HARAMAYA UNIVERSITY

HARAMAYA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

POSTGRADUATE PROGRAM DIRECTORATE
SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING
POWER ENGINEERING

GRADUATE SEMINAR

ADAPTIVE NEURO-FUZZY-BASED POWER SYSTEM STABILIZERS

FOR DAMPING OSCILLATIONS IN MULTI-MACHINE POWER
SYSTEMS

Submitted by: Kenan yeshitela

Id. No :( PGP/888/15)

Submitted to: Dr.Ramesh Kumar

February 16, 2024

Haramaya, Ethiopia
 i

ACRONYMS

PSS POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER

CPSS CONVENTIONAL POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER
FLPSS FUZZY LOGIC POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER
ANFPSS ADAPTIVE NEURO-FUZZY POWER SYSTEM STABILIZER
ANFIS ADAPTIVE NEURO-FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM
SMIB SINGLE MACHINE INFINITE BUS
 ii

Table of Contents
ACRONYMS...................................................................................................................................................i
LIST OF FIGURE...........................................................................................................................................iii
ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................................iv
1. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Background of Study..........................................................................................................................1
1.1.1 Classification of Power System Stability...............................................................................2
1.2 Statement of Problem.................................................................................................................2
1.3 Scope of the Study.......................................................................................................................4
1.4 Significant of the study......................................................................................................................4
1.5 Objectives of the Study......................................................................................................................4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW................................................................................................................................6
2.1 compare and contrast......................................................................................................................10
2.1.1 Best Performer Based on Parameters:......................................................................................11
3. METHODS..............................................................................................................................................12
4. CONCLUSION.........................................................................................................................................15
REFERENCE................................................................................................................................................16
 iii

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 1. Structure of Sugeno type ANFIS for PSS...................................................................................13

Figure 2 Procedure of the research............................................................................................................14
 iv

ABSTRACT

Low-frequency disturbances in power systems can lead to synchronization issues and system
failure. These disturbances, known as "low-frequency oscillations," have operational limits that
affect bulk power transmission in power networks and can cause the system to fail. For this
particular problem, Power system stabilizers (PSSs) play a crucial role in addressing these low-
frequency oscillations by providing additional damping to synchronous generators. The
supplementary power system stabilizer must be capable of providing appropriate stabilization
signals across a wide range of operating conditions, as well as disturbances. However, a CPSS
faces challenges in adapting to varying operating conditions, resulting in suboptimal
performance.

This seminar aims to address the drawbacks of CPSS by proposing the design and modeling of
ANFPSS. The new approach effectively reduces oscillations caused by various disturbances on
generators. The focus of my thesis is centered on the design of a FLPSS and a self-learning
ANFPSS. These aim to enhance dynamic stability and provide additional signals, thereby
extending power stability limits. The suggested controller utilizes synchronous machine speed
variation and acceleration as input signals.

The proposed technique for power system stabilization is simple, fast, effective, and affordable.
The simulation findings indicate that the ANFIS controller-based stabilizer outperforms
conventional power system stabilizers in terms of inter-area power oscillation damping at low
frequencies. The ANFIS controller-based power system stabilizer provides 73% less damping
time than CPSS during three-phase fault circumstances. With these advancements, power
systems can become more resilient and reliable in the face of disturbances.
 1

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of Study

Since the 1920s, experts in electrical engineering have raised concerns about the stability of
power systems. As power systems become more advanced, their ability to recover from errors
becomes increasingly vital. Modern power systems are susceptible to significant disturbances
that can spread across interconnected networks without adequate safeguards. The primary issue
arises from the growing power demand. In countries like Ethiopia, where a significant portion of
the population resides in villages and suburbs, providing power to these areas takes precedence.
As transmission lines become longer and carry greater power, the likelihood of power
fluctuations and faults increases. This situation can potentially lead to a complete failure of
power grids [1].
The number of power transactions is increasing each day in the restructured power systems.
These systems are expected to operate at various operating points and closer to their operational
limits. One of the constraints that limit the transmission of bulk power through the network is
known as "low-frequency oscillations." In such cases, power system controls play a crucial role.
These controls can contribute either positively or negatively to damping the oscillations.
Specifically, the regulation of generator voltage, and in particular, high gain in this regulation,
can lead to poor or negative damping of the oscillation. To address this issue, Power System
Stabilizers (PSS) have been implemented to dampen the oscillations. For reliable power
generation and transmission, it is essential to maintain stability in the power system. Most
modern power generators are equipped with PSS to control slowly oscillating instability. These
stabilizers produce control signals to decrease low-frequency power system oscillations. Various
methods, such as fuzzy logic, neural networks, and PID controllers, have been proposed to
overcome the limitations of common power system stabilizers. This thesis focuses on the
application of a Neuro-fuzzy controller to improve system control based on simulations. It is
found that the Neuro-fuzzy controller provides better results compared to the traditional Fuzzy
Logic Controller (FLC). FLC is chosen as a controller for this thesis due to its advantages, such
as control simplicity, low cost, and the ability to design without an exact mathematical model of
the process. The combination of neural networks and fuzzy control in the Neuro-fuzzy controller
enhances its performance [2].
 2

1.1.1 Classification of power system stability

Power system stability refers to the characteristics of a power system that allows it to maintain its
operational equilibrium under normal conditions and to restore a satisfactory state of equilibrium
after experiencing a disturbance [1]. There are three categories of power system stability.

Dynamic or Small Signal Stability

Dynamic stability refers to the response of the synchronous machine when faced with small,
oscillating perturbations. If these oscillations have a small amplitude, the system can be
considered stable. However, if the oscillations grow over time, the system may lose its stability.
Typically, heavy power flow in transmission lines or the interaction of the controller with the
system frequency can lead to small signal instabilities [3].

Steady-state stability

Steady-state stability analysis pertains to examining a power system and its generators under
stable operating conditions to establish the maximum load that can be transmitted without
causing any loss of synchronism in the generators.

Transient stability

Transient stability refers to the response of the synchronous machine to significant disturbances,
such as the application and clearing of faults, sudden load changes, or modifications in
transmission lines or generators. The accompanying figure provides an overview of the stability
issues. This thesis focuses on the aspect of small disturbance stability, which is a component of
rotor angle stability [1].

1.2 Statement of the problem

The need to operate power systems close to their capacity limits has arisen due to the increasing
magnitude and complexity of interconnected power systems caused by competitive energy
markets, economy, and population development. However, this can lead to stability issues and
 3

poor dynamic behaviors such as power oscillations. These oscillations have detrimental effects,
including a reduction in the lifetime of system components, expensive operations of electrical
grids, and in the worst-case scenario, the risk of partial system collapse. Additionally, the action
of the excitation control system weakens the damping provided by the field and damper windings
in synchronous generators. This is because additional currents induced by voltage regulation
appear in the rotor circuits, opposing the currents induced by rotor speed deviations.

Currently, the installation of automatic voltage regulators (AVRs) in generators is common

practice in power systems. Many generators are equipped with high-gain and fast-acting AVRs
to enhance large-scale stability and ensure the generator remains in synchronism with the power
system during significant transient fault conditions. However, the high gain in generator voltage
regulation can result in poor or negative damping of the oscillations. This study addresses the use
of power system stabilizers (PSS) in synchronous generators to counteract the effect of high
AVR gain.

Power system stabilizers (PSS) should be capable of providing suitable stabilization signals
across a wide range of operating conditions and disturbances. However, traditional PSSs provide
positive damping torque aligned with the speed signal to counteract the system's negative
damping torque. Since the gains of this controller are determined for a specific operating
condition, they may not be valid for a wide range of operating conditions. This leads to high
starting overshoot, sensitivity to controller gains, and sluggish response to sudden disturbances
and loading conditions within a short time. Designing a conventional PSS for constantly
changing power systems is a challenging task. The nonlinear nature of power systems, along
with random disturbances like load changes and time-varying operating conditions, makes
precise real-time modeling of large power systems difficult. This study attempts to overcome
these challenges by using a hybrid of fuzzy logic and neural network control, which is a
powerful tool for controlling systems that are not precisely characterized.

