Atap Revision Test (Week1 - 5)
Atap Revision Test (Week1 - 5)
● Inductive Approach:
○ The inductive method involves deriving general principles from observations
or empirical data. In this approach, accountants look at real-world accounting
practices and build theories based on these practices.
● Deductive Approach:
○ The deductive method begins with general assumptions or principles and
applies them to specific cases. Theories are developed starting from a broad
framework and are then applied to real accounting scenarios.
Both approaches contribute to the development of accounting theory, but they do so in different
ways. The inductive approach focuses on observation, while the deductive approach
emphasizes theoretical foundations.
The document discusses the evolution of accounting theory through four periods:
1. Pre-Theory Period:
● In the early stages, accounting was more about practical tasks like record-keeping,
and there was little systematic theory behind these practices. Accounting was simply a
method to track transactions, with no formal theory to back up decisions.
● During this period, accounting began to evolve from a purely practical task into a more
scientific discipline. Efforts were made to apply scientific methods and theories to
accounting practices. This was the beginning of accounting as a formalized field, with
emerging guidelines and principles that attempted to standardize practices.
3. Normative Period:
● The normative period focused on establishing standards and norms for accounting
practices. This period saw the development of accounting theories that attempted to
prescribe how accounting should be done, rather than just describing what was
happening. Theories in this period aimed to establish best practices and ethical
guidelines for accountants.
● The final stage in the development of accounting theory is the specific scientific theory
period. During this phase, accounting theory became more specialized and technical.
Specific accounting practices, such as financial reporting, cost accounting, and
auditing, were developed as distinct fields within accounting. The theories during this
period are based on empirical research and data-driven analysis.
4. Nature of Accounting
The document emphasizes that accounting is not like the "hard" sciences (e.g., physics or
chemistry), where there are clear, universally applicable laws. Instead, accounting is a practical
discipline that requires theories and frameworks to guide decision-making.
● Accounting Rules:
○ While accounting relies on rules and guidelines, it is important to recognize that
theory is necessary to provide a solid foundation for these rules. Without theory,
accounting practices would be inconsistent and potentially unreliable.
● Theory's Role in Decision-Making:
○ Accounting theory is crucial for providing a rational basis for decisions in the
field. It helps accountants and organizations make informed choices about how
to measure, report, and interpret financial data.
5. Conclusion
The document concludes by reinforcing the idea that accounting theory is essential for the
coherent and consistent application of accounting practices. It serves as the foundation
for developing accounting standards and ensures that accountants can apply practices that are
both ethical and reliable.
Key Takeaways:
This document outlines the importance of accounting theory in structuring and guiding the
practice of accounting, and how it has evolved over time to become a fundamental aspect of
modern accounting.
Accounting theory is not just a set of rules or principles, but it also involves justifying or
refuting existing accounting practices. The goal is to develop a conceptual framework for
understanding what accountants do and what they are expected to do.
Despite these changes, the underlying objective of both approaches remains the same: to
create a conceptual framework that helps understand and guide accounting practices.
Accounting theory is different from theories in natural sciences (such as physics or biology).
While natural sciences deal with universal laws and objective truths, accounting theory is
more subjective and contextual.
● Contextual Nature: Accounting theory deals with human-made rules and standards,
which are shaped by economic, legal, and social factors. Therefore, the development of
accounting theory is influenced by the cultural context and economic environment in
which it is applied.
● Normative vs. Positive Accounting Theories: The chapter likely touches on the
distinction between normative theories (which prescribe how accounting should be)
and positive theories (which describe how accounting is actually practiced).
The chapter addresses a significant issue in accounting: the lack of progress toward a
general theory of accounting.
● Lack of Universality: Unlike in natural sciences, where universal laws can apply
everywhere, accounting practices vary greatly between different countries, industries,
and organizations. As a result, developing a universal theory that fits all situations is
challenging.
● Diverse Accounting Standards: Accounting theory must account for different
systems such as GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), IFRS
(International Financial Reporting Standards), and other national standards. These
differences make it difficult to create a single, overarching theory that applies globally.
● Empirical Approach: This approach relies on empirical data to test and verify
accounting practices. It focuses on real-world observations and data, making it more
practical.
● Conceptual Approach: The conceptual approach focuses on developing a
framework of ideas or concepts that help in understanding accounting practices. This is
often theoretical and abstract, aiming to develop guiding principles or general theories.
● Positivist vs. Interpretivist Approaches: The chapter may also mention the debate
between positivist approaches (which focus on observable, quantifiable data) and
interpretivist approaches (which focus on understanding the context and meaning
behind accounting practices).
