0% found this document useful (0 votes)
154 views24 pages

Debye Huckel Theory

The document discusses the Debye-Huckel Theory in electrochemistry, focusing on ionic strength, activity of ions, and the activity coefficient. It explains the interactions between ions in a solution and introduces the Debye-Huckel Limiting Law, which describes the relationship between ionic strength and activity coefficients. The document also covers the mathematical derivations and assumptions underlying the theory.

Uploaded by

snjha2850
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
154 views24 pages

Debye Huckel Theory

The document discusses the Debye-Huckel Theory in electrochemistry, focusing on ionic strength, activity of ions, and the activity coefficient. It explains the interactions between ions in a solution and introduces the Debye-Huckel Limiting Law, which describes the relationship between ionic strength and activity coefficients. The document also covers the mathematical derivations and assumptions underlying the theory.

Uploaded by

snjha2850
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

रसो वै सः ॥

Master of Science (Chemistry)


Compulsory Course (CC) -2 Physical Chemistry

Unit 2
Electrochemistry: Debye Huckel Theory

Sonu Ram Shankar


Assistant Professor
University Department of Chemistry
Lalit Narayan Mithila University, Darbhanga

1
Ionic Strength

Summation of the charge and concentration of each ion in the solution

1
𝐼𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑐 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ, 𝜇 = 𝑐𝑧
2

𝑐 is the molar concentration of each ion 𝑧 is the charge of each ion

for 0.10 M NaCl, ignoring [H3O+]and [OH–] ≈1.0×10−7 ≪ [Na+] and [Cl–] 𝐾 = 1.0 × 10

1 1 1 1
𝜇 . = 𝑁𝑎 × 1 + 𝐶𝑙 × −1 = 0.1 × 1 + 0.1 × 1 = 0.1 + 0.1 = 0.2 = 0.10
2 2 2 2

for 0.10 M Na2SO4 ignoring [H3O+], [OH–] and [HSO4–] 𝐾 = 1.0 × 10

1 1 1 1
𝜇 . = 𝑁𝑎 × 1 + 𝑆𝑂 × −2 = 0.2 × 1 + 0.1 × 4 = 0.2 + 0.4 = 0.6 = 0.3
2 2 2 2
2
Activity of Ion

FeCl3 and KSCN solutions are colorless.

Mixing them produce Fe(SCN)2+ reddish–orange color solution

Fe3+(aq) + SCN− (aq) ⇌ Fe(SCN)2+ (aq)

𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦, ∆𝐺 = 𝑅𝑇 ln 𝐾

𝐹𝑒 𝑆𝐶𝑁
𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝐾 =
𝐹𝑒 𝑆𝐶𝑁

Adding KNO3 to the solution makes the solution’s lighter color

shifts reaction to the left,

decreasing the effective concentration of Fe(SCN)2+ and increasing the concentrations of Fe3+ and SCN–.
3
Activity Coeffiecient

The true thermodynamic equilibrium constant using activities.

𝐴𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝐴 = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝐴 × 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡

𝑎 = 𝐴𝛾

𝑎 𝛾
𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝐾 =
𝑎 𝛾 𝑎 𝛾

Finding relation between activity coefficient and ionic strength

It is due to the ion-ion interaction

4
Ion-ion interaction
Model:

1. There is an ion with 𝑧 charge

2. There is a charge distribution around that ion +

3. the ion is interacting with charge distribution

4. All the ions interacting with each other

Assumptions

1. The solution a dielectric continuum of dielectric constant (relative permittivity) 𝜀. +

2. The ions are hard spheres.

3. The concentration is relatively low.

5
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
𝑛 number of ion per unit volume,

an ion with charge 𝑧 𝑒

At distance 𝑟, the potential 𝜓, ,

Potential energy of the ion with charge, 𝜓𝑒

According to Boltzmann distribution

The probability of a positive ion in region of potential; 𝑛 = 𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑝

The probability of a negative ion in region of potential 𝜓; 𝑛 = 𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑝

Net Charge density: 𝜌 = 𝑛 − 𝑛 𝑒 = 𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝 − 𝑒𝑥𝑝


6
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
The Poisson equation

𝜌
∇ 𝜓 𝑟 = −4𝜋
𝜀

the Laplacian operator, ∇ ,

in Cartesian coordinates: ∇ = + + is.