The proposed Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Power System Stabilizer (ANFPSS) addresses the
limitations of conventional power system stabilizers. The new design effectively reduces
oscillations caused by various disturbances in generators. The ANFPSS dampens oscillations in
the excitation system, ensuring reliable and sustainable grid operations despite small and large
disturbances.
 4

1.3 Scope of the Study

The Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy power system stabilizer is restricted to examining an SMIB model
and conducting simulation trials in multi-machine systems. Furthermore, the evaluation of the
PSS effectiveness and the implementation of alternative control structures are presented as a
theoretical assessment of the findings backed by simulations.

1.4 Significance of the study

In my master's thesis, I will develop a methodology for the adaptive neuro-fuzzy power system
that is utilized in synchronous generators. I will also explore the use of a control structure that is
different from the one used in the generators for damping electro-motion oscillations

 Enhanced power flow and improved system reliability.

 Decrease the number of machines needed for both peak load operation and spinning
reserves for sudden load changes.
 Offer a cost-effective power source for consumers.
 Electrical devices are susceptible to failure when faced with power stability issues.
 Improve current and future power generation and transmission systems.

1.5 Objectives of the Study

1.5.1 General objective

The main aim of my thesis is to create and analyze Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy-based power system
stabilizers to dampen oscillations using the MATLAB package with the control system toolbox.

1.5.2 Specific Objectives

The specific goals include:
 Analyzing Power system stability, Excitation systems, Automatic Voltage
Regulators for synchronous generators, and Power system stabilizers.
 5

 Review various approaches to power system stabilizer design for potential

adoption in this thesis.
 Developing the Neuro-fuzzy Power System Stabilizer to swiftly stabilize the
system during transmission line faults and validate its effectiveness.
 Decreasing settling time, rise time, peak amplitude, and overshoot of the system.
 Operating the power system over a wide range.
 Enhancing the stability and reliability of synchronous generators.
 Utilize simulation to validate the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy power system stabilizer
and compare its performance with traditional stabilizers.
 6

2. LITERATURE REVIEW

In this section, we will examine previous works related to the damping of low-frequency
oscillations in power systems to enhance stability. The reviewed works are categorized into
recently published journal papers, M.Sc. theses, and Ph.D. theses. While this work draws on a
variety of related materials, only selected works from each category will be reviewed due to
space constraints.

Yagami and Tamura (2009) [4] present a method for enhancing power system stability by
combining a fault current limiter and a thyristor-controlled braking resistor. The fault current
limiter is used to restrict fault currents, improve power system stability, and dampen turbine shaft
torsional oscillations. On the other hand, the thyristor-controlled braking resistor aims to quickly
manage generator disturbances. The effectiveness of both devices is demonstrated using a Three-
lines-to-ground (3LG) fault in a two-machine infinite bus system. Simulation results show
improved power system stability and damping of turbine shaft torsional oscillations within
acceptable temperature rise limits.
Li Zhengguo et al (2007) [5] present the concept of a switched controller to analyze a SMIB
power system when a symmetrical 3-phase short circuit fault occurs in one of the transmission
lines. Typically, a linear controller is unable to deliver satisfactory transient performance for
such a power system with a significant fault. The proposed switched controller addresses both
temporary and permanent faults. The effectiveness and efficiency of this approach are
demonstrated through simulation results. It is important to note that this method offers a solution
to the stabilization issue during fault occurrences. A future extension of this approach involves
exploring ways to achieve optimal post-fault performance.
Soon Kiat Yee and Milano Vic (2008) [6] The authors suggest a Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC)
for the decentralized stabilization of multi-machine power systems. They have developed a
novel, mostly analytical approach for developing a resilient Multi-Input-Single-Output (MISO)
FLC targeted at improving the damping and stability of an electrical power system while
preserving voltage control. The proposed decentralized FLC employs a systematic analytical
method based on a performance indicator, removing the need for previous knowledge of the
system. This FLC is intended to track speed variations to zero to stabilize the generator's power
output while also regulating and stabilizing the terminal voltage.
 7

Dysko, W.E. Leithead, and J. O'Reilly (2010) [7] developed a rigorous coordinated design
technique for power system stabilizers (PSSs) and automated voltage regulators (AVRs) in a
highly linked system. The recommended coordinated PSS/AVR design approach is organized
around a frequency domain framework.