A major part of constructing accounting theory involves understanding and applying key
concepts and standards.
Key Takeaways:
1. Accounting theory seeks to justify and improve existing accounting practices through
the development of a conceptual framework.
2. Unlike natural sciences, accounting theory is influenced by contextual and social
factors, making it more subjective.
3. There has been little progress in developing a universal theory of accounting due to
the diversity in practices across countries and industries.
4. Various approaches, including empirical and conceptual approaches, are used to
develop accounting theory.
5. Key concepts like assets and liabilities, as well as accounting standards like GAAP
and IFRS, are crucial for constructing a reliable accounting theory.
6. A conceptual framework is essential for developing new standards and ensuring that
accounting practices remain relevant and consistent.
This chapter provides an in-depth exploration of accounting theory, its importance, and the
challenges faced in its development. It also highlights the need for conceptual frameworks
and the crucial role that accounting standards play in shaping theory and practice.
The chapter traces the historical development of accounting theory and how views on
accounting have changed over time. It examines the shift in perspectives from practical
record-keeping to a more conceptual approach.
● Early Accounting: In the early stages, accounting was primarily about record-keeping
and the management of resources, often for taxation or trade. It was seen more as a
technical skill rather than a theoretical discipline.
● Development of Theories: As the scope and complexity of businesses grew, the need
for formal theories emerged. Accounting became more structured, with theories aiming
to provide rational foundations for practices like valuation, measurement, and
reporting.
● Theory's Authority: The chapter questions the authority of theory and why theories
are respected in disciplines like physics and biology. Similarly, accounting theory holds
authority in explaining accounting practices and ensuring their consistency across
different regions and time periods.
● Relevance of Accounting Theory: Accounting theory provides theoretical
justification for accounting practices. Just as scientific theories explain natural
phenomena, accounting theory helps explain why financial transactions are reported in
particular ways.
Accounting theory ensures that these reports are consistent, reliable, and transparent,
making them useful for all stakeholders involved.
The chapter briefly outlines the structure of the book and how it logically sequences
discussions on accounting theory. The chapters are designed to take readers through a
historical perspective, exploring the development of accounting theory and introducing
various approaches to accounting practices.
Key Takeaways:
1. Accounting theory is a set of principles and concepts that guide accounting practices.
2. The development of accounting theory over time has helped shape the field, moving
from basic record-keeping to more complex and conceptual frameworks.
3. Just like theories in other scientific fields (e.g., gravity, evolution), accounting theory
provides explanations and justifications for accounting practices.
4. Published accounting reports are essential for decision-making in the business world
and are guided by accounting theory to ensure their accuracy, reliability, and
consistency.
5. The book is structured to trace the historical development of accounting theory, providing
a logical sequence of how it has evolved and how it informs modern accounting
practice.
The chapter introduces pragmatic approaches to accounting theory, which are based on
practical experience and real-world observations rather than purely theoretical constructs.
The chapter discusses the criticisms of historical cost accounting as a theoretical model.
Historical cost accounting involves recording assets and liabilities at their original purchase
price, which may not reflect their current market value.
● Limitations: Critics argue that historical cost accounting is outdated and does not
reflect the true value of assets, especially in periods of high inflation or volatile markets.
This leads to a mismatch between financial statements and the actual economic
position of a business.
● Theoretical Issues: The reliance on historical cost accounting has been challenged by
proponents of fair value accounting, which suggests that assets and liabilities should
be measured at their current market value to better reflect the financial condition of an
organization.
The chapter introduces normative true income theories and discusses the
decision-usefulness approach to accounting theory.
The chapter explores positive accounting theories, which aim to describe and explain actual
accounting practices, rather than prescribe what should be done.
● Positive Theories: These theories are grounded in empirical research and focus on
understanding how accounting decisions are made in practice. They attempt to
explain the behavior of accountants, the choice of accounting methods, and the impact
of accounting on the real world.
● Construction of Positive Theories: The chapter discusses how positive accounting
theories are constructed based on observations of accounting practices in the field and
the data collected from these observations.
The chapter also introduces naturalistic approaches to accounting theory and discusses the
importance of ontology (the study of being and existence) in theory development.
Key Takeaways:
This chapter delves into various approaches to accounting theory, offering insights into the
different methodologies and critical issues that shape how accounting is understood and
practiced. It emphasizes the importance of context, real-world applicability, and empirical
research in constructing accounting theory.