENSIVE STRATEGIES
1. Market Penetration 1 1 1 3
2. Market Development 1 1 1 3
3. Product Development 1 1 1 3
C. DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGIES
1. Concentric Diversification `1 1
2. Conglomerate Diversification
3. Horizontal Diversification
D. DEFENSIVE STRATEGIES
1. Joint Venture
2. Retrenchment 1 1
3. Divestiture
4. Liquidation
The proposed courses of action (ACA) were identified based on the Strategic Factor
Analysis, Competitive Profile Matrix, TOWS Matrix, Internal-External Matrix and further validated
through the evaluative dimensions of the Grand Strategy Matrix. The Strategic Factor Analysis
revealed that according to our measurements, Citigroup matches other companies in the
industry and is improving its services. The Competitive Profile Matrix indicated that Citigroup is
performing relatively well however it needs to elevate its strategic planning to adjust the
company’s trajectory. TOWS Matrix pointed out that Citigroup is facing numerous challenges
and it includes decreasing worldwide presence, market concentration, organizational
complexity, technology issues, ethical problems, and strong competition. Matrix revealed that
The Internal-External Citigroup has a strong ability to respond to external factors and an
average to internal strength. Moreover, the analysis of the market growth and competitive
position of the company from the Grand Strategy Matrix indicated that the appropriate strategies
that must be pursued by the company fell under Quadrant (I). These findings could be attributed
to Citigroup's outstanding competitive advantage and continuing improvements in their industry.
In totality, the Summary of Strategies Matrix confirmed that the most feasible alternatives is
product development. Therefore strategy product development would best address the major
problem of the firm under study.
V. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE AND ACTION PLAN
e e e
OPPORTUNITIES:
THREATS:
STRENGTHS:
WEAKNESSES:
B. ACTION PLAN
Functional
Objective Strategies Time Frame Budget
Area
1. Engage customers with the help of
social media and implement
customer referral and loyalty
Increase market programs to improve customer Marketing
Marketing share and sales retention and attract new 3 years Expenses
by 10% customers. = $2,500,000
2. Enhance targeted digital marketing
campaigns to promote product and
services offerings.
1. Contracting out particular sections
of the business.
Low operation’s
2. Lowering starting salary. Investments
Finance cost and 3 Years
3. automating the process of $5,000,000
expenses
business's activities.
Forecast:
Year Sales, US$
2015 $77,347.81
2016 $77,816.43
2017 $78,287.90
Interest Expense - - -
Property, Plant
& - - - - -
Equipment
Goodwill 25,009.00 23,592.00 23,734.94 23,878.74 24,023.41
Intangibles 5,056.00 4,566.00 4,593.66 4,621.50 4,649.50
Trading account 285,928.00 296,786.00 298,584.14 300,393.17 302,213.16
Total
308,980.00 333,443.00 335,463.23 337,495.70 339,540.49
investments
Net loans 645,824.00 628,641.00 632,449.75 636,281.57 640,136.61
Other Assets 127,984.00 124,316.00 125,069.19 125,826.95 126,589.30
Total Assets 1,880,382 1,842,530 1,853,693 1,864,924 1,876,223
Investing Activities
Proceeds from securitization
450,000.00 450,000.00 450,000.00 450,000.00
of loans
Proceeds from subsidiaries
400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00
and affiliates
Purchase of investment -333,443.00 -359,842.82 -388,332.80 -419,078.44
Net Cash Flow from
Investing Activities 516,557.00 490,157.18 461,667.20 430,921.56
Financing Activities
Issuance of preferred stock 3,730.00 5,795.00 9,003.22 13,987.58
Other liabilities 85,084.00 85,599.50 86,118.12 86,639.88
Net Cash Flow from
Financing Activities -88,814.00 -91,394.50 -95,121.34 -100,627.47
Resources
Citibank. (2015). Annual Report 2014. New York, NY: Citigroup.