P. De Mello (1969) [8] investigated the stability of synchronous machines under modest shocks
by analyzing a scenario in which a single machine is connected to an infinite bus via an external
reactance. The creation of Power System Stabilizers (PSSs) for a single machine connected to an
infinite bus was expanded by including quick output sampling feedback.

J.H. Chow and J.J. Sanchez-Gasca (1989) [9] studied the four pole-placement approach for
designing power system stabilizers, focusing on the frequency characteristics of these
controllers. However, their designs were not globally optimized.

The fundamental PSS design concept in this paper is rooted in the stabilizer proposed by De
Mello and Concordia (1969) [8]. Nonetheless, the phase characteristics were derived using a
multi-machine Eigenvalue program instead of a single-machine model. This study emphasized
enhancing overall system stability, addressing simultaneous damping of inter-area and local
modes, and evaluating PSS performance under various system conditions. The authors claimed
that the frequency response approach utilized to correct the delay between excitation input and
electrical torque was extremely reliable.
Hiyama et al (1994) introduced a PID-type FLPSS. [10]. The integration of the speed deviation
was utilized as one input, and the phase plane origin was adjusted leftward or rightward based on
the integral sign. Both simulations and experiments were conducted to showcase the
effectiveness of this modification. Hiyama's heuristic-based approach demonstrated some
success in his series of research studies. However, in his work, the fuzzy PSS parameters were
not globally optimized as he argued that these parameters are relatively insensitive to external
conditions.
Son and Park (2000) [6] applied the Linear Quadratic Gaussian technique to design a TCSC
damping controller for a 3-machine 9-bus system. They utilized the optimal Hankel norm
 8

approximation technique to obtain a reduced-order power system model and designed a

controller based on this model. They also discussed using the Loop Transfer Recovery technique
to maintain the robustness of the designed controller. However, due to matrix size limitations,
these methods were not extended to higher-order systems.

Del Rosso et al. (2003) [11] proposed a hierarchical control strategy for enhancing dynamic and
steady-state stability, including strategies to mitigate adverse interactions among TCSC
hierarchical controls. They analyzed and compared different locally measurable input signals
qualitatively using the equal area criterion. The focus was on comparing active power and line
current as input signals, without exploring the potential use of bus voltage and bus frequency as
input signals for the damping controller.
M. F. Othman, M. Mahfouf, and D.A. Linkens [12] outlined the design methodology for an
FLPSS and an ANFIS, examining their effectiveness for a single-machine power system. They
chose speed deviation and its derivative as input signals for the FLPSS.

Vani, M.U., Raju, G.S., and Prasad, K.R.L. [13] outlined a structured design approach for an
ANFIS and optimization-based automatic voltage regulator and PSS.

Chun-Jung Chen [14] presented an adaptive power system stabilizer incorporating a recurrent
neural network controller (RNNC) and a compensator to mitigate power system oscillations. The
RNNC delivers an adaptive control signal to the exciter or governor to dampen most oscillations.

Sumina D. (2008) [15] showcased the application of a neural network-based excitation control
on a SMIB. The proposed feedforward neural network combines a voltage regulator and a power
system stabilizer.

Barton (2004) presented a robust artificially intelligent ANFIS-based PSS design for damping
electromechanical oscillation modes and enhancing power system synchronous stability. The
actual power system was divided into subsystems, each containing one machine. Each subsystem
was associated with a local ANFPSS, with input signals including speed, power angle, and real
power output. Nonlinear simulations illustrated the robustness of the ANFPSS.
 9

Hsu and Chen (1991) [14] utilized a neural network to adjust the parameters of a conventional
PI (Proportional + Integral) type PSS. Abdel-Magid et al. (2000) [16] aimed to identify a single
set of PSS parameters that could stabilize the power system across a wide range of operating
conditions simultaneously.
All the papers mentioned above, proposed by different researchers, are effective for specific
operating conditions but may not be suitable for a wide range of operating conditions due to
issues like high initial overshoot, sensitivity to controller gains, and slow response during sudden
disturbances and heavy loading conditions. This thesis explores the implementation of Neuro-
fuzzy techniques, which combine Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Fuzzy Inference
Systems (FIS) to address real-world problems. A Neuro-fuzzy system is essentially a fuzzy
system trained using a learning algorithm derived from neural network theory. The learning
capability is advantageous from the FIS perspective, while the formation of a linguistic rule base
is beneficial from the ANN perspective. Various methods exist to integrate ANN and FIS, with
the choice often depending on the specific application.
The proposed Neuro-fuzzy controller processes speed deviation and acceleration error signals
through the fuzzy inference system to produce an output suitable for damping oscillations.
Simulation results demonstrate the superior performance of the ANFIS system compared to
traditional approaches. Multiple model adaptive controllers have been developed for Single
Machine Infinite Bus (SMIB) systems and Multi-machine systems as intelligent control
solutions. The performance evaluation of these controllers is carried out using Fuzzy Logic
Control and Neural Network control methods.
In the field of Power System Stabilizers (PSS), new trends have emerged, leading to a surge in
research papers. Among these, Kothari et al. [17] developed a variable structure power system
stabilizer with desired eigenvalues in the sliding mode. Hariri and Malik [18] combined fuzzy
control with the learning capabilities of neural networks to create a PSS, which could potentially
trap the system in local minima. Abido and Abdel Magid [16] utilized an evolutionary
programming algorithm to determine the optimal values for a classical lead-lag PSS. Rashidi et
al. [17] proposed adapting the gain of the discontinuous component of the control signal in a
sliding mode controller using a fuzzy inference system augmented by linear state feedback
applied to a sliding surface with an integral term. Elshafei et al. [19] suggested power system
stabilization using fuzzy logic and direct adaptive techniques. Hossein-Zadeh and Kalam [20]
 10

developed an indirect adaptive indirect fuzzy approach. Elshafei et al. [19] expanded the direct
adaptive fuzzy method to include the stabilization of multi-machine power systems.

2.1 compare and contrast

We may analyze the contributions of the researchers described in the text by comparing their
results in terms of several characteristics such as processing timing, voltage regulation, power
reduction, and oscillation damping.

1. Yagami and Tamura (2009) discovered that incorporating a fault current limiter and a
thyristor-controlled braking resistor enhanced power system stability.

Strengths: Improved stability and damping of turbine shaft torsional oscillations within
acceptable temperature rise limits.

Weaknesses: The focus on fault current limitation and turbine shaft oscillations may not address
overall system stability.

2. Li Zhengguo et al. (2007):

Strengths: Introduced a switched controller design to enhance transient performance during

symmetrical 3-phase short circuit faults.

Provided a solution to stabilization concerns during fault incidents.

Weaknesses: Limited attention to fault scenarios, which might not cover all stability issues.

3. Soon Kiat Yee and Milano Vic (2008):

Strengths: Developed a decentralized Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) for multi-machine power
system stability. A performance-oriented analytical approach for designing a robust MISO FLC.

Weaknesses: Limited details on specific performance metrics and comparative results.

4. Other Researchers (A. Dysko, W.E. Leithead, J. O'Reilly, P. De Mello, J.H. Chow,
J.J. Sanchez-Gasca, Hiyama et al, Son and Park, Del Rosso et al, M.F. Othman,
Vani et al, Chun-Jung Chen, Sumina D., Hsu and Chen, Abdel-Magid et al, Kothari
et al, Hariri and Malik, Rashidi et al, Elshafei et al, Hossein):
 11

- Each researcher or research group devised innovative methodologies and strategies for power
system stabilization.

- Strengths and drawbacks vary based on the specific approach adopted by each.

2.1.1 Best Performer Based on Parameters:

For Processing Timing: Li Zhengguo et al.'s switching controller offers rapid responses during
fault scenarios.

For Voltage Regulation: Kiat Yee and Milano Vic's FLC shows promise in excelling at voltage
stabilization while ensuring regulation.

For Power Management: Yagami and Tamura's method, combining a fault current limiter and a
braking resistor, could aid in power control during faults.

For Oscillation Suppression: Combining approaches from various researchers may yield
optimal results as each approach targets a distinct aspect of oscillation damping.

Ultimately, determining the best performance concerning specific characteristics would depend
on the unique requirements of the power system and the significance placed on elements like
processing timing, voltage control, power management, and oscillation suppression. Each
researcher's method has its pros and cons, making them suitable for different aspects of power
system stabilization.
 12

3. METHODS

The research procedure is illustrated in Fig. 2. MATLAB software package is selected as the
simulation environment for this study. It serves as the primary engineering tool for modeling and
simulating multi-machine power systems, as well as for interacting with the user and relevant
simulation programs. MATLAB was chosen for its robust set of programming tools, signal
processing capabilities, numerical functions, and user-friendly interface. Within this custom
simulation environment, evaluation procedures can be easily carried out. The Fuzzy Logic
Toolbox of MATLAB was utilized to develop the ANFIS model with four inputs and a single
output.

Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy PSS

The design process of the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy (ANFIS) for PSS goes through the following
steps:

1. Generating suitable training data: To apply the ANFIS technique for power system stability
using Power System Stabilizers (PSS), it is crucial to precisely determine the input parameter
limits. These parameters are typically collected from recording devices sparsely positioned at the
sending end in a power system network. Since practical fault data for transmission lines is
limited, generating training/testing data through simulations becomes necessary. A computer
program has been developed to create training data for various faults in a typical transmission
system.

2. Selecting an appropriate ANFIS structure for a specific application: Different ANFIS

structures are tailored for PSS to expand stability boundaries by adjusting generator excitation to
provide damping to synchronous machine rotor oscillations relative to each other. The structure
of a Sugeno-type ANFIS for PSS is depicted in Figure 1.
 13

Figure 1. Structure of Sugeno type ANFIS for PSS

3. ANFIS Training: Different network configurations are trained to identify a suitable network
with satisfactory performance levels. The ANFIS models are trained to detect the presence of
faults, classify faults, and achieve system stability.

4. Evaluation of Trained ANFIS: The trained ANFIS models are evaluated using test patterns
until their performance meets the desired criteria. Once the network is trained, the ANFIS
models should provide accurate outputs for unseen data. When the output of test patterns and the
network's error falls within an acceptable range, the fuzzy system is adjusted optimally. This
adjustment ensures that the membership functions and fuzzy rules are well-tuned. All these steps
are conducted offline, and once the structure and parameters of the ANFIS are adjusted, it can be
utilized online as a Power System Stabilizer (PSS).
 14

Figure 2 Procedure of the research.

 15

4. CONCLUSION

The real-time response of the non-linear system considered in this study indicates that the
ANFIS-based controller delivers superior performance compared to the conventional controller.
The ANFLPSS In terms of settling time and dampening impact, it outperforms the typical power
system stabilizer. In conclusion, this paper suggests that the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference
System (ANFIS) controller can be implemented for small signal stability in power systems to
achieve quicker control action. The ANFIS-based tuning of the PSS is specifically developed for
an SMIB system, aiming to address local mode oscillations.
 16

REFERENCE

[1] Power-System-Stability-and-Control-by-Prabha-Kundur. 1994.

