The document discusses the critical timing issues in sequential circuits, including propagation delays, setup and hold times, and clock synchronization. It outlines the design flows for ASICs and FPGAs, highlighting their differences in flexibility, cost, and performance. Additionally, it covers static timing analysis, timing rules, and coding guidelines relevant to digital circuit design.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views32 pages
Sequential Cicuit Timing
The document discusses the critical timing issues in sequential circuits, including propagation delays, setup and hold times, and clock synchronization. It outlines the design flows for ASICs and FPGAs, highlighting their differences in flexibility, cost, and performance. Additionally, it covers static timing analysis, timing rules, and coding guidelines relevant to digital circuit design.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32
Sequential Circuit Timing
• The correct functioning of sequential circuits involves several timing issues.
• Propagation delays of flip-flops, The propagation delay can depend on whether the output is changing from high to low or vice versa • gates and wires; • setup times and • hold times of flip-flops; • clock synchronization; • clock skew; These are the important issues in designing sequential circuits Propagation Delays, Setup, and Hold Times • Static timing analysis (STA) is a method of validating the timing performance of a design by checking all possible paths for timing violations under worst-case conditions. • A static analysis path starts at a source flip-flop (or at a primary input) and terminates at a destination flip-flop (or primary output). • A static timing path between two flip-flops starts at the input to the source flip-flop and terminates at the input of the destination flip-flop. • It does not go through the destination flipflop. The path terminates when it encounters a clocked device. If a signal goes from register (flip-flop) A to register B and then to register C, the signal contains two paths • The timing paths in a synchronous digital system can be classified into 4 types: I. Register to register paths (i.e., flip-flop to flip-flop) II. Primary input to register paths (i.e., input to flip-flop) III. Register to primary output paths (i.e., flip-flop to output) IV. Input to output paths (i.e., no flip-flop) A Circuit to Illustrate Timing Paths Imp definitions • A setup time violation occurs if the data changes just before the clock without pro- viding enough setup time for the flip-flop. • A hold-time violation occurs if the data changes just after the clock without providing enough hold time for the flip-flop. • Slack is the amount of time still left before a signal will violate a setup or hold-time constraint. • Paths must have a positive or zero slack in order to have no violations. • Paths that have a zero or very small slack are the speed-limiting paths in the design, because any small changes in clock or gate delays will lead to violations in such circuits. • Paths that have a negative slack time have already violated a setup or hold constraint. • Static timing analysis considers the worst possible timing scenarios, but not the logical operation of the circuit. In comparison with circuit simulation, static timing analysis is faster because it doesn’t need to simulate multiple test vectors. Timing Rules for Flip-Flop to Flip-Flop Paths • Rule No. 1: Setup time rule for flip-flop to flip-flop path: Clock period should be long enough to satisfy flip-flop setup time. • Rule No. 2 Hold-time rule for flip-flop to flip-flop path: Minimum circuit delays should be long enough to satisfy flip-flop hold time. • Rule No. 3 Setup time rule for input to flip-flop path: External input changes to the circuit should satisfy flip-flop setup time. • Rule No. 4 Hold-time rule for input to flip-flop path: External input changes to the circuit should satisfy flip-flop hold times. Design flow for ASIC and FPGA • The design flow for ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit) and FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array) development includes a series of similar steps, but the tools, objectives, and final implementations differ significantly between the two. Here’s a breakdown of the design flows for each: • FPGA Design Flow • FPGAs are reprogrammable devices with an array of logic blocks, so their design flow is generally more iterative and flexible. 1.Design Entry: The design is created using Hardware Description Languages (HDLs) like VHDL or Verilog, or via schematic entry and block design tools. 2.Simulation & Functional Verification: The initial design is tested through simulations to verify its functionality and correctness, using software like ModelSim or Vivado. 1.Synthesis: The HDL code is converted into a gate-level netlist that can be mapped onto FPGA resources. This process is handled by synthesis tools like Xilinx Vivado or Intel Quartus. 2.Implementation (Place and Route): 1. Mapping: Maps the netlist onto FPGA logic blocks. 2. Placement: Determines where each block will be placed on the FPGA. 3. Routing: Connects the blocks based on the design. 3.The output is a bitstream file that configures the FPGA hardware. 4.Timing Analysis and Optimization: Ensure the design meets timing requirements (e.g., clock constraints) to prevent signal delays. 5.Configuration and Testing: The bitstream is loaded onto the FPGA, and the design is tested on the actual hardware. Modifications are easy at this stage, as the FPGA can be reprogrammed with a new bitstream. 6.Debugging and Iteration: Tools like ChipScope or SignalTap allow for real-time debugging on the FPGA, and changes can be implemented quickly. • ASIC Design Flow • ASICs are fixed hardware devices once manufactured, so the design process is more extensive and focused on optimization to meet performance, power, and area (PPA) constraints. 1.Design Specification: Define detailed requirements and constraints, including functionality, performance, and power objectives. 2.Design Entry: Similar to FPGA, using HDL or schematic entry, but with a focus on defining constraints for optimal silicon use. 3.Functional Verification: Extensive verification using simulation tools and formal verification to ensure all aspects of the design meet the functional specifications. 4.Synthesis: The HDL is synthesized into a gate-level netlist optimized for the target technology. Power, performance, and area optimization are prioritized. 1. Floorplanning and Physical Design: 1. Floorplanning: Organize the layout of the circuit blocks on the chip. 2. Placement: Place the logic cells and blocks onto the physical design. 3. Clock Tree Synthesis (CTS): Ensure the clock signal is distributed with minimal skew. 4. Routing: Connects the placed cells based on the netlist. 2. Design Rule Check (DRC) & Layout Versus Schematic (LVS): Ensure the design adheres to manufacturing rules and that the layout matches the intended schematic. 3. Static Timing Analysis (STA): Verify that all timing requirements are met to prevent delays or setup/hold violations. 4. Power Analysis: Analyze power consumption and optimize to meet the target. 5. Verification: Includes more thorough testing like gate-level simulation, and Design-for-Test (DFT) structures are added for manufacturing testing. 6. Sign-Off: The design undergoes final checks, including formal verification and tape-out preparation. 7. Fabrication: The design is sent to a foundry for manufacturing, which produces the actual ASIC hardware. 8. Testing and Validation: Once fabricated, the chip is tested extensively to ensure it functions as intended. Comparison of ASIC and FPGA Design Flows
• Flexibility: FPGAs allow reprogramming and are well-suited for
iterative design, while ASICs are one-time programmable and require higher initial investment. • Cost: FPGA development has lower initial costs, but ASICs become more cost-effective for large production volumes. • Performance: ASICs can be highly optimized for specific applications, often achieving better performance and lower power consumption than FPGAs. • In summary, FPGA design flow is more iterative and allows for flexibility and reconfiguration, while ASIC design flow is more rigorous and targeted toward final, optimized silicon. Compiler directives • Timescale • Syntax: \timescale <time_unit> / <time_precision> • `Purpose: Specifies the time unit and precision for simulation timing. • Example: \timescale 1ns / 1ps` sets the time unit to 1 nanosecond and the precision to 1 picosecond. • Use Case: Useful for defining timing resolution in testbenches and simulation models. • Define • Syntax: \define <macro_name> <value>` • Purpose: Defines macros, which act as constants or shorthand for specific values or expressions. • Example: \define DATA_WIDTH 8 creates a constantDATA_WIDTH` with a value of 8. • Use Case: Enables easy modification of parameters (like data widths or constants) throughout the code by changing a single line. • Include • Syntax: \include "filename"` • Purpose: Imports the content of another Verilog file. • Example: \include "definitions.v"will include the code from definitions.v`. • Use Case: Organizes code by separating common definitions or module parameters into separate files. • ifdef, ifndef, elsif, else, and endif • Syntax:Verilog `ifdef <macro_name>// code if macro_name is defined `else // code if macro_name is not defined `endif • Purpose: Conditionally includes code based on whether a macro is defined.Example:verilogCopy code`define DEBUG`ifdef DEBUG initial $display("Debugging enabled");`endif • Use Case: Controls which parts of the code are included, useful for creating different configurations or enabling debug code without affecting the main functionality. Coding guidelines Slack In digital circuit design, slack is a term used to describe the difference between the required timing of a signal and its actual arrival time. It's an essential concept in timing analysis and helps determine whether a circuit can meet its timing requirements. •Positive Slack: Indicates that the design meets the timing requirement. •Negative Slack: Indicates a timing violation, requiring design optimization. •Setup Slack: Ensures data arrives before the next clock edge. •Hold Slack: Ensures data remains stable after a clock edge. Analyzing and managing slack is crucial for ensuring a design's performance, stability, and reliability.