In spherical coordinates ∇ = 𝑟 + sin 𝜃 +

There is spherically symmetrical distribution of charge. There is no effect of 𝜃 and 𝜑

1 𝑑 𝑑𝜓 𝑟 𝜌
∇ 𝜓 𝑟 = 𝑟 = −4𝜋
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝜀
7
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
Substituting for charge density

4𝜋𝑛𝑒
∇ 𝜓 𝑟 =− 𝑒𝑥𝑝 − 𝑒𝑥𝑝
𝜀

When 𝜓 is small: 𝑒𝑥𝑝 =1+ + ⋯ and 𝑒𝑥𝑝 =1− +⋯

Substituting these

4𝜋𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝜓 𝑟 𝑒𝜓 𝑟 4𝜋𝑛𝑒 𝑒𝜓 𝑟 𝑒𝜓 𝑟 4𝜋𝑛𝑒 2𝑒𝜓 𝑟 8𝜋𝑛𝑒


∇ 𝜓 𝑟 =− 1− − 1+ =− 1− −1− =− − = 𝜓 𝑟
𝜀 𝑘𝑇 𝑘𝑇 𝜀 𝑘𝑇 𝑘𝑇 𝜀 𝑘𝑇 𝜀𝑘𝑇

If 𝜅 = ; 𝑟 =𝜅 𝜓 𝑟

8
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
If ; 𝜓 𝑟 =
Then

𝑑𝜓 𝑟 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑 1 𝑑 1 1𝑑 1 1 𝑑𝜇 𝜇 1 𝑑𝜇
= = 𝜇. =𝜇 + 𝜇 =𝜇 − + = − +
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟

Substituting =− +

1 𝑑 𝑑𝜓 𝑟 1 𝑑 𝜇 1 𝑑𝜇 1 𝑑 𝑑𝜇
𝑟 = 𝑟 − + = −𝜇 + 𝑟
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟

1 𝑑 𝑑 𝑑 𝑑𝜇 1 𝑑𝜇 𝑑 𝑑𝜇 𝑑𝜇 𝑑
= −𝜇 + 𝑟 = − +𝑟 + 𝑟
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟

1 𝑑𝜇 𝑑 𝜇 𝑑𝜇 1 𝑑 𝜇 1𝑑 𝜇
= − +𝑟 + = 𝑟 =
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟 𝑑𝑟

9
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

Substituting 𝜓 𝑟 = in 𝑟 =𝜅 𝜓 𝑟

1 𝑑 𝑑𝜓 𝑟 𝜇
𝑟 =𝜅
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟

Since 𝑟 =𝜅 and 𝑟 =

1𝑑 𝜇 𝜇
=𝜅
𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑟

𝑑 𝜇
=𝜅 𝜇
𝑑𝑟 10
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

Solving the differential

The differentiation of an exponential function is the product of the constant and the exponent function.

𝑒± = ±𝜅𝑒 ± and 𝑒± = ±𝜅 𝑒 ±

the differential equation in 𝜇 must have had an exponential in 𝜅𝑟

Two possible exponential functions, one of them would have a positive exponent and the other a negative one

The general solution of the linearized equation can therefore be written as

𝜇 = 𝐴𝑒 + 𝐵𝑒

where A and B are constants to be evaluated.


11
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
The Constant B

Since 𝜓 𝑟 =

𝑒 𝑒
𝜓 𝑟 =𝐴 +𝐵
𝑟 𝑟
the Coulombic forces,
𝜓 𝑟 → 0 as 𝑟 → ∞.
if B had a finite value
At infinity, 𝑟 → ∞, 𝜓 𝑟 → ∞
the electrostatic potential would shoot up to infinity, a physically unreasonable proposition.
This condition would be satisfied only if 𝐵 = 0.

So equation reduces to 𝜓 𝑟 = 𝐴

12
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
The constant 𝑨,
From Coulomb’s law
the potential is due to an isolated point charge of value 𝑧 𝑒.
𝑧𝑒
𝜓 𝑟 =
𝜖𝑟
At infinity, the concentration tends to zero, 𝑛 → 0

Since, 𝜅 = ∑𝑛 𝑧 then 𝜅 → 0

When 𝜅 → 0 then 𝑒 → 1 then 𝜓 𝑟 =

Substituting 𝜓 𝑟 = in 𝜓 𝑟 =

𝐴 𝑧𝑒
=
𝑟 𝜖𝑟
Or
𝑧𝑒
𝐴=
𝜖 13
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

Substituting 𝐴 = in 𝜓 𝑟 = 𝐴

𝑧 𝑒𝑒
𝜓 𝑟 =
𝜖 𝑟
the electrostatic potential varies with distance r from reference ion
𝑒 can be expanded using a Taylor series as

𝜅𝑟 𝜅𝑟
𝑒 = 1 − 𝜅𝑟 + − +⋯
2! 3!
For small values of 𝜅𝑟 (where 𝜅𝑟 ≪ 1), higher-order terms 𝜅𝑟 , 𝜅𝑟 ,… become negligible.
𝑒 ≈ 1 − 𝜅𝑟
Expanding the solution and retaining the first two terms
𝑧𝑒 𝑧𝑒𝜅
𝜓(𝑟) = −
𝜀𝑟 𝜀
14
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

𝑧𝑒 𝑧𝑒𝜅
𝜓(𝑟) = −
𝜀𝑟 𝜀

The term represents the Coulomb potential, gives the charge on the electrolytic solution as a whole.
This is zero because the solution as a whole must be electrically neutral.
𝑧𝑒
=0
𝜀𝑟
− is the potential due to the charge, 𝑧𝑒, at a distance, ,
The screening effect introduced by the exponential decay term.
𝑧𝑒𝜅
𝜓(𝑟) = −
𝜀

