0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views2 pages

Equity Discussion

The document discusses the legal maxim 'where equities are equal, the first in time prevails,' emphasizing its application in determining priority between competing equitable interests in property. It analyzes the case of Musogo v. Kasagalya, where the court ruled in favor of William, who had a longer-standing equitable interest as a tenant, over Musogo, who failed to fulfill the payment terms for the land. The document highlights the importance of time and notice in establishing equitable interests within Uganda's legal framework.

Uploaded by

Kangwamu Finian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views2 pages

Equity Discussion

The document discusses the legal maxim 'where equities are equal, the first in time prevails,' emphasizing its application in determining priority between competing equitable interests in property. It analyzes the case of Musogo v. Kasagalya, where the court ruled in favor of William, who had a longer-standing equitable interest as a tenant, over Musogo, who failed to fulfill the payment terms for the land. The document highlights the importance of time and notice in establishing equitable interests within Uganda's legal framework.

Uploaded by

Kangwamu Finian
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

THE UGANDA PENTECOSTAL UNIVERSITY

THE GROTIUS SCHOOL OF LAW

FACULTY OF LAW

EQUITY AND TRUST DISCUSSION

YEAR FOUR SEMISTER ONE

NAME OF STUDENT : KANGWAMU FINIAN

REGISTRATION NO : U/2021/LLB/085/E

NAME OF LECTURER : NIMUSIIMA BRITON


Where equities are equal the first in time prevails

The maxim deals with priority where there is a conflict between two competing equitable interests in
property because priority of time gives better equity. In Ndigejjerawa Vs Kizito and
Kubulwamwana13[13] court held that Kizito’s /Kubulwamwana’s equitable interests had priority because
it was created earlier than Ndigejjerawa’s interest. Court further stated that the first in time rule only
applies where equities are equal. It should be note that in determining priorities between competing
equitable interests the doctrine of notice does not apply. In Uganda’s legal system the general law rules
for determining priorities are substantially different with respect to the land registered under The
Registration of Title Act. However there situations where the courts do not apply the maxim for example
in situation where there are successive assignments or mortgages of equitable interest

MUSOGO V KASAGALYA AND ANOR

KASANGALYA SOLD LAND TO MUSONGO FOR AN AGREED PRICE WHICH MUSOGO PAID PARTLY AND WAS
SUPPOSED TO PAY THE BALANCE WITHIN 6 MONTHS, LATER MUSONGO LEARNT THAT KASANGALYA HAD
SOLD THE LAND TO WILLIAM . KASANGALYA AGREED TO HAVING SOLD THE LAND TO MUSONGO BUT
WILLIAM HAD RENTED THE LAND FOR A PERIOD OF 10 YEARS FROM 1ST JAN 2010 TO 1ST JAN 2020 BUT
LATER SOLD THAT LAND TO WILLIAM SINCE MUSONGO HAD FAILED TO PAY THE REMAINING MONEY
WITHIN THE 6 MONTHS.

In deciding this case, court stated that by the time musongo bought the land, william had already been
staying on the land as a tenant for hire purchase so he was in actual possession and his tenancy was still
running by the time of the sale so the question arising was on who held a better title.

Court relied on the maxim of qui prior est tempre meaning he who is ealier in time is stronger in law .
Court stated that since musongu knew the existence of a tenant by higher purchase and when the law is
to be applied, the tenant has a long standing equitable interesty than musongu, further more mosungu
had not even fulfilled the terms of the contract of paying the rest of the money within 6 months so
kasangalya could have repudiated the contract by non performance.

Back to the main point, william had longer equitable interest than the musonga

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy