The document outlines the elements and legal standards for trademark infringement, including ownership, reproduction without consent, and likelihood of confusion. It also discusses copyright law, including what constitutes copyrightable works, the rights of copyright owners, and the concept of fair use. Additionally, it explains the differences between trademarks, copyrights, and patents, as well as the remedies available for infringement in each case.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views69 pages
Law 3 PDF Part 1 Ipl
The document outlines the elements and legal standards for trademark infringement, including ownership, reproduction without consent, and likelihood of confusion. It also discusses copyright law, including what constitutes copyrightable works, the rights of copyright owners, and the concept of fair use. Additionally, it explains the differences between trademarks, copyrights, and patents, as well as the remedies available for infringement in each case.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 69
TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Elements:
1, Ownership of a trademark through registration
2eThat the trademark is reproduced, counterfeited, copied, or
colourably imitated by
another
3. No consent by the trademark owner or assignee
4. Use in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or advertisi
any such goods, business or services or those related there
5. Likelihood of ConfusionCOLORABLE IMITATION
*such a close or ingenious imitation as to be calculated to
deceive ordinary purchasers, or such resemblance of the
infringing mark to the original as to deceive an ordinary
purchaser giving such attention as a purchaser usually gives,
and to cause him to purchase the one supposing it to be the
otherLikelihood of confusion
Types of confusion
* Confusion of goods- As to the goods themselves
* Confusion of business- As to the source or origin of such goods
-Wherein the goods of the parties are different but the
defendant's product can reasonably be assumed to originate from
the plaintiff thereby deceiving the public into believing that there is
some connection between the plaintiff and defendant, which in
fact, does not exist.
HommeTests of confusion
* Dominancy test- focuses on the prevalent features of the competingTests of confusion
+ Totality test- determined on the basis of visual, aural, connotative comparisons and
overall impressions engendered by the marks in controversy as they are encountered
in the marketplace.
¢ Stud
EOther factors
+a Sonans Rule — aural effects of the words and letters contained in
the marks are also
considered in determining the issue of confusing similarity
« Examples:
@ “Pycogenol” vs. “PCO-GENOL” (Prosource vs. Horphag)
@ “Dermaline” vs. “Dermalin” (Dermaline Inc. vs. Myra
Pharmaceuticals)
@ “Nanny” vs. “Nan” (Nestle S.A. vs. Dy Jr.)Doctrine of secondary meaning
* This doctrine is to the effect that a word or phrase originally incapable
of exclusive appropriation with reference to an article on the market,
because geographically or otherwise descriptive, might nevertheless
‘0 long and so exclusively by one producer with
reference to his article that, in that trade and to that branch of the
purchasing public, the word or phrase has come to mean that the
article was his product.Unfair competition
* It is the passing off (or palming off) or attempting to pass off upon the
public of the goods or business of one person as the goods or business of
another with the end and probable effect of deceiving the public.
Unauthorized use of a trademark. The passing off of one’s goods as those of
another.
Fraudulent intent is unnecessary. Fraudulent intent is essential.
GR: Prior registration of the trademark is Registration is not necessary.
a prerequisite to the action.
XPN: Well-known marksRemedies and Jurisdiction
Administrative action — IPO-BLA, concurrent with RTC-SCCs
Civil Action, RTC-SCC concurrent with IPO-BLA
@Criminal-Action,exclusive with RTC-SCC
-2-5 years imprisonment
-P50,000-P200,000 in fineCOPYRIGHT
* Aright over literary and artistic works which are original
intellectual creations in the literary and artistic domain
protected from the moment of creation
4
ASECopyrightable works
Derivative Works
a. Dramatizations, translations, adaptations, abridgements, arrangements,
and other alterations of literary or artistic works;
b. Collections of literary, scholarly, or artistic works and compilations of
data and other materials which are original by reason of the selection or
coordination or arrangement of their contents (IPC, Sec. 173).
CSECopyrightable works
1. Literary and Artistic Works
a. Books, pamphlets, articles and other writings
b. Lectures, sermons, addresses, dissertations
prepared for Oral delivery, whether or not reduced
in writing or other material form
€ Letters (shall belong to the writer)
4. Dramatic, choreographic works
¢, Musical compositions
{. Works of Art
6. Periodicals and Newspapers
h. Works relative to Geography, topography,
architecture or science
i. Works of Applied art
J. Works of a Scientific or technical character
k. Photographic works
|. Audiovisual works and cinematographic works
'm. Pictorial illustrations and advertisements.
¥. Computer programs; and
0. Other literary, scholarly, scientific and artistie
works (PC, Sec. 172.1)
4
(ties
oeCopyrightable works
Derivative Works
a. Dramatizations, translations, adaptations, abridgements, arrangements,
and other alterations of literary or artistic works;
b. Collections of literary, scholarly, or artistic works and compilations of
data and other materials which are original by reason of the selection or
coordination or arrangement of their contents (IPC, Sec. 173).NON-COPYRIGHTABLE WORKS
1. Idea, procedure, system, method or operation, concept, principle, discovery or mere data as such
2. News of the day and other items of press information '
3. Any official text of a legislative, administrative or legal nature, as well as any official translation thereof
5. Decisions of courts and tribunals ~ this refers to original decisions and not to annotated decisions such
as the SCRA or SCAD as these already fall under the classification of derivative works, hence
copyrightable
6. Any work of the government of the Philippines
7. TV programs, format of TV programs (Joaquin v. Drilon, G.R. No. 108946, Jan. 28, 1999)
8. Systems of bookkeeping; and
9, Statutes.ARE TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES
GHTABLE?
jes are not copyrightable and therefore the use of them does not
infringement. The Intellectual Property Code mandates originality as a
prerequisite for copyright protection. This requirement necessitates independent
creation plus a modicum of creativity.
Ses
+ A compilation is not copyrightable per se, but is copyrightable only if its facts have
been "selected, coordinated, or arranged in such a way that the resulting work as a
whole constitutes an original work of authorship.” Thus, the statute envisions th
some ways of selecting, coordinating, and arranging data are not sufficiently or
to trigger copyright protection. Even a compilation that is copyrightable recei
limited protection, for the copyright does not extend to facts con
compilationRights of copyright owners
‘Economic rights - The right to carry out, authorize or prevent the following acts:
‘a. Reproduction of the work or substantial portion thereof
b. Carry-out derivative work (dramatization, translation, adaptation, abridgement, arrangement or other
transformation of the work)
«. First distribution of the original and each copy of the work by sale or other forms of transfer of
‘ownership
4, Rental right
. Public display
f. Public performance
{Other communications to the public.
4
esDuration of economic rights
Literary and Artistic Works
Derivative Works.
Joint Authorship
‘Anonymous or Pseudonymous Works
Work of Applied Art
Photographic works
Audiovisual works
Performances nat incorporated in
recordings
Sound recordings and performances
Incorporated therein
Life ofthe author + 50 years after his
death
Life ofthe last surviving author + 50,
vears after his death
50 years from date itis firs lawfully
published
If before expiration of period, identity is
revealed or no longer in doubt, the rule
fn Literary and Joint Authorship applies
25 years from date of making
I published ~ 50 years from publication,
Unpublished ~ 50 years from making
50 years from end of the year in which
performance took place
50 years from end of the year in which
recording took placeithorship of the works be attributed to him (attribution
right/paternity right)
b. To make any alterations of his work prior to, or to withhold it from publication
c. To preserve integrity of work, object to any distortion, mutilation or other
modification which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation; and
d. To restrain the use of his name with respect to any work not of his own,
a distorted version of his work(right against false attribution) (IPC, Se:Duration of moral rights
* “During the lifetime of the author and in perpetuity after his death” —
Paternity Right/Right of Attribution
* Coterminous with Economic Rights -Alteration and Non-Publication
Right; Right to Preservation of Integrity; and Right against False
Attribution
estExpiration Of Copyright
- Transfers to public domain
- Examples: Pride and Prejudice, The Lizzie Bennet Diaries
aSCopyright infringement
Element
> Ownership of a valid copyright
‘Proof of Ownership: Sec. 218 ~ Affidavit Evidence
> Exercise of any of the exclusive economic rights in Section 177
without the consent of the copyright owner
MIUNLESS: FAIR USEFair use exception
* fair oe for criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching [C-
C-N-T] including limited [multiple] number of copies for
_.classroom_use, scholarship, research and similar purposes
{CSR} . (Sec. 185)Factors to be considered in determining fair use
(Sec.
