Teachers' Project Guide NCDC 2023
Teachers' Project Guide NCDC 2023
ASSESSING PROJECTS.
1. TEACHER’S ROLE.
Make observations.
Formative assessment
Hold conversations.
Keep records.
Communication.
Scores for each parameter will be determined by the teacher. The total score for the
project will be scaled to 10%. This will be added to the score from the activities of
Integration to account for the 20% score of the end of cycle summative assessment.
A learner who has not been assessed at school level does not qualify to be assessed at the
A learner will have a maximum of two projects every term provided that by the time the
learners sit for final UNEB examinations, a project in each of the subject registered for has
1|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
3. CHECKLIST USED IN ASSESSING PROJECTS.
2 Project Organisation/sketching/drafting. 3
implementation. Steps/procedures.
Use of resources (materials and tools).
Generic skills and values applicable to the project i.e.
communication, creativity and innovation, critical
thinking and problem solving, ICT proficiency,
honesty, integrity, social harmony, national unity etc.
Score ; X/3
3 Product Originality. 3
Creativity and innovation.
Accuracy.
Score ; X/3
NB: The table above will appear on the front page of the learner’s project report for marks
awarding.
2|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
4. ASPECTS TO BE EXAMINED AND SCORING BASED ON PHASES.
3|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
A. PHASE 1 AND 2.
4|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
PHASE 1: PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION, PROJECT PLANNING AND SCORE
DESIGN ACTION.
If the learner’s answer is correct and exhausts all point(s) / content 2 marks
required.
OR when point(s) given is/ are more than half of content required.
If the learner’s answer is correct but does not exhaust all point(s) or 1 mark
when point(s) given is/are below half of the point(s) needed by the
question.
If the learner’s answer is wrong. 0 mark
OR when a learner did not completely answer the question
5|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
COMMUNICATION
24 Was the learner able to Listen attentively and with
comprehension?
25 Was the learner able to Talk confidently and explain things
clearly?
26 Was the learner able to read accurately and fluently to others?
27 Was the learner able to Write and present coherently?
28 Did the learner use a range of media to communicate idea?
CO-OPERATION AND LEARNING
29 Was the learner able to Work effectively in diverse teams?
30 Was the learner able to Interact effectively with others?
31 Was the learner able to Take responsibility for own learning?
32 Was the learner able to Work independently with persistence?
33 Was the learner able to Manage goals and time?
CALCULATION AND ICT
34 Was the learner able to use numbers and measurements
accurately?
35 Was the learner able to Interpret and interrogate mathematical
data?
36 Was the learner able to use mathematics to justify and support
decisions?
37 Was technology used to create, manipulate and process
information?
38 Was technology used to collaborate, communicate and refine
their work?
I VALUES
39 Was the learner able to illustrate Peace and harmony in his/her
project?
40 Was the learner able to express Integrity and honesty?
41 Was the learner able to exhibit Patriotism in his/her project?
42 Was the learner able to show a positive attitude towards work?
43 Was the learner able to respect human rights?
44 Was the learner able to demonstrate Self-Control in the
project?
Total marks for phase - 2 3 marks
6|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
PHASE 2: PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ACTION. SCORE
If the learner’s project work met all the desired generic skills or values 3 marks
expected.
If the learner’s project work met some desired generic skills or values 2 mark
expected.
If the learner’s project work met few desired generic skills or values 1 mark
expected.
If the learner’s project work did not meet the desired generic skills or 0 mark
values expected.
B. PHASE 3 AND 4.
MARKS
PHASE 3: PRODUCT. 3
J 45 ORIGINALITY.
K 46 CREATIVITY
L 47 INNOVATION.
M 48 ACCURACY.
7|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
quality or state of being correct or precise? Is there no fault
in the product?
N 49 TESTING
authentic?
Did the test yield proper results about the working of the
product?
making the product, was there value for those resources? Was
there effectiveness?
If the aspect examined in the learner’s product is good but not very 2 marks
excellent
If the aspect examined in the learner’s product is just quite good or to an 1 marks
average extent
If the aspect examined in the learner’s product is present but to a very 0 mark
8|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
No ASPECT EXAMINED
PHASE 4: PROJECT REPORT.
BASIS OF Criteria 1 Criteria 2 Criteria 3
EVALUATION RELEVANCE ACCURACY COHERENCE
REPORT SCORE 1
CONTENT If ALL the content written in If ALL the report’s If ALL content
the student’s report is content conforms to the presented in the
connected, correct and facts and real truth report connect to each
suitable for solving the known about the other smoothly,
problem that the student solutions, research logically, in choice of
identified. literature and the words and in a way that
OR If half or three student’s product give meaning to solving
quarters of the content OR If half or three the student’s problem
written in the student’s quarters of the report’s and product
report is connected, correct content conforms to the OR If 𝟏𝟐 or 34 of the
and suitable for solving the facts and real truth ideas presented in the
problem that the student known about the report connect to each
identified. solutions, research other smoothly,
OR If less than half of the literature and the logically, in choice of
content written in the student’s product words and in a way that
student’s report is connected, OR If less than half of give meaning to the
correct and suitable for the report’s content student’s problem and
solving the problem that the conforms to the facts product
student identified. and real truth known OR If less than half
about the solutions, ideas presented in the
research literature and report connect to each
the student’s product other smoothly,
logically, in choice of
words and in a way that
give meaning to the
student’s problem and
product
SCORE 0
If all the content written in If NONE of student’s If NONE of the ideas
the student’s report is NOT project report content presented in the
9|Page watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
connected, correct and not conforms to the facts report connects to
suitable for solving the and real truth known each other smoothly,
problem that the student about the solutions, logically, in choice of
identified. research literature and words and in a way that
product he/she is give meaning to the
suggesting to bring student’s problem and
forth. product
FORMAT OF SCORE 1
THE REPORT If the following 5 or 6 If what is written in the If what is written in
aspects are present in the following 5 or 6 aspects the following 5 or 6
structure of a report. are the real facts and components e.g.: -
1. An INTRODUCTION that: truth known about what: 1. INTRODUCTION
- Introduces the writer’s - 2. Action plan and
Problem statement, the 1. An INTRODUCTION, budget
product to be made and The 2. A BODY, 3. Product making
project objectives, 3. CONCLUSION, procedure
2. A BODY that includes: - 4. and a project 4. Product testing
Procedure and materials for ANALYSIS experiment
implementation. Should contain. 5. CONCLUSION
3. A CONCLUSION that 5. If proper 6. ANALYSIS in the
shows Testing the product’s Punctuations in the work report connect to each
efficiency and effectiveness are rightly used within other smoothly,
4. ANALYSIS of the project statements of the logically, in choice of
work based on out puts. report. words and in a way that
5. Punctuated statements 6. If paragraphs are is clearly
6. Paragraphed work. correctly introduced understandable in line
with correct word with a true report
spellings and grammar / format order.
phrasing of statements NB. Emphasis is on the
in the report. flow and clarity of the
6 In the way they are
supposed to be
structured in a report.
10 | P a g e
watmonmaxwell@gmail.com
SCORE 0
If all of the following 5 or 6 If NONE is written in If NONE is written in
aspects are NOT present in the following 5 or 6 the following 5 or 6
the structure of a report. aspects are NOT the components e.g.: -
1. An INTRODUCTION that: real facts and truth 1. INTRODUCTION
- Introduces the writer known about what: - 2. Action plan and
the Problem statement the 1. An INTRODUCTION, budget
product to be made and The 2. A BODY, 3. Product making
project objectives, 3. CONCLUSION, procedure
2. A BODY that includes: - 4. and a project 4. Product testing
Procedure and materials for ANALYSIS experiment
implementation. Should contain. 5. CONCLUSION
3. A CONCLUSION that 5. If proper 6. ANALYSIS in the
shows Testing the product’s Punctuations in the work report DO NOT
efficiency and effectiveness are rightly used within connect to each other
4. ANALYSIS of the project statements of the smoothly, logically, in
work based on out puts. report. choice of words and in
5. Punctuated statements 6. If paragraphs are a way that is clearly
6. Paragraphed work. correctly introduced understandable in line
with correct word with a true report
spellings and grammar / format order.
phrasing of statements NB. Emphasis is on the
in the report. flow and clarity of the
6 In the way they are
supposed to be
structured in a report.
Criteria 4 : EXCELLENCE
If there is an exceptional response unsolicited in the process of writing the
report
Total marks for phase 2 2
11 | P a g e
watmonmaxwell@gmail.com