Jurnal 4
Jurnal 4
Article
Economic Growth, Increasing Productivity of SMEs,
and Open Innovation
Batara Surya 1, *, Firman Menne 2 , Hernita Sabhan 3 , Seri Suriani 4 , Herminawaty Abubakar 5
and Muhammad Idris 5
Abstract: The empowerment of small and medium economic enterprises will drive economic growth.
The purpose of this study is to analyze (1) how economic growth works as a determinant of in-
creasing the productivity of small and medium enterprises; (2) the influence of government policies,
business capital support, and the strengthening of human resource capacity on the development of
small and medium enterprises (SMEs); and (3) strategies to increase business productivity and the
sustainability of SMEs. We used a sequential explanatory design, which is a combination of quanti-
tative and qualitative research, and data were obtained through observation, in-depth interviews,
surveys, and documentation. The results of the study indicate that economic growth coupled with
Citation: Surya, B.; Menne, F.; technological innovation will boost the productivity of economic enterprises and increase people’s
Sabhan, H.; Suriani, S.; Abubakar, H.; welfare. Government policies, business capital support, and human resource capacity strengthening
Idris, M. Economic Growth, simultaneously have a positive effect on the development of SMEs, with a determination coefficient
Increasing Productivity of SMEs, and of 97.6%. Based on the results of this study, an economic growth strategy based on technological
Open Innovation. J. Open Innov.
innovation is recommended for government decision making as an effort to increase the productivity
Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20.
of community economic enterprises in Makassar City, Indonesia.
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010020
Keywords: economic growth; business productivity; public welfare; economic business sustainability
Received: 11 December 2020
Accepted: 4 January 2021
Published: 7 January 2021
1. Introduction
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neu- Development policies that are oriented towards regional economic growth supported
tral with regard to jurisdictional clai- by the use of technology will accelerate and encourage increased productivity in economic
ms in published maps and institutio- enterprises developed in the community. Community economic development through
nal affiliations. entrepreneurship training has an impact on economic growth, and efforts to increase
community productivity will require technological innovation [1]. The dynamics of the
global economy have a significant impact on the economic structure of the region, including
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Li-
the SMEs [2]. Political stability and security play an important role in economic growth.
censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
This means that the components of political stability, socio-economic conditions, and
This article is an open access article
investment have a positive effect on the flow of capital and investment in a country,
distributed under the terms and con- including small and medium enterprise development [3]. Furthermore, industrialization
ditions of the Creative Commons At- and modernization followed by conducive investment flows are determinants of regional
tribution (CC BY) license (https:// economic growth in Indonesia [4]. Thus, technological innovation followed by political
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ stability leading to industrialization and modernization will accelerate economic growth
4.0/). and increase the productivity of community economic enterprises [5].
Economic growth in several countries in Southeast Asia during the 2018–2019 period
grew by an average of 4.6%. The highest economic growth was experienced by Cambodia
and Vietnam, with respective values of 7.1% and 6.9% [6]. There are 63 million SMEs
developing in Indonesia, 62 million of which are categorized as medium enterprises and
750,000 of which are categorized as small businesses. Thus, SMEs have the potential to
boost national economic growth in Indonesia. Furthermore, if these business ventures are
developed and improved, the Indonesian economy will experience a growth rate of 5% [7].
This means that developing SMEs will contribute 60% of Indonesia’s total gross domestic
product (GDP). The existence of MSMEs in Indonesia is still faced with a very basic problem,
namely weak access to formal financial institutions, especially access to capital loans from
banks, which only reach 20% of the total loans disbursed. Thus, the characteristics of small
and medium business management are still not conducive to maximum benefits due to
various policy problems that still require complex procedures and requirements [8].
In the context of regional growth at a macro level, support for the existence of economic
enterprises, especially SMEs, needs to be oriented towards creating competitiveness and
business productivity that is competitive in global, national, and local markets. Thus, it
requires increased knowledge, good management, and a strengthening of human resource
competencies. That is, the key element of the sustainability of an economic enterprise is
the ability to read the strategic environment and be competitive [9,10]. Economists believe
that the achievement of high economic growth, which is most often measured in GDP
(Gross Domestic Product), not only reflects wealth, social welfare, and the ability to develop
entrepreneurship, but is also important for balancing economic, environmental, and social
development on an ongoing basis [11,12]. Furthermore, in the context of local and regional
development, relational assets are important in strengthening the capacity of business
institutions, network systems, and business cooperation as a single system [13,14].
The acceleration of the development of Makassar City towards industrialization and
city modernization is marked by an economic growth of 10.2%. Five strategic economic
sectors contributed positively to Makassar City’s Gross Regional Domestic Product in
2019: (1) wholesale trade, retail, and car and bicycle repair, with a contribution value of
20.46%; (2) construction services, with a contribution value of 18.22%; (3) the processing
industry, with a contribution value of 10.31%; (4) educational services, with a contribution
value of 8.77%; and (5) information and communication, with a contribution value of
9.08% [15]. These five sectors confirm that the macroeconomic growth of Makassar City
is relatively stable but has not been able to encourage an increase in SMEs in relation to
business innovation and sustainable employment absorption. This condition is influenced
by several factors, including (1) the weak process of developing SMEs, (2) the innovation
and utilization of technology that has not been optimized to support the development of
SMEs, (3) support for business capital and access to formal finance to support increased
production, a diversity of economic enterprises, and product marketing systems that are
not yet optimal and sustainable, and (4) government policy support that has not been
optimal for SMEs.
Research results that support this study include: (1) studies conducted by Munizu [16]
affirmed that hard and soft technology resources play an important role in encouraging the
increased productivity of economic enterprises in relation to organizational arrangements.
(2) Studies conducted by Smith [17] found that the technological innovation capability of an
economic enterprise is an integration of all existing resources in one company. (3) Studies
conducted by Hsien Wang et al. [18] found that the ability of technological innovation is
directly related to five indicators, namely, (i) the ability to read opportunities, (ii) innovation
in making decisions, (iii) ability in marketing, (iv) production capability, and (v) capital
capability. (4) Studies conducted by Xirogiannis et al. [19] found that the relationship
between human resource competence and the performance of SMEs was influenced by
human resource competency factors, namely, knowledge, skills, and the ability to improve
business performance. The results of these studies are at a meeting point in the sense that
SMEs will be productive when followed by the ability of human resources and technological
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 3 of 37
2. Conceptual Framework
The dynamic development of Makassar City illustrates that the macroeconomic
growth orientation has made a positive contribution to the Gross Regional Domestic
Product but has not been able to encourage the improvement of the micro economy and
the small business sector driven by SMEs. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a measure of
total production in relation to the monetary value of all goods and services produced in a
region for a given period of time [20]. This means that macroeconomic stability tends to be
stable if it is not faced with serious problems, such as disease outbreaks that disrupt the
social stability of the community, in relation to the decreasing purchasing power, as well as
the distribution patterns of the flow of goods and services. Thus, macroeconomic growth
tends to be stable if it is followed by enough public confidence in government policies. The
conceptualization of macroeconomic theory holds that sustainable development is an effort
to permanently maintain income, which results from a reduced capital stock [21,22]. This
means that capital flows are a key variable in supporting the sustainability of economic
growth both for the country and in the regional context [23,24].
In the context of regional development, the macroeconomic concept is basically ori-
ented towards efforts to promote fair and equitable economic growth through the use of
natural resources [25,26]. Development policies and financing are designed to address
income inequality and socio-economic inequality [27]. Thus, widening income inequal-
ity will have an impact on the economic order, political unrest, and social problems in
a country and region [28,29]. This means that inequality and socio-economic disparities
contribute to weak consumption levels, leading to an increase in the poverty rate. One of
the government’s efforts to overcome this problem is the development of SMEs through
a simplified licensing facility, in the hope that more economic enterprises will develop,
and which has the opportunity to legalize economic activities in the community [30,31].
Thus, an increase in the productivity of community economic enterprises in Makassar City
will be achieved if it is supported by government policies and an ease of licensing for the
community in relation to the development of SMEs.
One effort made by the Indonesian government to encourage increased economic
growth and the optimization of business ventures developed in the community has been to
simplify the licensing process through the use of online single submission (OSS). The use
of OSS is expected to encourage technological innovation efforts so that entrepreneurs can
survive, continue to produce, and drive the national economy. OSS is a business licensing
system that is integrated electronically with all ministries and state agencies to all local
governments in Indonesia. Thus, the implementation of an OSS policy is an effort to
improve the national economy and the growth of the business world, especially SMEs,
which have been complaining about the length of time required, and the bureaucratic chain
that must be passed, to start a business. Technological innovation is important in supporting
economic activities in the community for increasing productivity and modern business
management [32,33]. The study’s conceptual framework is presented in Figure 1 below.
which have been complaining about the length of time required, and the bureaucratic
chain that must be passed, to start a business. Technological innovation is important in
supporting economic activities in the community for increasing productivity and modern
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex.business
2021, 7, 20management [32,33]. The study’s conceptual framework is presented in Figure 1
4 of 37
below.
Figure 1.
Figure The conceptual
1. The conceptual framework
framework ofof economic
economic growth,
growth, technological
technological innovation,
innovation, and
and community
community economic
economic business
business
sustainability.
sustainability. Source:
Source: author’s
author’selaboration.
elaboration.
2.1.Economic
2.1. EconomicBusiness
BusinessProductivity
Productivity
Theera
The eraofofglobalization
globalizationwithwithtechnological
technologicaladvances
advancesindeed
indeedentails
entailsaademand
demandto tosup-
sup-
portregional
port regional andandnational
national economic
economic growth.
growth. In Ingeneral,
general,globalization
globalization is is seen
seen asas aaprocess
process
of global
of global dependence
dependencedriven drivenby by capital
capital and
and investment
investment towards
towards market
market integration
integration andand
competition, which requires deregulation
competition, which requires deregulation [34,35]. In this context, it can be understood
In this context, it can be understood that that
the progress of development and economic growth of Makassar
the progress of development and economic growth of Makassar City cannot be separated City cannot be separated
from the
from the impact
impact of of globalization
globalization andand technological
technologicaladvances,
advances,whichwhichplay playa astrategic
strategic role in
role
supporting
in supportingthe theperformance
performanceofofSMEs SMEsdeveloped
developedin inthe
the community.
community. Five important and
Five important and
strategic roles
strategic roles inin the
the use
use of
oftechnology
technologysupport
supportthe thedevelopment
development ofofSMEs
SMEs include
includethethe
follow-
fol-
ing: (1) changing manual processes to automatic ones, reducing labor
lowing: (1) changing manual processes to automatic ones, reducing labor costs and oper- costs and operating
costs;costs;
ating (2) reducing the time
(2) reducing needed
the time to perform
needed tasks;tasks;
to perform (3) increasing the speed
(3) increasing of decision
the speed of de-
cision making and increasing competitive economic business performance; (4)costs
making and increasing competitive economic business performance; (4) saving savingon
promotion and marketing; and (5) integrating the system from process
costs on promotion and marketing; and (5) integrating the system from process to product to product market-
ing. Thus, Thus,
marketing. the function and role
the function andof technology
role of technologywill will
accelerate the transformation
accelerate the transformation of the
of
business world, including SMEs developed in the community. Thus,
the business world, including SMEs developed in the community. Thus, the use of tech- the use of technology
is a driver
nology is a of business
driver sustainability,
of business digital digital
sustainability, transformation, and entrepreneurship
transformation, and entrepreneurship [36].