185)
L Purpose & character of the use
01
-2.Nature.of the copyrighted Work
3. Amount & substantiality of the portion used in
relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; &
4. Effect of the use upon the potential market for or
value of the copyrighted work.Who are liable for infringement?
a. Directly commits an infringement;
b. Benefits from the infringing activity of another person who commits
anunidoaement ithe person beneftnghas been given notice ofthe
infringing activity and has the right and ability to control the activities
of the other person;
c. With knowledge of infringing activity, induces, causes or materially
contributes to the infringing conduct of another (IPC, Sec. 216, as
amended by R.A. No. 10372).¥ yright infringement vs. plagiarism
u
The _unauthorized......use of The.use of another's information,
I in a manner le
that violates one of the copyright withou
owner's exclusive rights, such as of the original source.
the right to reproduce or perform
the copyrighted work, or to make
derivative works that build upon itRemedies in case of Copyright
Infringement
12. Damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the
Infringement as well asthe profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement
Ss Impounding: during the.pendency of the action sales invoices and other documents evidencing
sales,
4. Destruction without any compensation all infinging copies
5. Moral and Exemplary damages (IPC, Se. 216.1); or
6, Seizure and impounding of any article, which may serve as evidence inthe court proceeding
(iP¢, Sec. 216.2)Differences between Copyright, Trademark
and Patents
1s a
Intellectual rights Technical solution of Any visible sign capable _titeraryand artistic
problem inany fied of | of distinguishing the works
hhuman activity which's goods (tademark or
‘ew (novel invention) Services (service mark)
and industily of an enterprise must be
spoliabie
Term of protection 20 years from ling date {depends onthe type of
‘of application .(generaly 50 yeas)
Office where registered Bureau of Patents, Bureau of Not required;
Intellectual Trademars, Optional at The
Property Office Intellectual "Nationa Library
Property Office or PoPractical application >
* Copyright?
Logos and word marks
* Patent?
Camere, fingerprint recognition, facial recognitionDoctrine of Exhaustion
Also known as the doctrine of first sale, it provides that the
patent holder has control of the first sale of his invention. He
has the opportunity to receive the full consideration for his
invention from his sale. Hence, he exhausts his rights in the
future control of his invention.
4
| Bee
mclaren cecy ConenecePatent Infringement
The MAKING, USING, OFFERING FOR SALE, SELLING, or
IMPORTING a patented product or a product obtained
directly or indirectly from a patented process, or the
USE of a patented process without the authorization of
the patentee. (Sec. 76)A patent maybe infringed either:
1.Literally, or
2.By equivalentsLiteral infringement
Literal infringement exists if an accused device falls directly
within the scope of properly interpreted claims.
4
1 AESDoctrine of equivalents
An infringement also occurs when a device appropriates a
prior invention by incorporating its innovative concept and,
ification and change, performs substantially
the same function in substantially the same way to achieve
substantially the same result.
function-means- and-result testREMEDIES OF THE OWNERS OF THE
PATENT AGAINST INFRINGERS
* Civil action for infringement
* Criminal action for infringement — If the infringement is repeated; The criminal action
prescribes'in three (3) years from the commission of the crime
* Administrative remedy - Where the amount of damages claimed is not less than
P200,000.00
* Destruction of Infringing material-upon court order
eoDEFENSES IN ACTION FOR
INFRINGEMENT
L.nvalidity of the patent (IPC, Sec. 81);
2. Any of the grounds for cancellation of patents:
a. That what is claimed as the invention is not new or patentable
b. That the patent does not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear
and complete for it to be carried out by any person skilled in the art; or
c. That the patent is contrary to public order or morality (IPC, Sec. 61).
3. Prescription
BEE
eeRequirements for a mark to be
registered
* Avisible sign and
* Capable of distinguishing one’s goods and services from
another.
SA
1 ASSVisible sign
* Words
sletters
+ Nuinerals
Fi Pi
* Shapes
* Colors
+ Logos
* Three dimensional
* Objects
* CombinationsNot visible
* Scents
* Sounds
4Marks which may be registered
Any word, name, symbol, emblem, device, figure, sign, phrase,
or any combination thereof except those enumerated under
Section.123, IPC.Trademark vs. Trade nam:
TRADEMARK TRADE NAME
Identifies or distinguishes the goods Identifies or distinguishes the
or services business or enterprise
Registration is required Registration is not required.Collective mark
* mark or trade-name used by the members of a cooperative, an
association or other collective group or organization
aRIGHTS OVER A TRADEMARK
CONFERRED
* The rights in a mark shall be acquired through registration with the
IPO. (IPC, Sec. 122) The filing date of application is the operative act
to acquire trademark rights.
* Prior use is no longer a condition precedent for registration of
trademark, service mark or trade name.
odCQUISI ERSHIP OF
* The rights in a mark shall be acquired through registration
but the right to register a trademark should be based on
* An exclusive distributor does not acquire any prop!
interest in the principal's trademark and cannot register it i
his own name unless it is has been validly assigned to hiiREGISTRATION
*- Prior use is not a requirement but there must be actual use after
application
*-Declaration of Actual Use — within three (3) years from filing of the
applicationDURATION OR EFFECTIVITY OF
TRADEMARK REGISTRATION
+10 years, subject to indefinite renewals of 10 years each.
required to file a declaration of actual use and
evidence to that effect, or show valid reasons based on the existence
of obstacles to such use, within one (1) year from the fifth
anniversary of the date of the registration of the mark. Otherwise, the
mark shall be removed from the Register by the IPO. (IPC, Secs.
and 146)NON-REGISTRABLE MARKS
* Immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matters
* Matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection
with persons, etc.
* Contrary to public order or morality
7 AesNON-REGISTRABLE MARKS
* Flags/coat of arms of nations
*- Names, portraits or signature of living
* persons
- Exception: with consent
*- Names, portraits or signature of a deceased President of
the Philippines
- Exception: with written consent of his/her living widow
4
| AeNON-REGISTRABLE MARKS
. cle nee mere tat
pl jetor ora r priority date, in
rO|
an of:
a. The same 2 The same goods or services, ow vv
b. Closely related goods or services, or
c. If it nearly resembles such a mark as to be likely to deceive or
cause confusion: '
*FIRST-TO-FILE RULE‘NON-REGISTRABLE MARKS: WELL-
KNOWN MARKS
* Identical with an internationally well-known mark, whether or not it is
registered here, used for identical or similar goods or services;
‘dential with an internationally well-known mark which is registered
the Philippines with respect to non-similar goods or services.
Provided, that the interests of the owner of the registered mark are
likely to be damaged by such use;RIGHTS OF A TRADEMARK OWNER
+ Right to exclusive use of the mark in connection with one’s own goods or services
resulting in likelihood of confusion
+" Right to prevent others from use of an identical mark for the same, similar or related
goods or services. (Sec.147)
TERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE: Trademark registration abroad shall not be valid and
binding here in the Philippines
Exception: Well-known marks, bad faithTRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
Cane ee
*Use without consent of the trademark owner of any
reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable limitation of any
or trade name. Such use is likely to cause
confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers or others as to
the source or origin of such goods or services, or Identity of
such business.TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
*Use without consent of the trademark owner of any
reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable limitation of any
or trade name. Such use is likely to cause
confusion or mistake or to deceive purchasers or others as to
the source or origin of such goods or services, or Identity of
such business.Rule: When a work has already been made
available to the public, it shall be non-patentable
for absence of novelty.
Exception: Doctrine of Non-Prejudicial Disclosure
the disclosure of information contained in the application during the 12-month period before the filing
date or the priority date of the application if such disclosure was made by:
1. The inventor;
2. Apatent office and the information was contained:
a. In another application filed by the inventor and should have not have been disclosed by the office, o
b. In an application filed without the knowledge or consent of the inventor by a third party which
obtained the information directly or indirectly from the inventor;
3. A third party who obtained the information directly or indirectly from the invento!Test of Non-Obviousness
* If any person possessing ordinary skill in the art was able to draw the
inferences and he constructs that the supposed inventor drew from
prior art, then the latter did not really invent it
* Person skilled in the art-Ordinary practitioner (fictional person)
a. Has access and understanding of all the prior art
b. Aware of common general knowledge in the specific art
c. Observes developments in the related technical field
-could be a team; need not have inventive abiliNon-patentable inventions
_}. Fant varieties or animal breeds or essentially biological process for the production of plants
4r animals. This provision shall not apply to micro-organisms and non-biological and
microbiological processes;
@sthetic creations; fh Le
3, Discoveries, scientific theories and mathematical methods; i GS
4. Schemes, rules and methods of performing mental acts, playing games or doing business,
and programs for computers;
5. Anything which is contrary to public order or morality (IPC as amended by R.A. 9502, Sec. 2:
6. Methods for treatment of the human or animal body; and
7. In the case of drugs and medicines, mere discovery of a new form or new proper
known substance which does not result in the enhancement of the efficacy of thaOWNERSHIP OF PATENTS
SECTION 28. Right to a Patent. - The right to a patent belongs
to the inventor, his heirs, or assigns. When two (2) or more
persons have jointly made an invention, the right to a patent
shall belong to them jointly.
m7
(AESMay patent rights be assigned or
transferred?
YES. For a valid assignment of patent rights, the
assignment must be in writing and must be duly
notarized. (IPC, Sec. 105)FIRST-TO-FILE RULE
* If two (2) or more persons have made the invention separately and
independently of each other, the right to the patent shall belong to
the person who filed an application for such invention, or
* Where two or more applications are filed for the same invention, to
the applicant which has the earliest filing date (/PC, Sec. 29).INVENTIONS CREATED PURSUANT TO A
COMMISSION
Pursuant to a commission: The person who commissions the work shall own the
patent, unless otherwise provided in the contract.
Pursuant to employment: In case the employee made the invention in the course of his
employment contract, the patent shall belong to:
a. The employee, if the inventive activity is not a part of his regular duties even if th
employee uses the time, facilities and materials of the employer;
b. The employer, if the inventive activity is the result of the performance o
regularly-assigned duties, unless there is an agreement, express or in
contrary (IPC, Sec. 30).Patent registration
The procedure for the grant of patent may be summarized as follows:
1. Filing of the application
2. Accordance of the filing date
3. Formality examination
4. Classification and Search
5. Publication of application
6. Substantive examination
7. Grant of Patent
8. Publication upon grant
9. Issuance of certificate
Sf
(aPatent application
SECTION 32. The Application. - 32.1. The patent application shall be in
Filipino or English and shall contain the following:
(a) A request for the grant of a patent;
(b) A description of the invention;
(c) Drawings necessary for the understanding of the invention;
(d) One or more claims; and
(e) An abstract.