[2] A. B. Muljono, I. M. Ginarsa, I. M. A. Nrartha, and A. Dharma, “Coordination of adaptive
neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and type-2 fuzzy logic system-power system
stabilizer (T2FLS-PSS) to improve a large-scale power system stability,” Int. J. Electr.
Comput. Eng., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 76–86, 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v8i1.pp76-86.
[3] . S. S., “Efficient Power Oscillation Damping Control By Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy
Controller Based Power System Stabilizer,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., vol. 05, no. 09, pp.
101–105, 2016, doi: 10.15623/ijret.2016.0509015.
[4] Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, 2009. ECCE, IEEE. IEEE, 2009.
[5] S. Xie, X. Wang, C. Qu, X. Wang, and J. Guo, “Impacts of different wind speed
simulation methods on conditional reliability indices,” Int. Trans. Electr. energy Syst., vol.
20, no. August 2008, pp. 1–6, 2013, doi: 10.1002/step.
[6] S. K. Yee and J. V. Milanović, “Fuzzy logic controller for decentralized stabilization of
multimachine power systems,” IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 971–981, 2008,
doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2008.917296.
[7] A. Dyśko, W. E. Leithead, and J. O’Reilly, “Enhanced power system stability by
coordinated PSS design,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 413–422, Feb.
2010, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036704.
[8] F. P. Demello and C. Concordia, “Concepts of Synchronous Machine Stability as Affected
by Excitation Control,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., vol. PAS-88, no. 4, pp. 316–329,
1969, doi: 10.1109/TPAS.1969.292452.
[9] A. Jamal and R. Syahputra, “Design of Power System Stabilizer Based on Adaptive
Neuro-Fuzzy Method,” Int. Semin. Appl. Technol. Sci. Arts, pp. 14–21, 2011.
[10] P. Ghareeb, A. G. Asim, and M. Ahmed, “The Design of a Fuzzy Logic Based Power
System Stabilizer Applied to Two Electric Power Generation Units " Researchers :
Abstract :” pp. 41–68, 2020.
[11] A. D. Del Rosso, C. A. Cañizares, and V. M. Doña, “A Study of TCSC Controller Design
for Power System Stability Improvement,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 4, pp.
1487–1496, 2003, doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2003.818703.
[12] M. F. Othman, M. Mahfouf, and D. A. Linkens, “Designing Power System Stabilizer for
Multimachine Power System Using Neuro-Fuzzy Algorithm,” J. Teknol., vol. 35, no. D,
pp. 55–63, 2012, doi: 10.11113/jt.v35.610.
[13] M. Uma Vani, G. S. Raju, and K. R. L. Prasad, “Robust supplementary controllers for
AVR and PSS,” Proc. INDICON 2009 - An IEEE India Council. Conf., pp. 9–12, 2009,
doi: 10.1109/INDCON.2009.5409474.
[14] C. J. Chen and T. C. Chen, “Design of a power system stabilizer using a new recurrent
 17

network,” Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 907–918, 2007.
[15] D. Sumina, N. Bulic, and G. Erceg, “Simulation model of neural network based
synchronous generator excitation control,” 2008 13th Int. Power Electron. Motion
Control Conf. EPE-PEMC 2008, no. 4, pp. 556–560, 2008, doi:
10.1109/EPEPEMC.2008.4635324.
[16] M. A. Abido and Y. L. Abdel-Magid, “Optimal design of power system stabilizers using
evolutionary programming,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 429–436,
2002, doi: 10.1109/TEC.2002.805179.
[17] F. Rashidi, M. Rashidi, and H. Amiri, “An Adaptive Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control for
Power System Stabilizer,” IECON Proc. (Industrial Electron. Conf., vol. 1, pp. 626–630,
2003, doi: 10.1109/IECON.2003.1280053.
[18] P. Shamsollahi and O. P. Malik, “An adaptive power system stabilizer using online trained
neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 382–387, 1997, doi:
10.1109/60.638951.
[19] A. L. Elshafei, K. A. El-Metwally, and A. A. Shaltout, “A variable-structure adaptive
fuzzy-logic stabilizer for single and multi-machine power systems,” Control Eng. Pract.,
vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 413–423, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2004.03.017.
[20] N. Hossein-Zadeh and A. Kalam, “An indirect adaptive fuzzy-logic power system
stabilizer,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 837–842, 2002, doi:
10.1016/S0142-0615(01)00093-X.