Goddard Otieno Project
Goddard Otieno Project
Goddard Otieno-project
TRADE PROJECT
SERIES: NOVEMBER
DECLERATION
THE CANDIDATE:
(i) The project named above was approved by KNEC and supervised by
…………………………………..
(ii) I personally carried out the project whose report follows after this declaration
(iii) I received no undue help from unauthorized persons other than the normal
guidance from my supervisor
(iv) The report submitted to the council is the original work
SIGNATURE………………………………..DATE…………………………………………
THE SUPERVISOR
I . ………………………………………..……….TSC NO…….…………………………
(NAME OF SUPERVISOR)
Declare that I supervised the above named candidate's project contained here in as the
genuine work of the candidate.
ii
DEDICATION.
This book is dedicated to my cousin Mary, my Mother Karirwe my beloved brothers Karisa ,
Chaka, my favorite friend Joan for their devotion ,love and endless support towards
business.
iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I sincerely give my gratitude to all those who helped me in making the project a success, The
Almighty God, my family and my supervisor.
iv
ABSTRACT
The introduction entails all what the project is about. The current situation before the
proposal and the justification of the project is explained. The objectives for the proposed
project are also laid out.
The surveying of the project is inclusive of all the necessary original surveying data that is
included in the project. The reduced levels from the temporary benchmark to the proposed
site location are also include in the earthworks.
Soil investigation involves details of samples taken on the proposed site locations and tests
carried out to classify the soils and show the strength analysis to determine the bearing
capacity.
The architectural requirements show a site plan of all the existing features of the proposed
project and the elevations, sections and foundation layouts.
Structural requirements involve the design and details for the proposed project, the type of
reinforcement and the calculations used in structural designing for the work.
The measurement of works involves taking off of quantities for the sub structure works of the
proposed parking area and the bill of quantities for items.
Estimating and costing shows the build up rates for all the measurement of works and the
pricing of all the items required for the parking area.
Site organization and management consists of a site layout plan for all the works and a
method statement for the substructure works. The detailed programme for works of the
proposed parking area and the plant schedule.
Services involving details for drainage of the parking area and the accessibility to the
completed project is shown.
Table of Contents
DECLRATION............................................................................................................................i
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT........................................................................................................iv
CHAPTER ONE......................................................................................................................11
Introduction..............................................................................................................................11
Background information..........................................................................................................11
Problem statement....................................................................................................................11
Justification..............................................................................................................................11
OBJECTIVE.............................................................................................................................11
Major objective........................................................................................................................11
Minor objective........................................................................................................................12
CHAPTER TWO......................................................................................................................13
Reconnaissance Survey............................................................................................................13
Preliminary survey...................................................................................................................13
Detail survey.........................................................................................................................14
Importance of drainage............................................................................................................15
Actual levelling........................................................................................................................16
Levelling procedure.................................................................................................................17
CHAPTER 3.............................................................................................................................21
Soil investigation..................................................................................................................21
Objectives.............................................................................................................................21
Laboratory test......................................................................................................................21
vi
Grading test..........................................................................................................................21
2 Proctor test............................................................................................................................24
CHAPTER 4.............................................................................................................................27
Designing of library..............................................................................................................27
CHAPTER 5.............................................................................................................................29
Ref............................................................................................................................................35
Calculation...............................................................................................................................35
Output.......................................................................................................................................35
4.2.3. Influence areas chart showing the beam type along c-c axis that is considered as
overloaded............................................................................................................................43
4.2.4. Calculation of areas of influence on the typical longitudinal beam along C-C axis
..............................................................................................................................................43
Summary..................................................................................................................................44
vii
4.2.5. Calculation of dead load on the typical longitudinal beam C-C axis............................44
4.2.6. Calculations of live load on the typical longitudinal beam along C –C axis............46
4.2.7. Calculation of dead load per meter on the beam type = GK..........................................47
4.2.9. Calculation of bending moments and shear forces using CROSS’s moments
Distribution method (MDM).................................................................................................47
a) DF of span BA.............................................................................................................50
b) DF of span BC...........................................................................................................50
c) DF of span BC............................................................................................................51
d) DF span CD...............................................................................................................51
e) DF of span DC...........................................................................................................51
f) DF of span DE............................................................................................................52
Summary..........................................................................................................................55
viii
SKECTH..................................................................................................................................60
4.3.2.1. Load Design analysis of column C2 at intersection of I-I nad 2-2 axis on.................72
a) Plan view..............................................................................................................................80
ix
CHAPTER7..............................................................................................................................90
Owningcost.............................................................................................................................90
CHAPTER EIGHT.....................................................................................................................1
SERVICES.................................................................................................................................1
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
Background information
Kenya Coast national polytechenic has a large number of students who are congested
in library more so the new intake which is done after every time has created
institution population to be so high hence the only library can't accommodate such a
large number of students this has created a challenge for students .The current
structure accommodate around 100 students .The proposed structure will
accommodate around 400 students .The main components of structure will consist
testing of material ,levelling, design and construction.The structure will consist of
ground floor and another floor .The proposed structure is designed to provide greater
strength ,servicebility,longlasting,flexibility and economy .The project shall entail
design for critical column stairs and slab.marerials which will be used include
tiles,masonary blocks,iron sheet,cement,sand,chips,steel bars,glass and paints
Problem statement
Due to big number of students in the library this has led to inconducive learning
environment as students are congested in library leading to some students carrying out
their studies under the tents .
Justification
Big enough space is available within the school compound which can accommodate
such a structure still on the same space can be used for construction of drainage
system and create a good and conducive environment more so there is availability of
facilities which can be acquired during construction and the Presence Of Services
Such As Water ,Elecricity Enhances Conducivity Of The Place
Objective
Major objective
11
Minor objective
12
CHAPTER TWO
a) Reconnaissance Survey
b) Preliminary Survey
c) Detailed Survey
Reconnaissance Survey
ii. To identify site condition for example problem encountered during survey
work
Preliminary survey
During the preliminary survey the following field activities took place
iii. The centre line of existing alignment was marked at interval line.
13
Detail survey
In this section the principle of chain surveying and levelling were applied. Chain
survey was carried for the purpose of determining the exact location in terms of
Dimension of feature and existing structure on site. The data obtained has recorded
and booked in booking sheet.
The data above was taken from administration block up to the Block B civil
engineering block where the construction end.
14
Importance of drainage
The levelling was then carried to obtain vertical and horizontal profile of the proposed
for classrooms and it also involve flying of levels from survey of Kenya benchmark c
plus Buxton two proposed Project. It was carried out to find the establishment of
temporary benchmark.
The method employed during this existence was the rise and fall and detailed were
recovered and establish on table.
Transfer of benchmark.
15
Actual levelling
16
Levelling procedure
i. The dumpy level was set and level at appropriate position with respect to
benchmark of known valued level
ii. Our staff is held at the benchmark and a back sight reading is Taken
iii. The foresight has taken appropriately changing position of the machine the
necessary until a temporary benchmark is obtained on the required proposed
site.
iv. The centre line is obtained and levels are taken at Centre right and left at right
angle to centreline
vi. The levelling procedure was repeated at interval of 10 m with the changing of
position of machine where necessary
17
18
19
20
21
CHAPTER 3
Soil investigation
Very often sample are taken to lab for testing. purpose of testing the soul was to
identify and obtain the characteristics of the soil with the Foundation of the proposed
Project.
The story test was carried out accordance to the advanced Engineering build and
construction foundations. The test here informed of preliminary test on lab after a
careful extraction of undisturbed soil sample.
Objectives
2 Determining the nature and physical properties of the soil used in design.
3 And in foresight construction hazard that may be encountered and ways of solving
them.
Laboratory test
The following tests were carried out on soil sample taken from site.
i. Grading test
ii. Proctor test
iii. Atterberg limit test
Grading test
It was carried out to determine the property of different size of particles present in the
soil.
Test procedure
2 mix the materials thoroughly then some divide each other by quarterly or rifting.
22
4 arranging the series in sequence are specified put larger size on top of small size as
20, 14 10, 6.5 ,5 ,3.5, 2.01, 1.18, 0.600, 0.425, 0.300, 0.212 ,0.150 ,0. 063 mm.
5 was the material on 20 mm sieve and brush the remaining particles to remove
smaller sticking particles.
6.Sieve the retaining particles on the appropriate long-sleeve and record highest
retained on each sieve.
7 Calculation.
Technician
Date approved by
Ref
23
24
2 Proctor test
It was carried out to determine the mass of the solute that can be held in a unit
volume.
2 heights the mould with basic plate and record the height m.
3 put in the soil in try and mix thoroughly with water that 20 ml of water.
4 place the mould + basic plate on solid base and fix the collar then feel and compact
the soil in the mould using T 99 23 kg.
5 compact for about 27 blues about three layers ages and high for moisture content.
6 remove the colour from the excess soil age and weigh for moisture content.
7 break the specimen mix with remain material in a train and an organ 20 ml of water.
10 calculation
Formula
MDO and OMC = Park of the curve (MDO)and value of the horizontal scale or OMC
25
26
Diagram 8
27
CHAPTER 4
Designing of library
This library has constructed mainly to accommodate the huge number of students
hands to create smooth learning condition within school environment more so it is
modern design.
1 climatic condition
2 availability of materials
4 number of users
Design procedure
Site clearance
The Dimension of proposed site is 6 m by 24 m. The site has cleared by cutting down
all bushes and shrubs and Damned away 1.5 m from the site hence the surface related
on free space. All the unwanted waste or spoil soil must be disposed on site as
directed by the engineer on site.
With basement of 1.5 according to the ground condition and capacity of the building
constructed it also determines the wet the ground will carry the building and is stable
from ground soil.
28
Buy planking and structuring of the formulation it protects the excavated foundation
from being disturbed by the Ground activities hands maintain the foundation level
before construction of basement and Foundation levelling
29
CHAPTER 5
M: Bending moment
Mu : Ultimate moment of
resistance N: Axial load n:
Total distributed load on
the slab panel n: Ultimate
30
Z: Lever arm
DF : Distribution Factor
Ø: Bar diameter
31
concrete
32
R:
Mil
d
steel
D:
Ove
rall
dept
h
bf :
Wid
th
of
flan
ge:
Dep
th
of
flan
ge
Area of
Area of
C/c: Center-to-center
33
Qsinc : Total vertical component of the shear force carried by all inclined
bars at the distance Co = Shear force carried by bent up bars
Co : Projection of stirrups
Rsw : 0.8 Rs: Design strength of the stirrups and the inclined bars
φ : coefficient taking into account the slenderness ratio of column and the
construction inaccuracies
34
Exposure = 25mm
Provide nominal cover =
Nominal cover for 1.5 hours fire
25mm
resistance
=20 mm
35
ℎo=12.5 cm
REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN
Loading
1.40*0.15*1*1*24= 5.04KN/m2
36
= 7.14 KN/m2
37
Msy= sx * n Lx2
Mx- = 0.037 * 9.54 * 3.90 * 3.90 = 5.37 KNm
Mx+ = 0.016 * 9.54 * 3.90 * 3.90 = 2.32 KNm
Conclusion
38
39
5Ø12/m
5Ø12/m
Ln Ln
40
Lx = 3.90m
Φ12/20cm
Ø12/20 cm
0,25L 025L
Φ12/20cm
Ly = 5.20m
Ø12/20 cm Ø12/20 cm
41
15 8 15 8
Taken ht = 50 cm
ht 50
Taken : bw = 30 cm
bf’ = 180 cm
3 3
b) ℓx = 390 = 195 cm
2 2
42
( T. section)
Sketch
bf
bf=175cm bw
hf
= 30cm hf =
ht
15 cm ht =
bw 50cm
4.2.3. Influence areas chart showing the beam type along c-c axis
that is considered as overloaded
11111
43
A B C D E
Summary
44
A L 1 B L2 C L3 D L 4 E
= 11.34KN
45
= 14.04KN
= 8.64 KN
= 69.63 KN
46
= 7.29KN
47
Mx
Mx
- +
L1= 4.20m
12 12
12 12
Mx
Mx
- +
L2= 5.20m
48
12 12
12 12
32.87KN/m = w
Mx
- +
L3= 3.20m
12 12
12 12
Mx Mx
- +
L4= 2.70m
49
12 12
12 12
Considering that :
- Joints A and E are rigid, so that moments at these points are zero
- Joints B attaching span BA and span BC
- Joints C attaching span CB and CD
- Joints D attaching span DC and span DE
According to formulas for calculation of DF and K value below:
a) DF of span BA
l l 0.24
0.558
50
1 1 1 1 0.24
+ 0.19 0.43
+ +
b) DF of span BC
DF =
l
5.20
= 0.19 = 0.19 = 0.442
5.20 4.20
c) DF of span BC
DF =
l
5.20
= 0.19 = 0.19 = 0.380
5.20 3.20
d) DF span CD
DF =
51
l
3.20
= 0.31 = 0.31 = 0.620
3.20 5.20
e) DF of span DC
DF =
l
3.20
= 0.31 = 0.31 = 0.456
3.20 2.70
f) DF of span DE
DF =
l
2.70
= 0.37 = 0.37 = 0.544
2.70 3.20
52
SPAN AB BA BC CB CD DC DE ED
53
54
2
a) MAB = WL1 = 31.36 x 4.20 x 4.20 = 69.15 KN.m
8 8
2
b) MBC = WL2 = 12.64 x 5.20 x 5.20 = 42.72 KN.m
8 8
2
c) MBC = WL3 = 32.87 x 3.20 x 3.20 = 42.07KN.m
8 8
2
d) MBC = WL4 = 29.23 x 2.70 x 2.70 = 26.64 KN.m
8 8
55.05 KN 28.69K
113.86KN 79.68KN 104.76KN
55
Summary
Effective depth (ℎ
ℎ ) = 50 cm – 3.00 cm = 47.00 cm
Rb * b * ho2= 1.40 * 30 * 47 * 47
Where ℎ is the thickness of the flange of the 𝛾 section. For that the compression
area is reinforced, we have :
𝛾 x𝛾𝛾 x ℎ= 0.980 x 40 x 47
Because of the minimum bar in the beam is Ø 12, we must use Ø16
56
0.960 x 40 x 47
Taken 3 Ø 14 = 4.62 cm 2
= (Vmax)2
4φ ℎℎ2
57
= 0.09 KN/cm2
qsw
= 196.29 cm
0.164 KN/Cm2
Note: The distance between stirrups must be lesser than the three
following values
Vmax
Vmax 76.67
58
59
3 Ø 16 HR
Note: In order to respect the homogeneity and architectural appearance, all the beam
have to maintain the same cross section like above one.
Without doing calculation, the theory assumes that the cross section of the tie beam
(plinth beam) have to be in the following range.
a)
Taken h = 0.30m
b) b 20 cm
Taken b = 0.25
60
SKECTH
Ø8@20cm 6Ø 12 30 cm
25cm
Without calculation, the theory assumes that the cross section of the lintel beam have
to be in following range.
a) h>20cm
b) b=thickness of the wall maconery
c) As=1% of the cross section of the lintel beam.
Therefore, cross section
characteristics are: a) h=20cm
) b=20cm
c) As=1%*20cm*20cm=4cm2
SKECTH
61
4Ø 12
20 cm
20cm
End conditions
a 25 cm
RCDI)
a) Column loading area = (2.10 x 4.10 ) + (2.10 x 5.10 ) + (5.10 x 3.80) + (3.80 x
4.10) = 13.58m2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
63
g) Load from the light roof ≅Permanent load from slab = 68.44KN = 34.22KN
2 2
reinforcement
0.25
φ 0.91
AS = =
RS
40
40
64
Negative sign indicate that compression steel reinforcement is not required because
AS< 0
Therefore the theory assumes that the minimum percentage of steel reinforcement
must be evaluated as follows
Asmin = 0.004 Ab
But, because of the minimum diameter of bar in the column is assumed as Ø 12, we
must use 4 Ø12
65
Thus we use Ø 8 @ 15 cm
25 cm
6Ø12
25 cm 8 @ 15cm
put
4.4.DESIGN OF PAD FOUNDATIONfooting nº 22
66
NC = 177.09KN
NC = 177.09 KN = 17.71 KN
10 10
PS 200
Af = 0.974cm2 af x bf = √0 .98��
2
=
Af = 1.00m2
Qf = Nf - ∆q ≤ Rbt X Ab
67
af = bf = sides of footing
ℎℎ = 30 cm – 5 cm = 35 cm
= 200 cm
∆q = ℎ
(ℎ+ 2 )( ℎ+ 2 ℎ𝛾)
∆q = 0.013
/ / 2
(25 + 2 20) ( 25 + 2 x 25)
∆q = 0.013 75 75
∆q = 73.13
68
Thus : = 𝛾𝛾 − ∆q ≤
Footing
Thus :
As = cm2
0.
69
70
7Ø14
S/Total = 5.36m2
71
N1=(27.01KN+12.86KN+74.85KN+18.71KN)+(6.30KN*2) + 13.51
KN N1=133.43KN+12.60KN+13.51KN=159.54KN
Lo = 07 * 3.00 = 2.10m
0.25m
AS = = =
RS 40 40
Negative sign indicates that compression steel reinforcement is not required because
AS ˂ 0. Therefore that theory assumes that the minimum percentage of steel
reinforcement must be evaluated as follows
Asmin = 0.004 * Ab
72
S= 300mm
6Ø12
25m
25m
NC =
NC = 112.81KN
= 0.62cm2
73
= 1.00m
Qƒ q Rbt * Ab
P= 0.016 KN/cm2
= = sides of footing
Let us take
um = 2(act+bc+2ho) = 2 (25+25+2*20)
Um = 120cm
74
Th =
∆ 4− ∆≤ ∗ = 159.54− 59 . 𝛾𝛾 ≤ 0.9 ∗
us 1 360
0 0
=
0 100.39< 324 0
9
𝛾𝛾 5
The condition is satisfaction; therefore no punching shear
𝛾𝛾
4.5
.4.
𝛾𝛾𝛾 = Bending moment about side 𝛾𝛾𝛾𝛾𝛾 =
of the footing
Bending moment about side 𝛾𝛾
the
Wh
footing
ere
= 1.37cm2 Ø14@20cm
100 cm
Be
cau
se
af = 100 cm
Steel reinforcement arrangement
75
Stirrup = Ø
25 cm
4.5
.5.
6Ø14 25cm
100cm
76
satisfactory R=183mm
G=278mm
Preliminary sizing of staircase members
slab=3000mm
120cm
250cm
490cm
77 120cm
a) Plan view
ℎ= dℓ + 2𝛾 1 = 18 + 2 x 18.33 = 33.21 cm
Cos∝ 3 0.85749
3
78
Where dl = thickness of slab of stair case and h = waist of slab of stair case and H1 =
rise of stair
P = 18.06KN/m
P1 = 12.95KN/m
P 1= 12.95KN/m
P1 = 12.95 KN/m
79
L = 4.90m
8
8
L= 4.90 m
* RA = RB = PL = 5.11*2.50 = 6.39KN
2 2
Mx
RA
80
Mx
RA = 6.39KN
Mx – RA *X + P2 ( X – 1.00)2
X = 11.50 = 2.25m
- 5.11
2 2
81
4.6.4.
Calculation of
MmaxMmax =
Mmax1 +
Mmax2
m = 0.038 n = 0.980
Because of we have to use at least 5 Φ 14/ m in the slab, therefore we take the
minimum Provide 1 Φ14 @ 20cm as main steel reinforcement, it means 1
Ø14@20cm Distribution steel reinforcement
82
18. 33 cm
5ø14/m
5ø12/m
83
R= Rise = 18.33cm
T= Tread = 27.78 cm
Dl = Thickness of slab = 18 cm
=l-p
84
85
86
87
88
CHAPTER7
Owningcost
6×2250
89
537×30=161.10per hr
100
=30,000=13.30per hr 2250
2250
537+656+40+97.78+161.1+13.3+22.3=1487.88
fuel/hr=225×104=520sh/hr
45
45
=520+40+125+60+50=7
95ksh total running and
operating
cost/hr=2,282ksh
Output of excavator
1.5
90%efficiency=40×90%= 36 buckets
= 36×0.45m3 =15.12m3
Hardcore
cost per
m3 =
800×1.7
5=1400
sh
(add20
%comp
actiona
nd5%w
aste)
20%
of1400
=350
91
5%
of1400
=70
350+70+1400 =1820
1×1×0.25=455sh
Labour
0.25m3=20sh
50m3 hardcore=1hr
1000
Add 5%waste
and
10%compaction=
863sh 1m3 = 863
0.05= 43.15ksh
10 mins to spread
92
93
60
Compaction Assume
Sand
50 mm per m2 Assume
unskilled labour= 50sh per hr cost of sand 700 per tonne density of sand
=1500kg/m3 cost per m3 = 1500× 700=1050
1000
cost of 50 mm
sand 1m3 =
1207.5
94
95
CHAPTER EIGHT
Before the start of the project the site shall be cleared t o ensure smooth progress of work.
Temporary structures to be put up to cater for the clerk office, site manage, material store
and toilets.
• Water point shall be near the mixer and away from the cement store.
Before the start of the project the site shall be cleared t o ensure smooth progress of
work.
Temporary structures to be put up to cater for the clerk office, site manage, material
store and toilets.
• Water point shall be near the mixer and away from the cement store.
• Mixer to be close to the proposed site for the structure to avoid dying of the
cement before placing and laying.
9-12 Backfilling
11-12 Removal of formwork 3
o 10-12 Compaction 3
CHAPTER NINE
SERVICES
FIRE REPORT
1. Class A Fire: Fire caused by carbonation material such as wood, cloth or paper,
where cooling by water is most effective of reducing the temperature of the burning
materials.
2. Class B Fire: Fire caused by inflammable liquids including petroleum, grease paints,
varnishes etc. where blanketing or smothering effects of agent which exclude
oxygen is more effective.
3. Class C Fire: Includes all the risks where the problem of extinguishing the fire is
increased due to the danger of electric shock. The fire is in the presence of live
electrical equipment or wiring. A non-conducting extinguishes agent is therefore
required. In case of fire breakout, the main switch should be switched off
immediately
1. Hinged hose reel 6mm @ nozzle fixed at them wall 1.5m above the floor level
situated into an escape corridor so that people living in the building as the first
firefighting. Hose reds will be fixed at interval of 25m apart.
2. Fire escape routes will be through stairs at the middle and the ends of the building.
3. Instruction of fire fighting incase of fire will be in posters hanged on the walls in
each floor.