Homme
enoGrounds for cancellation of patent
may petition to cancel any patent or any claim or parts of a claim
any of the following grounds:
1. The invention is not new or patentable;
2. The patent does not disclose the invention in a manner sufficiently clear and
complete for it to be carried out by any person skilled in the art; or
3. Contrary to public order or morality (IPC, Sec. 61.1);
4. Patent is found invalid in an action for infringement (IPC, Sec. 82); and
5. The patent includes matters outside the scope of the disclosure contained in'the
application. (IPC, Sec 21, Regulations on Inter Partes Proceeding, Sec.1)Patent Application by Persons Not Having
the Right to a Patent
Remedies of persons with a right to a patent
Ifa person other than the applicant is declared by final court order or decision as
having the right to a patent, he may within 3 months after such decision has
become final:
1. Prosecute the application as his own
2. File a new patent application
3, Request the application to be refused; or
4, Seek cancellation of the patent (IPC, Sec. 67.1).
Time to file action:within one (1) year from the date of publication
7 heeRemedies of the True and Actual Inventor
If a person, who was deprived of the patent without his
consent or through fraud is declared by final court order or
decision to be the true and actual inventor, the court shall
order for his substitutior-espatentee, or at the option of the
true inventor, cancel the patent, and award actual and other
damages in his favor if warranted by the circumstances.
Time to file action: within one (1) year from the da
publicationRights conferred by patent
1. In case of Product — Right to restrain, prohibit and prevent any unauthorized
person or entity from making, using, offering for sale, selling or
importing(MUOSI) the product.
2. In case of Process — Right to restrain prohibit and prevent any unauthorized
person or entity from manufacturing, dealing in, using, offering for sale, selling
or importing any product obtained directly or indirectly from such process. (IPC,
Sec. 71) '
3. Right to assign the patent, to transfer by succession, and to conclude
licensing contracts. (IPC, Sec. 71.2)
The rights conferred by a patent application take effect after publication
Official Gazette. (IPC, Sec 46)LIMITATIONS OF PATENT RIGHTS
‘The owner of a patent has no right to prevent third parties from making, using, offering for sale, selling
or importing a patented product in the following circumstances:
2. Using a patented product after it has been put on the market in the Philippines by the owner of the
product, or with his express consent.
* In case of drugs or medicines, the said limitation applies after a drug or medicine has been introduced
in the Philippines or anywhere else in the world by the patent owner, or by any party authorized to
Use the invention. This allows parallel importation for drugs and medicines.
+ The right to import the drugs and medicines shall be available to any government agency 0
private third party (IPC, Sec. 72.1, as amended by RA No. 9502)LIMITATIONS OF PATENT RIGHTS
b. Where the act is done privately and on a non-commercial scale or for a non-
commercial purpose (IPC, Sec. 72.2).
c. Exclusively for experimental use of the invention for scientific purposes or
educational purposes. (IPC, Sec. 72.3).
d. In the case of drugs and medicines, where the act includes testing, using, making
or selling the invention including any data related thereto, solely for purposes
reasonably related to the development and submission of information and issuance
of approvals by government regulatory agencies required under any law of the
Philippines or of another country that regulates the manufacture, constructio
or sale of any product.OTHER LIMITATIONS...
‘Prioruser — '
Person other than the applicant, who in good faith, started
using the invention in the Philippines, or undertaken serious
preparations to use the same, before the filing date or priority
date of the application shall have the right to continue the use
thereof, but this right shall only be transferred or assigne
further with his enterprise or business (IPC, Sec. 73).Other limitations: Use by government
74.1. A Government agency or third person authorized by the Government may exploit the invention,
even without agreement of the patent owner where:
(a) The public interest, in particular, national security, nutrition, health or the development of other,
sectors, as determined by the appropriate agency of the government, so requires; or
(b) A judicial or administrative body has determined that the manner of exploitation, by the owner of the
patent or his licensee is anti-competitive; or
(c)In the case of drugs and medicines, there is a national emergency or other circumstance of extreme
urgency requiring the use of the invention; or
(4) In the case of drugs and medicines, there Is public non-commercial use of the patent by the
patentee, without satisfactory reason; or
() In the case of drugs and medicines, the demand for the patented article in the Phi
being met to an adequate extent and on reasonable terms, as determined by the
Department of Health.