0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views13 pages

Geotech Lab Report

The document is a laboratory report for CE_413 E Geotechnical Engineering conducted by Group 8 of BSCE 4C at Naga College Foundation. It includes detailed laboratory data computations for various soil types, including top soil, soil 1 meter below ground, canal soil, and borrow pit soil, along with sieve analysis, moisture content determination, liquid limit, and plastic limit tests. The report also provides AASHTO soil classifications and group index calculations for each soil type tested.

Uploaded by

Mariel Sibulo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views13 pages

Geotech Lab Report

The document is a laboratory report for CE_413 E Geotechnical Engineering conducted by Group 8 of BSCE 4C at Naga College Foundation. It includes detailed laboratory data computations for various soil types, including top soil, soil 1 meter below ground, canal soil, and borrow pit soil, along with sieve analysis, moisture content determination, liquid limit, and plastic limit tests. The report also provides AASHTO soil classifications and group index calculations for each soil type tested.

Uploaded by

Mariel Sibulo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

NAGA COLLEGE FOUNDATION

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING

LABORATORY REPORT IN
CE_413 E GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING

BSCE 4C – GROUP 8

Group Leader:
Cristobal Camang

Members:
Jobeth Banta
Robin Ace Bautista
Mariel M. Sibulo
Kyla Mae Paular

Engr. Ariel C. San Lorenzo


Instructor
TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. LABORATORY DATA COMPUTATIONS ………………………….………………………………………………… 1

I. LABORATORY 1: Top Soil …………………………………………………………………………………… 1


II. LABORATORY 2: Soil 1 Meter Below the Ground ………………………………………………. 3
III. LABORATORY 3: Canal Soil ………………………………………………….…………………………….. 5
IV. LABORATORY 4: Borrow Pit Soil ………………………………………….…………………………….. 7
V. LABORATORY 5: Riverbank Soil ………………………………….……………………………………… 9

B. DOCUMENTATIONS …………………………………………………………….……………………………………… 11
A. LABORATORY DATA COMPUTATIONS

I. LABORATORY 1: SURFACE SOIL\TOP SOIL (1000g)

A. SIEVE ANALYSIS

SIEVE OPENING MASS COMMUTATIVE COMMUTATIVE


NO. (mm) RETAINED MASS RETAINED MASS PASSING % FINER
(CMR) (CMP)
4 4.75 110 110 732 100 %
10 2.00 202 312 420 57.38 %
20 0.850 154 466 266 36.34 %
40 0.425 77 543 189 25.82 %
60 0.250 55 598 134 18.31 %
80 0.180 41 639 93 12.70 %
100 0.150 43 682 50 6.83 %
200 0.075 43 725 7 0.96 %
PAN - 7 732 0 0%
TOTAL = 732 g

B. DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT

Wt. of Wet Soil + Container 1,165 g


Wt. of Dry Soil + Container 860 g
Wt. of Container 165 g
Moisture Content 43.885 %

𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑡 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 − 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙


𝜔= × 100
𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙

1000𝑔 − 695𝑔
𝜔= × 100
695𝑔

𝝎 = 𝟒𝟑. 𝟖𝟖𝟓 %

C. LIQUID LIMIT TEST (LL)

TRIAL WEIGHT OF WATER NO. OF WEIGHT OF WEIGHT MOISTURE


NO. SOIL CONTENT (ml) BLOWS WET SOIL OF DRY CONTENT,
SAMPLE (g) (g) SOIL (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 60 20 28 17 12 41.667
2 60 21 19 19 1 35.714
3 60 19 34 17 14 21.429
LL = 33.857 %

1
D. PLASTIC LIMIT TEST (PL)

WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF MOISTURE


TRIAL WATER WEIGHT OF
SOIL WET SOIL CONTENT,
NO. CONTENT (ml) DRY SOIL (g)
SAMPLE (g) (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 30 9 4 2.4 66.667
2 30 10 5 3.3 51.515
PL = 59.091 %

E. AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION

• Solving for the Group Index

Partial G.I. = 0.001(F200-15) (PI-10)

Partial G.I. = 0.001(0.96-15) (-25.234-10)

Partial G.I. = 4.947 ≈ 5

TOPSOIL IS A-2-6 (5)

