Neurology: Myasthenia Gravis Upper Limbs
Neurology: Myasthenia Gravis Upper Limbs
Follow Up Questions/Answers
This candidate was asked to examine the upper limbs in a patient who presented with
difficulty in dressing. The neurological examination was performed in a confident, fluent,
and well-structured manner. As is customary in upper limb exams, the candidate inspected
the patient in general and then checked tone, power, reflexes, coordination, and
sensation. All the key elements were covered, and the pertinent signs were elicited.
The main finding was weakness, and the candidate did well in the assessment of this. He
remembered to put the muscles into activation first, checking power against gravity and
then testing against resistance. Other aspects of the examination were normal, which is a
key point and helps in the differential diagnosis. The candidate clearly felt that the reflexes
might have been initially brisk, so sensibly checked for pathological reflexes by testing for
finger jerks and Hoffman’s sign.
The fact that tone was not increased, and the reflexes were not brisk means that this
weakness is unlikely to be due to an upper motor neurone lesion. The fact the reflexes
were normal rather than depressed or absent means that the weakness is unlikely to be
neurogenic. So, this leaves us with only a couple of options – the weakness could be either
myopathic or due to a neuromuscular junction disorder. Both problems tend to result in
proximal and symmetrical weakness, so the pattern will not help us differentiate these
disorders.
So, what other signs can we use? Well, looking for eye involvement is crucial as
neuromuscular disorders such as myasthenia characteristically involve the eyes, although
it is less common in Lambert Eaton myasthenic syndrome. If you can demonstrate
fatigable ptosis and/or oculoparesis then myasthenia is highly likely. In this case the
candidate noted on observation that there was a left-sided partial ptosis, and this is a
reasonable clue to the fact that this patient does indeed have MG. Another useful clinical
sign is the demonstration of fatigable proximal upper limb weakness. This is conducted by
asking the patient to repeatedly abduct their arm at the shoulder and then comparing the
strength there with the opposite non-exercised side.
Investigating Myasthenia is straightforward. Most patients will be seropositive, so the first
line investigation is acetylcholine receptor antibodies. In patients who are antibody
negative, neurophysiology can be helpful; repetitive stimulation or single fiber EMG can
demonstrate characteristic changes in support of a neuromuscular junction disorder.
Having confirmed a new diagnosis of MG, there are several important next steps. Firstly,
there are some decisions to make about treatment – this will be guided by the severity of
the presentation. In acute cases - sometimes referred to as myasthenic crises - inpatient
care, intensive monitoring, and treatment with IVIG or plasma exchange may be
required. At the other end of the spectrum, there are some very mildly affected patients
who only need pyridostigmine. In generalised myasthenia, however, most patients will
need immunosuppression.
In all patients diagnosed with myasthenia we get a CT thorax to check for the presence of a
thymoma.