Dormitory

AT

Gundu , Bhaktapur

Structural Analysis and Design Report

Structural Design Consultant:

Ripple Training and Consulting Services Pvt.Ltd.

Tokha, Kathmandu.

1
Table of Contents
1.0 Project Detail..............................................................3
1.1 INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................
1.1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................3
1.1.2 STRUCTURAL MODELING...................................................................................4
1.2 STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS FOR THE BUILDING..............................................................
1.3 GENERAL DATA FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.........................................................
1.3.1 Grade of Concrete...................................................................................................................
1.3.2 Reinforcement Steel................................................................................................................
1.3.3 Cover to Reinforcements........................................................................................................
1.3.4 Reference Codes.....................................................................................................................
1.4 LOAD CALCULATIONS......................................................................................................
1.4.1 Gravity Loads.............................................................................................................6
1.4.2 Live Loads..................................................................................................................6
1.4.3 Dead Load..................................................................................................................6
1.5 Seismic coefficient method......................................................................................................
1.6 Soft Storey.............................................................................................................................
1.7 LOAD COMBINATIONS....................................................................................................
1.8 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN PROCEDURE.........................................................................
2.0 Structural Analysis..............................................................13
2.1 3D modeling of the building:................................................................................................
2.2 User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation.........................................................................
2.3 MODAL PARTICIPATING MASS RATIOS..............................................................................
2.4 INTER STORY DRIFT:................................................................................................................
2.5 Irregularity Check of the Building.................................................................................................
2.5.1 Eccentricity Check....................................................................................................23
2.5.2 Torsional Irregularity Check.....................................................................................23
2.6. Base reaction:................................................................................................................................
3.0 Design of Elements..............................................................26
3.1 Design of Mat /Raft Footing..........................................................................................................
3.2 Sample Design of Slab...................................................................................................................
3.3 Beam Summary.............................................................................................................................
3.4 Column Summary..........................................................................................................................
3.5 Strong Column Weak Beam..........................................................................................................
4.0 Design input municipality format.....................................44

2
1.0 Project Detail

Name of the Project: Staff Quarter Building

Location : Gundu, Bhaktapur

Type of Building: The Building covers a total plinth area of 451.37 Sqft. The building
is divided into 3 blocks. The blocks A (Top) and C (Bottom) have
Basement + 5 storey. The block B (mid) has 6 stories.

1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and design
of the residential building to be built as partial requirement of application for permit to construct
building. This Report describes in brief about the Structural Aspects and Design Report of the

3
proposed building. The analysis and design have been carried out using finite element software
ETABS 2016. This software provide the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to
create, modify, analyze, design, and optimize the structural elements in a building model. The
structure design is intended to be based primarily on the current National Building Code of
Practice of India taking account of relevant British Codes for the provisions not covered in this
and is generally in conformance with NBC.

1.1.2 STRUCTURAL MODELING

A three-dimensional mathematical model of the physical structure should be used that
represents the spatial distribution of the mass and stiffness of the structure to an extent that is
adequate for the calculation of the significant features of its dynamic response. Thus, the essential
requirements of the model are that, it should include the sufficient detail in geometry, support,
material, members, loading, strength, rigidity, stability etc. such that it reflects the real and true
prototype of a physical structure. In modeling, for the vertical loading system, the deflection on the
column in axial direction is so minimal that we can neglect it. It is because of high rigidity of
column in axial direction whereas in horizontal loading system, the in-plane stiffness of floor is
assumed to be very high compared to the stiffness of other frame members in that plane. It is
because of the presence of floor slab. Since, floor slab has very high in-plane rigidity, the member
like column, wall and braces connected to that plane are assumed to move as a single unit in the
lateral direction. This system is known as rigid floor diaphragm in which beam is monolithically
connected with slab providing negligible bending in the vertical plane.
For the modeling of this building, ETABS 2016 software was used. ETABS 2016 is a
sophisticated, yet easy to use, special purpose analysis and design program developed specifically
for building systems. ETABS 2016 features an intuitive and powerful graphical interface coupled
with unmatched modeling, analytical, design, detailing procedure, powerful numerical methods
and many international design codes all integrated using a common database. Although quick and
easy for simple structures, ETABS 2016 can also handle the largest and most complex building
models, including the wide range of nonlinear behaviors, making it the tool of choice for structural
engineers in the building industry.

1.2 STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS FOR THE BUILDING

The structural system chosen is RC building with SMRF (Special Moment Resisting
Frame). Columns and beams have been laid out in plan in coordination with architectural and
services planning that acts jointly support and transmit to the ground those forces arising from
earthquake motions, gravity and live load. Its role becomes increasingly important with the
increase in building height. Thus, the vital criteria for structural systems are an adequate reserve
of strength against failure, adequate lateral stiffness, and an efficient performance during the
service life of the building. The determination of the structural forms of a building involves the
selection and arrangement of the major structural elements to resist most efficiently the various
combinations of gravity and horizontal loadings. The choice of structural form is strongly
influenced by the internal planning, the material and method of construction, the external
architectural treatment, the location and routing of service systems, the nature and magnitude of
the horizontal loading, and the height and proportion of the building.

4
1.3 GENERAL DATA FOR STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Grade of Concrete and Cover to the Reinforcement is provided according to the provisions
of the NBC. The appropriate grade of concrete and nominal cover to reinforcement is governed by
the following main considerations:
I. Durability of Concrete including Fire resistance rating
II. Corrosion Protection of the Reinforcement
III. Bar Size
IV. Nominal maximum aggregate size

1.3.1 Grade of Concrete

The NBC Code 105:2020 permits a Minimum grade of structural concrete shall be M20,
but M25 for buildings more than 12 m in height.

Foundation: M25
Column: M25
Beam: M25
Slab: M25

1.3.2 Reinforcement Steel

All reinforcing steel to be used in the structural elements shall have a yield stress of 500
MPa, (Thermo-Mechanically Treated bars), conforming to IS: 1786-1985.

1.3.3 Cover to Reinforcements

Clear cover to the main reinforcement in the various structural elements shall be as
follows:

a) Footings (Bottom): 50mm

Footings (Top and Sides): 50 mm
b) Columns: 40 mm
c) Beams: 25 mm or bar diameter whichever is greater
e) Slabs: 15 mm or bar diameter whichever is greater

1.3.4 Reference Codes

Many international standard codes of practices were adopted for the creation of
mathematical model of this building, its analysis and design. As per the requirements, National
Building Code was used for the load combination in order to check for the worse case during
analysis.
Some of the codes used are enlisted below:

 IS 875:1998 (Part I) Code of Practice for Design Loads (Part I: Dead Loads)
 IS 875:1998 (Part II) Code of Practice for Design Loads (Part II: Imposed Loads)
 IS 456:2000 Plain and reinforced concrete Design Code of Practice
 IS 800:2007 Code of Practice for General Construction in Steel

5
  IS 13920:2016 Ductile Detailing of Criteria Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected to
Seismic Force
 IS 1893:2002 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Construction of Buildings
 IS 4326:1993 Earthquake Resistant Construction of Buildings
 SP 16: Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete
 NBC 105:2077:Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal

1.4 LOAD CALCULATIONS

1.4.1 Gravity Loads
Gravity loading is primarily due to the self-weight of the structure, superimposed dead
load and occupancy of the building. Following loads have been considered for the analysis and
design of the building based on the relevant NBC.

1.4.2 Live Loads

The Live Load for building has been adopted as given IS 875 - Part II:
Living room, Bed Room, Dormitories = 2 kN/m2
Billiards Rooms and Public Lounges = 3 kN/m2
Store Rooms = 5 kN/m2
Corridor/Staircase = 3 kN/m2
Normal Rooms = 2 kN/m2
Kitchen and Laundaries = 3 kN/m2
Lobby and Balcony=4 kN/m2
Baths and Toilets = 2 kN/m2
For Roofs (accessible) = 1.5 kN/m2
For Roofs (inaccessible) = .75 kN/m2

1.4.3 Dead Load

The Dead Load for building has been taken as following:
Floor Finish = 1.2 kN/ m2
Wall Load Calculation:

1 Unit Weights of materials

Brick masonry 19.00 kN/m3

Screed 21.00 kN/m3

Mosaic 23.10 kN/m3

Marble 26.70 kN/m3

Reinforced Concrete 25.00 kN/m3

Cement plaster 20.40 kN/m3

2 Heights of Beams, Walls &

6
 Parapet Walls

Depth of Beam 0.15 m

Height of Building 3.15 m

Height of Parapet Wall 1.00 m

Wall thickness 0.23 m

Plaster thickness (both interior

and exterior) 0.03 m

3 Dead Loads of Walls

a) Dead load of 230 mm thick wall 13.11 kN/m

KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 25.4 mm 1.53 m tal 14.64 KN/m

Dead load of 230 mm thick wall with 30 % opening (Outer wall) 9.18 kN/m

1.07 KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 25.4 mm 1 m tal 10.25 KN/m

Dead load of 230 mm thick wall with 20% opening (Inner wall) 10.49 kN/m

1.22 KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 25.4 mm 4 m tal 11.71 KN/m

Dead load of 230 mm thick wall with 10% opening (Inner wall) 11.80 kN/m

0.96 KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 25.4 mm 39 m tal 12.76 KN/m

b) Dead load of 115 mm thick wall 6.56 kN/m

KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 25.4 mm 1.53 m tal 8.09 KN/m

Dead load of 115 mm thick wall with 30 % opening (Outer wall) 4.59 kN/m

1.07 KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 25.4 mm 1 m tal 5.66 KN/m

Dead load of 115 mm thick wall with 20% opening (Inner wall) 5.24 kN/m

1.22 KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 25.4 mm 4 m tal 6.47 KN/m

c) Dead load of parapet wall (230 mm thick) 4.37 kN/m

with inside and outside plaster 32.5 mm 0.51 KN/ To 4.88 KN/m

7
 m tal

Dead load of parapet wall (115 mm thick) 2.19 kN/m

KN/ To
with inside and outside plaster 32.5 mm 0.51 m tal 2.70 KN/m

4 Floor Loads

Thickness of slab 0.13 m

Thickness of tile with plaster 0.03 m

Thickness of Mosaic 0.02 m

Thickness of Marble 0.02 m

Thickness of Screed 0.04 m

Thickness of Cement Plaster 0.01 m

Dead load of structural slab 3.13 kN/m2

Dead load of Tile 0.51 kN/m2

Dead load of Mosaic 0.46 kN/m2

Dead load of Marble 0.53 kN/m2

Dead load of screed 0.84 kN/m2

Dead load of Cement Plaster 0.26 kN/m2

Total dead load of Floor Finishes (Tile) 1.35 kN/m2

Total dead load of Floor Finishes (Mosaic) 1.30 kN/m2

Total dead load of Floor Finishes (Marble) 1.57 kN/m2

Total dead load of Floor Finishes (Cement Punning) 1.10 kN/m2

Dead load of light partition walls 1.20 kN/m2

1.5 Seismic coefficient method

The NBC 105:2077 contains provisions for both the static analysis and the dynamic
analysis of buildings. Static analysis using equivalent lateral force procedure is restricted to
regular buildings having height less than 40 m and irregular buildings having height less than 12
m in seismic Zone D. At the core of seismic analysis is the use of response spectra plot as given

8
in figure 4:1 of NBC105:2077, in which the spectral acceleration is plotted for wide range of
fundamental natural period of the structures. For the static analysis, the static forces in the
structure are derived from the design seismic base shear (Vi) given by:

Design of Horizontal Seismic Base shear V = Cd (T1)* W

Where,

Cd (T1) = Horizontal base shear coefficient as per 6.1

W = Seismic Weight of the building 5.2

Design Horizontal Seismic Coefficient:

Ultimate limit state

For the ultimate limit state, the horizontal base shear coefficient (design coefficient),
Cd (T1), shall be given by:

Cd(𝑇1)=C(𝑇1)/Rµ x Ωu ………………………………………. ….
………………..6.1(1)

Where,

C (T1) = Elastic Site Spectra as per 4.1.1

Rµ = Ductility Factor as per 5.3

𝛀u = Over strength Factor for ULS as per 5.4 6.1.2

Serviceability Limit State

For the serviceability limit state, the horizontal base shear coefficient (design coefficient),
Cd (T1), shall be given by:

Cd (𝑇1) = Cs(𝑇1)/ Ωs ………………………………………………..6.1(2)

Where,

Cs(T1) = Elastic Site Spectra determined for Serviceability Limit State as per 4.2

𝛀s = Over strength Factor for SLS as per 5.4

Where,

Z = (Zone Factor applicable for structures built in Dharan =0.3)

I = Importance factor for the buildings =1.25

Soil Type- B

9
 Seismic forces are calculated for Full Dead Load plus 30 percentage of Imposed Load.

Fundamental Natural Period (T)

As per NBC 105:2077 Clause 5.1.2 the approximate fundamental natural period of
vibration in seconds of the building which is moment resisting frame is given by empirical
expression
T = kt H ¾
Where, kt
= 0.075 for Moment resisting concrete frame
H = Height of the building from foundation or from top of a rigid basement.

Amplification of Approximate Period

The approximate fundamental time period calculated using empirical equation in
section 5 1.2 shall be increased by a factor of 1.25.

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OF SEISMIC FORCES

The lateral seismic force (Fi) induced at each level ‘i’ shall be calculated as:

Fi = (Wi hik /∑in Wi hik)X V

Where,

Wi = seismic weight of the structure assigned to level ‘i’

hi= height (m) from the base to level ‘i’

n= total number of floors/levels

V= horizontal seismic base shear calculated as per 6.2

k= an exponent related to the structural period as follows:

• For structure having time period T≤0.5sec, k=1

• For structure having time period T≥2.5sec, k=2

• for structure having period between 0.5 sec and 2.5 sec, k shall be determined by
linear interpolation between 1 and 2.

Calculation for Horizontal Seismic Coefficient:

Height (m) from the base to level (H):23.46m

Soil type: B

Importance factor: 1.25

Zoning Factor: 0.3

10
 T =1.25 * kt H ¾
For Block A and C,

T = 1.25*0.075*(15)3/4 (Height above the basement is considered)

= 0.714 sec

For Block B,

T = 1.25*0.075*(18)3/4 (Height above the basement is considered)

= 0.819 sec

Spectral Shape Factor, Ch (T):

1 + (𝛼 − 1) × (𝑇 /𝑇𝑎) 𝑖𝑓 𝑇 < 𝑇𝑎

Ch (T): 𝛼 𝑖𝑓 𝑇𝑎 ≤ 𝑇 ≤ 𝑇𝑐

𝛼 [𝐾 + (1 − 𝐾) (𝑇𝑐/ T )2 ] ( 𝑇𝑐/ 𝑇 )2 𝑖𝑓 𝑇𝑐 ≤ 𝑇 ≤
6

Where,

α - peak spectral acceleration normalized by PGA

Ta and Tc - the lower and upper periods of the flat part of the spectrum

K – Coefficient that controls the descending branch of the spectrum

From NBC 105: 2077, Table 4-1 Ta, Tc, α & K

Parameters Soil Type B

Ta 0.1

Tc 0.7

α 2.5

K 1.8

The value of Ta shall correspond to zero for Equivalent Static Method.

Ch(T): 2.25

The Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading shall be as given by equation 4.1(1).

C (T) =Ch(T) Z I........................................................................4.1(1)

C (T) =2.25*0.35*1

11
 =0.7875

The elastic site spectra for Serviceability Limit State shall be given by:

Cs (T) = 0.20 C (T)

Where C (T) = elastic site spectra for horizontal loading determined from clause 4.1.1.

Cs (T) = 0.20*0.64741

=0.1575

Table 5-2: Ductility and Over strength Factors

S. No. Structural System Rμ Ωu Ωs

Moment Resisting Frame Systems

1 Reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Frame 4 1.5 1.25

Ultimate limit state

Cd (𝑇1) = C (𝑇1)/Rµ x Ωu
=0.7875/ (4*1.5)
= 0.13125
Serviceability Limit State

Cd (𝑇1) = Cs(𝑇1)/ Ωs
= 0.1575/1.25
=0.126
For, T=0.714 sec (Block A and C)
For structure having period between 0.5 sec and 2.5 sec, k shall be determined by linear
interpolation between 1 and 2.

We get, K=1.107281

For T= 0.819 sec (Block B)

We get, K=1.1596

12
1.6 Soft Storey
A soft storey can be detected by comparing the stiffness of adjacent storeys.
Soft storeys are present in buildings with open fronts on the ground floor or tall storeys.

Fig 1: Open Ground Storey and Bare Frame

There is no soft storey in the proposed building since no storey level has changed in
mass and stiffness in considerate amount.

1.7 LOAD COMBINATIONS

Load Combinations for Parallel Systems

Where seismic load effect is combined with other load effects, the following load combination shall be
adopted.

1.2DL + 1.5LL
DL + λLL + E

Where, λ = 0.6 for storage facilities

= 0.3 for other usage

Load Combinations for Non- Parallel Systems

When lateral load resisting elements are not oriented along mutually orthogonal horizontal directions,
structure shall be designed for the simultaneous effects due to full design earthquake load in one direction
plus 30 percent of design earthquake load along the other horizontal direction. In this case, the following
load combination shall be adopted.

1.2DL + 1.5LL

DL + λLL + (Ex + 0.3Ey)

DL + λLL + (0.3Ex + Ey)

Where, λ = 0.6 for storage facilities

= 0.3 for other usage

13
1.8 ANALYSIS AND DESIGN PROCEDURE
Space frame analysis using ETABS 2016 software has been undertaken to obtain refined
results for all load combinations in accordance with Indian Standard Code.

The RCC design shall be based on NBC 105:2077 Code of practice for plain and
reinforced concrete, following Limit state philosophy. Structural design for typical members has
been done for the combination of loads that produces maximum stress in the structural elements,
and in turn requires maximum reinforcing steel provisions.

General Information on Structural Elements of the Building

Element Description Grade of Concrete Remarks

Column 600mm X 600mm M25

For Block A and C

550 mm X 400 mm
Main Beam M25 For Block B
350 mm X 550 mm

Secondary Beam 350 mm X 250 mm M25

Staircase Slab 175 mm M25

Slab 125 mm M25

Soil Bearing Capacity

Foundation Mat Footing M25
is taken as 146 kN/m2

The design of Columns and Beams is done directly using ETABS 2016 design software. The
design of Slab and footings are done by in house developed Worksheets in Excel. The size of
columns and beams are provided as per requirement.

The total lateral seismic load (base shear) is then distributed by the program among
different levels of the structure.

Mass Source
Load Multiplier
LIVE 0.3
WALL 1
STAIRCASE DEAD 1
STAIRCASE LIVE 1
FINISHING 1
PARTITION 1
WATER TANK LOAD 1
DEAD 1

14
2.0 Structural Analysis
The analysis and design have been carried out using software called SAP2000 &ETABS

v 15.2.2. It provides the Structural Engineer with all the tools necessary to create, modify,

analyze, design, and optimize the structural elements in a building model.

The building geometry based on architectural drawings been generated using above

named software. The dead load, live load and lateral loads were supplied to the digital

models as per standard code of practices. Several analysis run were performed to achieve

the best result to meet the design and service requirements.

For the analysis, following loading parameters were considered:

i. Self-weight of the frames and slabs

ii. Floor finishing dead loads

iii. Fixed wall loads as per architectural drawings

iv. Partition wall loads as per architectural drawings only.

v. Live loads

2.1 3D modeling of the building:

i. 3D model of the building
ii. Plan of the building
iii. Elevation of the building

3D Modeling of the building

15
BlOCK A

BLOCK B

16
 BLOCK C

Plan of the building

BLOCK A

17
BLOCK B

BLOCK C

18
Elevation of the building

BLOCK A

BLOCK B

19
 BLOCK C

2.2 User Coefficient Auto Seismic Load Calculation

Limit W V
C
state (kN) (kN)
BLOCK A SLS 0.126 12596.45 1587.28
ULS 0.131 12596.45 1650.266
BLOCK B SLS 0.126 12937.97 1694.873
ULS 0.131 12937.97 1630.18
BLOCK C SLS 0.126 15612.41 2045.23
ULS 0.131 15612.41 2045.23

2.3 MODAL PARTICIPATING MASS RATIOS

NBC105:2020 clause 7.3 states that number of modes to be used in the analysis should be such that the
sum total of modal masses of all modes considered is at least 90 percent of the total seismic mass of the
structure. The analysis was carried out for 20 modes so that the mass participation satisfies this criterion
in both orthogonal directions. The table shows time period and mass participation ratio for all modes.

20
Table: Time period and mass participation ratio(BLOCK A)
Period
Case Mode UX UY Sum UX Sum UY
sec
Modal 1 0.933 0.6444 0.0244 0.6444 0.0244

Modal 2 0.88 0.0274 0.635 0.6718 0.6594

Modal 3 0.676 0.0011 0.0983 0.673 0.7577

Modal 4 0.278 0.0473 0.0587 0.7203 0.8164

Modal 5 0.271 0.0564 0.05 0.7767 0.8664

Modal 6 0.205 0.0001 0.0154 0.7768 0.8818

Modal 7 0.149 0.0026 0.0398 0.7794 0.9216

3.68E- 1.029E-
Modal 8 0.148 0.7794 0.9217
05 05

Modal 9 0.139 0.0497 0.0024 0.8291 0.924

Modal 10 0.111 0.0001 0.0059 0.8292 0.93

Modal 11 0.096 0.0006 0.0235 0.8298 0.9535

Modal 12 0.085 0.0253 0.0006 0.8551 0.9541

Time period and mass participation ratio(BLOCK B)

Period
Case Mode UX UY Sum UX Sum UY
sec
6.425E- 6.425E-
Modal 1 0.995 0.7457 0.7457
06 06

1.384E-
Modal 2 0.804 0.7676 0.7676 0.7457
05

Modal 3 0.7 0.0001 0.0081 0.7678 0.7538

1.332E-
Modal 4 0.328 0.1304 0.7678 0.8842
06

3.542E-
Modal 5 0.279 0.1326 0.9004 0.8842
06

Modal 6 0.24 0.0001 0.0012 0.9005 0.8854

3.695E-
Modal 7 0.167 0.0627 0.9005 0.9481
06

21
 1.268E-
Modal 8 0.152 0.0512 0.9516 0.9481
05

Modal 9 0.136 0.0002 0.0007 0.9518 0.9488

Modal 10 0.105 0.0046 0.0005 0.9564 0.9494

Modal 11 0.104 0.0103 0.0003 0.9667 0.9497

1.478E-
Modal 12 0.098 0.031 0.9667 0.9807
06

Time period and mass participation ratio(BLOCK B)

Period
Case Mode UX UY Sum UX Sum UY
sec
Modal 1 0.935 0.6672 0.0085 0.6672 0.0085

Modal 2 0.862 0.0094 0.6837 0.6766 0.6922

Modal 3 0.686 0.0012 0.0666 0.6778 0.7588

Modal 4 0.277 0.0875 0.0179 0.7652 0.7767

Modal 5 0.269 0.0166 0.0956 0.7818 0.8723

Modal 6 0.208 0.0001 0.0116 0.782 0.884

Modal 7 0.148 0.0035 0.0387 0.7855 0.9226

4.922E-
Modal 8 0.147 0.0001 0.7855 0.9227
05

Modal 9 0.14 0.0488 0.0032 0.8343 0.9259

Modal 10 0.113 0.0001 0.0052 0.8344 0.9311

Modal 11 0.095 0.0006 0.0229 0.835 0.954

Modal 12 0.086 0.0248 0.0007 0.8599 0.9547

2.4 INTER STORY DRIFT:

In order to control deflection of structural elements, the criteria given in the Clause 5.6.3
of NBC 105:2077 is proposed to be used.
To control overall deformation due to earthquake load, the criteria given in Clause 5.6.3
of NBC 105:2077 is applied. The maximum deflection in any story due to the minimum specified

22
design lateral force, with partial load factor of 1.0 shall not exceed 0.006 times the story height.
Furthermore, the drift shall not exceed 0.006 in Serviceability Limit State and 0.025 in Ultimate
Limit State case.
BLOCK A
Table: Maximum displacement and Story Drifts due to EQx and EQy For UlS
Drift Ratio Check For Ultimate Limit State-NBC105:2020-Clause 5.6.3
Displacement Drift Ratio Drift Check
Elevation- Locatio Dis-X- Dis-Y-
Story
m n mm mm X Y X Y
0.00218 0.00246
Story7 19 49.802 58.785 8 1 <0.025O <0.025O
Top K K
0.00303 0.00263
Story6 16 43.238 51.402 5 9 <0.025O <0.025O
Top K K
0.00417 0.00413
Story5 13 34.134 43.485 0 3 <0.025O <0.025O
Top K K
0.00418 0.00398
Story4 10 21.623 31.087 0 9 <0.025O <0.025O
Top K K
0.00280 0.00400
Story3 7 9.084 19.121 7 3 <0.025O <0.025O
Top K K
0.00015 0.00164
Story2 4 0.662 7.111 7 3 <0.025O <0.025O
Top K K
0.00218 0.00246
Story1 0 0.036 0.54 8 1 <0.025O <0.025O
Top K K
19 49.802 58.785
Base Top 0 0

Table: Maximum displacement and Story Drifts due to EQx and EQy For SLS
Drift Ratio Check For Serviceability Limit State-NBC105:2020-Clause 5.6.3
Displacement Drift Ratio Drift Check
Locatio Dis-X- Dis-Y-
Story
Elevation-m n mm mm X Y X Y
Story 0.00210 0.00236
7 19 47.901 56.541 4 7 <0.006O <0.006O
Top K K
Story 0.00291 0.00253
6 16 41.588 49.44 9 8 <0.006O <0.006O
Top K K
Story 0.00401 0.00397
5 13 32.831 41.825 1 5 <0.006O <0.006O
Top K K
Story 10 Top 20.797 29.901 0.00402 0.00383 <0.006O <0.006O
23
 4 0 7
K K
Story 0.00270 0.00385
3 7 8.738 18.391 0 0 <0.006O <0.006O
Top K K
Story 0.00015 0.00158
2 4 0.637 6.84 1 0 <0.006O <0.006O
Top K K
Story 0.00210 0.00236
1 0 0.035 0.519 4 7 <0.006O <0.006O
Top K K
0.00291 0.00253
Base 19 Top 47.901 56.541 9 8

BLOCK B
Table: Maximum displacement and Story Drifts due to EQx and EQy For UlS
Drift Ratio Check For Ultimate Limit State-NBC105:2020-Clause 5.6.3
Displacement Drift Ratio Drift Check
Elevation- Dis-X- Dis-Y-
Story
m Location mm mm X Y X Y
Story7 19 49.301 64.262 0.001840 0.002763
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story6 16 43.78 55.974 0.002639 0.003441
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story5 13 35.864 45.651 0.003209 0.004133
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story4 10 26.237 33.251 0.003490 0.004606
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story3 7 15.766 19.434 0.003303 0.004253
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story2 4 5.858 6.675 0.001953 0.002225
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story1 0 0 0 0.001840 0.002763
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK

Table: Maximum displacement and Story Drifts due to EQx and EQy For SLS
Drift Ratio Check For Serviceability Limit State-NBC105:2020-Clause 5.6.3
Displacement Drift Ratio Drift Check
Dis-X- Dis-Y-
Story
Elevation-m Location mm mm X Y X Y
0.00265
0.001770
Story7 18 47.419 61.809 7
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00331
0.002538
Story6 15 42.109 53.838 0
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
24
 0.00397
0.003086
Story5 12 34.495 43.909 6
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00443
0.003357
Story4 9 25.236 31.982 0
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00409
0.003176
Story3 6 15.164 18.693 1
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00214
0.001878
Story2 3 5.635 6.42 0
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
Story1 0 0 0
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
BLOCK C
Table: Maximum displacement and Story Drifts due to EQx and EQy For UlS
Drift Ratio Check For Ultimate Limit State-NBC105:2020-Clause 5.6.3
Displacement Drift Ratio Drift Check
Elevation- Dis-X- Dis-Y-
Story
m Location mm mm X Y X Y
Story7 19 54.214 61.406 0.002305 0.002488
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story6 16 47.298 53.941 0.003223 0.002707
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story5 13 37.63 45.82 0.004509 0.004265
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story4 10 24.102 33.026 0.004615 0.004136
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story3 7 10.256 20.618 0.003159 0.004185
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story2 4 0.78 8.062 0.000246 0.002611
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK
Story1 0 0.043 0.23 0.002305 0.002488
Top <0.025OK <0.025OK

Table: Maximum displacement and Story Drifts due to EQx and EQy For SLS
Drift Ratio Check For Serviceability Limit State-NBC105:2020-Clause 5.6.3
Displacement Drift Ratio Drift Check
Dis-X- Dis-Y-
Story
Elevation-m Location mm mm X Y X Y
0.00239
0.002217
Story7 19 52.145 59.063 4
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00260
0.003100
Story6 16 45.493 51.882 4
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00410
0.004337
Story5 13 36.194 44.071 2
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
25
 0.00397
0.004439
Story4 10 23.182 31.766 8
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00402
0.003038
Story3 7 9.865 19.831 6
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00251
0.000236
Story2 4 0.75 7.754 1
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK
0.00239
0.002217
Story1 0 0.041 0.221 4
Top <0.006OK <0.006OK

2.5 Irregularity Check of the Building

2.5.1 Eccentricity Check.

Table: Eccentricity Calculation
Eccentricity Calculation
Length Length- ex- ey- ex- ey-
Story Diaphragm -x y Cm-x Cm-y Cr-x Cr-y m m % %
5.965 5.874
Story1 D1 11.372 19.96 9.9237 9.9791 0.09 0.06 0.8 0.3
1 1
5.929 5.883
Story2 D2 11.372 19.96 9.9234 9.9782 0.05 0.05 0.4 0.3
2 8
5.938
Story3 D3 11.372 19.96 9.9373 5.889 9.9777 0.05 0.04 0.4 0.2
8
5.965 5.892
Story4 D4 11.372 19.96 9.9237 9.9775 0.07 0.05 0.6 0.3
1 4
5.965 5.894
Story5 D5 11.372 19.96 9.9237 9.9774 0.07 0.05 0.6 0.3
1 8
6.098 5.896
Story6 D6 11.372 19.96 10.6134 9.9774 0.20 0.64 1.7 3.2
2 8
5.967 5.897
Story7 D7 11.372 19.96 10.1308 9.9777 0.07 0.15 0.6 0.8
7 9
Eccentricity<10%, So provided accidental eccentricity is ok.

2.5.2 Torsional Irregularity Check

Table: Torsional Irregularity Calculation
Torsional Irregularity Check-Clause 5.5.2.1 NBC 105:2020
Displacement-X Displacement-Y
Min Max Ratio Check Ratio Check
58.04
72.86 56.197 1.297 52.266 1.111
<1.5ok 7 <1.5ok
Story7
26
 54.62
68.403 52.721 1.297 49.183 1.111
<1.5ok 9 <1.5ok
Story6
48.68
60.759 46.848 1.297 43.822 1.111
<1.5ok 9 <1.5ok
Story5
49.973 38.544 1.297 <1.5ok 40.19 36.161 1.111 <1.5ok
Story4
29.66
36.748 28.333 1.297 26.683 1.112
<1.5ok 6 <1.5ok
Story3
17.95
22.137 17.043 1.299 16.146 1.112
<1.5ok 6 <1.5ok
Story2
8.071 6.194 1.303 <1.5ok 6.596 5.93 1.112 <1.5ok
Story1

2.6. Base reaction:

FOundation Reaction A

27
FOundation Reaction B

28
 FOundation Reaction C

NOTE: More than 50% of area will be covered with isolated footing so construction of mat
footing is recommended. Design of mat footing is done.

3.0 Design of Elements

3.1 Design of Mat /Raft Footing
soil bearing capacity ∗ factor of safety
Soil subgrade modulus of elasticity (K) =
permissible settlement

1 46 ∗3
=
25/1000

= 17520 kN/m3

29
Maximum foundation settlement=7.5mm < 25mm (OK)

30
Maximum Soil Pressure is 125.75Kn/m2 <146Kn/m2(OK)

31
Punching shear max 0.63 <1 (OK)

32
 Required reinforcement in Block A and C(additional to 20 mm
@100 mm)

Required reinforcement in Block B(additional to 20 mm @150 mm)

Provide Depth of Mat footing =800mm

Depth from Ground Level of=1200mm
Grade of concrete: M20
33
 Provide 20mmφ bars @ 150 mm c/c in X-direction
Provide 20mmφ bars @ 150 mm c/c in Y-direction.
Please Refer Structural Drawings for further details.

3.2 Sample Design of Slab

DESIGN OF TWO WAY SLAB:

1.
0 General Data:

Depth of slab : (D) 125 mm

Grade of Concrete : (fck) 25 N/mm2

Grade of Steel : (fy) 500 N/mm2

Effective cover: (d') 20 mm

Effective depth of slab : (d) 105 mm

Effective length:

Shorter span: (lx) 3.45 m

Longer span: (ly) 4.35 m

2.
0 Loading:

Dead Load: (DL) 3.125 KN/m2

Other Dead Load: (ODL) 2.5 KN/m2

Live Load: (LL) 2 KN/m2

Total Load: (w) 7.625 KN/m2

Factored Load: (wu) 11.4375 KN/m2

3.
0 Type of slab:

1.261

34
 Two way
Type: Slab

4.
0 Calculation of Moments:

Moment coefficient:

Type of Slab Panel: 3

Short span coefficient: αx

Support S 0.05505

Mid Span M 0.04205

Long span coefficient: αy

Support S 0.037

Mid Span M 0.028

Moments:

Short span moments:

Support S 7.495 KN-m

Mid Span M 5.725 KN-m

Long span moments:

Support S 5.037 KN-m

Mid Span M 3.812 KN-m

5. Check depth for maximum

0 Moments:

Maximum moments: Mu 7.495 KN-m

Moment coefficient: k 0.134

effective depth: d 53 < 105 mm

OK

35
6.
0 Calculation of reinforcement:

6.
1 For shorter span

(Ast)m
Mim'm reinforcement in 126 mm2

Design moment: Mx 7.495 KN-m

Neutral axis depth : x 11 mm

Area of steel required: Ast 172 mm2

Area of steel provided: Ø 8 mm

S 150 mm

Ast 336 mm2

Pt 0.32 %

For longer span

Effective depth d 97 mm

(Ast)m
Mim'm reinforcement in 117 mm2

Design moment: Mx 5.037 KN-m

Neutral axis depth : x 8 mm

Area of steel required: Ast 126 mm2

Area of steel provided: Ø 8 mm

S 150 mm

Ast 336 mm2

Pt 0.347 %

7.
0 Check for shear stress:

Maximum shear force: Vu 19.73 KN

36
 Shear Stress: tv 0.188 N/mm2

β 7.257

Concrete Shear Strength: tc 0.399 N/mm2

Shear Strength factor: K 1.3

> 0.188
'
Shear Strength of Slab: t c 0.5187 N/mm2

OK

8.
0 Check for development length:

Ultimate moment Capacity: M1 14.12 KN-m

Maximum Shear Force: V 19.73 KN

Bond Stress: tbd 1.92 N/mm2

Development length: Ld 454 mm

Anchorage length: L0 105 mm

Available length: 1036 > Ld

OK

8.
0 Check for deflection:

length to eff. Depth ratio: l/d 32.858

α 23

β 1

148.4523 N/
ϒ 2.000 for fs = 81 mm2

37
 δ 1 and Pt = 0.32 %

λ 1

Coefficient: 46.000

OK

3.3 Beam Summary

First floor beam layout(BLock A)

38
 First floor beam layout(BLock B)

First floor beam layout(BLock C)

ETABS Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016Beam Section Design

39
 Beam Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)
Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
1F B129 30 Beam 400x550 DL+0.3LL+RSX 304.8 3960 1

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) bf (mm) ds (mm) dct (mm) dcb (mm)
400 550 400 0 32 32

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Factored Forces and Moments

Factored Factored Factored Factored
Mu3 Tu Vu2 Pu
kN-m kN-m kN kN
-259.5427 17.786 177.7524 0

Design Moments, Mu3 & Mt

Factored Factored Positive Negative
Moment Mt Moment Moment
kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m
-259.5427 24.8481 251.8573 -284.3909

Design Moment and Flexural Reinforcement for Moment, Mu3 & Tu

Design Design -Moment +Moment Minimum Required
-Moment +Moment Rebar Rebar Rebar Rebar
kN-m kN-m mm² mm² mm² mm²
Top (+2 Axis) -284.3909 1476 0 1476 497
Bottom (-2 Axis) 251.8573 1278 1278 0 738

Shear Force and Reinforcement for Shear, Vu2 & Tu

Shear Ve Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
263.6789 0 334.823 226.383 1791.16

Torsion Force and Torsion Reinforcement for Torsion, Tu & VU2

Tu Vu Core b1 Core d1 Rebar Asvt /s
kN-m kN mm mm mm²/m
17.786 177.7524 356 506 746.88

40
3.4 Column Summary

BLOCK A

41
 BLOCK B

BLOCK C

ETABS 2019 Concrete Frame Design

IS 456:2000 + IS 13920:2016 Column Section Design

42
 Column Element Details Type: Ductile Frame (Summary)
Level Element Unique Name Section ID Combo ID Station Loc Length (mm) LLRF
1F C62 574 Column 610*610 DL+0.3LL+RSX 0 3352.8 0.539

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
609.6 609.6 58 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Design For Pu , Mu2 , Mu3

Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Minimum M2 Minimum M3 Rebar Area Rebar %
kN kN-m kN-m kN-m kN-m mm² %
9.681 135.2521 622.3573 0.251 0.251 6537 1.76

Axial Force and Biaxial Moment Factors

K Factor Length Initial Moment Additional Moment Minimum Moment
Unitless mm kN-m kN-m kN-m
Major Bend(M3) 0.67257 2802.8 348.5406 0 0.251
Minor Bend(M2) 0.654773 2802.8 75.6199 0 0.251

Shear Design for Vu2 , Vu3

Shear Vu Shear Vc Shear Vs Shear Vp Rebar Asv /s
kN kN kN kN mm²/m
Major, Vu2 212.4533 213.2369 134.5013 134.2271 675.7
Minor, Vu3 128.2534 213.2369 134.5013 128.2534 675.7

Joint Shear Check/Design

Joint Shear Shear Shear Shear Joint Shear
Force VTop Vu,Tot Vc Area Ratio
kN kN kN kN cm² Unitless
Major Shear, Vu2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Minor Shear, Vu3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1.4) Beam/Column Capacity Ratio

Major Ratio Minor Ratio
N/A N/A

Additional Moment Reduction Factor k (IS 39.7.1.1)

Ag Asc Puz Pb Pu k
cm² cm² kN kN kN Unitless
3716.1 65.4 6632.0972 2099.1558 9.681 1

Additional Moment (IS 39.7.1)

Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Major Bending (M3 ) Yes 0.836 609.6 3.092 12 No 0

43
 Consider Length Section KL/Depth KL/Depth KL/Depth Ma
Ma Factor Depth (mm) Ratio Limit Exceeded Moment (kN-m)
Minor Bending (M2 ) Yes 0.836 609.6 3.01 12 No 0

Notes:
N/A: Not Applicable
N/C: Not Calculated
N/N: Not Needed

3.5 Strong Column Weak Beam

Ground Floor Column at grid B1 along Grid 1

Upper Column
Material Characteristics:
Concrete Grade: M25
Steel Grade: TMT Fe 500
Section Characteristics:
Size of column =600mm*600mm
Effective Cover (d') = 40 mm
D’/D= 0.06~ 0.1 for all Column
Lower Column
Pu= 711.95374 KN
Reinforcement provided= (8-25+4-20) mm dia. Bar,
Area of steel in column=5176 mm2
Therefore, percentage reinforcement (pt) =1.43%
Pt/fck=0.0572
Pu/fck∗b∗D= 0.0791
From chart
Mu/fck∗b∗D2 = 0.08chart (48),
35 Detailed Analysis & Design Report of Building
Muv= 432 kN-M

Lower Column
Pu=839.0047KN
Reinforcement provided =4-32+8-25 mm dia. bar
Area of steel in column= 7143.982mm 2

Therefore, percentage reinforcement (p) = 1.98 %

Pt/fck=0.0792
Pu/fck∗b∗D=0.0932
From chart
Mufck∗b∗D2 = 0.11, chart (48),
Muv= 594 KN-M

Then,
TOTAL MOMENT= (432+594)KN-M = 1026 KN-m
44
 Beam of ground floor
Left beam
Concrete Grade = M20 (fck= 25N/mm2)
Steel Grade = TMT Fe500 (fy= 500 N/mm2)
Width of Beam (bw) = 400 mm
Overall depth (D) = 550mm
Effective cover (d’) = 37.5 mm
Effective depth (d) = 512.5 mm
Limiting moment capacity of the Rectangular Beam
Mu,lim= 0.133fckbd2(for Fe500)
Balanced Depth of Neutral Axis
(Xu,lim) = 0.46d = 0.46*512.5 = 235.75 mm
Moment =298.2271 KN-M
Right beam
Width of Beam (bw) = 300mm
Overall depth (D) = 500mm
Mu,lim= 0.133fckbd2(for Fe500)
Balanced Depth of Neutral Axis
(Xu,lim) = 0.46d = 0.46*462.5 = 235.75mm
Moment = 305.30 KN-M
Total moment=(298.2271+305.30)KN-M=603.5271 KN-M
Check for strong column weak beam
Ratio of total column moment/total beam moment=1026/603.5271=1.70>1.5 ok

BLOCK A

45
BLOCK B

BLOCK C

46
 ETABS 2016 Concrete Frame Design
IS 456:2000 Column Section Design (Envelope)

Column Element Details

Level Element Unique Name Section ID Length (mm) LLRF
1F C62 574 Column 610*610 3352.8 0.539

Section Properties
b (mm) h (mm) dc (mm) Cover (Torsion) (mm)
609.6 609.6 58 30

Material Properties
Ec (MPa) fck (MPa) Lt.Wt Factor (Unitless) fy (MPa) fys (MPa)
25000 25 1 500 500

Design Code Parameters

ɣC ɣS
1.5 1.15

Longitudinal Reinforcement Design for Pu - Mu2 - Mu3 Interaction

Rebar Area Rebar
Column End
mm² %
Top 2973 0.8
Bottom 6537 1.76

Design Axial Force & Biaxial Moment for Pu - Mu2 - Mu3 Interaction
Design Pu Design Mu2 Design Mu3 Station Loc
Column End Controlling Combo
kN kN-m kN-m mm
kN kN-m kN-m mm
Top -16.3502 -13.8284 225.0184 2802.8 DL+0.3LL+RSY
Bottom 9.681 135.2521 622.3573 0 DL+0.3LL+RSX

Shear Reinforcement for Major Shear, Vu2

Rebar Asv /s Design Vu2 Station Loc
Column End Controlling Combo
mm²/m kN mm
Top 675.7 134.2271 2802.8 DL+0.3LL+eqy
Bottom 675.7 134.2271 0 DL+0.3LL+eqy

Shear Reinforcement for Minor Shear, Vu3

Rebar Asv /s Design Vu3 Station Loc
Column End Controlling Combo
mm²/m kN mm
Top 675.7 149.6697 2802.8 DL+0.3LL+eqy
Bottom 675.7 149.6697 0 DL+0.3LL+eqy

Joint Shear Check/Design

Shear Shear Joint
Joint Shear Controlling
Vu,Tot Vc Area
Ratio Combo
kN kN mm²
Major(Vu2) 0.321 596.7177 1858.0608 371612 DL+0.3LL+RSY

47
 Shear Shear Joint
Joint Shear Controlling
Vu,Tot Vc Area
Ratio Combo
kN kN mm²
Minor(Vu3) 0.321 530.5168 1858.0608 371612 DL+0.3LL+RSY

Beam/Column Capacity Ratios

SumBeamCap SumColCap
1.4(B/C) Column/Beam Controlling
Moments Moments
Ratio Ratio Combo
kN-m kN-m
Major33 0.64 2.189 280.0718 703.6707 DL+0.3LL+RSY
Minor22 0.611 2.291 294.9411 703.6707 DL+0.3LL+RSY

4.0 Design input municipality format

A. General Information:
(i) Structural Design By: - Ripple Training and Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd.

B. Geometrical Configuration of Structure:

(i) No. of Blocks:- 3
(ii) No. of Storey:- 6

C. Structural Analysis and Design:

(i) Structural Analysis Software:- ETABS2019
(ii) Structural System: - RC buildings with Special Moment Resisting Frame SMRF.
(iii) Foundation System:- Isolated and Combined Footing
(iv) Loading Parameters:
a) Dead Load:- As per IS875:1987 PartI
b) Live Load:- As per IS875:1987 PartII
c) Seismic Load :-(As per NBC105:2077)
(v) Load Combination Considered:- IS 1893:2002
(vi) Concrete Design code Referred:- IS456:2000
(vii) Ductile Detailing code Referred:- IS13920:2016
(viii) Concrete Grade Used:
Beam – M25
Slab – M25
Column – M25
Foundation – M25
(ix) Reinforcement Grade Used: - Fe500

Note:
Though the Architectural and Structural drawings of 5 storey building is only
provided but the building is designed for 7 storey so that in future it can be add up

48
to 2 storey above it and reinforcement provided in 5 storey building are adequate
for future expansion also.

49
50