2
I. LABORATORY 2: SOIL 1 METER BELOW THE GROUND (1000g)

A. SIEVE ANALYSIS

SIEVE OPENING MASS COMMUTATIVE COMMUTATIVE


NO. (mm) RETAINED MASS RETAINED MASS PASSING % FINER
(CMR) (CMP)
4 4.75 39 39 496 100 %
10 2.00 129 168 328 66.13 %
20 0.850 97 265 231 46.57 %
40 0.425 84 349 147 29.64 %
60 0.250 56 405 91 18.35 %
80 0.180 26 431 65 13.10 %
100 0.150 18 449 47 9.48 %
200 0.075 39 488 8 1.61 %
PAN - 8 496 0 0%
TOTAL = 496 g

B. DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT

Wt. of Wet Soil + Container 1,165 g


Wt. of Dry Soil + Container 871 g
Wt. of Container 165 g
Moisture Content 41.643 %

𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑡 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 − 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙


𝜔= × 100
𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙
1000 𝑔 − 706 𝑔
𝜔= × 100
706 𝑔
𝝎 = 𝟒𝟏. 𝟔𝟒𝟑%

C. LIQUID LIMIT TEST (LL)

TRIAL WEIGHT OF WATER NO. OF WEIGHT OF WEIGHT MOISTURE


NO. SOIL CONTENT (ml) BLOWS WET SOIL OF DRY CONTENT,
SAMPLE (g) (g) SOIL (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 60 18 30 14 10 40
2 60 20 27 21 16 31.25
3 60 19 17 17 12 41.667
LL = 37.266 %

D. PLASTIC LIMIT TEST (PL)

WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF MOISTURE


TRIAL WATER WEIGHT OF
SOIL WET SOIL CONTENT,
NO. CONTENT (ml) DRY SOIL (g)
SAMPLE (g) (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 30 13 3 2.3 30.435
2 30 10 2 1.4 42.857
PL = 36.646 %

3
E. AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION

• Solving for the Group Index

Partial G.I. = 0.001(F200-15) (PI-10)

Partial G.I. = 0.001(1.61-15) (0.62-10)

Partial G.I. = 1.256 ≈ 1

1 METER BELOW THE GROUND SOIL IS A-2-6 (1)

4
II. LABORATORY 3: CANAL SOIL (1000g)

A. SIEVE ANALYSIS

SIEVE OPENING MASS COMMUTATIVE COMMUTATIVE


NO. (mm) RETAINED MASS RETAINED MASS PASSING % FINER
(CMR) (CMP)
4 4.75 89 89 657 100 %
10 2.00 138 227 430 65.45 %
20 0.850 113 340 317 48.25 %
40 0.425 80 420 237 36.07 %
60 0.250 65 485 172 26.18 %
80 0.180 35 520 137 20.85 %
100 0.150 23 543 114 17.35 %
200 0.075 91 634 23 3.50 %
PAN - 23 657 0 0%
TOTAL = 657 g

B. DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT

Wt. of Wet Soil + Container 1,158 g


Wt. of Dry Soil + Container 758 g
Wt. of Container 158 g
Moisture Content 66.667 %

𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑡 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 − 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙


𝜔= × 100
𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙
1000 𝑔 − 600 𝑔
𝜔= × 100
600 𝑔
𝝎 = 𝟔𝟔. 𝟔𝟔𝟕 %

C. LIQUID LIMIT TEST (LL)

TRIAL WEIGHT OF WATER NO. OF WEIGHT OF WEIGHT MOISTURE


NO. SOIL CONTENT (ml) BLOWS WET SOIL OF DRY CONTENT,
SAMPLE (g) (g) SOIL (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 60 18 23 22 16 37.5
2 60 16 28 17 13 30.769
3 60 17 20 20 15 33.333
LL = 33.265 %

D. PLASTIC LIMIT TEST (PL)

WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF MOISTURE


TRIAL WATER WEIGHT OF
SOIL WET SOIL CONTENT,
NO. CONTENT (ml) DRY SOIL (g)
SAMPLE (g) (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 30 13 3 2.4 25
2 30 14 3.4 2.2 54.545
PL = 39.773 %

5
E. AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION

• Solving for the Group Index

Partial G.I. = 0.001(F200-15) (PI-10)

Partial G.I. = 0.001(3.50-15) (-6.508-10)

Partial G.I. = 1.900 ≈ 2

CANAL SOIL IS A-2-6 (2)

6
III. LABORATORY 3: BORROW PIT SOIL (1000g)

A. SIEVE ANALYSIS

SIEVE OPENING MASS COMMUTATIVE COMMUTATIVE


NO. (mm) RETAINED MASS RETAINED MASS PASSING % FINER
(CMR) (CMP)
4 4.75 37 37 629 100 %
10 2.00 114 151 478 76.00 %
20 0.850 109 260 369 58.66 %
40 0.425 77 337 292 46.42 %
60 0.250 118 455 174 27.66 %
80 0.180 129 584 45 7.15 %
100 0.150 27 611 18 2.86 %
200 0.075 13 624 5 0.79 %
PAN - 5 629 0 0%
TOTAL = 629 g

B. DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT

Wt. of Wet Soil + Container 1,160 g


Wt. of Dry Soil + Container 911 g
Wt. of Container 160 g
Moisture Content 33.156 %

𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑡 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 − 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙


𝜔= × 100
𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙
1000 𝑔 − 751 𝑔
𝜔= × 100
751 𝑔
𝝎 = 𝟑𝟑. 𝟏𝟓𝟔 %

C. LIQUID LIMIT TEST (LL)

TRIAL WEIGHT OF WATER NO. OF WEIGHT OF WEIGHT MOISTURE


NO. SOIL CONTENT (ml) BLOWS WET SOIL OF DRY CONTENT,
SAMPLE (g) (g) SOIL (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 60 24 30 15 12 25
2 60 27 16 16 11 45.455
3 60 21 19 15 9 66.667
LL = 37.703 %

D. PLASTIC LIMIT TEST (PL)

WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF MOISTURE


TRIAL WATER WEIGHT OF
SOIL WET SOIL CONTENT,
NO. CONTENT (ml) DRY SOIL (g)
SAMPLE (g) (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 30 12 3 1.8 66.667
2 30 13 3 2 50
PL = 58.334 %

7
E. AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION

• Solving for the Group Index

Partial G.I. = 0.001(F200-15) (PI-10)

Partial G.I. = 0.001(0.79-15) (-20.631-10)

Partial G.I. = 4.353 ≈ 4

BORROW PIT SOIL IS A-2-6 (4)

8
IV. LABORATORY 3: RIVERBANK SOIL (1000g)

A. SIEVE ANALYSIS

SIEVE OPENING MASS COMMUTATIVE COMMUTATIVE


NO. (mm) RETAINED MASS RETAINED MASS PASSING % FINER
(CMR) (CMP)
4 4.75 99 99 674 100 %
10 2.00 93 192 482 71.51 %
20 0.850 98 290 384 56.97 %
40 0.425 16 306 368 54.60 %
60 0.250 227 533 141 20.92 %
80 0.180 96 629 45 6.68 %
100 0.150 17 646 28 4.15 %
200 0.075 24 670 4 0.59 %
PAN - 4 674 0 0%
TOTAL = 674 g

B. DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT

Wt. of Wet Soil + Container 1,160 g


Wt. of Dry Soil + Container 756 g
Wt. of Container 160 g
Moisture Content 67.785 %

𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑡 𝑠𝑜𝑖𝑙 − 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙


𝜔= × 100
𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑟𝑦 𝑆𝑜𝑖𝑙
1000 𝑔 − 796 𝑔
𝜔= × 100
796 𝑔
𝝎 = 𝟔𝟕. 𝟕𝟖𝟓 %

C. LIQUID LIMIT TEST (LL)

TRIAL WEIGHT OF WATER NO. OF WEIGHT OF WEIGHT MOISTURE


NO. SOIL CONTENT (ml) BLOWS WET SOIL OF DRY CONTENT,
SAMPLE (g) (g) SOIL (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 60 19 17 16 12 33.333
2 60 17 26 14 10 27.273
3 60 18 23 20 17 17.647
LL = 23.020 %

D. PLASTIC LIMIT TEST (PL)

WEIGHT OF WEIGHT OF MOISTURE


TRIAL WATER WEIGHT OF
SOIL WET SOIL CONTENT,
NO. CONTENT (ml) DRY SOIL (g)
SAMPLE (g) (g) 𝜔 (%)
1 30 11 4 2.8 42.857
2 30 12 4 3.4 17.647
PL = 30.252 %

9
E. AASHTO SOIL CLASSIFICATION

• Solving for the Group Index

Group index= (F200-35) [0.2+0.005 (LL-40)] + 0.01(F200 -15) (PI-10)


= (0.59-35) [0.2+0.005 (23.020-40)] +0.01(0.59 -15) (-7.-10)
Group index= -3.708 ≈ -3

*Since the computed G.I. yields a negative value, the final group index is 0.

RIVER BANK SOIL IS A-2-4 (0)

10
B. DOCUMENTATIONS

• Liquid Limit Test (before and after oven drying)

• Plastic Limit Test (before and after of oven-drying)

• During the Sieve Analysis and the displayed Soil Samples

11

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy