Tariff Hike by USA CareEdge Report
Tariff Hike by USA CareEdge Report
Synopsis
• India’s direct steel exports to the US are relatively low, constituting around 4% of its total exports in CY24.
As a result, the direct impact on the steel sector’s sales volume due to the imposition of tariffs by the US is
not expected to be significant. However, there is likely to be an indirect effect on realisations if major steel
exporters to the US divert some of their supplies to India.
• Global steel consumption is expected to decline for the second consecutive year in CY24, mainly due to a
decline in consumption from major developed countries, including the USA, Japan and the European region.
• China, which accounts for nearly half of global steel production and demand, also experienced a continued
decline in domestic consumption. However, the capacity utilisation rate of the Chinese steel industry remains
above 80-85%. This, combined with declining domestic demand, has led to significant surplus production
being exported, estimated at around 90-95 million tonnes (MnT) during CY24, an increase from
approximately 65 MnT previously CY22.
• India continues to witness good demand for steel, growing at around 10-13% during the last three fiscal
years (FY22 to FY24).
• Weakening demand in major steel-consuming economies has led to an over-supply situation, thereby adding
pressure on realisations. Global steel prices (world export prices for Hot Rolled Coil) have averaged around
US$ 535 per tonne during CY24, down from around US$ 788 per tonne recorded in CY22. Global steel prices
declined in CY25, hovering around US$ 481 per tonne in January 2025.
• An increase in import tariff by the US could result in the diversion of surplus production by major Asian steel
manufacturing countries to Indian markets, which is likely to keep realisations under check. During 10MFY25,
realisations of the domestic steel industry have already witnessed moderation with growing imports of steel
whereby India has turned a net importer vis-à-vis a net exporter up to FY24 – even though the overall
volume of steel import into India is low compared to total domestic consumption, the realisations tend to
mirror the landed cost parity with international prices.
• India is a major exporter of primary aluminium (around 40% of our domestic aluminium production is
exported during CY24). India’s direct aluminium exports to the US are around 6-8%. Consequently, the
impact of the tariff hike on export volumes and its realisations for Indian aluminium producers is expected
to be higher than that of domestic steel manufacturers. However, India remains one of the lowest-cost
aluminium producers globally, mainly on account of the availability of quality bauxite reserves, which
improves India’s cost competitiveness in the global market – this can provide greater cushion to domestic
aluminium producers to meet the increased competition from any over-supply scenario arising from the
imposition of tariff by the US.
1
US import tariff hike on Steel & Aluminium: Impact Analysis on
Indian Corporates
Subsequently, relief was extended to numerous significant and strategically important steel and aluminium
exporting countries to the US. This time, however, the order also encompasses the termination of any previous
exemptions granted to these countries.
Over the last two decades or more (CY04-24), the US has remained a major importer of steel in the global market,
with imports on average accounting for around 20% of its total domestic steel consumption.
CY24 E
CY05
CY06
CY07
CY08
CY09
CY10
CY11
CY13
CY15
CY16
CY17
CY18
CY19
CY20
CY21
CY22
CY23
CY04
CY12
CY14
Capacity Production Consumption Net Import/Export (RHS) Capacity Utilization (%) (RHS)
Although US steel capacity is adequate to meet domestic demands, capacity utilisation levels have remained low,
resulting in ongoing import dependence. This lower utilisation can also be attributed to higher production costs
than other major steel-producing countries. The increased cost of production and subsequent import reliance have
led US steel prices to command a significant premium, thereby attracting imports. Over the past four years (CY21
to CY24), US steel prices, on average, were approximately 50% higher than Chinese steel prices, while they were
around 23% and 38% higher than Western European and global export prices, respectively.
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Jan-21
May-21
Jan-22
May-22
Jan-23
May-23
Jan-24
May-24
Jan-25
Sep-21
Sep-22
Sep-23
Sep-24
Nov-21
Nov-22
Nov-23
Nov-24
Mar-21
Jul-21
Mar-22
Jul-22
Mar-23
Jul-23
Mar-24
Jul-24
2
US import tariff hike on Steel & Aluminium: Impact Analysis on
Indian Corporates
The tariff order comes in as a respite for the US steel industry, given the subdued demand environment for the
metal as reflected from the declining trend of steel consumption in last two-three years, which along with higher
levels of import has resulted in prolonged lower capacity utilization rates and lower profitability margins for the US
steel producers.
Canada, Brazil, and Mexico remained the major steel exporters to the US market during CY24. Meanwhile, several
Asian countries, such as South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, China, and Vietnam, contributed significantly to steel exports
to the US market. Considering the tariff increase by the US, surplus steel production could be redirected to other
countries, including India.
Canada 6.0 23
Brazil 4.1 16
Mexico 3.2 12
South… 2.5 10
Japan 1.1 4
Taiwan 0.9 4
China 0.5 2
Vietnam 5
1.2
India 1
0.2
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Domestic steel consumption has increased by around 13-14% during FY24 and H1FY25. Despite a robust growth
in domestic steel consumption, realisations during this period have remained under pressure, mainly due to the
decline in global steel prices. Domestic prices are based on the landed cost parity with international prices. During
FY24, imports in the domestic market increased by around 38% and 20% during the first 10 months of FY25. While
India’s exports increased by around 11% in FY24, it recorded a sharp decline of around 29% during the first 10
months of FY25.
3
US import tariff hike on Steel & Aluminium: Impact Analysis on
Indian Corporates
Indian steel industry scenario: India has again turned into a net importer of steel:
(Mn Tonnes) (percent) (Mn Tonnes)
200 100 15
80
150 10
60
100
5
40
50
20 -
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 Apr_Jan
0 0 25
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
-5
Capacity Consumption
Capcity Utilization (RHS) -10 Imports Exports Net (Imp)/Exp
The surge in import volumes has resulted in lower realisation in domestic prices, thereby impacting the profitability
of domestic steel producers.
Aggregated quarterly data for the sample set of four large integrated steel players in the domestic market, which
represents around 48% of the total domestic steel capacity, has shown a decline in net sales realisations (NSR) of
around Rs 5,850 per tonne and profitability (PBILDT) of around Rs. 1,600 per tonne during the first 9MFY25 when
compared with the same period last year. However, softening in key raw material prices has partially aided the
decline in profitability for these players.
Q2FY23
Q3FY23
Q4FY23
Q1FY24
Q2FY24
Q3FY24
Q4FY24
Q1FY25
Q2FY25
Q3FY25
Globally, India is the second largest producer and consumer of steel after China. Given the robust growth in India’s
domestic steel demand as against an otherwise subdued global steel industry and the negligible level of direct steel
exports from India to the US, CareEdge Ratings believes that although the recent tariff order may not directly affect
the Indian steel producers; but it has the potential to keep their sales realisations under check if some of the major
suppliers to the US start diverting their exports to other markets, including India. Further, India exported around
6.3 MnT of steel during CY24. Given the anticipated rise in competition in export markets, Indian players may
4
US import tariff hike on Steel & Aluminium: Impact Analysis on
Indian Corporates
encounter lower export volumes, which would increase domestic supply and subsequently exert pressure on
realisations.
India’s total steel exports and US share in it US steel Imports and India’s share in US imports
(Mn Tonnes) (Percent) (Mn Tonnes) (Percent)
14 30 29 28 10
28
28
12 25 8
28
10 27
20
8 26 6
27
15
6 26 26
4
7.9 10 26
4 2.8
4.5 3.65 25 2
2 1.6 25 1.29 2.22
0 0 1.19 0.86 0
24
CY20 CY21 CY22 CY23 CY24 CY21 CY22 CY23 CY24
Total Exports US share in Exports (%) Total Imports India's share in Imports (%)
Aluminium:
Aluminium production through the primary route remains lower in the US than in the secondary route (scrap route).
However, the US aluminium industry remains significantly dependent on imports, with around 75% of the US
aluminium’s apparent supply (primary + secondary production + imports–exports + adjustments for stock changes;
excludes imported scrap) being primarily met through imports. Canada remains the largest exporter of aluminium
to the US, followed by UAE and China.
China remains the largest producer of primary aluminium, holding approximately 60% of the global production
share, while India ranks as the second largest producer, contributing around 6%. Unlike steel, India is a net
exporter of aluminium, with nearly 40% of its primary aluminium output being exported. The US accounts for about
6-8% of India's total aluminium exports, representing a larger share of aluminium exports than steel exports.
5
US import tariff hike on Steel & Aluminium: Impact Analysis on
Indian Corporates
Indian aluminium industry scenario: India’s aluminium exports and the US's share in it
(Mn Tonnes) (Percent) (Mn Tonnes) (Percent)
4.5 80 3.0 2.7 15
68 2.6
4.0 64 70 13
63 2.5 2.3
3.5 60
3.0 51 2.0 11
47 50 1.9
2.5 38 2.0
40 7.3 8.5 9
2.0
30 1.5 7
1.5 6.4
1.0 20 6.0 5
10 1.0 4.4
0.5 3
0.0 0 0.5
1
9MCY24
CY20
CY21
CY22
CY23
CY24
0.0 -1
CY20 CY21 CY22 CY23 CY24* P
Production Consumption India Total Exports Exports to US
Exports % Exports (RHS) (% of Total Exports)
Source: CMIE, US Department of Commerce
6
US import tariff hike on Steel & Aluminium: Impact Analysis on
Indian Corporates
as exports account for 40% of India’s primary aluminium output. However, India stands to gain from being one of
the lowest-cost aluminium producers, owing to the availability of high-quality bauxite reserves,” says Hitesh
Avachat, Associate Director, CareEdge Ratings.
7
US import tariff hike on Steel & Aluminium: Impact Analysis on
Indian Corporates
Net NPAs
Large PSBs 1 0.86 0.79 0.71 0.64 0.57 0.53 0.49 0.48 0.43 -0.25 -0.11
Other
0.56 0.5 0.44 0.39 0.41 0.29 0.26 0.25 0.21 0.21 -0.25 0.03
PSBs
PSBs 1.55 1.36 1.22 1.1 1.05 0.86 0.79 0.74 0.69 0.64 -0.25 -0.07
Source: Ace Equity, CareEdge Calculations, Note: Includes 14 PSBs (5 Large, 9 Others,) and 16 PVBs (3 large, 13 others)
Contact
Ranjan Sharma Senior Director ranjan.sharma@careedge.in +91 - 22 - 6754 3453
Pulkit Agarwal Director pulkit.agarwal@careedge.in +91 - 22 - 6754 3596
Hitesh Avachat Associate Director hitesh.avachat@careedge.in +91 - 22 - 6754 3510
Mandar Avachar Analyst Mandar.avachar@careedge.in
Mradul Mishra Media Relations mradul.mishra@careedge.in +91 - 22 - 6754 3596
Connect:
Locations: Ahmedabad l Andheri-Mumbai l Bengaluru l Chennai l Coimbatore l Hyderabad l Kolkata l Noida l Pune
About Us:
CareEdge is a knowledge-based analytical group offering services in Credit Ratings, Analytics, Consulting and Sustainability. Established in
1993, the parent company CARE Ratings Ltd (CareEdge Ratings) is India’s second-largest rating agency, with a credible track record of rating
companies across diverse sectors and holding leadership positions in high-growth sectors such as BFSI and Infra. The wholly-owned
subsidiaries of CareEdge Ratings are (I) CARE Analytics & Advisory Private Ltd (previously known as CARE Risk Solutions Pvt Ltd), (II) CARE
ESG Ratings Ltd,( previously known as CARE Advisory Research and Training Ltd) and (III) CareEdge Global IFSC Ltd. CareEdge Ratings’ other
international subsidiary entities include CARE Ratings (Africa) Private Ltd in Mauritius, CARE Ratings South Africa (Pty) Ltd, and CARE Ratings
Nepal Ltd.
Disclaimer:
This report has been prepared by CareEdge (CARE Ratings Limited). CareEdge has taken utmost care to ensure accuracy and objectivity based on information available in the
public domain. However, neither the accuracy nor completeness of the information contained in this report is guaranteed. CareEdge is not responsible for any errors or
omissions in analysis/inferences/views or for results obtained from the use of the information contained in this report and especially states that CareEdge has no financial
liability whatsoever to the user of this report.