PSM (En) DH48FTC01 GW4-G6
PSM (En) DH48FTC01 GW4-G6
Case summary:
Case problem:
Scenario: As Andrew Baines, what action would you take to solve the problems
in the purchasing-marketing relationship?
Since the root cause of Eastern's purchasing-marketing problem was due to poor
communication between these two departments, therefore, if I were Andrew Baines,
the first action I would take is scheduling a meeting with Shannon Bailey to discover
and tackle the current disagreements. Having a conference would help them have a
better understanding of each other's perspective. As stated in the case, there were
contradictory priorities between the purchasing and marketing departments. While
Andrew only wanted to offer Lucas 25 percent of the contract filling as his goal is to
optimize costs and rely the least on one supplier, Shannon preferred the long-term
procurement strategy without considering the risks. To address this, I would propose
that Eastern merely offer from 25 to 50 percent of the contract filling in order to
decrease the risk of depending on one vendor and test the efficiency of Lucas. This
percentage of the contract filling might be increased in the next year if Eastern
achieves better business performance according to the cooperation with Lucas.
As claimed by Matt Robert, Andrew's boss, final selection of sources for any
purchased items that had to be packaged by the plant had always been the duty of the
purchasing department. However, the marketing department still had significant
responsibility during this phase since they created the deal with the vendor. This led to
a vague border in the responsibilities of purchasing and marketing departments. Thus,
the second action to implement is having a clear policy statement that outlines the
responsibility scope of each department in terms of selecting suppliers, controlling
contracts and managing inventory to avoid unexpected conflicts.