CFP3172017
CFP3172017
ISSN: 3471-7102
Corresponding author
Isaac Masiye D. Ndhlovu
Deputy National Coordinator University Of Zambia,
Education and Counselling Dept. Institute of Distance Education
Drug Enforcement Commission P.O. Box 32379, Lusaka. Zambia.
P.B. 476 x RW , Lusaka. Zambia E-mail: ndhlovu2010@gmail.com
E-mail: imasiye@yahoo.com Tel: +260-977-152676
Tel: +260-977-896555
ABSTRACT
The study sought to establish current practices that distribution of school rules to learners as
and policies in drug and alcohol abuse they reported to school and head teachers
prevention education in selected secondary communicating the rules to learners during
schools in Zambia. This need was necessitated school assemblies were the most used ways of
by the fact that despite escalating incidences of implementing policy guidelines. Based on the
drug and alcohol abuse among school-going findings, it is recommended that teachers and
children, little was known concerning other prevention education providers should
prevention practices and policies used in use activities which are more interactive such
secondary schools. This article reports on two as small group discussions, role-play, and
of the study objectives which were to; (1) educational games. Furthermore, preventive
explore how prevention education activities education should be provided on a regular
were conducted in secondary schools. And (2) basis by means of multiple and booster
explore how policy guidelines were sessions. Teachers and school administrators
implemented in secondary schools. The study should constantly remind learners of the rule
adopted a descriptive survey research design to and regulations through multiple avenues.
collect, analyze and interpret both quantitative
and qualitative data from 514 respondents. The Key words: Drug abuse, alcohol abuse,
study found that although a variety of activities Prevention education activities, Secondary
such as lectures, discussions, video shows, role schools.
plays, drama, games and sports, were
conducted, the most frequently conducted were
lectures and discussions. In addition
prevention education activities were
irregularly conducted. It was also established
1
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
2
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
A number of studies have suggested that interactive activities include; Lectures, use
using extracurricular activities as a strategy of ex-addicts, use of scare tactics, large
may have prevention potential to reduce group discussions, use of brochures posters
abuse of alcohol and other drugs in learning and campaign T-shirts, video shows
institutions (Eccles et al., 2003; Moore and depicting negative consequences of drug
Werch, 2005; Hoffmann, 2006). For use and display of drugs that are commonly
example Eccles et al. (2003), found that used. For example Bangert-Drowns (1988)
young people who participate in who conducted a meta-analysis of 33
extracurricular activities such as sports and school-based programmes found that
performing arts had a better academic programmes that used lectures as their only
performance, lower risk of dropping out of intervention had less influence on attitude
school and reduced involvement in risk and behaviour change than those which
behaviours such as abuse of alcohol and used small group discussion.
other drugs. However, other studies have
also shown that different activities may Similarly, a study conducted by Yamada et
produce mixed results in young people drug al. (2014) to evaluate the effectiveness of
abuse behaviours. For example some types small group discussions in drug abuse
of sports and athletic involvement may not prevention in Japan, found that more
protect young people from drug and alcohol learners acquired skills to prevent drug
abuse (Moore and Werch, 2005; Hoffmann, abuse by participating in small group
2006). discussions than in a lecture.
MOE (2003) noted that interactive methods
In their studies, Tobler and Stratton, are used to stimulate active participation by
(1997); Cuijpers, (2002); Botvin and the audience. They also allow practice of
Griffin, (2003) have revealed that some interpersonal competencies and desired
methods or activities for drug and alcohol behaviour.
abuse prevention are less effective and
counterproductive while others have shown Botvin and Griffins (2003) have argued that
to produce desired outcomes. For instance, the more intensive the delivery system is,
they have concluded that using interactive the greater the success of the prevention
activities is an effective way of delivering programmes. This is also supported by
drug and alcohol abuse prevention UNODC (2004) who stated that providers
education. Tobler et al. (1999) define should ensure that there is sufficient contact
interactive activities as those with higher time with the target group.
degree of active participation by all
learners. These activities include: small White and Pitts (1998) and Tobler (1999)
group discussions, role-play, educational have provided evidence indicating that
games, cooperative learning, prevention strategies that allow for frequent
demonstrations, brainstorming, modeling, and multiple sessions or booster sessions
homework assignments, drama, are generally associated with success in
motivational interviewing, behaviour drug abuse prevention. This is as opposed
rehearsal, debate and peer education. Less to a one-off sessions which may not have
3
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
an impact on individuals who are currently In the same vein, Evans-Whipp et al.
using drugs or alcohol (Myers et al., 2008). (2013) reported on a study conducted on
Flemish secondary school learners where it
Pertaining to drug and alcohol abuse was found that schools with clearly
prevention activities, it was generally formulated and communicated rules had
unclear regarding how they were conducted fewer regular drinkers than schools with
in schools in Zambia. This study was less clarity surrounding alcohol
therefore, set to find out how prevention regulations. These studies generally
activities in secondary schools in Zambia demonstrate that well implemented
were conducted. prevention policies are crucial to
For drug abuse prevention policies to be prevention of drug and alcohol abuse in
effective, the people concerned need to schools. However, it was not clear how
know about them. Policy dissemination is a drug and alcohol abuse prevention
vital component of drug and alcohol abuse education activities and policy guidelines
prevention implementation in every were implemented in Zambia’s secondary
institution. It ensures that the people it is schools.
intended for follow the guidelines as
indicated in it. METHODOLOGY
The study adopted a descriptive survey
In its ‘Student Code of Conduct Policy research design to collect, analyze and
Guidelines,’ the Virginia Board of interpret both quantitative and qualitative
Education in USA stipulates that “local data. This design was preferred because it
school boards must provide written copies allows the researcher to describe the facts
of the Standards of Students Conduct to and characteristics of a given phenomenon,
students, parents and school personnel” population, or area of interest (Merriam
(Atkinson, 2015:11). The Board further and Simpson, 1995). A total number of five
suggests that dissemination procedures hundred and fourteen (514) respondents
may include special students orientation participated in the study. This number
activities and class teachers reviewing the included: 400 learners, 91 teachers and 12
standards with their students in the head teachers selected form twenty
classroom. Additionally, Gaustad (1993) secondary schools in five provinces. In
asserts that ongoing communication of addition, 6 District Education Board
policy is more effective than one-shot Secretaries (DEBS) and 5 Drug
policy message. Gaustad further suggests Enforcement Commission (DEC) officers
that a policy should be distributed in located in the selected sites were included
writing and discussed verbally with because they represented providers or
stakeholders. This is to ensure implementers of prevention programmes
understanding of the provisions of the and activities in schools. A multi-stage
policy for effective implementation. sampling was conducted in which both
probability and non-probability procedures
were employed. This involved sampling of
provinces, districts, schools and finally
4
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
respondents. For instance, a qualitative How drug and alcohol abuse prevention
purposive sampling technique was used to education activities were conducted in
select teachers, head teachers, DEBS and secondary schools
DEC officers, while quantitative simple Concerning how the drug and alcohol abuse
random and systematic random sampling prevention activities were conducted in the
was used to select learners. Due to the selected secondary schools, the study found
sensitive nature of the subject, ethical that they were conducted through a number
precautions were taken in this study. This of activities which included class room
included explaining the purpose of the lectures, discussions, video shows, role
study, giving respondents chance to decide plays and drama. Other ways were through
on whether to participate in the study and anti-drug club meetings, games and sports,
by keeping their names anonymous. and special skill training programmes. For
instance, 29.5% of learners indicated they
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION leant through lectures in the classroom,
In the light of escalating incidences of drug 18.5% through talks and discussions with
and alcohol abuse among learners, the visiting professionals, 16% through drama,
study sought to explore how prevention and 14.7% through anti-drug club
education activities and policy guidelines meetings, while the least activity
were implemented in secondary schools, by mentioned were Video show (8.4%), life
answering the following research skills training (8.4%) and sports and games
questions: at 4.5%.
(i) How were the drug and alcohol abuse
prevention education activities In response to the question regarding how
conducted in secondary schools? they learnt about drug and alcohol abuse
(ii) How were the drug and alcohol abuse prevention in school, most of the learners
prevention policy guidelines interviewed during focus group discussions
implemented in secondary schools? confirmed having learnt mainly through
This is because how something is taught or lectures in classrooms and talks or
learnt, has a bearing on the knowledge discussions with visiting professionals such
retention rate and overall behaviour change as DEC officers and some NGOs
in young people. Firstly, the researchers programme officers. To this effect one
were interested in finding out how participant said:
prevention education activities were “Sometimes the head teacher also
talks to us about the bad things of
conducted in the selected secondary smoking and drinking at school
schools and secondly, how policy during assembly periods.”
guidelines were implemented. Details of
the findings and discussion are presented Another participant said:
below. “They just teach us in class and
tell us to write notes about effects
of drug abuse.”
5
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
In the same vein, 26.9% out of 91 teachers intervention had less influence on attitude
who participated in the study agreed with and behaviour change regarding drug use.
the learners views and added counselling to In this regard, the researchers suggest that
the list of the frequently conducted prevention education providers should
prevention activities. Similar findings were engage more in activities which promote
indicated by DEC officers. They confirmed interactivity such as life skills training,
lectures and large group discussions as their small group discussions, role play/drama,
most frequently conducted activity for drug debate, educational games and sports. As
sensitization programme in schools. rightly pointed out by Ministry of
Additionally, they said they sometimes Education (2003) interactive teaching
combined different activities in one session strategies should be encouraged because
depending on the situation and the audience they stimulate active participation among
they were attending to. For example one learners in the classroom or group activity,
officers explained that they normally therefore, they allow for the development
conduct lectures and large group of interpersonal competencies.
discussions because it was convenient for Additionally, as rightly argued by Tobler et
them when dealing with large numbers of al. (1999), the more communication exists
learners, with limited time for interaction. among teachers, learners and peers, the
more learners will be prevented from
The above findings suggest that although a abusing drugs and alcohol.
variety of activities were used, the most
frequently conducted by both internal To further understand how prevention
(teachers) and external providers (e.g. DEC activities were conducted, the researchers
officers) were lectures and discussions. The explored the intensity and duration with
over reliance on these activities by which they were done. With regard to
providers may be the contributing factor to intensity, the majority (62.5%) of learners
the limited success scored in reducing drug indicated that they occasionally learnt
and alcohol abuse among learners in about drugs and alcohol abuse prevention.
schools. This is because studies have Occasionally in this regard means once in
shown that the use of activities or methods six months or the entire school year. When
such as lecture, talks, large group asked how often they learnt about drug and
discussions in drug and alcohol abuse alcohol abuse education in school, some
prevention education is less effective and grade twelve learners in focus group
counterproductive (Tobler and Stratton, discussions further stated that they only
1997; Cuijpers, 2002; Botvin and Griffin, learnt about it in grade ten. For instance,
2003). These methods are largely one way one of them said:
communication, that is, from source to “As for me sir, I learnt about
audience. In addition, they do not provide drugs in class, when I was in
grade ten. That was almost two
for high level of active participation by all
year ago. It takes a long time
learners. This is supported by Banget- before you learn about drug in
drawn (1988) who found that programmes the classroom. But sometimes
that used lecture method as their only the head teachers talks about
6
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
drug abuse during school the average duration in which they were
assembly when they catch some conducted was fourty minutes. This is
learners who drink beer in contrary to the expectation of the
town.”
researchers considering that both internal
and external providers conducted
This response may have been due to
prevention activities in the selected
learners considering what was learnt in the
schools. As earlier mentioned, the
formal grade ten Civic Education syllabi.
explanation for this phenomenon may lay
As regard to duration, most (46.5%) of the
in the learners’ considering formal
learners said fourty minutes was the
classroom lessons which are time-tabled. It
average time under which prevention
is important to note that the intensity or
activities were conducted. Findings from
frequency of prevention activities has a
teacher showed that (68.1%) said they
positive impact on learners. As Botvin and
occasionally taught about drug abuse
Griffins (2003) pointed out, the more
prevention while on duration they indicated
intensive the delivery system is, the greater
similar views with those of learners. Head
the impact on the learners’ delay of the
teachers interviewed agreed with teachers’
onset of drug use, reduction or complete
and learners’ views on duration. When
abstinence from drugs and alcohol abuse.
asked how often they visited each school in
When learners are given more
the locality they operated to conduct drug
opportunities to hear and practice skills
prevention educational activities, DEC
they are likely to internalize them.
officers interviewed justified their
Prevention education providers in
infrequent visit to schools, indicating that
secondary schools should consider
the large number of schools in their
conducting interactive activities in multiple
catchment area made it difficult to cover
sessions or booster sessions.
them frequently. In support of this
response, one DEC officer said:
How drug and alcohol abuse prevention
“Well, to tell you the truth, there
policy guidelines were implemented in
are so many schools to visit. For
secondary schools
instance at this office, I am alone
Effective policy implementation is critical
catering for the whole province, so
for adherence to the guidelines for drug and
you find that one cannot manage to
alcohol abuse prevention by stakeholders in
carry out sensitization activities in
an institution. Hence in this study, learners
all the schools in the province. In
were asked to indicate ways in which they
fact sometimes we go there when
became aware of the rule and regulations
they write us indicating that they
concerning drug and alcohol use in the
want our services. Some schools
school, while teachers and head teachers
are only visited once in a year.”
indicated how policies were disseminated.
Hence the focus was on exploring the issue
The above findings show that drug and
of policy dissemination in secondary
alcohol abuse prevention activities were
schools.
occasionally conducted in schools, and that
7
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
9
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
10
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net
The International Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Research
ISSN: 3471-7102
Distributed to us
White, D. and Pitts, M. (1998), “Educating upon first entry
193 48.3
Young People about Drugs: A Systematic to the school
Review.” Addiction 93 (10) 1475-87.
(Retrieved 29/11/14). Posted on the
school notice
Wyler, L.S. (2012) International Drug board or 28 7.0
Control Policy: Background and US. classroom
Response, Congress Research Service.
www.crs.gov Through
counselling 8 2.0
Yamada, J., Takayanagi, R., Yokoyama, sessions
H., Suzuki, Y., and Yamada, Y. (2014). Total 400 100.0
Investigation of the educational
effectiveness of including small group
discussion as part of a drug abuse
prevention program for junior high school
students. Yakugaku Zasshi, 134(12): 1331-
45.
Communicated to
us by head
teacher during 164 41.0
school assembly
11
Paper-ID: CFP/317/2017 www.ijmdr.net