15
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

The Poisson equation 𝑟 = −4𝜋

Linearized equation 𝑟 =𝜅 𝜓 𝑟

The linear relation between excess charge density and potential


𝜀
𝜌=− 𝜅 𝜓 𝑟
4𝜋
Substituting 𝜓 𝑟 =

𝜀 𝑧 𝑒𝑒 𝑧𝑒 𝑒
𝜌=− 𝜅 =− 𝜅
4𝜋 𝜖 𝑟 4𝜋 𝑟
This ionic cloud;
𝑒 : The excess charge density decays with distance r in an exponential way.
-ve sign: The excess charge residing on the ion cloud is opposite in sign to that of the central ion.
a positively charged reference ion has a negatively charged ion atmosphere, and vice versa.

16
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

Interaction of ion with the cloud


Energy required to form the ionic atmosphere from 0 charge to 𝑧𝑒 charge

𝑧𝑒𝜅 𝜅 𝑧 𝑒 𝜅
𝑊 = − 𝑑 𝑧𝑒 = 𝑧𝑒 =
𝜀 2𝜀 2𝜀

For activity coefficient, of I ion 𝛾


𝑊 = 𝑘𝑇 ln 𝛾
Substituting

𝑧 𝑒 𝜅
ln 𝛾 =
2𝜀𝑘𝑇

17
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

If 𝜐 and 𝜐 are number of positive and negative ions


where
𝜐 =𝜐 +𝜐
mean activity coefficient
𝛾± = 𝛾 𝛾
𝜐 𝜐
ln 𝛾± = ln 𝛾 + ln 𝛾
𝜐 𝜐
For charge neutrality
𝜐 𝑧 =𝜐 𝑧

𝑒 𝜅
ln 𝛾± = − 𝑧 𝑧
2𝜀𝑘𝑇

18
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
For ionic strength

1
𝜇= 𝑐 𝑧
2

𝑐𝑁
𝑛 =
1000
𝑐 =𝑚𝜌
Where 𝜌 is density of the solvent

8𝜋𝑁 𝑒 𝜌 𝜇
𝜅 =
1000 𝜀𝑅𝑇

8𝜋𝑁 𝑒 𝜌 𝜇
𝜅=
1000 𝜀𝑅𝑇

19
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

for water 𝜌 = 1𝑔 𝑚𝑙

ln 𝛾± = −𝐴 𝑧 𝑧 𝜇

𝑁 𝑒 2𝜋
𝐴=
2.303𝜀𝑅𝑇 1000𝜀𝑅𝑇
Substituting the values of 𝑁 , 𝜋 and 𝜌
1.8246 × 10
𝐴=
𝜀𝑇

20
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

At 𝑇 = 25℃ and 𝜀 = 78.54 for water


𝐴 = 0.509

ln 𝛾± = −0.509 𝑧 𝑧 𝜇

21
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
Debye Huckell radius

Charge in a spherical shell of thickness

𝑞 = −𝑧 𝑒 𝜅 𝑟𝑒

At the maximum

𝑑𝑞 𝑑 𝑑
=0= −𝑧 𝑒 𝑒 𝜅 𝑟 = −𝑧 𝑒 𝜅 𝑒 𝑟 = −𝑧 𝑒 𝜅 𝑒 − 𝑟𝜅𝑒
𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟 𝑑𝑟

Since −𝑧 𝑒 𝜅 ≠ 0

𝑒 − 𝑟𝜅𝑒 =0

𝑒 = 𝑟𝜅𝑒

1 = 𝑟𝜅

1
𝑟=
𝜅 22
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law

23
Debye- Huckel Limiting Law
Effective Diameters (α) for Selected Ions
ion effective diameter (nm)
H3O+ 0.9
Li+ 0.6
Na+, IO−3, HSO−3, HCO3−, H2PO−4 0.45
OH–, F–, SCN–, HS–, ClO3−, ClO4−, MnO4− 0.35
K+, Cl–, Br–, I–, CN , NO2−, NO3− 0.3
Cs+, Tl+, Ag+, NH4+ 0.25
Mg2+, Be2+ 0.8
Ca2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Sn2+, Mn2+, Fe2+, Ni2+, Co2+ 0.6
Sr2+, Ba2+, Cd2+, Hg2+, S2– 0.5
Pb2+, SO42−, SO32− 0.45
Hg22+, SO42−, S2O32−, CrO42−, HPO42− 0.40
Al3+, Fe3+, Cr3+ 0.9
PO43−, Fe(CN)63− 0.4
Zr4+, Ce4+, Sn4+ 1.1
Fe(CN)64− 0.5
Source: Kielland, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59, 1675–1678. 24

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy