Overview of Auditing and Assurance Engagements
Overview of Auditing and Assurance Engagements
Consideration when planning and performing Types of assurance engagement (as to level of assurance)
engagement:
a. Quantity of evidence (Sufficiency) ● Reasonable assurance engagement
b. Quality of evidence (Appropriateness) - Positive form of expression of
- Relevance and reliability practitioner’s expression
c. Materiality - Aims to reduce risk to an acceptably low
- Relevant when determining nature, timing, level
and extent of evidence-gathering - Performs more detailed work to gain
procedures, and when assessing whether sufficient appropriate evidence to reduce
the risks (TOC and ST)
● Limited assurance engagement - Practitioner obtains representation from
- Negative form responsible party that has performed
- Aims to reduce risk to a level that is evaluation or measurement (not available
acceptable to intended users)
- Generally requested by company based on
their purpose/objectives Non-assurance engagements
1. Agreed-upon procedures
- Based on procedures agreed upon by
auditor, third parties (if any)
Reasonable Limited
- Report on factual findings
Level of Reasonable or high, but Limited or moderate - Recipients of report must form their own
assurance not absolute conclusions from report by auditor
provided - Report is restricted to those parties who
have agreed to procedures to be performed
Form Positive Negative
Assurance
● Attestation
- Audit
- Review Detailed approach of Audit Process
- Other attest services
● Other services
- Performance review
- Examination of forecasts
Non-assurance
- Compilation
- Bookkeeping
- Management advisory
- Agreed-upon procedures
- Taxes services (no conclusion)
Auditing
- Systematic process of objectively obtaining and
evaluating evidence regarding assertions about
economic actions and events to ascertain the degree
of correspondence between these assertions and
established criteria and communicating the results
thereof