We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 19
LECTURE 2
Regional Cooperation and
Integration INTRODUCTION This lecture seeks to introduce undergraduate students to current processes, decision-making procedures and challenges associated with regional integration in Africa. It also seeks to familiarize them with the impact of regional cooperation and integration on trade, investment and security management on the continent. What is regional Cooperation and integration The terms regional integration and cooperation are commonly used to describe the processes that lead to greater regional economic interdependence, for example a stronger co-movement of business cycles, increased transmission of macro shocks, increasing intraregional trade and investment or substitutability of financial products across the region. Regional Integration is a process in which neighbouring states enter into an agreement in order to upgrade cooperation through common institutions and rules. Regional integration initiatives, according to Van Langenhove, should fulfil at least eight important functions: the strengthening of trade integration in the region the creation of an appropriate enabling environment for private sector development the development of infrastructure programmes in support of economic growth and regional integration the development of strong public sector institutions and good governance; contribution to peace and security in the region
the building of environment programmes at the regional
level the strengthening of the region’s interaction with other regions of the world Examples of RI, North American Free Trade Area for Canada, Mexico and USA (1989) Mexico joined in 1994, EU, COMESA, SADC, Arab Customs Union (ACU), Association of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN) formed in 1967, Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum (APEC) 1989 THEORIES OF REGIONAL COOPERATION AND INTEGRATION Classical Theory of Customs Union The theory maintains that, Regional integration processes move in stages: from the shallowest to the deepest, namely: Customs Union: common tariffs against non- members and free trade among members only. The participant countries set up common external trade policy, but in some cases they use different import quotas. Common competition policy is also helpful to avoid competition deficiency. Common Market: free movement of goods, services, capital and labor among members only. In EAC for example Common market has been in force since 2010. Underlying the EAC Common Market are operational principles of the Community, namely: Non-discrimination of nationals of other Partner States on grounds of nationality; Equal treatment to nationals of other Partner States; Ensure transparency in matters concerning the other Partner States; and Share information for the smooth implementation of the Protocol. Monetary Union: single currency, one monetary policy and one capital market among members only. It is there to facilitate the issue of common market (trade and exchange) Political Federation: one supranational political body, one army and one federal legislature. THEORIES OF REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONT…
Variable Geometry Principle: The theory allows
participating countries to move at different paces toward a common objective e.g. in the EU some countries are at Monetary Union stage, others at the Common Market stage such as UK while others at the Customs Union State such as Turkey. Theory posits that regional integration should serve the engine of development (it takes care of Africa’s small, land-locked and fragmented economies, national resources spread across borders and isolated markets). The theory makes four basic assumptions: That participating countries should be located in a contiguous region i.e. neighboring countries to reap economic benefits. That participating countries should have similar levels of economic development and similar sizes. That participating countries agree to raise a common tariff against products of non-members and free trade among members. Expected economic outcomes for participating members: Widening of markets for goods and services produced by member countries. Promotion rational division of labor among participating countries. Promotion of coordinated industrial planning for high cost activities such as petrochemicals, iron and steel and fertilizers. Creating internal mechanisms to help development laggards through “Compensatory Financing Schemes”. WHY COUNTRIES PARTICIPATE IN REGIONAL COOPERATION AND INTEGRATION
Regional integration schemes seek to pool efforts by
coordinating and harmonizing development efforts through inter-government bodies/ Secretariats. The Secretariat provides a common framework for national behavior i.e. common policies. The Secretariat serves as joint facility for coordinating national policies on agreed issue areas The Secretariat provides Regional integration schemes seek to pool efforts by coordinating and harmonizing development efforts through inter-government bodies/ Secretariats. The Secretariat provides a common framework for national behavior i.e. common policies. The Secretariat serves as joint facility for coordinating national policies on agreed issue areas Basing on its scope, regional integration and cooperation's provides a room for countries’ economic, political to security policies, systems and procedures for mutual benefits. Economics arguments: portrays the harnessing the economies of scale as the engine of economic grow and provides positive incentives to managing cross-border resources for mutual benefits…rivers, lakes, oceans and exploiting regional synergies etc. Political arguments: portrays regionalism as the best means of promoting the positive political norms of democracy, human rights, rule of law and political inclusion; and enhancing regional bargaining power vs other extra-regional actors Security arguments: portrays regionalism as best mechanisms of addressing common security threats such as terrorism, climate change etc and building mutual trust, security confidence; enhancing political cooperation and reducing regional security rivalries. Cultural arguments: portrays regionalisms of the best mechanism of cultivating regional collective consciousness, fighting against cultural chauvinism, and promoting and cerebrating regional togetherness. READ THE BOOK BY Walter Mattli (1999). The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond WHY COUNTRIES JOIN TO THE RI GLOBAL TRENDS OF REGIONAL COOPERATION AND INTEGRATION SCHEMES A trend means, general tendency, movement or direction (Encarta Dictionary 2009). The regional cooperation and integration schemes has been changing overtime in terms of themes and mode of cooperation/integrations. E.g in Europe during 1822 Prussia established custom union with Hesse-Darmstadt followed by Bavaria Wurttemberg Customs union, German monetary union, etc Similarly, during 1960’s the main target for integration in African continent was to fight against colonial domination, neo-colonialism and building of independent economy for post-colonial African countries. Recently the global agenda of regional cooperation and integration is on globalization where issues such as global democracy, global security, multilateral cooperation, etc are given an impetus. Developments such as trade and capital account liberalization, as well as technological innovation in transport and telecommunications, have increased the international exchange of factors of production and final products. What is less often recognized is that the process of ‘globalisation’ has been accompanied by the strengthening of economic and financial linkages within geographic regions. Indeed the world economy is simultaneously becoming more ‘regionalized’ and more ‘globalized’. The trend towards regional integration has been supported in many areas by regional policy initiatives, particularly in the field of trade. The result is a proliferation of regional agreements that vary widely in breadth and depth. Different paces in integration processes. For example by looking at Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) after the collapse of Soviet Union the main target was to create a common market for goods, services, labour and capital. But the integration activities so far have been more pronounced at the sub-regional level, such as among Russia, Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan. These regional policy initiatives, overall, have not brought about tangible results, since countries have not yet implemented the steps required for the creation of a common market The similar case can be evidenced to EU where some countries are at Monetary Union stage, others at the Common Market stage such as UK while others at the Customs Union State such as Turkey. The trend of joining and dropping from the integration. For example recently Britain has dropped from the EU, Southern Sudan joined the EAC Structural changes and institutional development. For example, South-East and East Asia, the key catalytic event to propel regional cooperation has been the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98. Part of the focus today is on forming the types of institutions that would best serve the interests of the region as a whole as much as the interests of the individual economies. Currently, two organisations stand out: ASEAN, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, and APEC, the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation For the case of EU initial impetus for European integration was a catalytic event, in the European case the two world wars. The first efforts at building a common European “house” In fact, much of the objective of European integration over the past fifty years can be understood as en effort to ensure that a military conflict will ever again originate in Europe. But as with many integration processes, the European experience gradually evolved into something much larger with well-established executive, legislative and judiciary branches. This has led to introduction of common currency i.e Euro in January, 1999. Recently, there is a trend of multiregional integrations working together (Troika).