SSCT
SSCT
Aim
To assess the attitude and emotional conflict of the subject using Sacks Test developed by
Joseph M. Sacks and Levy Sidney.
Introduction
The word “personality” originates from the Latin “persona”, which refers to a theatrical
mask worn by Roman actors in Greek dramas to project a role or false appearance. No single
definition is accepted by all personality theorists; however, one definition of personality was
given by Roberts & Mroczek (2008), stating that it is “a pattern of relatively permanent traits
and unique characteristics that give both consistency and individuality to a person’s
behaviour.” Traits contribute to individual differences, temporal consistency of behaviour,
and stability of behaviour across situations. Characteristics are unique qualities of an
individual, including such attributes as temperament, physique, and intelligence. Today, the
American Psychological Association defines personality as “the enduring configuration of
characteristics and behaviour that comprises an individual’s unique adjustment to life,
including major traits, interests, drives, values, self-concept, abilities, and emotional
patterns.”
Theories of Personality
Many different perspectives have developed on how to best explain personality. These
perspectives differ in their assumptions and focus on different aspects of behaviour:
Psychodynamic Theory: Pioneered by Sigmund Freud, this approach focuses on the early
childhood experience and on relationships with parents as guiding forces that shape
personality development. As per this view, the unconscious mind and motives are much more
powerful than the conscious awareness. Psychoanalysis uses dream interpretation to uncover
unconscious thoughts, feelings, and impulses as treatment of neurosis and mental illness.
Over the decades, it has moved away from its emphasis on sexuality and increased its focus
on social and cultural forces.
Behaviouristic Theory: Pioneered by Ivan Pavlov, J. B. Watson and B. F. Skinner, this view
focuses only on behaviour, not on hypothetical and unobservable internal states like thoughts,
feelings, or drives. According to this theory, all behaviours are learned through association
and/or its consequences (which may be reinforcing or punishing). To shape behaviour, one
must understand and then establish the conditions that bring about those particular
behaviours. This is done through classical conditioning, operant conditioning, behaviour
modification, etc.
According to the American Psychological Association, personality tests are “any instrument
used to help evaluate personality or measure personality traits.” In general, personality tests
measure typical behaviour. There are several types of personality tests-
Structured personality tests provide statements and require the subject to choose between
two or more alternative responses such as “True” or “False”. The scoring of such tests is
objective, and the results are interpreted according to standardized norms. In a self-report
measure, participants select items that describe themselves. Questionnaires involve a set of
questions or prompts used to obtain information from a respondent about a topic of interest. A
personality assessment consists of a series of statements covering various characteristics and
behavioural patterns to which the participant responds by choosing among fixed answers, as
applied to themselves. Rating scales enable the observer to indicate both the presence or
absence of a behaviour, and its prominence. These may be either self-rating scales or observer
rating scales. Examples include the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), 16
Personality Factor Questionnaire, etc.
Projective personality tests are unstructured; either the stimulus or the required response- or
both- are ambiguous. The subject is generally asked to provide a spontaneous response, as
these tests assume that a person’s interpretation of an ambiguous stimulus will reflect their
unique characteristics. Thus, they are able to measure both the conscious and unconscious
aspects of a participant’s personality. The Rorschach Inkblot Test is an example of a fully
projective test. On the other hand, semi-projective tests are partly structured- for example, the
Sentence Completion Test (SCT).
Sacks Sentence Completion Test (SSCT) was designed to obtain significant clinical material
in four representative areas of adjustment- family, sex, interpersonal relationship and self-
concept. It was developed by Joseph M. Sacks and other psychologists of New York Veteran
Administration Mental Hygiene Service in 1950.
The test includes a total of 60 items. Each area of adjustment is divided into sub-domains,
and each of the 15 sub-domains consists of 4 items. Clinician rate the examinee’s overall
response to each sub-domain on a continuum that ranges from “no significant disturbance”
(i.e. 0) to “severely disturbed” (i.e. 2).
Inter-rater reliability of the test was found to be between .48 and .57. According to Sacks and
Levy (1950), 77% of the test statements were rated in “close agreement with clinical
findings”. The norms or appropriate ages of test takers have not been reported.
SSCT is a projective test; it promotes the respondents to disclose their concealed feelings. It
is used in personality analysis, clinical application, attitude assessment, achievement
motivation and measurement of other constructs. A limitation of the test is that its
interpretation is highly subjective, and prone to vary from clinician to clinician.
Preliminaries
Name: A
Age: 22
Gender: Female
Instructions
“Below are 60 incomplete statements. Read each one and finish it by writing the first thing
that comes to your mind. Work as quickly as you can. Do not spend too much time on a
particular item. If you cannot complete an item outright, encircle the number and return to it
later. Remember that there are no right or wrong answers.”
Procedure
The subject was seated comfortably in a quiet room. The purpose of the test was explained to
them, and informed consent was taken. Instructions were given, and the subject was given
sufficient time to fill the items. The responses were then scored and interpreted as directed by
the manual.
Materials Required
Result
Table 1 shows the scores obtained by the subject in each sub-domain of SSCT.
Sex Area
Relationships
Interpersonal Relationship
Acquaintances
Self-Concept
11. Guilt Feeling 2 Severely Disturbed
Interpretative Summary
Family Area
Sex Area
Interpersonal Relationship
Self-Concept
11. Guilt Feeling- Strong feelings of guilt due to perceived inaction; due to perceived
coldness/heartlessness.
12. Attitude towards Own Ability- Views self as capable of success but prone to self-
sabotage.
13. Attitude towards Past- Positive attitude with focus on childhood innocence and
freedom.
14. Attitude towards Future- Mixed emotions regarding the future- considers it bleak
yet hopes for a happier life.
15. Attitude towards Goal- Major goals involve financial security and relationship
security.
Impression
The subject’s SSCT reveals mild disturbance in the family area, with a mildly disturbed
relationship with each individual parent but no disturbance in the family unit. The sex area
contains no disturbance. The interpersonal relationship area is also free of disturbance,
besides the “attitude towards superior” sub-domain which shows mild disturbance, and the
fear sub-domain, which shows severe disturbance. The self-concept area is mildly disturbed-
only “attitude towards past” being free of any disturbance, and “guilt” being responsible for
severe disturbance.