[36].
2.2. Sustainability of SMEs
Technology has become important for business competition and has penetrated all
aspects of business life. This means that technology is a strategy in dealing with ongo-
ing developments in an era of globalization and digitalization. The impact of globaliza-
tion is characterized by the mobility of goods and services, capital flows, and the use of
technology [37]. Furthermore, in order to face the global market competition, business
enterprises that can master technology are needed. This means that the technological
components owned by a business must be continuously updated to compete in prod-
uct marketing and reach potential markets. Thus, product advantages, market potential,
the fulfillment of customer needs, human resource capacity, the mastery of technology,
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 5 of 37
and the utilization of resources are factors that affect the performance of economic enter-
prises [38]. This means that business competitiveness, business productivity, management,
raw materials, production costs, technology, leadership transformation, trust and inno-
vative employee behavior systems contribute positively to the existence of companies
including SMEs [39,40]. The development of SMEs through technological innovation that
develops in the community in Makassar City is expected to expand market reach and
the process of accelerating structural transformation. This indicator is measured based
on changes in the economic structure of Makassar City and the resilience of the national
economy in Indonesia.
The issue of sustainability has triggered the birth of new ideas about the concept
of economic development in relation to environmental and social aspects. Sustainable
development has become a fundamental strategy for guiding social and economic transfor-
mation [41,42]. Furthermore, small and medium business governance in Makassar City is
faced with new challenges, namely, in terms of business sustainability. Business continuity
is related to three basic components, namely, profit, people, and the planet. This means that
it requires the use of environmentally friendly technology and the development of clean
products [43]. Furthermore, the strategy to increase profit, people and planet can be carried
out in a simple way, namely waste management with the Garbage Bank system, product
innovation from recycled materials, paperless online promotion, the use of environmentally
friendly product packaging, reducing the use of equipment that consumes relatively large
amounts of energy, and apportioning some business profits towards social responsibility.
The aim is to ensure the sustainability of SMEs and social cohesion in society.
These indications were assessed based on the ability to survive and maintain economic
business stability. The number of SMEs in the developing city of Makassar was 2683 divided
into several categories, namely, (i) food and beverage businesses, (ii) handicraft businesses,
(iii) the creative economy, (iv) clothing, and (v) cafes and restaurants. Furthermore, the
sectors of economic activity and their contribution to the Gross Regional Domestic Product
of Makassar City for the period 2017–2019 are presented in Table 1 below.
Table 1 illustrates five business fields that have a dominant contribution value to the
economic growth of Makassar City: (1) wholesale trade, retail, and car and bicycle repair,
with an average growth of 5.56%; (2) the processing industry, with an average growth of
1.10%; (3) construction services, with an average growth of 5.65%; (4) information and
communication, with an average growth rate of 5.07%; and (5) financial and insurance
services, with an average growth of 3.34%. These five fields confirm that the economic
growth orientation of Makassar City still relies on trade, industry, construction services,
information and communication services, and financial and insurance services. Thus, the
economic growth of Makassar City has not been matched by its SMEs.
The potential for developing SMEs in Makassar City is dominant in centers of eco-
nomic activity in the city center and in transitional areas. Developing SMEs are spread
across several districts, among others: (1) Mariso Regency, with 517 business units;
(2) Mamajang District, with 81 units; (3) Tamalate District, with 157 units; (4) Makas-
sar Regency, with 149 units; (5) Ujung Pandang District, with 364 units; (6) Wajo District,
with 25 units; (7) Bontoala District, with 381 units; (8) Ujung Tanah District, with 8 units;
(9) Tallo Regency, with 82 units; (10) Panakukkang District, with 176 units; (11) Biringkanaya
Regency, with 63 units; (12) Tamalanrea District, with 25 units; (13) Rapoccini District,
with 408 units; (14) Manggala District, with 323 units; and (15) Sangkarrang Regency, with
5 units. The study locations are presented in Figure 2 below.
Mamajang District, with 81 units; (3) Tamalate District, with 157 units; (4) Makassar
Regency, with 149 units; (5) Ujung Pandang District, with 364 units; (6) Wajo District, with
25 units; (7) Bontoala District, with 381 units; (8) Ujung Tanah District, with 8 units; (9)
Tallo Regency, with 82 units; (10) Panakukkang District, with 176 units; (11) Biringkanaya
Regency, with 63 units; (12) Tamalanrea District, with 25 units; (13) Rapoccini District,
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 7 of 37
with 408 units; (14) Manggala District, with 323 units; and (15) Sangkarrang Regency, with
5 units. The study locations are presented in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Small and
and medium
medium enterprises
enterprises (SMEs)
(SMEs) in
in Makassar
Makassar City
City as
asstudy
studyobjects.
objects. Source:
Source: author’s
author’s elaboration
elaboration and
and
development planning agency at sub-national level in Makassar City.
development planning agency at sub-national level in Makassar City.
3.3. Data
3.3. Data Collection
Collection
In this study,
study, the
the data
data were
were obtained
obtained through
through field
field observations,
observations, surveys,
surveys, in-depth
in-depth
interviews, and documentation. The data sources
The data sources in this study were divided into three
three
categories: (1) Data on economic growth and technological
technological innovation
innovation are are determinants
determinants
of the increasing productivity of community economic enterprises in Makassar City. City. The
The
data sources
sources are
areeconomic
economicpotential,
potential,the
thebasic
basiceconomic
economic sector, and
sector, andtechnology
technologyutilization
utiliza-
obtained
tion through
obtained observation
through andand
observation documentation.
documentation. (2)(2)Data
Dataonon government
government policies,
business capital support, human resource capacity, and the the development
development of SMEs SMEs were
were
surveys, in-depth
obtained through observation, surveys, in-depth interviews,
interviews, andand documentation.
documentation. (3) (3) Data
on economic
economic growth, technological
growth, innovation,
technological businessbusiness
innovation, diversification, product marketing,
diversification, product
and business
marketing, economic
and businessstability
economic were obtained
stability werethrough
obtainedobservation, surveys, in-depth
through observation, surveys,
interviews, and documentation.
in-depth interviews, (4) Data on(4)
and documentation. strategies
Data onforstrategies
increasing forbusiness productivity
increasing business
and the sustainability
productivity and theof sustainability
economic enterprises, obtainedenterprises,
of economic through observation,
obtained surveys,
through
in-depth interviews, and documentation taking, into account the strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities, and threats of SME sustainability in Makassar City.
3.3.1. Observation
Observation was used to observe the characteristics and potential of SMEs, the busi-
ness cooperation that was built, the workforce used, and the efforts of SME to maintain
business stability. Furthermore, observation was also used to observe SME actors both
individually and in groups for some time without manipulating or controlling them, as well
as recording important findings to support the analysis process. The instruments used by
researchers in collecting through observation were, among others; field notes, periodicals,
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 8 of 37
and checklists. The aim was to describe the circumstances, situations and events related to
the existence of SMEs in Makassar City.
In this study, two things were done by researchers in identifying the existence of
SMEs, namely: (a) capturing the social situation and context of SMEs entrepreneurs in
developing their business, and (b) identify SME activities for the purpose of comparing and
assessing the different characteristics of the economic enterprises being developed. That is,
researchers noted things that are factual which are considered to influence the existence
of SMEs. From this information and context, the researchers then described the events
observed in the field. Types of data tracked in the implementation of observations included
the type of SMEs business, government policy support for SMEs development, business
stability, economic relations, work systems, used business capital, number of workers,
human resource capacity, technology used, management of the business, customer service,
diversification of businesses, and efforts to access potential markets. The results of these
observations by the researcher were then used to interpret the events that occured. That is,
the researcher concluded events in the field using theoretical references, for the purpose of
building research hypotheses.
3.3.3. Questionnaire
The questionnaire in this study was used for two functions: (1) Description, which
describes the characteristics and potential of developing SMEs in Makassar City; and
(2) Measurement, which describes the relationship to the object under study. Furthermore,
the purpose of using the questionnaire was to provide an overview of the potential of
developing SMEs in Makassar City. The questions raised in tracing the data were respon-
dents’ perceptions about government program support for SMEs development, SMEs
development needs, types of SMEs business, technology used, business diversification,
venture capital, SMEs product marketing, and SMEs business stability. The data was then
measured using a nominal scale and an interval scale.
Structured interviews using a questionnaire were carried out by asking questions to
predetermined respondents. The filling out of the questionnaire in this study was facilitated
by the enumerators who were previously selected. The enumerators were selected based
on the following considerations: (1) having the ability to collect data; and (2) understanding
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 9 of 37
the conditions of SMEs business in the study area. Before carrying out their duties in the
field, the enumerators were given instructions and exercises in filling out the questionnaire
as well as techniques for conducting interviews with respondents. Furthermore, the ques-
tionnaire was distributed to 15 sub-districts in Makassar City that had SME businesses. The
reason the researchers determined the location was based on the development conditions
of SMEs, which required various efforts to encourage increased productivity of economic
enterprises. The criteria for the actors who filled out the questionnaire (respondents)
were (i) SMEs based on the type of business, (ii) the participants were already married,
and (iii) the economic enterprises were developed by SMEs that have been running for
five years.
3.3.4. Documentation
Documentation is secondary data, collected by researchers to complement and support
analysis. The data referred to include (1) Makassar City Figures in 2019, (2) Makassar City
Gross Regional Domestic Product in 2017, 2018, and 2019, and (3) the SME profile. All
information obtained by researchers from the results of previous studies and data obtained
in the form of documents is categorized as secondary data. That is, the data obtained
by researchers is not directly obtained from primary sources but from secondary sources.
Furthermore, documentation data was used during the research, including documents
on the number of SMEs obtained from the Makassar City Statistics Office, SMEs profiles
obtained from the Makassar City SMEs Cooperative and Empowerment Office, and other
documents related to the developing SMEs in Makassar City. All of these documents are
used to support data from observations, in-depth interviews, and survey results.
is measured by indicators, namely (i) ability to compete, (ii) ability to diversify business,
(iii) ability to maintain product stability, and (iv) competitiveness of marketed products.
3.3.6. Triangulation
Triangulation was carried out by combining observations, in-depth interviews, and
documentation used as data sources, and this was done to test the credibility of the
data and understand and interpret economic growth and technological innovation as
determinants of the increasing productivity of economic enterprises. The goal was to
obtain consistent, comprehensive, and definitive data. The survey data were categorized
as quantitative, while the data from in-depth interviews and observations was categorized
as qualitative. Thus, triangulation was carried out in three stages: (i) the extension of
observations, (ii) the confirmation of data sources, and (iii) the testing of the credibility of
the data. The quantitative data collected through surveys include information regarding
(i) economic growth, (ii) technological innovation, (iii) business diversification, (iv) product
marketing, and (v) economic business stability. Furthermore, qualitative data collected
through in-depth interviews include information regarding (a) how to develop a business,
(b) work mechanisms, (c) product marketing, (d) labor used, and (e) factors affecting
SMEs. Qualitative data collected through observations include information regarding
(a) the selection of business locations, (b) the raw materials used, (c) business existence
and business stability, (d) the built economic relations, (e) work systems, and (f) barriers to
marketing products.
percentage analysis based on frequency figures. Sampling refers to Cochran [46] with the
following formulation:
n = Z2 αPQ/d2 (1)
where n is the sample, Zα is the standard deviation for 1.96 with a coefficient value of 95%,
P is the proportion of subjects, Q is 1, P = 0.5, and d is the degree of accuracy used, which is
0.15. The number of samples in this study was determined by as many as 350 respondents.
Y = a + b1 X1 + b2 X2 + b3 X3 + . . . bn Xn (6)
Explanations related to SWOT analysis (see Table 2) used in this study include (1) the
interaction between strength factors and opportunity factors (S–O interactions), based on
the principle of “using strength to take advantage of opportunities”; (2) the interaction
between factors of strength with threat factors (S-T interactions), based on the principle
of “using force to avoid or overcome threats”; (3) the interaction between the factors
of weakness with opportunities (W–O interactions), based on the principle of “taking
advantage of opportunities” or “taking advantage of opportunities with weaknesses”;
(4) the interaction between the factors of weakness with threat factors (W–T interactions),
based on the principle of “minimizing weaknesses and avoiding threats”. The grouping of
strategic issues can be divided into four categories: (1) S–O interactions, commonly called
the “aggressive strategy”, which will generate strategic issues in the comparative advantage
group, which is the advantage of SMEs; (2) S–T interactions, commonly known as the
“action diversification strategy”, which will generate strategic issues in the mobilization
group, which are efforts to mobilize the power possessed; (3) W–O interactions, commonly
known as the “stabilization strategy or rationalization strategy”, which will produce two
possible options: doing something (investing) or doing nothing (divesting); and (4) W–T
interactions, commonly called “defensive or survival strategies”, which can control losses
or avoid possible destruction. The process of combining the qualitative and quantitative
research in this study is illustrated in Figure 3 below.
4. Results
4.1. Determinants of Economic Growth and Technological Innovation
The economic growth of Makassar City illustrates that the achievement of develop-
ment targets has not been able to boost the productivity of community economic enter-
prises in a sustainable manner. SMEs are crucial for local economic development, playing a
noteworthy role in job creation, poverty alleviation, and economic growth [48,49]. These
indicators are reviewed based on the following: (1) government regulations, policies, and
programs have not directly contributed to the empowerment of SMEs; (2) limited manage-
ment resources, technological innovation, institutions, and access to potential markets; and
(3) a legal and political framework is absent, which is an important basis for the empow-
erment of SMEs, especially the micro business sector. These three things prevent SMEs
from positively contributing to economic growth and to Makassar City’s Gross Regional
Domestic Product.
There are a high number of laborers without adequate employment opportunities
and thus there is increasing unemployment. Thus, it is likely that it will be difficult to
achieve long-term economic and social outcomes [50]. Thus, creativity and technological
innovation efforts are needed in the development of SMEs supported by government
policies. The Industrial Revolution and the global economy have advanced rapidly due
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 14 of 37
4. Results
4.1. Determinants of Economic Growth and Technological Innovation
The economic growth of Makassar City illustrates that the achievement of develop-
ment targets has not been able to boost the productivity of community economic enter-
prises in a sustainable manner. SMEs are crucial for local economic development, playing
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 15 of 37
Location
Number Business Field Growth (%) Quotient (LQ) Information
Value
1 Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries 5.76 0.046 Non-Base
2 Mining and Excavation −10.08 0.000 Non-Base
3 Processing Industry 11.18 2.804 Base
4 Procurement of Electricity and Gas 8.63 0.656 Non-Base
5 Water Supply, Waste Management, and Waste and Recycling −0.40 2.924 Base
6 Construction 13.05 0.300 Non-Base
7 Wholesale and Retail Trade and Car and Motorcycle Repair 14.99 2.712 Base
8 Transportation and Warehousing 10.55 1.364 Base
9 Provision of Accommodation, Food, and Drink 7.61 3.021 Base
10 Information and Communication 9.47 2.698 Base
11 Financial Services and Insurance 6.88 3.377 Base
12 Real Estate 7.08 2.088 Base
13 Company Services 14.04 5.554 Base
14 Government Administration 10.86 1.626 Base
15 Education Services 25.41 3.694 Base
16 Health Services 11.98 2.831 Base
17 Other Services 13.36 4.063 Base
Source: analysis results.
Our interpretations are as follows: (1) the economic base sector consists of 13 economic
business fields, and (2) the non-basic sector includes four economic business fields. These
results confirm that the economic growth of Makassar City can drive the economy and
contribute positively to increasing regional revenue, but it has not been integrated with
the SMEs developed in the community. Thus, an economic policy from the government is
needed through strategic programs that favor SMEs. With the globalization of the knowl-
edge economy, national economic growth depends ever more on the efficiency of innovation
systems in stimulating the creation, dissemination, and use of knowledge. Technological
innovation is the main motivation in the evolutionary process of economic structures
towards economic development [53]. Furthermore, strategic efforts that can be made to
support the development of SMEs in Makassar City are as follows: (1) the empowerment
of economic enterprises; (2) business training and guidance towards the use of technology;
(3) financial management training and business capital support through formal financial
institutions; and (4) access to product marketing to reach potential markets. These will
require cooperation between the government, the private sector, and business actors. The
growth of the economic activity sector and its contribution to the Gross Regional Domestic
Product of Makassar City is presented in Table 4 below.
Economic Growth
Number Business Field Component of Component of Component of
Change in
Economic Proportional Economic
Income
Growth Growth Competitiveness
1 Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries 1,057,065.14 −924,868.15 (116,439.18) 144,713.07
2 Mining and Excavation 2535.45 −2437.21 (1335.13) (489.89)
3 Processing Industry 37,082,199.82 −33,649,482.60 (4,268,916.21) 6,097,189.86
4 Procurement of Electricity and Gas 51,791.24 −43,041.99 7426.57 17,949.59
Water Supply, Waste Management,
5 401,717.48 −348,324.39 (40,639.64) 55,452.16
and Waste and Recycling
6 Construction 31,192,545.21 196,836,957.61 225,597,340.43 9,175,035.17
Wholesale and Retail Trade and Car
7 33,301,407.04 −25,985,279.96 5,768,581.09 10,844,389.58
and Motorcycle Repair
8 Transportation and Warehousing 4,776,005.49 −3,911,636.66 239,383.12 1,152,235.06
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 16 of 37
Table 4. Cont.
Economic Growth
Number Business Field Component of Component of Component of
Change in
Economic Proportional Economic
Income
Growth Growth Competitiveness
Provision of Accommodation, Food,
9 4,254,246.59 −3,269,843.19 428,927.40 1,027,590.73
and Drink
10 Information and Communication 16,152,629.86 −12,721,275.80 2,080,467.11 4,659,740.42
11 Financial Services and Insurance 10,880,166.30 −9,30,085.98 476,713.53 2,875,300.57
12 Real Estate 7,874,489.85 −7,068,948.51 (1,111,907.63) 1,012,762.68
13 Company Services 2,165,789.77 −1,775,437.19 121,757.94 537,327.08
14 Government Administration 6,731,082.21 −6,079,316.11 (585,154.99) 1,267,812.03
15 Education Services 16,637,165.49 −13,639,381.72 844,884.66 4,038,030.98
16 Health Services 4,924,974.78 −4,054,936.77 428,832.14 1,391,448.53
17 Other Services 4,764,170.18 −3,683,495.79 786,903.66 1,479,045.95
Source: analysis results.
Our interpretations are as follows: (1) the dominant components of Makassar City’s
economic growth are the wholesale and retail trade sector and the car and bicycle re-
pair sector; (2) the dominant proportional growth component is in the construction sec-
tor; (3) the dominant component of economic competitiveness is in the construction sec-
tor; (4) changes in the income of Makassar City are predominantly influenced by the
trade, construction, processing industry, information and communication, and education
services sectors.
Furthermore, increasing the economic productivity of SMEs will require an adaptation
in the use of technology. Business strategy and organizational behavior require dynamic
adaptation and flexibility in responding to a changing business environment [54,55]. Field
facts that are found show that there are significant differences in various types of busi-
nesses that develop in communities that take advantage of technological innovations. This
condition is marked by a shift in normative space and the rationalization of actions in
developing economic business activities. The development of small business activities has
a tendency, to shift, while medium enterprises have a tendency to be balanced. These two
types of SMEs are then followed by the rationalization of actions. A comparison of the
process of shifting normative space and the process of rationalizing actions in relation to
the adaptation to technology utilization is described in Table 5 below.
Table 5. A comparison of the processes of business adaptation, shifting normative spaces, and rationalizing actions.
Table 5 provides an overview of the differences in the adaptive capacity and techno-
logical innovation of SMEs. Interpretations can be made regarding this process. First, the
economic growth of Makassar City has an impact on business transformation, investment
development, technological innovation, and the management of SMEs. Medium-sized
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 17 of 37
economic enterprises are categorized as upper. This process is closely related to the support
of investment, technology, modern business management, and cooperation in investment
within the framework of controlling production factors based on economic motivation
and business opportunities. In small businesses that are informal, the development of
investment, technology, and business management is categorized as low. This condition is
influenced by the ability of the business to access sources of business capital. Likewise, the
investment network is also very limited, and the ability to master technology is still rela-
tively simple. The economic business pattern that has been developed tends to be simple
and aimed only at meeting subsistence needs and is more independent in nature. At the
micro, small, and medium enterprise level, the transition process has a direct relationship
with employment status, wages, job security, job and career mobility, participation, and
satisfaction with job outcomes [56–59].
Second, the shift in normative space also shows differences in relation to the proce-
dures for production and the business being developed. The shift in normative space in
medium-sized economic enterprises is categorized as upper. This condition occurs as a
result of the production procedures and work systems that are carried out contractually and
collectively based on an individual’s ability to reach a position. This means that position
and status are largely determined by the adaptive capacity of the individual in the medium
economic enterprise work system. Furthermore, in small economic enterprises, the shift in
normative space is categorized as moderate. This condition occurs due to the influence of
values and traditions that are still quite strong, so that the principles of togetherness and
kinship are used as the basis for developing economic business. Thus, the development of
a developed economic enterprise does not directly affect how production is carried out,
nor does the position and status of the business tend to be constant. Even though there has
been a polarization in the economy, its effect is not significant. Social polarization occurs
when income inequality between groups occurs in an economic enterprise [60,61].
Third, the adaptation process in relation to the economic growth of Makassar City
is followed by the rationalization of actions by SMEs. In small economic enterprises, the
rationalization of the actions shown is categorized as moderate. This condition occurs
due to the influence of business capital and limited human resources. This means that
economic efforts are developed more for prosperity and motivation. Furthermore, different
conditions are shown in medium-sized economic enterprises, in the sense that medium-
sized economic enterprises developed in the community are perfectly structured. Complex
adaptive systems consist of a multitude of agents from whose individual adaptation efforts
the adaptive behavior of the system as a whole emerges. At the level of the individual
agent and the level of the system as a whole survival depends on proper adaptation to
the environment [62,63].
Fourth, the economic growth of Makassar City is related to efforts to increase produc-
tion by SMEs. In small economic enterprises, the effort to increase production is relatively
stagnant in the low category, while in medium economy businesses there is a tendency to
follow market demand in the medium category. This means that business differentiation
developed in the community is closely related to the ability of capital and efforts to build
product marketing networks.
Fifth, the economic growth of Makassar City in relation to human resource capacity is
closely related to the type of business being developed. Small economic enterprises tend to
use family and relatives with inadequate educational backgrounds as workers. Meanwhile,
medium-sized economic enterprises tend to utilize workers who have sufficient expertise
and skills. This difference illustrates that capital capacity, business management systems,
and business classifications play an important role in the use of human resources as labor
in SMEs. The innovation strategy is more focused on developing business management to
support increased productivity and product marketing [64]. Furthermore, innovation is the
willingness to go beyond the current best conditions and pursue new opportunities, such
as introducing new ideas from established practices and trying to do more than existing
businesses, with new product designs being innovations for each business unit [65,66].
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 18 of 37
Thus, capital capacity, business management systems, business classifications, and human
resources play an important role in business development and increasing productivity
towards sustainable product marketing.
Sixth, the economic growth of Makassar City in relation to business diversification
shows differentiation based on the category of community economic business types. In
small economic enterprises, business diversification is in a stagnant condition and has not
changed fundamentally. Meanwhile, medium-sized economic enterprises have a tendency
to follow consumer demand and developing situations. They tend to build innovations
based on the demands of consumer needs.
Seventh, the economic growth of Makassar City in relation to SMEs has limitations in
responding to and reaching potential markets. In small businesses, a business is closely
related to the ability to ensure consumer satisfaction with their products. The technology
used is relatively simple, and the market potential is limited. Meanwhile, medium-sized
enterprises have the ability to build networks in the product marketing system and use
modern technology. Thus, the differentiation of SMEs is strongly influenced by an ability to
build product marketing networks and by a mastery of technology. The actual conditions
for the accumulation of capital are quite different from those prevailing for individual
capital and simple reproduction [67]. The creative industry is now a topic of great publicity,
not only because the industry is developing in many countries because of the industry’s
peculiarities that are no longer based on economic issues (low prices), but also because
shifts to the creative aspect and product differentiation strategies (vertical and horizontal)
affect the operational performance of the SME industry significantly and negatively [68–70].
160 400
140
140 350 350 125 350 350 350
120 123
Business actor response
120 300
100 250
78 74
80 200
60
54
60 48 150
135 136 45
40
35 34.29 35.71 35.14
40 100 100 102 100 105 100 100
20 22.29 21.15
17.14 15.43 13.71
20 10 12.86 50
38.57 5.71 38.86 29.14 30
0 0
Very good Good Pretty good Not good
Creation of new entrepreneurs Business assistance Product marketing Business capital support Total
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Respondents’
Respondents’ perceptions
perceptions of
of the
the role
role and
and support
support of
of government
government policies
policies in
in the
the development
development of
of SMEs.
SMEs. Source:
Source:
primary data.
primary data.
Figure
Figure 44 shows
showsthe theresponse
responseofof SMEsSMEs to government
to government policies
policies in business
in business develop-
development.
ment.
The The interpretations
interpretations are asare as follows:
follows: (1) Government
(1) Government policypolicy
supportsupport in terms
in terms of busi-
of business
ness capital
capital supportsupport is 38.57%.
is 38.57%. (2) Government
(2) Government policypolicy
supportsupport in relation
in relation to thetoassistance
the assistance
and
and empowerment process for SME is 34.29%. (3) Government
empowerment process for SME is 34.29%. (3) Government policy support in relation to policy support in relation
to
thethe creation
creation of of
newnew entrepreneurs
entrepreneurs isis10.00%.
10.00%.(4) (4)Government
Governmentpolicy policysupport
support in in relation
relation
to SME product marketing is 17.14%. The results of the field confirmation
to SME product marketing is 17.14%. The results of the field confirmation show that the show that the
government
government policies
policiesrelated
relatedtotoMSME
MSMEdevelopment
development that have
that been
have implemented
been implemented have not
have
produced
not produced optimal results.
optimal Some Some
results. of the of factors that influence
the factors this condition
that influence are as follows:
this condition are as
(1) weak(1)
follows: coordination
weak coordinationbetweenbetween
agenciesagencies
in managing SMEs; (2)
in managing inadequate
SMEs; supportsup-
(2) inadequate for
human
port for resource capacitycapacity
human resource and insufficient professionalism
and insufficient in managing
professionalism economic
in managing enter-
economic
prises; (3) a sub-optimal
enterprises; (3) a sub-optimal abilityability
to organize SMEs;SMEs;
to organize and (4) an (4)
and ineffective fostering
an ineffective of SMEs
fostering of
in relation
SMEs to the various
in relation programs
to the various implemented
programs by the government.
implemented by the government.This means Thisthat
meansthe
implementation of government
that the implementation policies policies
of government has not hasbeen effective
not in encouraging
been effective the devel-
in encouraging the
opment
developmentof SMEs in Makassar
of SMEs City. Thus,
in Makassar the role
City. Thus, theofrole
government
of governmentis veryisimportant to in-
very important
to integrate
tegrate strategic
strategic programs
programs towards
towards increasing
increasing the productivity
the productivity of SMEs.of SMEs.
The mix Theofmix
policyof
policy
optionsoptions will depend
will depend on a numberon a number
of factorsofincluding
factors including societal attitudes
societal attitudes towards
towards entrepre-
entrepreneurship,
neurship, the structurethe structure of the workforce,
of the workforce, the size and therole
sizeofand role of government,
government, the prevalence the
prevalence
of existing of existing
levels levels of entrepreneurial
of entrepreneurial activity, and activity, and the conditions
the conditions of SMEs of SMEs
[75]. The[75].
re-
The responses
sponses of SMEs of SMEs
to thetoperformance
the performance of programs
of programs implemented
implemented by the by government
the government are
are presented
presented in Figure
in Figure 5 below.
5 below.
140
130
125
120 115 116
110 108
ctor response
100 98
89
80 79 81
74 72
opment of SMEs in Makassar City. Thus, the role of government is very important to in-
tegrate strategic programs towards increasing the productivity of SMEs. The mix of policy
options will depend on a number of factors including societal attitudes towards entrepre-
neurship, the structure of the workforce, the size and role of government, the prevalence
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex.of existing
2021, 7, 20 levels of entrepreneurial activity, and the conditions of SMEs [75]. The
20 ofre-
37
sponses of SMEs to the performance of programs implemented by the government are
presented in Figure 5 below.
140
130
125
120 115 116
110 108
Business actor response
100 98
89
80 79 81
74 72
60 64
46 45 48
40 33.14 37.14
32.86 31.43 35.71
30.86 28 25.43
20 22.61 23.14 21.14 20.57
13.14 12.86 13.71 18.29
0
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark.
VeryComplex.
good 2021, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW
Good Pretty good Not good 21 of 38
Empowerment of economic enterprises Program implementation Easy access to information Business training program
Figure 5. 5.
Figure Respondents’ perceptions
Respondents’ of of
perceptions thethe
performance ofof
performance government programs
government inin
programs SMEs. Source:
SMEs. primary
Source: data.
primary data.
Interpretations
Interpretations that
that can
can bebe proposed
proposed regarding
regarding thethe performance
performance of of government
government pro-pro-
grams
grams (Figure
(Figure 5) 5) related
related to the
to the development
development of SMEs
of SMEs in Makassar
in Makassar City City
are asare as follows:
follows: (1)
(1) 49.42%
49.42% statedstated
that that the economic
the economic empowerment
empowerment of SMEs
of SMEs waswasnotnot
yetyet optimal;
optimal; (2)(2) 46.57%
46.57%
stated that the implementation of the SME development program
stated that the implementation of the SME development program was not yet effective; was not yet effective;
(3)(3) 48.57%stated
48.57% statedthat
thatit itwas
wasstill
stilldifficult
difficulttotoaccess
accessinformation
informationrelated
related to
to business
business oppor-
opportu-
nities; and (4) 55.43%
tunities; 55.43% stated
statedthat
thatthethetraining
trainingprograms
programsimplemented
implementedbybythe thegovernment
government
were
were not
not effective
effective ininsupporting
supporting thedevelopment
the development ofofSMEs.
SMEs.Thus,
Thus, the
the performance
performance ofofthethe
implementation
implementation ofof government
government programs
programs toto encourage
encourage thethe development
development ofof SMEs
SMEs has
has notnot
been
been optimal
optimal inin supporting
supporting increased
increased productivity
productivity inin community
community economic
economic enterprises.
enterprises.
This means that the role of SMEs has not played an important
This means that the role of SMEs has not played an important role in supporting the eco- role in supporting the
economic growth of Makassar City. This means that the existence
nomic growth of Makassar City. This means that the existence of SMEs has not been well of SMEs has not been
well organized,
organized, including
including the coaching
the coaching process,process,
which which
has nothas beennotcarried
been carried out optimally.
out optimally. Un-
Unlike
like large large corporations,
corporations, SMEsSMEshave ahave a superior
superior flexibility
flexibility to technical
to technical shifts, shifts,
a higher a higher
pro-
promotion
motion of income
of income distribution,
distribution, and better
and better adaptability
adaptability to fluctuations
to fluctuations in the in the market
market and
new customer requirements, while their organizational structure allows for quickerquicker
and new customer requirements, while their organizational structure allows for deci-
decision
sion making making [76]. types
[76]. The The types of economic
of economic development
development andand empowerment
empowerment expected
expected byby
SMEs are presented in Figure
SMEs are presented in Figure 6 below. 6 below.
140
125
120
100
89
85 85
80
Business actor response
80 82 76
69 70 68
65 64 64 65
70
60 63
55 54 55
35.71
40
22.86 24.29 25.43
19.71 18.29 20 18.29 19.43 18.57
20 21.71
18.57 20 24.29 15.71 18 16 17.71
23.43 15.43
4.57
0
Urgently require Need Simply need No need
Financial management Business product improvement training Strengthening human resource capacity
Figure 6. 6.
Figure SMEs economic
SMEs development
economic and
development empowerment
and efforts.
empowerment Source:
efforts. primary
Source: data.
primary data.
Table 6. A summary of the test results for the significance of the regression equation coefficient.
Coefficient
Correlated Variables Error t-Count t-Table Information
Value
Government policy for SME development (rx1 y) 0.192 0.069 2.873 1.92 Significant
Business capital support for SME development (rx2 y) 0.137 0.052 2.853 1.92 Significant
Strengthening human resources for the development of SMEs (rx3 y) 0.405 0.096 4.182 1.92 Significant
R R2 db1 db2 F-count F-table
0.988 0.976 3 6 84,813 4.76
Interpretations of these results are as follows: (i) government policy has a positive
effect on the development of SMEs, with a value of 19.2%; (ii) support for business capital
has a positive effect on the development of SMEs, with a value of 13.7%; (iii) human resource
capacity strengthening has a positive effect on the development of SMEs, with a value
of 40.5%; (iv) strengthening government policies, business capital support, and human
resource capacity simultaneously has a positive effect on the development of SMEs, with a
determination coefficient of 97.6% on SME development. Thus, SMEs will develop rapidly if
supported by government policies, access to business capital, and human resource capacity
strengthening. Thus, it is imperative for companies to demonstrate proactive behavior
and to intensify their actions to support the achievement of a “sustainable future” [78].
Furthermore, organizations face various challenges and opportunities. However, today’s
business environment is changing at a faster pace than before, and organizations must
constantly adapt to new conditions [79].
Field findings show that the role of SMEs in Makassar City has not been able to in-
crease business productivity and increase community welfare. Four factors have a positive
effect on the productivity development of SMEs: (i) technology innovation, (ii) business di-
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW 23 of 38
versification, (iii) product marketing, and (iv) business stability. The survey results on these
four parameters in relation to the SMEs in Makassar City are presented in Figure 7 below.
40 30 32
18.6 16.6 20
20 8.6 9.1 11.4 15.7
0
Mastery of technology Percentage (%)
Food Drink Clothes Handycrafts Creative economy Printing Cafes and restaurants
95 4015.71
Business expansion 80 Business segment
20
27.14 22.86
0
10
24.29
35
Percentage
(%)
85
Product diversity Market share
50
45
(F) 60
40
85
70
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Distribution of goods Business expansion Service to consumers Promotions made Product selling price Products according to consumer needs
Inventory
Figure 7. Examples
Figure 7. Examples of SMEs:of(A) SMEs: (A) technological
technological innovation,
innovation, (B) (B) business
business diversification, (C)
diversification, (C) product
productmarketing,
marketing,andand
(D)
business stability. Source: primary
(D) business stability. Source: primary data. data.
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 23 of 37
Figure 7A shows the differences in the technological mastery of SMEs. Three types of
businesses can develop technological innovation: (i) cafe and restaurant business by 20%,
(ii) the creative economy by 18.6%, and (iii) printing businesses by 16.6%. These results
illustrate that technological innovation in SMEs in Makassar is still relatively low. The
informants illustrate that a weak mastery of technology in SMEs is influenced by several
factors, including (1) limited capabilities and expertise, (2) high operational costs, and
(3) unsupportive market guarantees for developing technology-based businesses. Thus,
the relatively low mastery of technology in SMEs is positively associated with business
innovation and sustainable product development. Due to resource constraints and fierce
competition, it is relatively difficult for small firms to achieve product innovation and gain
sustainable development independently [82].
Figure 7B shows the differences in the diversification of SMEs in Makassar City. Three
categories of effort increase business productivity: (i) business expansion, with a value of
27.14%, (ii) product diversity, with a value of 24.29%, and (iii) the development of business
segmentation, with a value of 22.86%. These results confirm that SMEs in Makassar City
can develop business diversification and new business patterns in a sustainable manner.
Thus, SMEs should start adopting more sustainable behaviors and a long-term vision to
design environmentally and organizationally sustainable processes [83].
Figure 7C shows product marketing efforts undertaken by SMEs. Three interpretations
can be put forward: (i) the selling price of a product needs to compete with similar
products by 24.29%, (ii) selling a product must be according to consumer needs by 20%,
and (iii) service must be given to consumers by 17.14%. These results confirm that SMEs
can market their products, even in limited quantities, and only need to meet local needs.
Accordingly, SMEs need to adopt survival strategies and strategic methods to confront
various global challenges [84].
Figure 7D shows the stability of SMEs developing in Makassar City. Three interpreta-
tions that can be proposed: (i) stability can be maintained based on an ability to manage a
business, with a value of 20.57%, (ii) 23.43% is determined by sales proceeds and the ability
to generate profits or sales balances, and (iii) 16.57% is determined by an SME’s ability to
maintain market and consumer confidence. These results confirm that SMEs can maintain
economic stability and the economic businesses that are developed. In most countries,
SMEs play a key role in promoting sustainable economic growth and job creation [85].
Strength Weakness
5. Discussion
5.1. Solutions for Increasing Productivity and Marketing of SME Products
The development of SMEs in the context of Makassar City will require government
support and cooperation with various parties in various aspects to encourage increased
productivity and product marketing. Several things that are needed related to efforts to
maintain the stability and existence of SMEs, among others: (1) strengthening production
capacity by subsidizing production tools and machines; (2) supporting business capital in
the form of low interest rates and competitive tax rates, enabling SMEs to remain stable in
production; (3) increasing the quality of production through tiered training efforts to im-
prove quality in terms of product design and product forms according to business quality
standards; (4) strengthening the capacity of human resources through training in terms
of product management and product packaging by utilizing environmentally friendly
technology; (5) production business management training to improve product competitive-
ness; (6) business feasibility training to obtain stimulant assistance from banks or formal
financial institutions; (7) financial management support with a modern financial admin-
istration system; and (8) the protection and expansion of marketing networks through
a startup-based business cooperation pattern based on the demands of consumers and
potential markets. These eight processes will drive economic business growth and increase
regional competitiveness through superior products that are strategic and of high economic
value. Thus, business management will be strategic within the framework of independently
developing SMEs towards business and implementing a sustainable business productivity
strategy based on product excellence and competitiveness [87]. In the era of economic
globalization, SMEs are recognized as an engine of sustainable economic development [88].
The field facts found show that limited mastery of technology, business capital, and
market access have a positive contribution to the low competitiveness of SMEs and their
contribution to the economic growth of Makassar City is not optimal. Thus, increasing
the productivity and competitiveness of small and medium enterprises requires support
for strengthening the capacity of human resources, utilizing technology and innovation
through sustainable business diversification [89]. Field findings show that four factors
cause the competitiveness of small and medium enterprises in Makassar City to be sub-
optimal in their business development, including: (i) limited business capital, (ii) low
competency of the workforce, (iii) poor business management, and (iv) limited mastery of
technology. Thus, small and medium enterprises will develop well if they have the ability
to access potential markets through government policy support followed by innovation
and business management development [90,91]. Field facts found indicate that efforts to
diversify business are not optimal and the products produced are still limited, causing
small and medium enterprises in Makassar City has not undergone significant changes.
This means that these small and medium enterprises are still faced with challenges, namely
limited access to capital, the availability of raw materials, the technology used, limited
human resources, and the role of government that is not yet optimal [92]. Furthermore, in
order to increase the productivity of these small and medium enterprises, it is necessary to
provide guidance, business training, access to capital, and support for strategic programs
from the government.
Furthermore, the efforts that need to be made to support and encourage increased
productivity of small and medium enterprises in Makassar City include: (1) increasing the
capacity and competence of the workforce; (2) adequate equipment support; (3) product
innovation; (4) business management; (5) mastery of technology; (6) business diversifica-
tion; and (7) expanding the market network. These seven things are very important to be
applied towards increasing the productivity of economic enterprises and the stability of
small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Thus, small and medium enterprises will make a
positive contribution to economic growth and job creation [93].
In the context of product marketing, SMEs need to be supported. (1) Marketing prod-
ucts through the internet and social media helps SMEs to exhibit merchandise. (2) Building
communication with various parties can help SMEs to determine market potential. This
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 26 of 37
means that SMEs will be able to understand and identify the right market for the prod-
ucts they produce. (3) Selection of the right business location is important. The location
of stalls that have business magnets that are easily accessible to potential buyers can be
considered. (4) Product marketing can be achieved through influencers. Using familiar
public figures can be used to introduce a trademark and to increase sales. (5) Product
marketing can be achieved through affiliate marketing. Promotional efforts are carried
out by building business cooperation by utilizing information technology based on online
product marketing to increase the number of consumers. (6) Discount promotions can
be implemented to entice users to re-order. (7) Marketing using social media can expand
market networks. The seven efforts related to SME optimization will require improving
product quality, human resources, digital technology-based business management, and the
ability to build partnerships through startup businesses. Technological innovation is the
driving force behind the industrial and business economy [94].
Figure
Figure8.8.The
Thesustainability
sustainabilityof of
SMEs in Makassar
SMEs City.City.
in Makassar
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 28 of 37
for government policies and support for local regulations on SMEs. The ease of licensing is
oriented towards the ease of obtaining formal legality, shortening the bureaucratic pathway,
and making it easier for people to start developing economic business ventures. Second,
business cooperation and product marketing, in this case in the context of global economic
development, which will be dominated by small and medium enterprises. The role of
the government is very strategic in the framework of facilitating SMEs to build business
cooperation and product marketing through the use of technology towards industrial
competition in the domestic and global markets. This means that the government has a
role in protecting the market and facilitating the marketing of SMEs products. This effort is
carried out through an intensive process of mentoring to SMEs players in marketing their
products through e-marketing. Furthermore, technological and environmental challenges
confront society with the need to change traditional approaches and management principles
at regional and city levels [106].
Third, the creation of new market areas on a regional, national, and global scale
through government support. This process is carried out through technological innovation,
building product marketing networks, and strengthening the human resource capacity of
SMEs. This step is carried out through the following efforts: (i) technical guidance for SMEs
to enter the global market, (ii) the facilitation of global market intelligence, (iii) the cura-
tion of SMEs products with international standards, (iv) promotional cooperation abroad,
and (v) optimizing bilateral and multilateral cooperation on SMEs product marketing.
Furthermore, increasing the competitiveness of SMEs products is carried out through
the following efforts: (1) development of joint production houses in small and medium
industrial centers, including training, consultation and mentoring; (2) partnerships with
large businesses, including transfer of knowledge, management and production technol-
ogy as well as easy access to machine and technology facilities; (3) accelerated business
development, including developing the incubation and acceleration of startup business
ecosystem platform development (e.g., financing, logistics, marketing, innovation); (4) in-
ternational standardization and certification, supporting SMEs (knowledge management,
coaching, etc.) to obtain international standard certificates and enter the global market;
(5) building a logistics system for SMEs, including: (i) improving supply chain connectiv-
ity at production centers, (ii) the development of imported raw materials and local raw
material warehousing, (iii) developing warehousing that supports export consolidators,
(iv) developing e-logistics that is integrated with e-commerce and fintech, and (vi) building
facilities for reducing the postal costs for sending product samples.
Fourth, open innovation through smart cities to support the development of SMEs
in Makassar City towards implementing an environment of innovation, empowerment,
and participation of citizens, businesses, and other stakeholders in shaping the small and
medium enterprises in Makassar City. In this context, the smart city is closely related to an
open innovation strategy. Instilling a culture of innovation through training government
managers and frontline workers is an important component in achieving a holistic approach
and sustainable smart city transformations that can withstand leadership changes [107].
The meaning, the implementation of smart city is not only a government matter, but also
the responsibility of the business world and SMEs towards the integration of information
technology systems. Furthermore, the development of a smart city is oriented towards the
inbound strategy of open innovation, which includes market-based innovation strategy,
crowdsourcing, collaboration, and network building. The smart city will solve inherent
problems while reducing expenses and improving quality of life. Through the technology
of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the advantages of the smart city are expected to be
able to overcome city spending by platforming cities [108].
Fifth, the dynamics of the entrepreneurial cycle of open innovation, in this case
developing business network relationships between companies and one another by giving
value to cooperation between individuals with one another, whereas dynamic capability
is more focused on interdependence with other companies so that the role of resources
becomes an important element in SMEs achieving greater performance and maximizing
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 30 of 37
profits, increasing income and welfare together. Currently small and medium enterprises
(SMEs) play a leading role in most of the world’s economies. For this reason, they seek
technological competitiveness and improvement of their innovation activities [109].
Sixth, the micro and macro dynamics of open innovation with the quadruple helix
model. The implementation of this model uses a positive synergy between government,
industry, and universities (academics). The application of this model is directed at three
roles in the development of innovation in a region, namely (i) the university as the center
of research-based development activities, (ii) the industry as a provider of consumer needs,
and (iii) the role of the government as a policy maker. These three things are an important
part of increasing the productivity of SMEs in Makassar City in a sustainable manner.
The implementation of the quadruple helix model refers to the findings of Ahonen and
Hämäläinen [110], namely: (1) TH + users are Triple Helix which is extended with the
community or users who provide information about their needs and experiences, for
example by testing products; (2) a company-centered living laboratory model, where the
community or users participate in each phase towards the development of ideas and
innovation as the main driving force for business ventures being developed; (3) a living
lab model that focuses on the public sector, where local government is at the center;
and (4) a community-centered model, where the user determines which innovations are
needed and developed. The implementation of these four models will lead to the creation
of cooperation between the government, academics, and the SME community towards the
sustainable economic growth of Makassar City.
Seventh, open innovation in SMEs in relation to trends, motivations and management
challenges requires SMEs to encourage regional economic growth in Makassar City. Thus,
the role of SMEs is an important element as a driver of entrepreneurship and economic
development. Furthermore, the developing SMEs in Makassar City in the future will con-
tribute positively to several things, including: (1) disseminating information related to the
quality of the products produced; (2) optimizing the use of natural and human resources in
the direction of increasing the productivity of economic enterprises; (3) optimizing demand
for imported goods and fixing domestic prices for certain products and stimulating de-
mand for domestic products towards product exports on the global market; (4) encouraging
economic development towards increasing the standard of living of the community. Fur-
thermore, global competencies and challenges due to advances in information technology
will have an impact on the life and business flow of SMEs. This means that the existence
of SMEs in Makassar City will require a transformation of business management and
innovation strategies towards sustainable SMEs. To maintain an innovative work style,
entrepreneurs need to build a unique identity to build an entrepreneurial identity [111].
Peter F. Drucker [112], stated that the main factors that support an organization to
survive change include: (1) flexibility, in the sense that the economic business community
must be flexible in making strategies. This means that in essence SMEs must be adaptive
and ready to face changes in order to remain sustainable and stable. Businesses must be
flexible in their implementation of the required strategies, namely policy, marketing, opera-
tions, and others; (2) providing facilities, in the sense that SMEs must be able to provide
facilities to support business performance, including equipment, machinery, resources
and technology. This means that increasing the productivity of SMEs will require facility
support in facing global challenges; (3) managing knowledge. In this case SMEs have the
ability to improvise changes by managing knowledge in a more productive direction; and
(4) innovation. In this case SMEs have the ability to increase productivity, diversify and
expand business.
Eighth, regional asymmetrical knowledge capabilities and open innovation in relation
to global marketing are global business-oriented activities that refer to the demand for
certain products based on global standards. Furthermore, the relational view can be under-
stood not only as a perspective for understanding organizations but also as a cultural way
that can support network settings and interactions with other actors, as well as facilitate
co-creation [113]. Thus, increasing the productivity of SMEs requires the importance of
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 31 of 37
being able to compete by paying attention to the global environment. In order to make a
production and consumption system for SME products in a sustainable manner, it is very
important to further explore and support new business models in relation to product pric-
ing, promotion, and distribution [114]. Thus, the performance of SMEs business activities
will include the pricing, promotion, and distribution of products (goods and services) to
customers/consumers for the purpose of making a profit. That is, global management is
the evolution of management towards operationalization in the global market, namely
exporting, negotiating franchises or licensing agreements, forming joint ventures, or mak-
ing direct investments in other countries [115]. Furthermore, the factors that need to be
considered in order to increase the competitiveness of SMEs to enter the global market
are: (i) expected business volume, (ii) geographic scope, (iii) SMEs involvement in global
marketing, (iv) sales volume and assets, (v) the product line and the nature of the products
produced, and (vi) business competition in foreign markets. The six basic principles will
ensure the stability of SME businesses going forward and contribute to the sustainable
economic growth of Makassar City.
6. Conclusions
The development of SMEs in Makassar City has a strategic role and function in
promoting economic growth and absorbing productive labor. To encourage an increase
in business productivity, creativity and technological innovation are needed in the de-
velopment of economic enterprises. The strategic steps needed for this are as follows:
(1) empowering economic enterprises; (2) business training and guidance towards the use
of technology; (3) training in financial management and business capital access through
formal financial institutions; and (4) access to product marketing to reach potential mar-
kets. The business transformation, investment development, technological innovation, and
management of SMEs will require the facilitation of institutional strengthening, modern
business management, and investment cooperation within a framework of controlling
production factors and business opportunities. SME diversification is closely related to the
demands of consumer needs, while business differentiation is strongly influenced by the
ability to build product marketing networks and a mastery of technology. The development
of SMEs based on technological innovation will require efforts to rearrange policies, in-
cluding (1) licensing and progressive manufacturing patterns that are oriented towards the
introduction and mastery of superior product-based production technology; (2) building
technological models, mastering more advanced production techniques, and continuing
the pattern of integrating technological components into new products; (3) designing new,
superior products after technology mastery integration by building products indepen-
dently; (4) determining the market, in the sense that the government provides incentives
and investment for the marketing of products developed in the community, especially by
SMEs. Thus, SMEs will develop rapidly if supported by government policies, access to
business capital, human resource capacity strengthening, and potential market access.
Four factors have a positive effect on the productivity development of SMEs in Makas-
sar City: (i) technological innovation, (ii) business diversification, (iii) product marketing,
and (iv) business stability. A weak mastery of technology in SMEs is influenced by sev-
eral factors: (1) capabilities and expertise are limited, (2) operational costs are high, and
(3) market guarantees for developing technology-based businesses are unsupportive. The
SMEs that are developing in Makassar City can market their products, even if they are
in limited quantities and only meet local needs. Business diversification is needed to
support business stability and develop new business patterns towards economic business
sustainability. Thus, economic growth, technological innovation, and business diversifica-
tion have a significant effect on product marketing and the economic stability of SMEs in
Makassar City.
The sustainability strategy of SMEs in Makassar City in relation to increasing busi-
ness productivity is influenced by several factors, among others: (1) selection of the right
location, which is highly dependent on the business being developed; (2) the use of social
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 32 of 37
media, the role of which is a strategic choice in terms of product marketing; (3) business
innovation, in a business with many competitors; and (4) financial planning, with a good
administration system. The sustainability of SMEs in Makassar City will require several
strategic steps that need to be considered: (1) manufacturing products according to con-
sumer needs; (2) producing goods in small quantities to save costs and resources in an
effort to eliminate in-process supplies of goods and waste, by using an evenly mixed
production pattern; (3) eliminating waste on inventory, purchasing, and scheduling by
using a card system in production; (4) improving production flow and building work
discipline in the business culture; (5) improving product quality by maintaining control
of the production process; (6) developing financial governance, product marketing, and
human resource capacity strengthening, which are cross-functional in accordance with
their levels and positions; (7) eliminating uncertainty by establishing relationships in the
production and marketing processes; and (8) ensuring long-term maintenance by improv-
ing quality, increasing flexibility in placing orders for goods, ordering in small quantities,
and continuously orienting towards a sustainable production process.
Because this study was conducted in a limited scope and focused on increasing the
productivity of SMEs in relation to economic growth, it is advisable to carry out a follow-up
study on the sustainability model of small and medium enterprises based on economic
empowerment to complement the results of this study.
Author Contributions: B.S. conceived the study; B.S., F.M. and H.S. compiled the research; S.S.,
B.S. and H.A. completed the settlement; B.S., H.S. and M.I. processed the data; S.S., M.I. and H.A.
contributed materials, methods, and analysis tools; B.S. and F.M. analyzed the data; S.S. and H.A.
contributed to data checking; B.S., S.S., M.I. and H.A. wrote and revised the paper. All authors have
read and published manuscript versions.
Funding: This research was funded by the University of Bosowa through the Research Center for
Economic and Business Research LPPM, University of Bosowa, Makassar City.
Institutional Review Board Statement: This study was carried out through the approval of the
Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM Bosowa University and LPPM STIM Lasaran
Jaya Makassar) through a Cooperation Contract Number 12/LPPM/IV/2020 dated 12 April 2020.
Furthermore, the funding for this study is funded through the Higher Education Educator Institution.
Bosowa University and STIM Lasaran Jaya Makassar and the study results have been validated by
the two institutions.
Informed Consent Statement: The results of this study were agreed upon by the Review Board of
the Bosowa University Research and Community Service Center and STIM Lasaran Jaya Makassar to
be published as outlined with the approval of the Review Board Number 76/LPPM/VI/2020.
Data Availability Statement: We fully support open scientific exchange through MDPI in sharing
and archiving research data from this study. We fully comply with the provisions that have been set
by referring to the established journal guidelines.
Acknowledgments: We are grateful for the participation of stakeholders in contributing ideas in
carrying out this study. Thank you to the Bosowa Foundation for their support and financial
assistance in carrying out this research.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
References
1. Stoica, O.; Roman, A.; Rusu, V.D. The Nexus between Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth: A Comparative Analysis on
Groups of Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1186. [CrossRef]
2. Maksum, I.R.; Sri Rahayu, A.Y.; Kusumawardhani, D. A Social Enterprise Approach to Empowering Micro, Small and Medium
Enterprises (SMEs) in Indonesia. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 50. [CrossRef]
3. De Vasconcelos, M.V. Political Stability and Bank Flows: New Evidence. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2020, 13, 56. [CrossRef]
4. Surya, B.; Syafri, S.; Hadijah, H.; Baharuddin, B.; Fitriyah, A.T.; Sakti, H.H. Management of Slum-Based Urban Farming and
Economic Empowerment of the Community of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7324. [CrossRef]
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 33 of 37
5. Surya, B. Globalization, Modernization, Mastery of Reproduction of Space, Spatial Articulation and Social Change in Devel-
opmental Dynamics in Suburb Area of Makassar City (A Study Concerning on Urban Spatial Sociology). Asian Soc. Sci. 2014,
10, 261–268. [CrossRef]
6. United Nation. Pertumbuhan Ekonomi 11 Negara di Asia Tenggara pada. 2019. Available online: https://databoks.katadata.co.i
d/datapublish/2020/02/12/pertumbuhan-ekonomi-11-negara-di-asia-tenggara-pada-2019 (accessed on 12 April 2020).
7. ASEAN Policy Brief. Economic Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on ASEAN. ASEAN Integration Monitoring Directorate (AIMD)
and Community Relations Division (CRD). 2020, pp. 1–17. Available online: https://asean.org/storage/2020/04/ASEAN-Policy
-Brief-April-2020_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 12 August 2020).
8. Surya, B.; Ahmad, D.N.A.; Sakti, H.H.; Sahban, H. Land Use Change, Spatial Interaction, and Sustainable Development in the
Metropolitan Urban Areas, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 95. [CrossRef]
9. Orhan, A.; Kirikkaleli, D.; Ayhan, F. Analysis of Wavelet Coherence: Service Sector Index and Economic Growth in an Emerging
Market. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6684. [CrossRef]
10. Surya, B.; Syafri, S.; Sahban, H.; Sakti, H.H. Natural Resource Conservation Based on Community Economic Empowerment:
Perspectives on Watershed Management and Slum Settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 104.
[CrossRef]
11. Meyer, N.; Auriacombe, C. Good Urban Governance and City Resilience: An Afrocentric Approach to Sustainable Development.
Sustainability 2019, 11, 5514. [CrossRef]
12. Surya, B.; Saleh, H.; Suriani, S.; Sakti, H.H.; Hadijah, H.; Idris, M. Environmental Pollution Control and Sustainability Management
of Slum Settlements in Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 279. [CrossRef]
13. Bappenas. Modernisasi UMKM Atasi Permasalahan Masyarakat, Bantu Perekonomian Nasional. IDF. 2019. Available on-
line: https://www.bappenas.go.id/id/berita-dan-siaran-pers/idf-2019-modernisasi-umkm-atasi-permasalahan-masyarakat
-bantu-perekonomian-nasional/ (accessed on 12 July 2020).
14. Prabowo, R.; Singgih, M.L.; Karningsih, P.D.; Widodo, E. New Product Development from Inactive Problem Perspective in
Indonesian SMEs to Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 20. [CrossRef]
15. BPS Makassar City. Makassar City in Figures. 2019. Available online: https://makassarkota.bps.go.id/publication/2019/08/16/
4ca03301b8e2b8414e33f6a3/kota-makassar-dalam-angka-2019.html (accessed on 3 February 2020).
16. Munizu, M. Pengaruh factor—Faktor eksternal dan internal terhadap kinerja usaha mikro dan kecil di Sulawesi Selatan. J. Manag.
Entrep. 2010, 12, 33–41. [CrossRef]
17. Smith, S. Understanding and Acquiring Technology Assets for Global Competition. Technovation 2007, 27, 643–649. [CrossRef]
18. Hsien Wang, C.; Yuan Lu, L.; Bein Chen, C. Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation
2008, 28, 349–363. [CrossRef]
19. Xirogiannis, G.; Chytas, P.; Glykas, M.; Valiris, G. Intelligent Impact Assesment of HRM to Shareholder Value. Expert Syst. Appl.
2008, 35, 2017–2031. [CrossRef]
20. Surya, B.; Hadijah, H.; Suriani, S.; Baharuddin, B.; Fitriyah, A.T.; Menne, F.; Rasyidi, E.S. Spatial Transformation of a New City in
2006–2020: Perspectives on the Spatial Dynamics, Environmental Quality Degradation, and Socio—Economic Sustainability of
Local Communities in Makassar City, Indonesia. Land 2020, 9, 324. [CrossRef]
21. Širá, E.; Vavrek, R.; Kravčáková Vozárová, I.; Kotulič, R. Knowledge Economy Indicators and Their Impact on the Sustainable
Competitiveness of the EU Countries. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4172. [CrossRef]
22. Asian Development Bank. Fiscal Policy for Inclusive Growth; ADB Outlook; Asian Development Bank: Mandaluyong, Philippines,
2014; ISBN 978-92-9254-453-9. Available online: https://www.adb.org/publications/asian-development-outlook-2014-fiscal-po
licy-inclusive-growth (accessed on 25 July 2020).
23. Surya, B.; Hamsina, H.; Ridwan, R.; Baharuddin, B.; Menne, F.; Fitriyah, A.T.; Rasyidi, E.S. The Complexity of Space Utilization
and Environmental Pollution Control in the Main Corridor of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Sustainability 2020,
12, 9244. [CrossRef]
24. Alinska, A.; Filipiak, B.Z.; Kosztowniak, A. The Importance of the Public Sector in Sustainable Development in Poland. Sustain-
ability 2018, 10, 3278. [CrossRef]
25. Saleh, H.; Surya, B.; Ahmad, D.N.A.; Manda, D. The Role of Natural and Human Resources on Economic Growth and Regional
Development: With Discussion of Open Innovation Dynamics. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2020, 6, 103. [CrossRef]
26. Kim, D.; Lim, U. Social Enterprise as a Catalyst for Sustainable Local and Regional Development. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1427.
[CrossRef]
27. Roser, M. “Economic Growth”. Published online at Our World in Data.org. 2013. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org
/economic-growth (accessed on 5 July 2020).
28. Surya, B.; Saleh, H.; Hamsina, H.; Idris, M.; Ahmad, D.N.A. Rural Agribusiness-based Agropolitan Area Development and
Environmental Management Sustainability: Regional Economic Growth Perspectives. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2021, 11, 1–16.
[CrossRef]
29. Spangenberg, J.H. Economic sustainability of the economy: Concepts and indicators. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 8, 47–64. [CrossRef]
30. Agbloyor, E.K.; Abor, J.Y.; Adjasi, C.K.D.; Yawson, A. Private capital flows and economic growth in Africa: The role of domestic
financial markets. J. Int. Financ. Mark. Inst. Money 2014, 30, 137–152. [CrossRef]
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 34 of 37
31. Kalemli-Ozcan, S.; Reshef, A.; Sørensen, B.E.; Yosha, O. Why does capital flow to rich states? Rev. Econ. Stat. 2010, 92, 769–783.
[CrossRef]
32. Aoyagi, C.; Ganelli, G. Asia’s quest for inclusive growth revisited. J. Asia Econ. 2015, 40, 29–46. [CrossRef]
33. Stiglitz, J.E. The origins of inequality and policies to contain it. Natl. Tax J. 2015, 68, 425–448. [CrossRef]
34. Stiglitz, J.E. America’s Great Malaise and what to do about it. J. Policy Model. 2016, 38, 639–648. [CrossRef]
35. Sawaya, A.; Bhero, S. Effect of simplified licensing on registration and formalizing of start-ups in Mozambique. Afr. J. Bus. Manag.
2018, 12, 542–554. [CrossRef]
36. Surya, B.; Saleh, H. Transformation of metropolitan suburban area (a study on new town development in Moncongloe-Pattalassang
Metropolitan Maminasata). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 202, 012027. [CrossRef]
37. Eliakis, S.; Kotsopoulos, D.; Karagiannaki, A.; Pramatari, K. Survival and Growth in Innovative Technology Entrepreneurship: A
Mixed-Methods Investigation. Adm. Sci. 2020, 10, 39. [CrossRef]
38. Huang, Y.; Ge, Y.; Hu, W. Multiple Dynamic Mechanisms of Globalization: Alternatives to Capitalism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5344.
[CrossRef]
39. Phoosawad, S.; Fongsuwan, W.; Trimetsoontorn, J. Leadership, Management Skill and Organization Innovation Affecting Auto
Parts Organization Performance. Res. J. Bus. Manag. 2014, 8, 70–88. [CrossRef]
40. Tang, S.; Wang, Z.; Yang, G.; Tang, W. What Are the Implications of Globalization on Sustainability? A Comprehensive Study.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 3411. [CrossRef]
41. Li, H.; Sajjad, N.; Wang, Q.; Ali, A.M.; Khaqan, Z.; Amina, S. Influence of Transformational Leadership on Employees’ Innovative
Work Behavior in Sustainable Organizations: Test of Mediation and Moderation Processes. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1594. [CrossRef]
42. Shi, L.; Han, L.; Yang, F.; Gao, L. The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects.
Sustainability 2019, 11, 7158. [CrossRef]
43. Soto-Acosta, P.; Cismaru, D.-M.; Vătămănescu, E.-M.; Ciochină, R.S. Sustainable Entrepreneurship in SMEs: A Business
Performance Perspective. Sustainability 2016, 8, 342. [CrossRef]
44. Burhan, B. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi. In Format-format Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif untuk Studi Sosiologi, Kebijakan Pub-
lik, Komunikasi, Manajemen dan Pemasaran; Prenadamedia Group: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2015; p. 13220, ISBN 978-602-9413.75.5001.42.
45. Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R dan D. Penerbit. Alfabeta. Bandung. 2011. Available online: ht
tps://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/10026/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-r-d.html (accessed on
6 January 2020).
46. Cochran, W.G. Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed.; John Willey & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997; 448p, ISBN 978-0-471-16240-
7. Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Sampling+Techniques%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9780471162407 (accessed on
5 April 2020).
47. Rangkuti, F. Analisis Swot Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis: Reorientasi Konsep Perencanaan Strategis Untuk Menghadapi Abad Ke 21;
Gramedia Pustaka Utama: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2006. Available online: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=UHV8Z2SE57EC&p
rintsec=frontcover&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed on 5 February 2020).
48. Gherghina, S.C.; Botezatu, M.A.; Hosszu, A.; Simionescu, L.N. Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): The Engine of
Economic Growth through Investments and Innovation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 347. [CrossRef]
49. Vermeulen, B.; Kesselhut, J.; Pyka, A.; Saviotti, P.P. The Impact of Automation on Employment: Just the Usual Structural Change?
Sustainability 2018, 10, 1661. [CrossRef]
50. Matuzeviciute, K.; Butkus, M.; Karaliute, A. Do Technological Innovations Affect Unemployment? Some Empirical Evidence
from European Countries. Economies 2017, 5, 48. [CrossRef]
51. Jia, C.; Tang, X.; Kan, Z. Does the Nation Innovation System in China Support the Sustainability of Small and Medium Enterprises
(SMEs) Innovation? Sustainability 2020, 12, 2562. [CrossRef]
52. Khan, A.; Bibi, S.; Lorenzo, A.; Lyu, J.; Babar, Z.U. Tourism and Development in Developing Economies: A Policy Implication
Perspective. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1618. [CrossRef]
53. Wolbers, M.H. Pattern of Labour Market Entry: A Comparative Perspective on School-to-Work Transitions in 11 European
Countries. Acta Sociol. 2007, 50, 189–210. [CrossRef]
54. Koentjoro, S.; Gunawan, S. Managing Knowledge, Dynamic Capabilities, Innovative Performance, and Creating Sustainable
Competitive Advantage in Family Companies: A Case Study of a Family Company in Indonesia. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark.
Complex. 2020, 6, 90. [CrossRef]
55. Zamfir, A.; Militaru, E.; Mocanu, C.; Lungu, E.O. School-to-work transition of higher education graduates in four European
countries. Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ. 2020, 50, 36–52. [CrossRef]
56. Caraballo, M.A.; Buitrago, E.M. Ethnolinguistic Diversity and Education. A Successful Pairing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6625.
[CrossRef]
57. Witt, U. Capitalism as a complex adaptive system and its growth. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2017, 3, 12. [CrossRef]
58. Hong, K.; Kim, B. Organizational Resource, and Innovativeness to Sustainable Design Outsourcing Service. Sustainability 2020,
12, 5288. [CrossRef]
59. Kelley, T.; Kelley, D. Creative Confidence: Unleashing the Creative Potential within Us All; The Crown Publishing Group: Manhattan,
NY, USA, 2013.
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 35 of 37
60. Luxemburg, R. The Accumulation of Capital: Section Three. The Historical Conditions of Accumulation. Chapter 26. The
Reproduction of Capital and Its Social Setting. 2008. Available online: https://www.marxists.org/archive/luxemburg/1913/ac
cumulation-capital/ch26.htm (accessed on 20 June 2020).
61. Surya, B. Spatial Interaction Pattern, and the Process of City Activity Formation System (Case study, Ternate City, Tidore
Archipelago City and Sofifi City of North Maluku, Indonesia). Res. J. Appl. Sci. 2015, 10, 880–892. [CrossRef]
62. Amar, M.Y. The influence of product differentiation strategy on operational performance at Small and Medium Enterprises
(SMEs) in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. J. Econ. Bus. Account. Ventur. 2015, 18, 343. [CrossRef]
63. Setyowati, T.; Fadah, I. Differentiation Competitive Strategy in Winning Smes Advantage at Creative Industry in Jember. Int. J. Sci.
Technol. Res. 2018, 7, 165–169. Available online: http://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/84772 (accessed on 5 April 2020).
64. Yoon, J.; Hur, E.J.; Kim, M. An Analysis of the Factors on the Problem-Solving Competencies of Engineering Employees in Korea.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1677. [CrossRef]
65. Horváthová, P.; Mikušová, M.; Kashi, K. Comparison of Human Resources Management in Non-Family and Family Businesses:
Case Study of the Czech Republic. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5493. [CrossRef]
66. He, J.; Chen, H.; Sheng Tsai, F. Strategy Orientation, Innovation Capacity Endowment, and International R&D Intensity of Listed
Companies in China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 344. [CrossRef]
67. Na, Y.K.; Kang, S.; Jeong, H.Y. The Effect of Market Orientation on Performance of Sharing Economy Business: Focusing on
Marketing Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2019, 11, 729. [CrossRef]
68. Jahanshahi, A.A.; Nawaser, K.; Khaksar, S.M.S.; Kamalian, A.R. The Relationship between Government Policy and the Growth of
Entrepreneurship in the Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises of India. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2011, 6, 66–76. [CrossRef]
69. Perez-Gomez, P.; Arbelo-Perez, M.; Arbelo, A. Profit efficiency and its determinants in small and medium-sized enterprises in
Spain. BRQ Bus. Res. Q. 2018, 21, 238–250. [CrossRef]
70. Gunasekaran, A.; Rai, B.K.; Griffin, M. Resilience, and competitiveness of small and medium size enterprises: An empirical
research. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011, 49, 5489–5509. [CrossRef]
71. Kiron, D.; Unruh, G.; Kruschwitz, N.; Reeves, M.; Rubel, H.; Felde, A.M. Corporate Sustainability at a Crossroads: Progress
Toward Our Common Future in Uncertain Times. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2017. Available online: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/pr
ojects/corporate-sustainability-at-a-crossroads/ (accessed on 1 July 2020).
72. Ioana Munteanu, A.; Bibu, N.; Nastase, M.; Cristache, N.; Matis, C. Analysis of Practices to Increase the Workforce Agility and to
Develop a Sustainable and Competitive Business. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3545. [CrossRef]
73. Nigri, G.; Del Bald, M. Sustainability Reporting and Performance Measurement Systems: How do Small- and MediumSized
Benefit Corporations Manage Integration? Sustainability 2018, 10, 4499. [CrossRef]
74. Masocha, R. Does Environmental Sustainability Impact Innovation, Ecological and Social Measures of Firm Performance of
SMEs? Evidence from South Africa. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3855. [CrossRef]
75. Xin, L.; Tang, F.; Zhang, S.; Pan, Z. Social Capital, and Sustainable Innovation in Small Businesses: Investigating the Role of
Absorptive Capacity, Marketing Capability and Organizational Learning. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3759. [CrossRef]
76. Shankar, K.M.; Kannan, D.; Kumar, P.U. Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices—A case study in Indian context. J. Clean.
Prod. 2017, 164, 1332–1343. [CrossRef]
77. Gamage, S.K.N.; Ekanayake, E.M.S.; Abeyrathne, G.; Prasanna, R.; Jayasundara, J.; Rajapakshe, P.S.K. A Review of Global
Challenges and Survival Strategies of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Economies 2020, 8, 79. [CrossRef]
78. Dushi, N.S.; Dana, L.P.; Ramadani, V. Entrepreneurial marketing dimensions and SMEs performance. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 100, 86–99.
[CrossRef]
79. Surya, B. Optimization of Function and Role of Traditional Markets in Urban Development System of Ketapang City (A Case
Study: Range Sentap Market, Delta Pawan Subdistrict, Ketapang City). World Appl. Sci. J. 2015, 33, 1457–1471. [CrossRef]
80. Park, S.; Jun, S. Statistical Technology Analysis for Competitive Sustainability of Three Dimensional Printing. Sustainability 2017,
9, 1142. [CrossRef]
81. Gironés, E.S.; Est, R.; Verbong, G. The role of policy entrepreneurs in defining directions of innovation policy: A case study of
automated driving in the Netherlands. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 161, 120243. [CrossRef]
82. Dvouletý, O. Effects of Soft Loans and Credit Guarantees on Performance of Supported Firms: Evidence from the Czech Public
Programme START. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2293. [CrossRef]
83. Surya, B. The Dynamics of Spatial Structure and Spatial Pattern Changes at the Fringe Area of Makassar City. Indones. J. Geogr.
2015, 47, 11–19. [CrossRef]
84. Kang, S.; Kue Na, Y. Effects of Strategy Characteristics for Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Sharing Economy Businesses on
Creating Shared Value. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1397. [CrossRef]
85. Surya, B. Change Phenomena of Spatial Physical in the Dynamics of Development in Urban Fringe Area. Indones. J. Geogr. 2016,
48, 118–134. [CrossRef]
86. Prasanna, R.; Jayasundara, J.; Gamage, S.K.N.; Ekanayake, E.; Rajapakshe, P.S.K.; Abeyrathne, G. Sustainability of SMEs in the
Competition: A Systemic Review on Technological Challenges and SME Performance. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019,
5, 100. [CrossRef]
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 36 of 37
87. Surya, B.; Saleh, H.; Remmang, H. Economic Gentrification and Sociocultural Transformation Metropolitan Suburban of
Mamminasata. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2018, 13, 6072–6084. [CrossRef]
88. Meré, J.O.; Remón, T.P.; Rubio, J. Digitalization: An Opportunity for Contributing to Sustainability from Knowledge Creation.
Sustainability 2020, 12, 1460. [CrossRef]
89. Kook, S.H.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, C. Dynamic Technological Diversification and Its Impact on Firms’ Performance: An Empirical
Analysis of Korean IT Firms. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1239. [CrossRef]
90. Seelos, C.; Mair, J. Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor. Bus. Horiz. 2005, 48, 241–246.
[CrossRef]
91. Coghlan, C.; Labrecque, J.; Ma, Y.; Dubé, L. A Biological Adaptability Approach to Innovation for Small and Medium Enterprises
(SMEs): Strategic Insights from and for Health-Promoting Agri-Food Innovation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4227. [CrossRef]
92. Eravia, D.; Handayani, T. The Opportunities and Threats of Small and Medium Enterprises in Pekanbaru: Comparison between
SMEs in Food and Restaurant Industries. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 169, 88–97. [CrossRef]
93. Diabate, A.; Sibiri, H.; Wang, L.; Yu, L. Assessing SMEs’ Sustainable Growth through Entrepreneurs’ Ability and Entrepreneurial
Orientation: An Insight into SMEs in Côte d’Ivoire. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7149. [CrossRef]
94. García, M.R.; García, M.G.; Castillo, A.C. An Overview of Ecopreneurship, Eco-Innovation, and the Ecological Sector. Sustainability
2019, 11, 2909. [CrossRef]
95. Krizanova, A.; Lăzăroiu, G.; Gajanova, L.; Kliestikova, J.; Nadanyiova, M.; Moravcikova, D. The Effectiveness of Marketing
Communication and Importance of Its Evaluation in an Online Environment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7016. [CrossRef]
96. Surya, B. Spatial Articulation and Co-Existence of Mode of Production in the Dynamics of Development at the Urban Fringe of
Makassar City. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2015, 10, 214–222. [CrossRef]
97. Cantele, S.; Vernizzi, S.; Campedelli, B. Untangling the Origins of Sustainable Commitment: New Insights on the Small vs. Large
Firms’ Debate. Sustainability 2020, 12, 671. [CrossRef]
98. Liu, Y.; Dijst, M.; Geertman, S.; Cui, C. Social Sustainability in an Ageing Chinese Society: Towards an Integrative Conceptual
Framework. Sustainability 2017, 9, 658. [CrossRef]
99. Surya, B.; Ruslan, M.; Abubakar, H. Inequility of Space Reproduction Control and Urban Slum Area Management Sustainability
(Case Study: Slum Area of Buloa Urban Village in Makassar City). J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2018, 13, 6033–6042. [CrossRef]
100. Phan, A.C.; Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, H.A.; Matsui, Y. Effect of Total Quality Management Practices and JIT Production Practices
on Flexibility Performance: Empirical Evidence from International Manufacturing Plants. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3093. [CrossRef]
101. Muljani, N.; Ellitan, L. Developing Competitiveness in Industrial Revolution 4.0. Int. J. Trend Res. Dev. 2019, 6, 1–3. Available
online: http://www.ijtrd.com/papers/IJTRD20721.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2020).
102. Boldureanu, G.; Ionescu, A.M.; Bercu, A.M.; Bedrule-Grigorut, ă, M.V.; Boldureanu, D. Entrepreneurship Education through
Successful Entrepreneurial Models in Higher Education Institutions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1267. [CrossRef]
103. Stancu, A.; Filip, A.; Rosca, M.I.; Ionită, D.; Căplescu, R.; Cânda, A.; Rosca, L.D. Value Creation Attributes—Clustering Strategic
Options for Romanian SMEs Value Creation Attributes—Clustering Strategic Options for Romanian SMEs. Sustainability 2020,
12, 7007. [CrossRef]
104. Brem, A.; Díaz, R.P. Creativity, Innovation, Sustainability: A Conceptual Model for Future Research Efforts. Sustainability 2020,
12, 3139. [CrossRef]
105. Tang, G.X.; Park, K.; Agarwal, A.; Liu, F. Impact of Innovation Culture, Organization Size and Technological Capability on the
Performance of SMEs: The Case of China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1355. [CrossRef]
106. Tolstykh, T.; Gamidullaeva, L.; Shmeleva, N.; Wozniak, M.; Vasin, S. An Assessment of Regional Sustainability via the Maturity
Level of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 5. [CrossRef]
107. Myeong, S.; Kim, Y.; Ahn, M.J. Smart City Strategies—Technology Push or Culture Pull? A Case Study Exploration of Gimpo and
Namyangju, South Korea. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 41–53. [CrossRef]
108. Yun, Y.; Lee, M. Smart City 4.0 from the Perspective of Open Innovation. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 92.
[CrossRef]
109. Juárez, L.E.V.; Vergara, M.C. Technological Capabilities, Open Innovation, and Eco-Innovation: Dynamic Capabilities to Increase
Corporate Performance of SMEs. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 8. [CrossRef]
110. Ahonen, L.; Hämäläinen, T. CLIQ: A Practical Approach to the Quadruple Helix and More Open Innovation. In Sustaining
Innovation: Collaboration Models for a Complex World, Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management; MacGregor, S.P., Carleton, T.,
Eds.; 2012. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-2077-4_2 (accessed on 5 October 2020).
111. Zhou, J.; Xu, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, C. Creative Enough to Become an Entrepreneur: A Multi-Wave Study of Creative Personality,
Education, Entrepreneurial Identity, and Innovation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4043. [CrossRef]
112. Drucker, P.F. Manajemen: Tugas, Tanggung Jawab dan Praktek; PT Gramedia: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1999. Available online:
http://library.um.ac.id/free-contents/index.php/buku/detail/manajemen-tugas-tanggung-jawab-praktek-buku-i-peter-f-d
rucker-diterjemahkan-oleh-sitor-situmorang-dkk-15724.html (accessed on 10 October 2020).
113. Rupo, D.; Perano, M.; Centorrino, G.; Sanchez, A.V. A Framework Based on Sustainability, Open Innovation, and Value Cocreation
Paradigms—A Case in an Italian Maritime Cluster. Sustainability 2018, 10, 729. [CrossRef]
J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2021, 7, 20 37 of 37
114. Oksana Mont, D.B.; Schoonover, H. Consumer Acceptance and Value in Use-Oriented Product-Service Systems: Lessons from
Swedish Consumer Goods Companies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8079. [CrossRef]
115. Tjiptono, F.G. Chandra. Service, Quality, & Satisfaction; Penerbit Andi: Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2005; ISBN 978-979-29-5384-8.
Available online: http://www.library.usd.ac.id/web/index.php?pilih=search&p=1&q=0000131247&go=Detailhttp://www.li
brary.usd.ac.id/web/index.php?pilih=search&p=1&q=0000131247&go=Detail (accessed on 5 July 2020).