Container Operations
Container Operations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nLiwRrn5VA container
lashing system
The organization and efficient execution of the loading and unloading operations
of a containership is a complex task. Careful coordination and planning of both
manpower and equipment is required to obtain the most economical results. Because
of its complexity, computer-based data processing and handling technology is of
great assistance to the human operator in the efficient execution of this task.
Certain programs were created and installed on the General Electric Mark III
Network for use by U.S. Flag operators in the United States. In addition,
communication satellites provide U.S. operators access to the same programs and
data banks from many maritime jurisdictions including Puerto Rico, Australia, Hong
Kong, Japan, and Western Europe. The only user equipment required is an
interactive computer terminal, a telephone, and a GE user's number.
a. Ship Inbound.
As the ship approaches the pet, the data files listing the containers on board, the
ballast, and the fuel conditions upon arrival are accessed and modified, if necessary,
by the Cargo Supervisor.
Additional files are created which contain sorted data to allow generation of
summaries, maps, and lists of containers for unloading, reloading, and those
remaining on board. The Cargo Loading Supervisor can:
• obtain the fuel burnoff, bunkering, and ballast conditions from the previous port,
• make changes to the liquid conditions based on projected arrival date,
1
• obtain container summaries, maps, and listings from the previous port.
Based on the expected trade and the containers already on board, each hold is
dedicated, according to a loading strategy, to a particular destination, mix,
commodities or container size. Using a statistical distribution of container weights, a
set of target loading weights for each available container position is generated based
on ship stability, draft, and stress requirements. The Cargo Loading Supervisor can
make changes:
• to the expected or anticipated loadings,
• to the resulting hold allocations,
• to the selective loading weight allocations
The dock file of containers for loading can be updated prior to the specification of
loading instructions. Additional containers can be entered in the dock files as they
arrive at intervals desired by the Supervisor.
The Cargo Loading Supervisor can:
• obtain listing and summaries of the containers on the pier.
• obtain listing for each port.
• assign a fixed location on the ship for special cargoes.
Instructions are generated to achieve the best match between available
containers and the desired container for each cell to be loaded. Loading and
discharge instructions are determined under control of specific availability and ship
attitude constraints. An updating routine is used to verify those instructions
unsuccessfully accomplished; exceptions and additions are made for those
instructions not properly completed. The Cargo Loading Supervisor can:
• select hold to be worked,
• select number of cranes,
• provide ship checkers, terminal, and yard personnel with copies of the detailed
loading instructions,
• make changes to the files for incorrectly located containers,
• obtain summaries, listings, and maps of loaded holds,
• load late arriving containers directly.
b. Ship Outbound.
2
Computerized container
operations provide the Cargo Loading Supervisor and terminal personnel with the
required documentation and control to assist them in the efficient loading and
unloading of containers. Many of the following computer-produced documents can be
used directly by loading personnel:
• summary of ship weight, attitude, and stability characteristics,
• summary of containers by hold, length, and destination,
• map of containers in the hold,
• list of containers by hold, identification and special handling, destination, weight,
and exact ship location,
• listing of the containers on the dock, location, identification and special handling,
weight, and destination,
• hold allocation by container size, destination, and above or below deck location,
• selective loadings with target weights for each available position,
• sequential loading/unloading instructions with container identification, dock and
ship location, and ship attitude.
Loading Rates and Other Study Related Data
3
• twin-boom rotating cranes, single-point lift with adjustment for off-center weight
— 10.0 min,
• ships heavy-lift gear, swinging boom with adjustment for off-center weight —
15.0 min,
• general cargo ship gear doubled up utilizing one set of gear at each end of
spreader — 15.0 min.
For smaller containers (i.e. 20 ft and Conex boxes) better rates can be expected
in the last three modes with singling up of gear because of the reduced load. It is also
important to understand when making time studies that:
• hatch covers require about the time of one to two cycles depending on fittings
and gear use,
• lashing and unlashing times must be added to the total container loading time as
this operation cannot completely be carried on while loading or unloading,
• to obtain a cycle where one container is discharged and one full container
reloaded in the ship in the same duty cycle (i.e. with a gantry crane 40 containers
moved in a hour instead of 20) it is necessary to discharge the entire deck load,
remove the hatch cover, and discharge all of the containers from one stack below
deck.
Container Lashing Systems
This is a typical pattern for an on-deck tensioned lashing system. Each lashing
assembly is usually composed of:
• a hook or other fitting that attaches to the container casting,
• a length of wire or solid steel bar,
• a tensioning device (turnbuckle, clamp type tensioner, etc.),
• deck padeye, ring or other base structure,
• shackles to connect hooks to lashing and lashing to deck padeye.
An interesting recent solution to the problem of securing containers has been the
evolution of rigid structural restraint systems. One such system was achieved by
affixing a system of cell guides, similar to those located below decks Another system
avoided the need to travel to the top of each cell before loading or unloading, and
4
also simplified accessibility to the hatch covers and holds. This system requires that
the first tier of on-deck containers be loaded and are restrained from sliding at their
bases by the normal hatch cover chocks.
After one layer of containers has been loaded, a large frame, covering the first
tier is placed on them. The frame is handled with the container crane. This frame has
down-facing chocks to assist in positioning itself on the containers - It also engages,
at its outboard edges; kingpost-like structure which is welded into the ships structure.
After the second frame is placed on that tier this second frame on top of the second
tier also engage: the same outboard buttress system. It is then possible to load a
third tier on this frame. These third tier container are locked to the frame by a gang-
operated set of twist-lock which engage their bases.
Another type of rigid system which has been devised is on which does not
employ the frames. This system has a permanent athwartships structure located in
the space between hatches. After each tier has been loaded, hinged chocks оn the
frame swing down on the container corners, thus locking them to the buttress, and
permitting the next tier to be loaded. And, finally, above deck loading of containers
can be simplified by designing deeper ships wherein more containers are carried
below decks with only two-high contains stacks above deck. Liu and Mitchell provide
an excellent treatment of the design of container securing systems.