2014 Syllabus
2014 Syllabus
8275
For examination in June and November 2014
If you have any questions about this syllabus, please contact Cambridge at
international@cie.org.uk quoting syllabus code 8275.
Note
The subject content of this syllabus is the same as the international version. The range
of components available is limited to make coursework, if applicable, a mandatory part
of the syllabus. Because of this, there may be component numbers omitted in the list of
components.
Administration materials appear in UK English and are standard for all our international
customers. Please read the Cambridge Glossary alongside this syllabus. This is available
from our website.
University of Cambridge International Examinations retains the copyright on all its publications. Registered
Centers are permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use. However, we cannot
give permission to Centers to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal
use within a Center.
1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 2
1.1 Why Choose Cambridge?
1.2 Why Choose Cambridge International AS and A Level?
1.3 Why Choose Cambridge International AS Level Global Perspectives?
1.4 Cambridge AICE (Advanced International Certificate of Education) Diploma
1.5 How Can I Find Out More?
1. Introduction
Recognition
A Cambridge International AS or A Level is recognized around the world by schools, universities, and
employers. The qualifications are accepted as proof of academic ability for entry to universities worldwide,
though some courses do require specific subjects.
Cambridge International A Levels typically take two years to complete and offer a flexible course of
study that gives students the freedom to select subjects that are right for them. Cambridge International
AS Levels often represent the first half of an A Level course but may also be taken as a freestanding
qualification. They are accepted in all UK universities and carry half the weighting of an A Level. University
course credit and advanced standing is often available for Cambridge International A/AS Levels in countries
such as the USA and Canada.
Excellence in Education
We understand education. We work with over 9,000 schools in over 160 countries that offer our programs
and qualifications. Understanding learners’ needs around the world means listening carefully to our
community of schools, and we are pleased that 98% of Cambridge schools say they would recommend us
to other schools.
Our mission is to provide excellence in education, and our vision is that Cambridge learners become
confident, responsible, innovative, and engaged.
We invest constantly in research and development to improve our programs and qualifications.
You can offer almost any combination of 55 subjects. Students can specialize or study a range of subjects,
ensuring breadth. Giving students the power to choose helps motivate them throughout their studies.
Cambridge International AS and A Level gives you building blocks to build an individualized curriculum that
develops your learners’ knowledge, understanding, and skills in:
• in-depth subject content
• independent thinking
• applying knowledge and understanding to new as well as familiar situations
• handling and evaluating different types of information sources
• thinking logically and presenting ordered and coherent arguments
• making judgments, recommendations, and decisions
• presenting reasoned explanations, understanding implications, and communicating them clearly and
logically
• working and communicating in English.
The syllabi are international in outlook but retain a local relevance. They have been created specifically for
an international student body with content to suit a wide variety of schools and to avoid cultural bias.
This syllabus is firmly based on skills rather than specific content. Through the study of global issues,
candidates will explore different and sometimes opposing perspectives and will acquire and develop
thinking and reasoning skills as well as research and communication skills. These skills will enable
candidates to meet the demands of the twenty-first century and to make a successful transition to study in
higher education.
Cambridge International AS Level Global Perspectives encourages candidates to become critically aware
of their own beliefs and assumptions and those of others, developing valid arguments by reflecting on and
interpreting a range of evidence.
Advances in technology have changed our access to information and the way we communicate and work.
Increasingly, young people are faced with a multiplicity of competing ideas, information, and arguments and
they need to be able to think critically to deconstruct arguments, to differentiate between the ways in which
people express their perspectives, to assess and evaluate claims, and to develop lines of reasoning.
Candidates will develop research skills that will enable them to obtain information, evaluate the reliability
and usefulness of this information, and use the evidence gathered to construct their own arguments and
support lines of reasoning.
Through well-defined stages, called the Critical Path, candidates will apply a logical approach to decision-
making. Candidates will be able to analyze the structure and context of arguments, assess the impact and
limitations of evidence, and make well-reasoned judgments through informed research. Candidates will
learn to organize and communicate their findings in appropriate formats.
Cambridge International AS Level Global Perspectives prepares candidates for further education and for life-
long learning across a range of disciplines by helping them to be:
• confident in working with information and ideas—their own and those of others
• responsible for themselves, responsive to and respectful of others
• innovative and equipped for new and future challenges
• engaged intellectually and socially, ready to make a difference
Cambridge AICE Diploma involves the selection of subjects from three curriculum groups—Mathematics
and Science, Languages, Arts and Humanities.
To be considered for an AICE Diploma, a candidate must earn the equivalent of six credits by passing a
combination of examinations at either double credit or single credit, with at least one course coming from
each of the three curriculum areas.
The AICE Diploma is comprised of examinations administered in May/June and October/November series
each year.
AS Global Perspectives counts towards fulfilling the requirements for six credits. It cannot, however, be
used to meet the requirements to obtain one credit in each of the curriculum groups 1, 2, and 3.
2. Assessment at a Glance
All three components are available in both the May/June and October/November examination series.
Availability
This syllabus is examined in the May/June and the October/November examination series.
3.1 Goals
Cambridge International AS Global Perspectives will appeal to young people because it enables them to
explore issues of global significance and offers them opportunities to acquire, develop, and apply skills in
critical thinking, research, and communication.
Not only does Cambridge International AS Global Perspectives equip candidates with the skills they need in
a rapidly changing intellectual and technical environment, it also prepares and encourages them to engage
confidently with issues and ideas of global significance.
To encourage candidates to think critically, this syllabus presents an approach to analyzing and evaluating
arguments and perspectives called the Critical Path.
Candidates will learn how to deconstruct and reconstruct arguments by researching global issues and
interrogating evidence. They will reflect on the implications of their research and analysis from a personal
perspective and communicate their findings and ideas as reasoned arguments.
Communication
AO1 18 3 6 27
AO2 12 12 6 30
AO3 0 10 16 26
AO4 0 5 12 17
Total 30 30 40 100
4. Syllabus Content
Candidates answer mandatory, structured questions based on two or more sources provided with the
paper. Questions will require both short and longer responses.
The stimulus material provided with the written paper may express different perspectives on issues of
global significance taken from the topics listed in the syllabus.
Candidates will not be assessed on their knowledge and understanding of the specific issues represented
in the stimulus material. Instead, candidates will be assessed on their thinking and reasoning skills focused
mainly on analyzing and evaluating arguments, evidence, and contexts. See Section 5 for the role of the
teacher.
In carrying out a critical and comparative analysis of the stimulus material, candidates will be assessed on
their ability to:
• identify and analyze the structure and context of arguments, reasoning, and claims
• evaluate the strength of the arguments
• identify the key components of arguments
• identify and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of arguments
• assess the validity of conclusions or claims
• assess the credibility of sources
• identify and evaluate different perspectives.
Nature of assessment
This component is an externally set assessment, marked by Cambridge.
Component 2: Essay
Candidates write an essay on a global issue of their choice from the topics studied during the course.
The essay must be framed as a single question which is clearly focused on a global issue that lends itself
to global treatment in 1,750 to 2,000 words. Candidates should be supported in formulating an appropriate
question. See Section 5 for the role of the teacher.
Candidates should focus their individual research on identifying and exploring the context and basis of the
arguments from different global perspectives. They should identify different perspectives, understand the
arguments, reasoning, or claims upon which these perspectives are based, offer a critical view of them, and
reach a personal, supported view.
The essay must be written in continuous prose, include a list of sources used, and be submitted in an
electronic format. Quotations must be fully referenced. The essay must not exceed 2,000 words and an
accurate word-count must be clearly stated on each essay. The word-count excludes the title, references,
and footnotes. Work beyond the 2,000 word maximum will not be included in the assessment.
Nature of Assessment
Candidates decide on their own essay question for this component, which is externally marked by
Cambridge. All materials for Component 2 must be submitted electronically. The deadline and methods for
submission are in the Cambridge Administrative Guide, available on our website.
Component 3: Presentation
Candidates produce a presentation based on prereleased source materials provided by Cambridge. The
stimulus material consists of a range of sources about at least one global issue seen through a variety of
perspectives.
Candidates use the stimulus material to identify and research a topic for their presentation. Candidates
must frame a single question that allows them to address contrasting perspectives on an issue derived from
the stimulus material. They may research one or more perspectives for themselves. Candidates should be
supported in formulating an appropriate question. See Section 5 for the role of the teacher.
Candidates should reflect on the alternative perspectives found in the source materials and from their own
research. The focus of the presentation is mainly reflection and communication. In their presentation,
candidates establish and present a coherent, personal perspective that shows an understanding of, and
empathy with, alternative perspectives.
Candidates are normally expected to deliver their presentation to a live audience and candidates may choose
any appropriate format to communicate their research (e.g., poster, PowerPoint, video, weblog, webpages,
or a mixture of different media). Teachers must ensure that the quality of any recording will permit accurate
marking of the work.
Whether presented or not, the submission must include a verbatim transcript of the presentation. The
running time for the presentation must not exceed 15 minutes. Work beyond the maximum 15 minutes
running time will not be included in the assessment.
The prereleased source material will be available to Centers by March 1 to allow candidates four weeks to
complete their presentation. Each Center may determine the precise timing of the four-week period to fit
their own circumstances.
Teachers must ensure that, for each candidate, sufficient and appropriate supporting evidence is submitted
to Cambridge to permit accurate marking of the work.
Nature of Assessment
Candidates decide on their own presentation question based on the stimulus material provided by
Cambridge. The presentation is marked by Cambridge. All materials for Component 3 must be submitted
electronically. The deadline and methods for submission are in the Cambridge Administrative Guide,
available on our website.
The example questions below are designed to support teachers and candidates in developing skills in
research, communication, thinking, and reasoning.
Reflection What were the personal viewpoints before carrying out the research?
Reflect on personal perspectives prior to undertaking the research.
Explore the impact How do the personal viewpoints relate to the perspectives identified
of the research in the research? Evaluate personal viewpoints against alternative
on personal perspectives on global issues.
perspectives
What impact has the research had on any prior viewpoints? Evaluate
the extent to which personal viewpoints have changed after carrying out the
research.
Why has the research had an effect on prior views? Justify the reasons
why personal perspectives have changed as a result of research.
What additional research might be useful? Identify and justify possible
further research directions.
Communication What is the most effective way to structure the presentation? Select
and organize relevant information in a logical and coherent way.
Present research How can research findings be presented to a nonspecialist audience?
findings effectively Explore appropriate media to present complex global perspectives.
How can arguments be presented effectively and persuasively? Use
well-supported lines of reasoning based on supporting evidence.
How can research findings be presented reliably? Use appropriate
technical terms and cite references accurately and clearly.
A suitable study program can be devised by choosing a range of topics set within a global context and
viewed through different perspectives. Candidates should select the topics that engage their interest and
explore each chosen topic through the four elements:
• deconstruction
• reconstruction
• reflection
• communication
Candidates research global topics through different themes. Candidates should explore a range of topics
from the list below.
Global Topic
• Alternatives to oil • Migration and work
• Artificial Intelligence • On-line and interactive communities
• Biodiversity and threats to the world’s natural • Standard of living/quality of life
heritage • Sustainable futures
• Endangered cultures • Technology and lifestyles
• Ethical foreign policies • The challenge of GM crops
• Genetic engineering • The economic role of women
• Global climate change • The emergence of a global superpower
• Globalization of economic activity • The ethics and economics of food
• Globalization versus new nationalisms • The religious-secular divide
• Impact of the internet • The speed of change in technology and global
• Incorporating technology into buildings trade
• Industrial pollution • Transnational organizations (UN, World Bank,
• Integration and multiculturalism EU, NATO)
• International law • Urbanization and the countryside
• Medical ethics and priorities
By studying at least four topics, candidates will develop the Critical Path to interrogating information and
acquire and develop a range of skills, including thinking critically, reasoning, and communication.
Theme
Culture
Economics
Environment
Ethics
Politics
Science and Technology
Global issues are complex, multifaceted, and multilevel challenges, and through the structured exploration
of global topics, candidates research alternative perspectives from different themes. Candidates will be
guided toward development of research, communication, thinking, and reasoning.
Different perspectives should be genuinely contrasting (i.e., they should come from a different world view
rather than represent subtly different takes on an issue). Although there is no absolute requirement that
alternative perspectives be rooted in different geographical areas, genuinely different global perspectives
are likely to be informed by different cultural, geographical, and political environments. Looking at materials
from different countries and/or cultures would therefore be a good way of accessing different global
perspectives.
It is also possible for two contrasting perspectives (rooted in different world views) to be exemplified by
particular “local” contexts (for example the views of a local Muslim community versus those of a secular
background). Teachers should note, however, that while local contexts can be used as exemplification, this
exemplification should be used to consider implications more globally. Candidates need to empathize with
viewpoints that differ from their own while not necessarily accepting the viewpoints of others.
Arguments and evidence often express a perspective and can be used to support a perspective. There
needs to be some form of evidence base underlying and/or supporting all perspectives. This evidence
base is likely to consist of a variety of arguments, sources, and evidence, which may or may not be of good
quality. Candidates need to sift and select evidence. Evidence is likely to come in two forms: primary
evidence such as historical texts or results of scientific evidence, and secondary evidence such as the
arguments and opinions of historians or scientists. The assessment objectives put weight on the second
of these. Candidates should be aware of the strengths and potential weaknesses of all types of evidence.
Primary is not necessarily better than secondary. When assessing the credibility of particular sources,
candidates should bear in mind that this is a way of assessing the evidence presented for a perspective and
is not an end in itself.
Candidates research and analyze different perspectives based on issues of global significance. They
examine the structure of arguments, considering the strengths and weaknesses. They will use research
skills to search, collect, and synthesize their findings into well-supported lines of reasoning, drawing
together evidence from a variety of sources into a balanced argument or conclusion. Candidates evaluate
evidence, arguments, reasoning, conclusions, or claims in the context of different perspectives, including
their own. They make reasoned and value judgments based on evidence and personal viewpoints prior to
and after carrying out their research. Candidates consider the validity of evidence, reasoning, conclusions,
or claims.
The Critical Path is an approach to thinking critically. It consists of deconstruction, reconstruction, and
personal reflection. Deconstruction is the analysis of an argument or reasoning; reconstruction is the
analysis of the context and evidence of an argument; and personal reflection is the exploration of the
impact of research on personal viewpoints.
The written paper consists of mandatory questions, based on sources provided with the paper.
Candidates will be required to analyze and evaluate arguments, interrogate evidence, and compare
perspectives centered on global issues.
Although this is a skills-based paper that does not require candidates to have been taught any specific
content, teachers should consider and explore the skills candidates need for this paper during class work.
Teachers should prepare candidates for the types of questions they are likely to meet in the paper by
using specimen and past papers and mark schemes, which can be obtained from the Cambridge website
http://www.cie.org.uk/
A class may work together to carry out background research on a common theme, but each candidate must
devise his/her own question. Each candidate must submit a different question.
Candidates should be given sufficient time to plan and prepare their research. During this preparation,
teachers should support each candidate in:
• understanding the nature of the task
• identifying a suitable topic to research
• formulating an appropriate question
• developing a suitable approach to the research
• developing organizational skills
• citing and referencing his/her sources
• focusing on reconstruction and reflection
• writing effectively and concisely to stay between 1,750 and 2,000 words
• including an accurate word count.
Questions for essay titles may be submitted to Cambridge for approval using the Outline Proposal Form.
Further details are available in the Cambridge Administrative Guide.
The essay must be the candidate’s own work. Once candidates embark on researching and writing the
essay, they must seek assistance only from their teacher, but there must be minimum intervention by the
teacher. Candidates must not cut and paste large amounts of text from sources without showing evidence
of reworking.
Candidates will be required to sign a declaration indicating that the essay is their own work. The teacher
responsible will be required to countersign this declaration, verifying that these regulations have been
observed. This declaration must accompany the essay on submission to Cambridge.
A class may work together to carry out background research on a common theme, but each candidate must
devise his/her own question that has its own focus.
Candidates should be given sufficient time to interrogate and discuss the prerelease material, and to plan
and prepare their research. During this preparation, teachers should support each candidate in:
• understanding the nature of the task
• discussing the issues, problems, and research opportunities based on the prerelease material
• formulating an appropriate question
• developing a suitable approach to the research
• developing organizational skills
• citing and referencing their sources
• focusing on reflection and communication
• developing an empathetic approach to alternative perspectives
The presentation and associated materials must be the candidate’s own work. Once candidates
embark on researching and producing the presentation, they must seek assistance only from their teacher,
but there must be minimum intervention by the teacher. Candidates must not cut and paste large amounts
of text from sources without showing evidence of reworking.
Candidates will be required to sign a declaration indicating that the presentation is their own work. The
teacher responsible will be required to countersign this declaration, verifying that these regulations have
been observed. This declaration must accompany the presentation on submission to Cambridge.
6. Grade Descriptions
A Grade A candidate:
• shows detailed evidence of identifying and critically evaluating different perspectives
• understands the structure of an argument, reasoning, or claims and identifies the key components
accurately, distinguishing between claims and counterarguments, where appropriate
• demonstrates the ability to make perceptive critical evaluation of an argument, identifying strengths,
weaknesses, and flaws even if subtle
• demonstrates evidence of critical evaluation of the implications and validity of conclusions, arguments,
reasoning, or claims
• locates and analyzes a range of relevant supporting evidence
• evaluates a range of relevant sources of evidence
• recognizes contrasting perspectives and identifies the reasoning that supports them, recognizing both
sides of an argument
• recognizes and understands the context upon which arguments are based
• can construct an argument that has coherence and depth
• evaluates the reliability and the credibility of sources with relevance to the issue
• shows extensive evidence of personal reflection and reasoned opinion
• shows extensive awareness of alternative perspectives
• carries out a thorough evaluation of the impact of alternative perspectives on personal viewpoints with
precision, sympathy, and empathy
• selects and presents information from relevant sources
• organizes and presents ideas with clarity
• presents an argument with clarity and with relevant supporting evidence
• uses appropriate media in an effective and persuasive way
• uses appropriate technical terms effectively
• uses relevant sources effectively, citing references accurately
A Grade C candidate:
• shows some evidence of identifying and critically evaluating different perspectives
• understands some of the structure of an argument, reasoning, or claims and identifies most of the key
components
• demonstrates some evidence of critical evaluation of an argument, identifies obvious strengths,
weaknesses, and flaws
• demonstrates some evidence of critical evaluation of the implications and validity of conclusions,
arguments, reasoning, or claims
• locates and analyzes a range of supporting evidence, most of which are relevant
• evaluates a range of sources of evidence, some of which are relevant
• usually recognizes contrasting perspectives and the main points of reasoning that supports them
• usually recognizes the context upon which arguments are based
• can construct an argument that has some coherence and/or depth
• evaluates the reliability and the credibility of sources with some relevance to the issue
• shows some evidence of personal reflection and reasoned opinion
A Grade E candidate:
• shows limited evidence of identifying and critically evaluating different perspectives
• understands the main points of an argument, reasoning, or claims and identifies some of the key
components
• demonstrates limited evidence of critical evaluation of an argument and identifies an obvious
weakness or flaw
• demonstrates limited evidence of critical evaluation of the implications and validity of conclusions,
arguments, reasoning, or claims
• locates and analyzes some supporting evidence, but some may lack relevance
• evaluates sources of evidence, but only superficially
• recognizes the main points of contrasting perspectives and/or some of the reasoning
• can usually recognize the context upon which arguments are based
• attempts to construct an argument, but with limited coherence and/or depth
• attempts to evaluate the reliability or the credibility of sources, but only superficially
• shows limited evidence of personal reflection or reasoned opinion
• shows a limited awareness of alternative perspectives
• evaluates the impact of alternative perspectives on personal viewpoints, but only in a limited way,
lacking sympathy and empathy
• selects and presents information from sources of limited relevance
• often lacks clarity in organizing and presenting ideas
• presents an argument that lacks clarity and lacks supporting evidence
• uses appropriate media in a limited way
• uses appropriate technical terms to limited effect
• uses sources that are limited and/or not always cited accurately
7. Additional Information
However, these figures are for guidance only, and the number of hours required may vary according to local
curricular practice and the candidates’ prior experience with the subject.
7.3 Progression
The Cambridge International AS Level Global Perspectives develops a range of transferable research skills
that is independent of subject content. The syllabus enables candidates to approach other subjects with an
improved ability to analyze, evaluate, and reflect on issues and reasoning and the Cambridge International
AS Level Global Perspectives will prepare candidates for a wide range of careers, including law, scientific
research, social science, journalism, medicine, business, accounting, and engineering. As a curriculum
subject, Cambridge International AS Level Global Perspectives enables candidates to think critically, to
reason in a disciplined way, and to communicate effectively.
The content and difficulty of a Cambridge International AS Level examination is equivalent to the first half of
a corresponding Cambridge International A Level.
7.6 Access
Reasonable adjustments are made for disabled candidates in order to enable them to access the
assessments and to demonstrate what they know and what they can do. For this reason, very few
candidates will have a complete barrier to the assessment. Information on reasonable adjustments is found
in the Cambridge Handbook, which can be downloaded from the website www.cie.org.uk
Candidates who are unable to access part of the assessment, even after exploring all possibilities through
reasonable adjustments, may still be able to receive an award based on the parts of the assessment they
have taken.
You can use the “Filter by” list to show all resources or only resources categorized as “Endorsed by
Cambridge.” Endorsed resources are written to align closely with the syllabus they support. They have
been through a detailed quality-assurance process. As new resources are published, we review them
against the syllabus and publish their details on the relevant resource list section of the website.
Additional syllabus-specific support is available from our secure Teacher Support website
http://teachers.cie.org.uk, which is available to teachers at registered Cambridge schools. It provides
past question papers and examiner reports on previous examinations, as well as any extra resources such
as schemes of work (unit lesson plans) or examples of candidate responses. You can also find a range of
subject communities on the Teacher Support website, where Cambridge teachers can share their own
materials and join discussion groups.
*2007140125*