Electronic Spectroscopy: Transitions
Electronic Spectroscopy: Transitions
Electronic Transitions
When a molecule absorbs Ultra-violet or Visible light, its electrons get promoted
from ground state to the higher excited state. During excitation an electron gets excited
from a bonding to an antibonding orbital.
Possible electronic transitions of bonding , electrons and nonbonding
For example, saturated hydrocarbons like methane (which has only C-H bonds,
and can only undergo σ→ σ* transitions) shows an absorbance maximum at 125 nm.
Absorption maxima due to σ→ σ* transitions are not seen in typical UV-Vis. spectra
(200 - 700 nm).
(ii) n → σ* Transitions
(iii) π→ π* Transitions
(iv) n→ π* Transitions
There are mainly two selection rules which should be followed for an electronic
transition to occur. These are -
Laporte Selection Rule
According to this rule, the only allowed transitions are those which involve a
change in parity i.e. gerade → ungerade (g→ u) and ungerade → gerade (u→ g) are
allowed while gerade→ gerade (g→ g) and ungerade→ ungerade (u→ u) are forbidden.
According to this rule, the only allowed transitions are those which involve no
change in spin state i.e. transitions from singlet → singlet and triplet → triplet are
allowed while transitions from singlet → triplet and triplet → singlet are forbidden.
Born-Oppenheimer Approximation
The complication that arisen while solving for the total wave function, was simplified
by Born and Oppenheimer in their approximation. In Born-Oppenheimer approximation
two simple steps were used to solve for the Ψtotal.
In the first step, nuclei are fixed at a certain configuration (usually equilibrium
configuration) and then the electronic Schrödinger equation is solved to get the
wavefunction Ψelectronic which depends only on electrons.
In the second step, the nuclear equation is solved to get the wavefunction Ψnuclear
which depends only on nuclei.
For two arbitrary values of ε electronic (ε” electronic and ε’ electronic) the Vibrational
coarse structure of the band formed during electronic absorption from the ground state
(v” = 0) to higher states (v’) are shown in Figure 3.2. From the figure, it is clear that the
spacing between the upper Vibrational levels are smaller than that between the lower,
this is because an excited electronic state generally corresponds to a weaker bond in a
molecule and hence a smaller Vibrational wavenumber ( ). The spacing between the
lines decreases with increase in frequency, this is due to anharmonicity of the upper
state vibration which causes the excited Vibrational levels to converge.
Conventionally, the transitions are represented as (v’,v”) i.e. (0,0),(1,0), (2,0) etc.
under high resolution, the lines formed from different transitions are seen as separate
lines, however, under low resolution, a set of lines appear as diffused and broad and
hence such a set is called a band. Moreover, in a set of lines as the values of v’
increases by one unit, so, such a set of lines is also called a v’ progression.
The study of a band spectrum enables one to get the values of Vibrational
wavenumber and anharmonicity constant for both the ground as well as excited
electronic state and also the separation between the electronic states.
Fig.3.2 Vibrational coarse structure of the band formed during electronic absorption
Franck-Condon Principle
As the mass of the nuclei are quite larger than that of the electrons and electronic
transitions take place quite faster, so, the nuclear configuration almost remains same
during the transition. Thus, the Franck-Condon Principle may be stated as –
Moreover, it may be mentioned here that the most intense vibronic transition is
one in which the excited Vibrational state lies vertically above the ground Vibrational
state. However, transitions to the other Vibrational levels also occur, but in that cases
the intensity of the transitions are found to be quite lower. To understand this fact, let us
consider four cases –
Case I
In this case the upper electronic state (ε’) is having slightly less equilibrium
internuclear distance (re) than the lower
electronic state (ε”). Here the transition
that occurs vertically is from (v” =0) to
(v’=2). So, the most intense line will be
(2,0), because in this transition the
internuclear distance does not change
(Figure 3.3).
Fig.3.3 Transition in which upper state internuclear distance is less than the lower state
Case II
In this case the upper electronic state (ε’) is having the same equilibrium
internuclear distance (re) as the lower electronic state (ε”). Here the transition that
occurs vertically is from (v” =0) to (v’=0). So, the most intense line will be (0,0), because
in this transition the internuclear distance does not change (Figure 3.4).
Fig.3.4 Transition in which the internuclear distances are same for both upper and
lower state
Case III
In this case the upper electronic state (ε’) is having slightly more equilibrium
internuclear distance (re) than the lower electronic state (ε”). Here the transition that
occurs vertically is from (v” =0) to (v’=2). So, the most intense line will be (2,0), because
in this transition the internuclear distance does not change (Figure 3.5).
Fig.3.5 Transition in which upper state internuclear distance is greater than the lower
state
Case IV
In this case the upper electronic state (ε’) is having considerably more equilibrium
internuclear distance (re) than the lower electronic state (ε”). In this case the observation
is somewhat different than that already discussed in the above three cases. Here the
Vibrational level to which a transition takes place has a quite high v’ value (to get a
vertical transition). Moreover, in this case transitions may take place to a state in which
the excited molecule has energy in excess of its own dissociation energy. As a result
the molecule will dissociate into its constituent atoms without any vibrations. Since the
atoms formed may take up any value of kinetic energy, so, transitions are not quantized
and results in the formation of a continuum (Figure 3.6).
Fig.3.6 Transition in which upper state internuclear distance is considerably greater than
the lower state
Problem 3.1: Using the Franck-Condon principle, explain why the intensities of the
vibrational lines associated with electronic transitions differ. [GU 2016]
Problem 3.2: Discuss Franck-Condon principle to explain intensities of vibronic
transitions due to absorption or emission of a photon of appropriate energy. [GU 2014]
Problem 3.3: State and explain Franck-Condon principle. Discuss how this principle is
applicable to explain the intensity distribution of vibrational bands in electronic transition.
[GU 2013]
Chromophore
Absorption
Chromophore Transition
Maxima, λmax (nm)
n→π* 285
R2C=O
π→π* 188
n→π* 290
R-CHO
π→π* 190
Auxochrome
The position as well as the intensity of the absorption band of a chromophore can
be changed by the attachment of certain groups in place of hydrogen to a basic
chromophore. Such substituents may not give rise to the absorption, but their presence
changes the position and intensity of the absorption band.
Thus, an auxochrome may be defined as any substituent or group which itself
doesnot absorb, but its attachment to the chromophore, increases the intensity of
absorption and shifts the absorption band to the longer wavelength.
Some examples of auxochromes include –OH, -R, -OR, -X, -NH2 etc.
The effect of the auxochrome is due to its ability to extend the conjugation of the
chromophore by the sharing of non-bonding electrons. Hence, by the attachment of
auxochrome to the basic chromophore, a new chromophore results which has a
different value of the absorption maxima as well as the extinction co-efficient. For
example , benzene shows an absorption maxima at 255 nm , while aniline absorbs at
280 nm. So, here amino group act as an auxochrome.
Hyperchromic Effect
The effect due to which the intensity of the absorption band of a chromophore
increases due the presence of an auxochrome is known as hyperchromic effect.
Hypochromic Effect
The effect due to which the intensity of the absorption band of a chromophore
decreases is known as hypochromic effect.
Problem 3.4: Define auxochrome. What do you mean by red shift and blue shift of
absorption maximum ? [GU 2016]
Woodward’s Rules
Woodward gave some empirical rules to calculate the λ max for conjugated dienes,
trienes and polyenes. According to Woodward, some basic value is assigned to the
parent compound and the increments made by each substituent is added to it. The
values of the parent compound as well as various increments for dienes are shown in
Table 3.2.
Table 3.2: Values of the parent compound as well as various increments for dienes.
Increments:
Auxochrome:
-OR 6 6
-Cl, -Br 5 5
-OCOCH3 0 0
-NR2 60 60
NB:
(i) A heteroannular diene means that the two double bonds in conjugation are
present in different rings.
(ii) A homoannular diene means that the two double bonds in conjugation are
present in same ring.
(iii) A double bond which lies at the junction of two rings is known as an exocyclic
double bond. If a double bond connects two rings then it is considered as two
exocyclic bonds.
Problem 3.6: Calculate the λmax for the following compounds as per Woodward rule –
ii.
i.
H3CH2CO
iv.
iii.
Solution:
Ring Residue – (3 X 5) = 15 nm
Ring Residue – (3 X 5) = 15 nm
-OCH2CH3 (-OR) = 6 nm
_______________________________________
ii.
i.
H3CCOO
COOH
Solution
Ring Residue – (5 X 5) = 25 nm
Ring Residue – (3 X 5) = 15 nm
Alkyl Substituent = 5 nm
The values of the parent compound as well as various increments for enones are
shown in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3: Values of the parent compound as well as various increments for enones.
Increments
α 10 10 10
Alkyl substituent or
β 12 12 12
ring residue
γ and
18 18 18
higher
Auxochrome
α 35 35 35
β 30 30 30
-OR
γ 17 17 17
δ 31 31 31
α 15 15 15
-Cl,
β 12 12 12
α 25 25 25
-Br
β 30 30 30
α 35 35 35
-OH β 30 30 30
δ 50 50 50
-OCOCH3 α, β, δ 6 6 6
-NR2 β 95 95 95
Problem 3.8 : Calculate the λmax for the following compounds as per Woodward rule –
O O
ii.
i.
O
iii. iv.
GU,2015
Solution
Homocyclic diene = 39 nm
The energy levels for free particles restricted to move in a 1D box are given by –
En = n2h2/8ma2
Where n=1,2,3,……..
m = mass of electron
h = Planck’s constant
When an electron from the highest filled energy level with quantum number
n = N/2 is excited to the next higher level with quantum number n’ = N/2 + 1 , energy is
absorbed. The difference in energy between these two levels is given as –
∆E = h2/8ma2 [n’2-n2]
∆E = h2/8ma2 [ N + 1]
or λ = hc/∆E
or λ = hc 8ma2 / h2 [ N + 1]
In the above equation, the length of the potential box is not the length of the
carbon chain but is taken as the length of the carbon chain plus one extra bond length
on each side of the chain, i.e.
λ = 8 m c [(N + 1) l] 2 / h [ N + 1]
or λ = 8 m c (N + 1) l 2 / h
NB: For a completely filled conjugated system, the number of π MO’s is even. Hence in
the ground state of the system the quantum number of the highest filled MO will be N/2,
where N is the number of π electrons (or the number of carbon atoms involved).
Table 3.4: Shift in the n→π * transitions for acetone in various solvents with change in
solvent polarity.
Solvent λmax (nm)
H2O 264.5
CH3OH 270
C2H5OH 272
CHCl3 277
C6H14 279
Quantitative Estimation by Spectrophotometry
Spectrophotometric analysis is generally used whenever the sample is coloured.
Substances like dichromate, permanganate, cupric, ferric ions etc. can be analyzed
directly as such without chemical reactions. As most of the ions are colourless, these
are made to react with suitable reagents to form coloured solutions which are then put
into analysis. The reagent should be selected such that it reacts with only one ion. It
eliminates interference due to the presence of other ions in solution.
Since Beer’s law shows variation it cannot be directly applied for analytical
problems. The difficulty can be removed by plotting calibration curve between the
absorbance and the sample concentration used for preparing calibration curves. For
preparing calibration curves a series of standard solutions are prepared. The
spectrophotometer is set at that wavelength where the absorption is maximum. This
value can be known from the curve between concentration (moles per litre) against
absorbance or optical density. After this the absorbance of each solution is measured
and then plotted against the concentration of the solution to get a calibration curve.
For measuring the concentration of the unknown solution the absorbance is
measured at the wavelength as used for the calibration curve. After this the
concentration of the unknown solution can be measured from the calibration curve by
observing the value of concentration against the absorbance of the solution. The use of
calibration curves is the normal procedure for the quantitative application of
spectrophotometry.
EXERCISE
3.1 Explain why absorption maximum (λmax) of CH3Cl is around 174 nm while that of
CH3I is around 260 nm?
3.2 Aniline shows an absorption maximum at 280 nm. What type of change in the
absorption maxima is observed if it is studied in acidic solution?
3.3 Discuss the types of electronic transitions, taking an example in each case.
3.4 If the upper electronic state (ε’) is having the same equilibrium internuclear distance
(re) as the lower electronic state (ε”), then at what point the most intense line will be
observed?
3.6 Explain why in case of transitions in which upper state internuclear distance is
considerably greater than the lower state, a continuum is observed.