THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT 1872

UNIT 1.1 ESSENTIALS ELEMENTS OF A CONTRACT, OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE

The term contract is defined under section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 as- “an agreement
enforceable by law”.
The contract consists of two essential elements:
I. an agreement, and
II. its enforceability by law.

The term ‘agreement’ given in Section 2(e) of the Act is defined as- “every promise and every set of
promises, forming the consideration for each other”.

Agreement = offer/Proposal + Acceptanc+consideration

An agreement to become a contract must give rise to a legal obligation which means a duly
enforceable by law.
Contract = Accepted proposal/Agreement + Enforceability by law
(i) Agreement: In order to constitute a contract, there must be an agreement in first place.

(ii) Free Consent: ‘Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by coercion, undue influence, fraud,
misrepresentation or mistake..

(iii) Lawful consideration:The agreement must be supported by a lawful consideration. Consideration means
‘something in return’. ‘

(iv) Parties are competent:The parties to an agreement must be capable of entering into a contract. A
person is considered competent if he is (a) eighteen years of age (b) of sound mind (c) not disqualified from
contracting by any law to which he is subject.
.

(v) Legality of object: There must be legality of object and consideration failing which it will not be a valid
contract.

(vi) Legal Relationship: Agreements of social or domestic nature do not contemplate legal relationship, so
they are not contracts.
Example: A husband promising his wife to buy her a ‘necklace’ on occasion of her birthday is not a contract.

vii) Agreements not expressly declared to be void:The agreement not expressly declared void or illegal by
law.

(ix) Certain and Capable of Performance: The terms of agreement must be certain and capable of
performance.

(x) Legal formalities: Where nature of agreement is such that it requires compliance of certain formalities,
such requirements should be fulfilled.

Classification of Contracts:
1. Valid Contract:
It contains all the essential elements of a valid contract.
2. Void Contract: “A contract which ceases to be enforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to
be enforceable”.
Example:
Mr. X agrees to write a book with a publisher. After few days, X dies in an accident. Here the
contract becomes void due to the impossibility of performance of the contract.

3. Voidable Contract:
“an agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties thereto, but not at
the option of the other or others is a voidable contract”

4. Illegal Contract :
It is a contract which the law forbids to be made. The court will not enforce such a contract but
also the connected contracts. All illegal agreements are void but all void agreements are not
necessarily illegal.

5. Unenforceable Contract:
Where a contract is good in substance but because of some technical defect i.e. absence in writing,
barred by limitation etc. one or both the parties cannot sue upon it, it is described as an
unenforceable contract.

1. Express Contracts: A contract would be an express contract if the terms are expressed by words
or in writing.
Example:
A tells B on telephone that he offers to sell his house for ` 2 lacs and B in reply informs A that he
accepts the offers, this is an express contract.

2. Implied Contracts: Implied contracts in contrast come into existence by implication. Most often
the implication is by law and or by action.
Example: Where a coolie in uniform picks up the luggage of A to be carried out of the railway
station without being asked by A and A allows him to do so, it is an implied contract and A must pay
for the services of the coolie detailed by him.

3. Tacit Contracts:
The word Tacit means silent. Tacit contracts are those that are inferred through the conduct of
parties without any words spoken or written. A classic example of tacit contract would be when cash
is withdrawn by a customer of a bank from the automatic teller machine [ATM].
4. Quasi-Contract:
A quasi-contract is not an actual contract but it resembles a contract. It is created by law under
certain circumstances. The law creates and enforces legal rights and obligations when no real
contract exists. Such obligations are known as quasi-contracts. In other words, it is a contract in
which there is no intention on part of either party to make a contract but law imposes a contract
upon the parties.
Example:
Obligation of finder of lost goods to return them to the true owner or liability of person to whom
money is paid under mistake to repay it back cannot be said to arise out of a contract even in its
remotest sense, as there is neither offer and acceptance nor consent. These are said to be quasi-
contracts.

5. E-Contracts:
When a contract is entered into by two or more parties using electronics means, such as e-mails is
known as e-commerce contracts.

1. Executed Contract:
The consideration in a given contract could be an act or forbearance. When the act is done or exe-
cuted or the forbearance is brought on record, then the contract is an executed contract.
2. Executory Contract:
In an executory contract the consideration is reciprocal promise or obligation. Such consideration is
to be performed in future only and therefore these contracts are described as executory
contracts.
(a) Unilateral Contract: Unilateral contract is a one sided contract in which one party has performed
his duty or obligation and the other party’s obligation is outstanding.
(b) Bilateral Contract: A Bilateral contract is one where the obligation or promise is outstanding on the
part of both the parties.
(iii) Multilateral Contract: In this type of contract more than two parties are involved. These are
very complex contracts and generally take international character.

(i) Formal contracts: This term is usually found in English laws. Validity of these contracts depends
upon their form. They are valid even if they lack consideration.

These contracts are of two types;

Contract under seal and contract of Records.
Contract under seal are in writing and signed by the parties to them.
Contract of Records includes the court judgements and recognizance, obligations in such cases arise out of
judgement and not under the contract.

(ii) Simple Contract: All contracts other than formal are called simple contracts or parole contracts.
A proposal is defined as, ‘when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or abstain from doing
anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a
proposal.’ [Sec 2(a)]

(a) General offer:

It is an offer made to public at large and hence anyone can accept and do the desired act (Carlill v.
Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.).

(b) Special/specific offer:

When the offer is made to a specific or an ascertained person, it is known as a specific offer.
Specific offer can be accepted only by that specified person to whom the offer has been made.
[Boulton v. Jones]

Example:
‘A’ offers to sell his car to ‘B’ at a certain cost. This is a specific offer.

(c) Cross offer: When two parties exchange identical offers in ignorance at the time of each
other’s offer, the offers are called cross offers. There is no binding contract in such a case
because offer made by a person cannot be construed as acceptance of the another’s offer.
(d) Counter offer: When the offeree offers to qualified acceptance of the offer subject to
modifications and variations in the terms of original offer, he is said to have made a counter offer.
Counter-offer amounts to rejection of the original offer. It is also called as Conditional Acceptance.

(e) Standing or continuing or open offer:

An offer which is allowed to remain open for acceptance over a period of time is known as standing
or continuing or open offer. Tenders that are invited for supply of goods is a kind of standing offer.

An offer to be valid must comply with the following rules:

1. Offer may be expressed or implied:
An offer may be expressed or may be implied from the conduct of the parties or circumstances
of the case.
Express Offer: An express offer is made by words spoken or written.
Implied Offer: An implied offer is not made by words spoken or written. It is implied from the conduct of the
parties or from the circumstances.
Example:
A boy starts cleaning the car as it stops on the traffic signal without being asked to do so, in such
circumstances any reasonable man could guess that he expects to be paid for this, here boy makes
an implied offer.

2. Offer may be specific or general:

A specific offer is one which is made to a particular person. It can be accepted by the person to whom it has
been made, no one else can accept such an offer. A general offer is an offer made to the public at large.

3. Offer must give rise to legal obligation:

An offer to be valid must create legal relationship between the parties. The very purpose of entering into an
agreement is to make it enforceable at a Court of law.
4. Terms of an offer must be definite and certain:
The terms of an offer should not be vague or indefinite.

5. Offer must be distinguished from an invitation to offer:

An advertisement for sale of goods by auction is an invitation to the offer. It merely invites offers/
bids made at the auction. Similarly, Red Herring Prospectus issued by a company, is only an invitation
to the public to make an offer to subscribe to the securities of the company.
Example:
The price list of goods does not constitute an offer for sale of certain goods on the listed prices. It
is an invitation to offer.

6. Offer must be communicated:

An offer must be communicated to the person to whom it is made. A person can accept the offer only when
he knows about it. If he does not know it, he cannot accept it.
7. Communication of Special Terms:
Special terms of a contract must be communicated. Generally, such cases arise in respect of general offers,
like tickets or receipts for depositing luggage at the Railway Station or receipts for clothes given for dry
cleaning etc.

8. Offer must be made with a view to obtaining the consent of the other party to do or to abstain
from doing the act:
The offer must be made with an intention to get the consent of the other party to do or to abstain from
doing the act and not simply with a view to making known the intention of making an offer.

9. Offer should not impose an unnecessary obligation to communicate non acceptance:

Thus an offeror cannot say that if acceptance is not communicated by Sunday next, the offer would be
considered as accepted.
Example:
A proposes B to purchase his android mobile for `5000 and if no reply by him in a week, it would be
assumed that B had accepted the proposal. This would not result into contract.

10. Offer to make an offer is not an offer.

Definition of Acceptance:
In terms of Section 2(b) of the Act, ‘the term acceptance’ is defined as follows:
“When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, proposal is said to be
accepted. The proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise”.

The following are the essentials of a valid acceptance. They are:

1. Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified: [Sec. 7(1)]

In order to be effective, there must be an absolute and unqualified acceptance of all the terms of the offer.
Qualified acceptance would amount to rejection of the offer.

2. Acceptance must be communicated:

For an acceptance to be valid, it must not only be made by the offeree but must also be communicated by or
with the authority of the offeree to the offeror. Silence cannot be construed as acceptance.

3. Acceptance must be in a prescribed or reasonable mode [Sec. 7(2)]

If the offer or prescribes no mode of acceptance, the acceptances must be communicated according to some
usual and reasonable mode.
Example:
If the offer or prescribes acceptance through messenger and offeree sends acceptance by email,
there is no acceptance of the offer if the offeror informs the offeree that the acceptance is not
according to the mode prescribed. But if the offeror fails to do so, it will be presumed that he has
accepted the acceptance and a valid contract will arise.

4. Acceptance must be given within a reasonable time and before the offer lapses:
Acceptance must be given within the specified time limit, if any and if no time is stipulated, acceptance must
be given within a reasonable time because an offer cannot be kept open indefinitely.

5. Acceptance cannot precede an offer:

It cannot precede an offer. Acceptance must be given after receiving the offer. It should not precede the
offer.

6. Acceptance must be given only by the person to whom the offer is made:
An offer can be accepted only by the person or persons to whom it is made and with whom it imports an
intention to contract. It cannot be accepted by another person without the consent of the offer.

7. Rejected offer can be accepted only on renewal:

Rejected offer can be accepted only, on renewal; offer once rejected can’t be accepted again unless a fresh
offer is made.

8. Revocation of acceptance:
Under English Law acceptance is revocable, whereas under Indian Law acceptance is irrevocable.

9. Acceptance to give an acceptance is not an acceptance.

10. Mere silence is not acceptance

The acceptance of an offer cannot be implied from the silence of the offeree or his failure to an-
swer, unless the offeree has in any previous conduct indicated that his silence is the evidence of
acceptance.

Communication of offer:
In terms of Section 4 of the Act, “the communication of offer is complete when it comes to
the knowledge of the person to whom it is made”. This can be explained by an example.
Mere receiving of the letter is not sufficient, he must receive or read the message contained
in the letter.
He receives the letter on 12th March, but he reads it on 15th of March. In this case offer is
communicated on 15th of March, and not 12th of March.
Communication of acceptance:
In terms of Section 4 of the Act, it is complete,
(i) As against the proposer, when it is put in the course of transmission to him so as to be out of the
power of the acceptor to withdraw the same;
(ii) As against the acceptor, when it comes to the knowledge of the proposer.
Where a proposal is accepted by a letter sent by the post, the communication of acceptance will be
complete as against the proposer when the letter of acceptance is posted and as against the
acceptor when the letter reaches the proposer.

Revocation of offer and acceptance:

Revocation means taking back; revocation can be of both offer/proposal as well as acceptance.
Para 3 of section 4 states, “the communication of a revocation is complete”- against the person
(i) who makes it, when it is put into a course of transmission to the person to whom it is made, so as to
be out of the power of the person who makes it;
(ii) as against the person to whom it is made, when it comes to his knowledge.

Section 6 of the Act provides the modes for revocation of an offer or acceptance.
(i) By the communication of notice of revocation by the proposer to the other party. The offer or may revoke
his proposal any time before the letter of acceptance is posted to him and not afterwards. Similarly
acceptance can be revoked any time before the letter of acceptance is received by the offer or.

(ii) By the lapse of the time prescribed in such proposal for its acceptance, or, if no time is so prescribed, by
the lapse of a reasonable time, without communication of the acceptance; What is a reasonable time is a
question of fact in each case.

(iii) By the failure of the acceptor to fulfill a condition precedent to acceptance. Suppose where ‘A’
proposes to sell his house to be ‘B’ for ` 5 lakhs provided ‘B’ leases his land to ‘A’. If ‘B’ refuses to lease
the land, the offer of ‘A’ is revoked automatically.

(iv) By the death or insanity of the proposer, if the fact of the death or insanity comes to the knowledge of
the acceptor before acceptance. Where an offeree writes his acceptance but dies before posting, the offer
lapse and posting of the letter after his death will not create a contract.

(v) If a counter offer is made to it. Where the offer is accepted with some modification in terms of the
offer or with some other condition not forming part of the offer, such qualified acceptance amounts to a
counter offer.

(vi) If an offer not accepted according to prescribed or usual mode. However, the offeror gives notice to
the offeree within the reasonable time that the acceptance is not according to the prescribed or usual mode
of acceptance.

(vii) An offer comes to an end if the law is changed so as to make the contract contemplated by the offer
illegal or incapable of performance
An agreement becomes a contract when it fulfills all essential elements of a valid contract. In case one or
more of the essential element of a valid contract are missing, the contract is void, voidable, illegal or
unenforceable.
Let us discuss them one by one.
A. Voidable contract: An agreement which is enforceable by law at the option of one or more parties thereto
but not at the option of other is a voidable contract. A contract become voidable when it is enforceable at
the option of one or more party thereto but not other. How this happens? When in one of the essential
element of a valid contract, free consent is absent.

Example: A promise to sell his farm to B for ` 5.0 lakh. B was not prepared for this but A by force compelled
B to sign the agreement. Here the consent of B was obtained by coercion or fraud. The contract is voidable at
the option of B.

B. Void agreement: An agreement not enforceable by law is said to be a void agreement. A void agreement
does not create any legal rights or obligation, hence is null and void ab initio.

C. Void contract: A contract which ceases to be unenforceable by law becomes void when it ceases to be
enforceable by law. Void contract is initially a perfectly valid contract but subsequent development turns it
into a void contract.

The following agreements have been expressly declared to be void by the Indian Contract Act:
1) Agreement by a minor or a person of unsound mind. [Sec (11) and Sec (12)]

2) Agreement of which the consideration or object is unlawful. [Sec (23)]

3) Agreement made under a bilateral mistake of fact material to the agreement. [Sec (20)]

4) Agreement of which the consideration or object is unlawful in part and the illegal part cannot be
separated from the legal part. [Sec (24)]

5) Agreement made without consideration. [Sec (25)]

6) Agreement in restraint of marriage. [Sec (26)] - Every agreement in restraint of the marriage of any
person, other than a minor, is void.

7) Agreement in restraint of trade. [Sec (27)]- Every agreement by which anyone is restrained from
exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind, is to that extent void. The exception is
an agreement not to carry on business of which goodwill is sold.

8) Agreement in restraint of legal proceedings. [Sec (28)]- Every agreement -

9) by which any party thereto is restricted absolutely from enforcing his rights under or in
respect of any contract, by the usual legal proceedings in the ordinary tribunals, or which
limits the time within which he may thus enforce his rights; or
 10) Which extinguishes the rights of any party thereto, or discharges any party thereto from
any liability, under or in respect of any contract on the expiry of a specified period so as to
restrict any party from enforcing his rights, is void to that extent.

11) Agreements the meaning of which is uncertain. [Sec (29)] - Agreements, the meaning of which
is not certain, or capable of being made certain, are void.

12) Agreements by way of wager. [Sec (30)] - Agreements by way of wager are void; and no suit
shall be brought for recovering anything alleged to be won on any wager, or entrusted to a person to
abide by the result of any game or other uncertain event on which any wager is made.

13) Agreements contingent on impossible events. [Sec(36)]

14) Agreements to do impossible acts. [Sec(56)] - According to section 56 an agreement to do impossible

event is void. Impossibility may be at the time of entering into a contract or subsequent to the
formation of the contract but before performance of the contract.

15) In case of reciprocal promises to do things legal and also other things illegal, the second set of
reciprocal promises is a void agreement [Sec(57)]

Consideration is an essential element of a valid contract without which no single promise will be
enforceable. It is a term used in the sense of quid pro quo, i.e., ’something in return’.

Section 2(d) defines consideration as follows:

“When at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from
doing, or does or abstains from doing or promises to do or abstain from doing something, such an act
or abstinence or promise is called consideration for the promise”.

1. Consideration must move at the desire of the promisor:

It must move at the desire of the promisor. Any act or abstinence at the desire of third party
is not consideration.

2. Consideration may move from the promisee or any other person:

Consideration may be furnished even by a stranger under Indian Law. Consideration can be from
any direction, even a stranger to contract can offer consideration. Under English law
consideration must move from promisee and no one else.

3. Consideration must be something of value:

Something in return need not be equal to something given. It can be considered a bad bargain of the party.
4. It may be an act, abstinence or forbearance or a return promise:
Promise to not to smoke is a negative act (abstinence),
Promise to not to refer the matter to court (abstinence).
Promise to perform at the wedding anniversary or birthday party (promise to do).

5. It may be past, present or future which the promisor is already not bound to do:
According to Indian Law Consideration may be past, present or future. But under English Law
Consideration may be present or future. Past consideration is no consideration according to
English Law.

6. It must not be unlawful:

The consideration or object of an agreement is lawful, unless —
➢ It is forbidden by law;
➢ or is of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law;
➢ or is fraudulent;
➢ or involves or implies injury to the person or property of another;

➢or the Court regards it as immoral, or opposed to public policy

Consideration may be present, past or future.

(i) Past consideration is something wholly done or suffered before making the agreement.
(ii) Present consideration is basically an act, which has been done in response to a positive promise. It is also
called executed consideration.
(iii)Executory or future consideration is when consideration is to move at a future date. Consideration,
depending on time can be in any combination as mentioned below:

The general rule is that an agreement made without consideration is void (Section 25). In every valid
contract, consideration is very important. A contract may only be enforceable when consideration is there.
However, the Indian Contract Act contains certain exceptions to this rule. In the following cases, the
agreement though made without consideration, will be valid and enforceable.

1. Natural Love and Affection: Conditions to be fulfilled under section 25(1)

(i) It must be made out of natural love and affection between the parties.

(ii) Parties must stand in near relationship to each other.

(iii) It must be in writing.

(iv) It must also be registered under the law.

A written and registered agreement based on natural love and affection between the parties standing in
near relation (e.g., husband and wife) to each other is enforceable even without consideration.
Example: A husband, by a registered agreement promised to pay his earnings to his wife. Held the
agreement though without consideration, was valid.

2. Compensation for past voluntary services: A promise to compensate, wholly or in part, a person who
has already voluntarily done something for the promisor, is enforceable under Section 25(2). In order that
a promise to pay for the past voluntary services be binding, the following essential factors must exist:

(i) The services should have been rendered voluntarily.

(ii) The services must have been rendered for the promisor.

(iii) The promisor must be in existence at the time when services were rendered.

(iv) The promisor must have intended to compensate the promisee.

Example: P finds R’s purse and gives it to him. R promises to give P `10,000. This is a valid
contract.

3. Promise to pay time barred debt: Where a promise in writing signed by the person making it or by
his authorised agent, is made to pay a debt barred by limitation it is valid without consideration [Section
25(3)].

Example: A is indebted to C for `60,000 but the debt is barred by the Limitation Act. A signs a written
promise now to pay `50,000 in final settlement of the debt. This is a contract without consideration, but
enforceable.

4. Agency: According to Section 185 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, no consideration is necessary
to create an agency. Thus when a person is appointed as an agent, his appointment is valid even if there
is no consideration

5. Completed gift: Gifts once made cannot be recovered on the ground of absence of consideration.
Absence of consideration will not affect the validity of any gift already made. Thus if a person gives
certain properties as gift to another according to the provisions of the Transfer of Property Act, he
cannot subsequently demand the property back on the ground there was no consideration.

6. Bailment: No consideration is required to effect the contract of bailment (Section 148).

7. Charity: If a promisee undertakes the liability on the promise of the person to contribute to
charity, there the contract shall be valid.

8. Contract of guarantee:
Under section 127, no consideration is needed for a contract of guarantee. In other words, contract of
guarantee needs no consideration.
9. Remission: Remission means lesser performance of the contract than what is actually to be
performed.

The doctrine of privities of contract means that a contract is between the parties only and no third
person can sue upon it. It means that a stranger to contract cannot sue upon it.

Example: P who is indebted to Q, sells his property to R and R promises to pay of the debt amount to Q.
If R fails to pay, then in such situation Q has no right to sue, as R is a stranger to contract.

The aforesaid rule, that stranger to a contract cannot sue is known as a “doctrine of privity of
contract”, is however, subject to certain exceptions. In other words, even a stranger to a contract may
enforce a claim in the following cases:

(1) In the case of trust, a beneficiary can enforce his right under the trust, though he was not a party
to the contract between the settler and the trustee.

(2) In the case of a family settlement, if the terms of the settlement are reduced into writing, the
members of family who originally had not been parties to the settlement may enforce the agreement.

(3) In the case of certain marriage contracts, a female member can enforce a provision for
marriage expenses made on the partition of the Hindu Undivided Family.

(4) In the case of assignment of a contract, when the benefit under a contract has been assigned,
the assignee can enforce the contract.

(5) Acknowledgement or estoppel – where the promisor by his conduct acknowledges himself as an
agent of the third party, it would result into a binding obligation towards third party. For example, if L
gives to M `20,000 to be given to N, and M informs N that he is holding the money for him, but afterwards
M refuses to pay the money. N will be entitled to recover the same from the former i.e. M.

(6) In the case of covenant running with the land, the person who purchases land with notice that
the owner of land is bound by certain duties affecting land, the covenant affecting the land may be
enforced by the successor of the seller.

(7) Contracts entered into through an agent: The principal can enforce the contracts entered by
his agent where the agent has acted within the scope of his authority and in the name of the principal.
OTHER ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A CONTRACT
Meaning: Capacity refers to the competence of the parties to make a contract. It is one of the essential
element to form a valid contract.

Who is competent to contract (Section 11)

“Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is
subject, and who is of sound mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is
subject”.

Analysis of Section 11

This section deals with personal capacity of three types of individuals only.

Every person is competent to contract who-

(A) has attained the age of majority,

(B) is of sound mind and

(C) is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.

As per section 3 of the Indian Majority Act of 1875, every person in India is a minor if he has not
attained the age of 18 years of age.

However in case of a minor of whose person or property or both a guardian has been appointed under the
Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 or whose property is under the superintendence of any court of wards before
he attains 18 years of age is 21 years.( matlab 18 years ke pehle appoint hue toh 21 yrs mana jaiga majority )

The position of Minor’s agreement and effect thereof is as under:

1. A contract made with or by a minor is void ab-initio: A minor is not competent to contract and
any agreement with or by a minor is void from the very beginning.

2. No ratification after attaining majority: A minor cannot ratify the agreement on attaining
majority as the original agreement is void ab initio and a void agreement can never be ratified.

Example: X, a minor makes a promissory note in the name of Y. On attaining majority, he cannot ratify
it and if he makes a new promissory note in place of old one, here the new promissory note which he
executed after attaining majority is also void being without consideration.

3. Minor can be a beneficiary or can take benefit out of a contract:

A minor cannot become partner in a partnership firm. However, he may with the consent of all the
partners, be admitted to the benefits of partnership (Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act,
1932).
4. A minor can always plead minority: A minor can always plead minority and is not stopped to do so
even where he has taken any loan or entered into any contract by falsely representing that he was
major. Rule of estoppel cannot be applied against a minor. It means he can be allowed to plea his minority
in defence.

5. Liability for necessaries:There is no personal liability of the minor, but only his property is liable.

To render minor’s estate liable for necessaries two conditions must be satisfied.

(i) The contract must be for the goods reasonably necessary for his support in the station in life.

(ii) The minor must not have already a sufficient supply of these necessaries.

Necessaries mean those things that are essentially needed by a minor. They cannot include luxuries or
costly or unnecessary articles.

6. Contract by guardian - how far enforceable: Though a minor’s agreement is void, his guardian can,
under certain circumstances enter into a valid contract on minor’s behalf. Where the guardian makes a
contract for the minor, which is within his competence and which is for the benefit of the minor, there
will be valid contract which the minor can enforce.

7. No specific performance: A minor’s agreement being absolutely void, there can be no question of
the specific performance of such an agreement.

8.No insolvency: A minor cannot be declared insolvent as he is incapable of contracting debts and
dues are payable from the personal properties of minor and he is not personally liable.

9. Partnership: A minor being incompetent to contract cannot be a partner in a partnership firm, but
under Section 30 of the Indian Partnership Act, he can be admitted to the benefits of partnership.

10. Minor can be an agent: A minor can act as an agent. But he will not be liable to his principal for
his acts. A minor can draw, deliver and endorse negotiable instruments without himself being liable.

11. Minor cannot bind parent or guardian: In the absence of authority, express or implied, an infant
is not capable of binding his parent or guardian, even for necessaries. The parents will be held liable
only when the child is acting as an agent for parents.

12. Joint contract by minor and adult: In such a case, the adult will be liable on the contract and not
the minor.

13. Surety for a minor: In a contract of guarantee when an adult stands surety for a minor then he
(adult) is liable to third party as there is direct contract between the surety and the third party.

14. Minor as Shareholder: A minor, being incompetent to contract cannot be a shareholder of the
company. If by mistake he becomes a member, the company can rescind the transaction and remove his
name from register. But, a minor may, acting though his lawful guardian become a shareholder by
transfer or transmission of fully paid shares to him.
15. Liability for torts: A tort is a civil wrong. A minor is liable in tort unless the tort in reality is a
breach of contract. Thus, where a minor borrowed a horse for riding only he was held liable when he
lent the horse to one of his friends who jumped and killed the horse. Similarly, a minor was held liable
for his failure to return certain instruments which he had hired and then passed on to a friend.
Person of sound mind: According to section 12 of Indian Contract Act, “a person is said to be of sound
mind for the purposes of making a contract if, at the time when he makes it is capable of understanding
it and of forming a rational judgement as to its e ect upon his interests.”
Unsound mind consist of :-
Lunatics
A lunatic is a person who is mentally deranged due to some mental strain or other personal experience. He
suffers from intermittent intervals of sanity and insanity. He can enter into contracts during the period
when he is of sound mind.

Idiots
An idiot is a person who has completely lost his mental powers. He does not exhibit understanding of even
ordinary maters. Idiocy is permanent whereas lunacy denotes periodical insanity with lucid intervals. An
agreement of an idiot, like that of a minor, is void.

Drunken or intoxicated persons

A drunken or intoxicated person suffers from temporary incapacity to contract, i.e. at the time when he is
so drunk or intoxicated that he is incapable of forming a rational judgment. The position of a drunken or
intoxicated person is similar to that of a lunatic.

examples
(a) A patient in a lunatic asylum, who is at intervals of sound mind, may contract during those intervals.
(b) A sane man, who is delirious from fever or who is so drunk that he cannot understand the terms of a
contract or form a rational judgment as to its effect on his interests, cannot contract whilst such delirium
or drunkenness lasts.
(c) Going by the spirit of the section it is clear that a person is of sound mind if he fulfills the following
two conditions.
(i) He/she is capable of understanding the contract.
(ii) He/she is capable of forming a rational judgment about the effects of such contract on his interest.
A person not satisfying any of these two conditions is not treated as a person of sound mind.

The persons who are disqualified from entering into contract due to certain other reasons may be from legal
status, political status or corporate status. Some of such categories of persons are given below:
1) Alien Enemy
2) Foreign Sovereign and Ambassadors:They can sue the Indian citizen but an Indian citizen cannot sue
them.
3) Convicts: A convict cannot enter into a contract while he is undergoing imprisonment.
4) Insolvents:
5) Company or Statutory bodies: A contract entered into by a corporate body or statutory body
will be valid only to the extent it is within its Memorandum of Association and is entered into with
authorized persons.
6) Drunken or intoxicated person cannot enter into valid contracts while such drunkeness lasts.
Consent: ‘Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the same
sense.’ - [Sec 13].
If the parties have not agreed upon the same thing in the same sense there is no real consent and
hence no contract is formed.
As per section 14 of the Contract act consent is said to be free when it is not caused by—
(1) Coercion (Sec 15), or
(2) Undue influence (Sec 16), or
(3) Fraud (Sec 17), or
(4) Misrepresentation (Sec 18), or
(5) Mistake, subject to provisions of Sec 20, 21 and 22.

The term coercion has been defined in section 15 of the Act as “Coercion” is the committing or threatening to
commit, any act forbidden by the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), or the unlawful detaining(Kabza karna), or
threatening to detain, any property, to the prejudice of any person whatever, with the intention of causing
any person to enter into an agreement. It includes Threat to commit suicide or to file a suit on false charges.

Effect of coercion:
1. The agreement is voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.
2. The aggrieved party may opt to rescind the contract. If the aggrieved party seeks to rescind the
contract he must restore the benefit so obtained under the contract from other party.

High prices and high interest Rates: Charging high interest rate, high price etc is not a coercion as the
same is not prohibited under the Indian Penal code.

Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act defines undue influence as under:

(i) A contract is said to be induced by “undue influence” where the relations subsisting between the parties
are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to
obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
(ii) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the forgoing principle, a person is deemed to be in
a position to dominate the will of another—
a) Where he holds a real or apparent authority over the other, or where he stands in a fiduciary relation
to the other; or
b) Where he makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or permanently
affected by reason of age, illness, or mental or bodily distress.
(iii) Where a person, who is in a position to dominate the will of another, enters into a contract with him, and
the transaction appears, on the face of it or on the evidence adduced, to be unconscionable, the burden of
proving that such contract was not induced by undue influence shall lie upon the person in a position to
dominate the will of the other.

Nothing in this sub-section shall affect the provisions of section 111 of the Indian Evidence Act,
1872 (1 of 1872).
There is presumption of undue influence in the following relationships:
(i) Parent and child
(ii) Guardian and ward
(iii) Doctor and patient
(iv) Solicitor and client
(v) Trustee and beneficiary
(vi)Religious advisor and disciple
(vii) Fiancé and fiancée

There is however no presumption of undue influence in case of relationship of —

(i) landlord and tenant
(ii) debtor and creditor
(iii) husband and wife.

Effect of undue influence:

the agreement is avoidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused.
The aggrieved party may opt to rescind the contract. If the aggrieved party seeks to rescind the
contract he must restore the benefit so obtained under the contract from other party, upon such
terms and conditions as to the court may seem just.

As per section 17 of the Contract Act:

“Fraud” means and includes any of the following acts committed by a party to a contract, or with
his connivance, or by his agent, with intent to deceive another party thereto or his agent, or to
induce him to enter into the contract:

(i) The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is not true by one who does not believe it to be true;
(ii) The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact;
(iii) A promise made without any intention of performing it;
(iv) Any other act fitted to deceive(dhoka);
(v) Any such act or omission as the law specially declares to be fraudulent.

Explanation to Section 17

Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud,
unless the circumstances of the case are such that, regard being had to them, it is the duty of the person
keeping silence to speak, or unless his silence is, in itself, equivalent to speech.

Example 1:

A sells, by auction, to B, a horse which A knows to be unsound, A says nothing to B about the unsoundness
of the horse. This is not fraud by A.

Example 2:

B is A’s daughter and has just come of age. Here, the relation between the parties would make it A’s duty
to tell B if the horse is unsound.

Example 3:
B says to A “If you do not deny it, I shall assume that the horse is sound”. A says nothing. Here A’s
silence is equivalent to speech.

Example 4:

A and B being traders, enter into a contract. A has private information of a change in prices which would
affect B’s willingness to proceed with the contract. A is not bound to inform B.

Effect of Fraud upon validity of a contract: When the consent to an agreement in caused by the fraud,
the contract is voidable at option of the party defrauded and he has the following remedies:

(1) He can rescind the contract within a reasonable time.

(2) He can sue for damages.

(3) He can insist on the performance of the contract on the condition that he shall be put in the position
in which he would have been had the representation made been true.

Mere silence is not fraud

A party to the contract is under no obligation to disclose the whole truth to the other party. ‘Caveat
Emptor’ i.e. let the purchaser beware is the rule applicable to contracts. There is no duty to speak in such
cases and silence does not amount to fraud. Similarly there is no duty to disclose facts which are within
the knowledge of both the parties.

Example: H sold to W some pigs which were to his knowledge suffering from fever. The pigs were sold
‘with all faults’ and H did not disclose the fact of fever to W. Held there was no fraud. [Word vs. Hobbs.
(1878)].

Silence is fraud:

1. Duty of person to speak: Where the circumstances of the case are such that it is the duty of the
person observing silence to speak.

Following contracts come within this category:

(a) Fiduciary Relationship: Here, the person in whom confidence is reposed is under a duty to act with
utmost good faith and make full disclosure of all material facts concerning the agreement, known to him.

Example: A broker was asked to buy shares for client. He sold his own shares without disclosing this fact.
The client was entitled to avoid the contract or a rm it with a right to claim secret profit made by broker
on the transaction since the relationship between the broker and the client was relationship of utmost good
faith.

(b) Contracts of Insurance: In contracts of marine, fire and life insurance, there is an implied condition
that full disclosure of material facts shall be made, otherwise the insurer is entitled to avoid the contract.

(c) Contracts of marriage: Every material fact must be disclosed by the parties to a contract of
Marriage.

(d) Contracts of family settlement: These contracts also require full disclosure of material facts
within the knowledge of the parties.

(e) Share Allotment contracts: Persons issuing ‘Prospectus’ at the time of public issue of shares/
debentures by a joint stock company have to disclose all material facts within their knowledge.

2. Where the silence itself is equivalent to speech: For example, A says to B “If you do not deny it, I
shall assume that the horse is sound.” A says nothing. His silence amounts to speech.

In case of fraudulent silence, contracts is not voidable if the party whose consent was so obtained had
the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence (Exception to section 19)

A statement of fact which one party makes in the course of negotiation with a view to inducing the other
party to enter into a contract is known as misrepresentation. It must relate to some fact which is material to
the contract. It may be expressed by words spoken or written or implied from the acts and conduct of the
parties.
A representation when wrongly made either innocently or intentionally is a misrepresentation.
When it is made innocently or unintentionally it is misrepresentation and when made intentionally or willfully it
is fraud.
Misrepresentation has been defined in section 18 of the Act as under:
“Misrepresentation” means and includes—
(1) The positive assertion, in a manner not warranted by the information of the person making it, of that
which is not true, though he believes it to be true;
(2) Any breach of duty which, without an intent to deceive, gains an advantage to the person committing it, or
any one claiming under him, by misleading another to his prejudice or to the prejudice of anyone claiming
under him ;
(3) Causing, however innocently, a party to an agreement to make a mistake as to the substance of the thing
which is the subject of the agreement. From the above definition of the term Misrepresentation, the
following two types of misrepresentations are noticed.

Unwarranted statements: When a person positively asserts, makes an absolute and explicit statement of
facts, that fact is true, though he has no reliable source to form this opinion, but he believe it to be true.
This is one type of misrepresentation.
Breach of duty: Any breach of duty which brings advantages to the person committing it by misleading the
other to his prejudice is a misrepresentation.
Effect of Misrepresentation:
the agreement is a contract a voidable at the option of the party whose consent was so caused. A party to a
contract, whose consent was caused by misrepresentation, may, if he thinks fit, insist that the contract shall
be performed, and that he shall be put in the position in which he would have been, if the representations
made had been true.
Exception: If such consent was caused by misrepresentation or by silence, fraudulent within the meaning of
section 17, the contract, nevertheless, is not voidable, if the party whose consent was so caused had the
means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence. This is also called ‘doctrine of constructive notice’.

Mistake means an erroneous belief about something. It has not been defined in the Indian Contract Act.
Mistake can be -
(A) Mistake of law, or
(B) Mistake of fact
(i) Mistake of law of the country
(ii) Mistake of law of a foreign country

(i) Mistake of law of the country:

When a party enters into a contract, without the knowledge of law in the country, the contract is
affected by such mistake but it is not void. A contract is not voidable because it was caused by
a mistake as to any law in force in India. The reason here is that ignorance of law is not an excuse
at all. However if a party is induced to enter into a contract by the mistake of law then such a
contract may be avoided. The principle of ignorance of law is not an excuse.
(ii) Mistake of law of foreign country: Such a mistake is treated as mistake of fact and agreement
is such case is void. Ignorance of foreign law may be excused.

(I) a bilateral mistake, or

(II) unilateral mistake

(I) Bilateral mistake

Where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to
the agreement, the agreement is void.
Explanation: An erroneous opinion as to the value of the thing which forms the subject-matter of
the agreement is not to be deemed a mistake as to a matter of fact.
In order to render a contract void due to bilateral mistake the following two conditions must be
met.
(a) Mistake must be mutual: Both the parties must misunderstand each other and should be at
cross purpose.
(b) Mistake must relate to a matter of fact essential to the agreement: What is essential fact of an
agreement depends upon the nature of promise in each case.

The various types of mistakes falling under bilateral mistakes are as under:
(i) Mistake as to subject matter covers following cases:

(a) Mistake as to existence of subject matter: If both the parties are at mutual mistake as to
existence of the subject matter the agreement is void.

(b) Mistake as to identity of subject matter: It usually happens when both the parties have different
subject matter of contract in their mind. The contract is void due to mistake of identify of
subject matter.

(c) Mistake as to the quality of the subject matter: If the subject matter is something essentially
different from what the parties thought to be, the agreement is void.

(d) Mistake as to quantity of subject matter: Bilateral mistake as to quantity of subject matter
would render the contract void.

(e) Mistake as to title of subject matter: The agreement is void due to bilateral mistake as to title
of the subject matter.

(f) Mistake as to price of the subject matter: Mutual mistake as to price of the subject matter
would render the agreement void.

(ii) Mistake as to possibility of performance of Contract. Impossibility may be:

(a) Physical impossibility: A contract is void if it is identified to be non-feasible due to physical

factors, like time, distance, height, etc.

(b) Legal impossibility: A contract is void if it provides that something shall be done which as a
matter of law cannot be done.

(II) Unilateral Mistake as to fact:

As per section 22 a contract is not voidable merely because it was caused by one of the parties to it being
under a mistake as to a matter of fact. A unilateral mistake is not allowed as a defense in avoiding a contract
unless the mistakes brought about by another party’s fraud or misrepresentation.

Under certain circumstances, the law creates and enforces legal rights and obligations although the
parties have never entered into a contract. Such obligations imposed or created by law are known as
“Quasi-Contracts”. In other words, Contracts constituted by law are known as Quasi- Contracts. In
other words, relationship in nature of a contract is also a quasi contract. The Indian Contract Act
describes them as “certain relations resembling those created by contracts”. In English law, they are
referred to as “implied contracts or constructive contracts”.
Quasi-contracts are based on the principles of equity and justice. The claim based on a quasi contracts
is generally for money. The remedy in quasi-contracts is only compensation and not damages.

Example:
A delivers goods to B mistaking him to be C, and B consumes them. B is bound to pay compensation
to A for the value of goods. Law imposes such a duty on B. This is a quasi-contract.

Features of a Quasi Contract:

The salient features of a quasi contract are as under:
1. It is imposed by law and does not arise by agreement.
2. The duty of a party and not the promise of any party is the basis of such contract.
3. The right under it is always a right to money and though not always to a liquidated sum of money.
4. The right is available against specific persons and not the whole world.
5. A suit for breach may be filed in the same way as in case of a complete contract.

Types of Quasi-Contracts:
The Indian Contract Act deals with the following quasi-contractual obligations. They are:
1. Claims for necessaries supplied to a person incompetent to contract. (Sec 68).
2. Payment by an interested person. (Sec 69)
3. Benefits of non-gratuitous act. (Sec 70)
4. Responsibility of finder of goods. (Sec 71)
5. Money paid by mistake or under coercion. (Sec 72)

Where necessaries are supplied to a person who is incompetent to contract, the supplier is entitled to
recover the price from the property of the incompetent person under section 68 of the Indian Contract
Act.
Example:
A supplies B, a minor, with necessaries suitable to his condition in life. A is entitled to be reimbursed
from B’s property.

Section 69 provides that a person who is interested in the payment of money of which another is bound
by law to pay, and who therefore, pays it, is entitled to be reimbursed by the other”.
In order to apply section 69, the following conditions must be satisfied.

a. The payment made should be bonafide for the protection of one’s interest.
b. The payment should not have been made gratuitously or voluntarily.
c. Another person must be bound by law to pay.
d. The payment must be made to a third party and not to himself.

Section 70 deal with the obligation of a person enjoying benefit of a non-gratuitous act. When a
person lawfully does anything for another person or delivers anything to him, not intending to do so
gratuitously, such person who enjoys the benefit must reimburse the former or must restore to him the
thing so delivered.
For the application of section 70, the following conditions must be fulfilled.
a. The act must have been done lawfully.
b. It must have been done by the person not intending to act gratuitously, i.e., without any consideration.
c. The person for whom the act is done must have enjoyed the benefit of that act.

A person who finds goods belonging to another and takes them into his custody is liable as a bailee.
The finder of goods must try to find out the real owner of the goods and deliver the goods to him on
demand. The obligations are imposed on finder of goods by Section 71 of the Indian Contract Act.
According to section 72, a person to whom money has been paid or anything delivered by mistake or
under coercion, must repay or return it.
Example: A and B jointly owe ` 100 to C. A alone pays the amount to C, and B, not knowing this fact,
later on also pays ` 100 to C. C is bound to repay the amount to B.

A contract may be an absolute contract or a contingent contract. An absolute contract is one where the
promisor undertakes to perform the contract in all events without any conditions. Hence, it is also known
as ‘unconditional contract’. A contingent contract is also called ‘conditional contract’. It is a contract in
which the performance becomes due, only upon the happening of some event, which may or may not
happen. Contracts of insurance, indemnity and guarantee are good examples of contingent contracts.
Section 31 of the Indian Contract Act, defines a contingent contract as “a contract to do or not
to do something if some event, collateral to such contract, does or does not happen”.
Example: A contracts to pay B ` 50,000 if B’s house is burnt. This is a contingent contract.

Essentials of Contingent Contract:

The following are the essentials of a contingent contract. They are:
1. There must be a contract to do or not to do something.
2. The performance of the contract depends upon the happening or non-happening of some event in
future.
3. The event must be uncertain.
4. The event must be collateral or incidental to the contract.

Rules regarding contingent contract:

Rules regarding contingent contracts are contained in section 32 to 36 of the Indian Contract Act.
They are as follows:
1. Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event happening [Sec. 32]
2. Enforcement of contracts contingent on an event not happening [Sec. 33]
3. When event on which contract is contingent to be deemed impossible, if it is the future conduct of a
living person (Sec. 34)
4. When contracts become void which are contingent on happening of specified event within fixed time
(Sec. 35)
5. Agreements contingent on impossible events void [Sec. 36]
6. The happening of the event is not under the will/intention of either of the parties.
Contracts, contingent upon the happening of a future uncertain event cannot be enforced by law unless
and until that event has happened. It the event becomes impossible, such contracts become void.
Example: A contracts to pay B a sum of money when B marries C. C dies without being married to B. The
contract becomes void.

Contracts contingent upon the non-happening of an uncertain future event can be enforced when the
happening of that event becomes impossible.
Example: A agrees to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship does not return. The ship is sunk. The
contract can be enforced after the ship sinks.

If the future event on which a contract is

contingent is the way in which a person will act at an unspecified time, the event shall be considered to
become impossible when such person does anything which renders it impossible that he should so act
within any definite time, or otherwise than under further contingencies.

Example: A agrees to pay B a sum of money if B marries C. C marries D. The marriage of B to

C must now be considered impossible, although it is possible that D may die and that C may
afterwards marry B.

Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if a specified uncertain event happens within a

fixed time become void if, at the expiration of the time fixed, such event has not happened, or if,
before the time fixed, such event becomes impossible.
When contracts may be enforced which are contingent on specified event not happening within
fixed time —
Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if a specified uncertain event does not happen
within a fixed time may be enforced by law when the time fixed has expired and such event has
not happened, or, before the time fixed has expired, if it becomes certain that such event will not
happen.
Examples:
a) A promises to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship returns within a year. The contract may be
enforced if the ship returns within the year, and becomes void if the ship is burnt within the year.
b) A promises to pay B a sum of money if a certain ship does not return within a year. The contract
may be enforced if the ship does not return within the year, or is burnt within the year.

Contingent agreements to do or not to do anything if an impossible event happens, are void,

whether the impossibility of the event is known or not to the parties to the agreement at the time
when it is made.
Illustrations
a) A agrees to pay B `1,000 if two-straight lines should enclose a space. The agreement is void.
b) A agrees to pay B `1,000 if B will marry A’s daughter C. C was dead at the time of the agreement.
The agreement is void.

Every Contract creates certain obligation on each of the parties involved in it. When both the parties to
the Contract fulfill their obligations towards each other, the contract is said to be performed. When
both the parties to the contract have performed their obligations, the contract is said to be discharged
by performance.

The parties to a contract must either perform, or offer to perform, their respective promises, unless
such performance is dispensed with or excused under the provisions of this Act, or of any other
law.
Promises bind the representatives of the promisor in case of the death of such promisor before
performance, unless a contrary intention appears from the contract.

Examples:
(a) A promises to deliver goods to B on a certain day on payment of ` 1,000. A dies before that
day. A’s representatives are bound to deliver the goods to B, and B is bound to pay ` 1,000 to
A’s representatives.
(b) A promises to paint a picture for B by a certain day, at a certain price. A dies before the day.
The contract cannot be enforced either by A’s representatives or by B.

Where a promisor has made an offer of performance to the promisee, and the offer has not been
accepted, the promisor is not responsible for non-performance, nor does he thereby lose his rights
under the contract.

Every such offer must fulfill the following conditions :

(i) it must be unconditional
(ii) it must be made at a proper time and place, and under such circumstances that the person
to whom it is made may have a reasonable opportunity of ascertaining that the person by
whom it is made is able and willing there and then to do the whole of what he is bound by his
promise to do.
(iii) if the offer is an offer to deliver anything to the promisee, the promisee must have a reasonable
opportunity of seeing that the thing offered is the thing which the promisor is bound by his
promise to deliver.

Example:
A contracts to deliver to B at his warehouse, on the 1st March, 2014,100 bales of cotton of a particular
quality. In order to make an offer of a performance with the effect stated in this section, A must bring
the cotton to B’s warehouse, on the appointed day, under such circumstances that B may have a
reasonable opportunity of satisfying himself that the thing offered is cotton of the quality contracted
for, and that there are 100 bales.
When a party to a contract has refused to perform, or disabled himself from performing his promise in
its entirety, the promisee may put an end to the contract, unless he has signified, by words or conduct,
his acquiescence in its continuance.

Example:
A, a singer, enters into a contract with B, the manager of a theatre, to sing at his theatre two nights
in every week during the next two months, and B engages to pay her 100 rupees for each night’s
performance. On the sixth night A willfully absents herself from the theatre. B is at liberty to put an
end to the contract.

If it appears from the nature of the case that it was the intention of the parties to any contract that
any promise contained in it should be performed by the promisor himself, such promise must be
performed by the promisor. In other cases, the promisor or his representatives may employ a competent
person to perform it.
Example:
A promises to pay B a sum of money. A may perform this promise, either by personally paying the
money to B or by causing it to be paid to B by another; and, if A dies before the time appointed for
payment, his representatives must perform the promise, or employ some proper person to do so.

When a promisee accepts performance of the promise from a third person, he cannot afterwards
enforce it against the promisor.

When two or more persons have made a joint promise then, unless a contrary intention appears by the
contract, all such persons, during their joint lives, and after the death of any of them, his
representative jointly with the survivor, or survivors, and after the death of the last survivor, the
representatives of all jointly, must fulfill the promise.

When two or more persons make a joint promise, the promisee may, in the absence of express
agreement to the contrary, compel any one or more of such joint promisors to perform the whole of
the promise.

Each promisor may compel contribution– Each of two or more joint promisors may compel every other
joint promisor to contribute equally with himself to the performance of the promise, unless a contrary
intention appears from the contract.

Sharing of loss by default in contribution– If any one of two or more joint promisors makes default in
such contribution, the remaining joint promisors must bear the loss arising from such default in equal
shares.
 Explanation : Nothing in this section shall prevent a surety from recovering from his principal,
payments made by the surety on behalf of the principal, or entitle the principal to recover anything from
the surety on account of payments made by the principal.
Examples:
(a) A, B and C jointly promise to pay D `3,000. D may compel either A or B or C to pay him `
3,000.

(b) A, B and C jointly promise to pay D the sum of `3,000. C is compelled to pay the whole. A is
insolvent, but his assets are sufficient to pay one-half of his debts, C is entitled to receive ` 500
from A’s estate, and ` 1,250 from B.

(c) A, B and C are under a joint promise to pay D `3,000. C is unable to pay anything, and A is
compelled to pay the whole. A is entitled to receive `1,500 from B.
(d) A, B and C are under a joint promise to pay D ` 3,000, A and B being only sureties for C. C fails
to pay. A and B are compelled to pay the whole sum. They are entitled to recover it from C.

Where two or more persons have made a joint promise, a release of one of such joint promisors by the
promisee does not discharge the other joint promisor or joint promisors; neither does it free the joint
promisor so released from responsibility to the other joint promisor or joint promisors.

When a person has made a promise to two or more persons jointly, then, unless a contrary intention
appears from the contract, the right to claim performance rests, as between him and them, with
them during their joint lives, and, after the death of any of them, with the representative of such
deceased person jointly with the survivor or survivors, and. after the death of the last survivor, with
the representatives of all jointly.
Example:
A, in consideration of ` 5,000, lent to him by B and C, promises B and C jointly to repay them
that sum with interest on a day specified. B dies. The right to claim performance rests with B’s
representative jointly with C during C’s life, and after the death of C with the representatives of B
and C jointly.

The time and place of performance of a contract are determined by an agreement between the
parties. The rules regarding time and place of performance are summarized below :

Where, by the contract, a promisor is to perform his promise without application by the promisee,
and no time for performance is specified, the engagement must be performed within a reasonable
time. Reasonable time would depend on the nature of contract. In case of dispute, court will
decide reasonable time.
When a promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has undertaken to perform
it without application by the promisee, the promisor may perform it at any time during the usual
hours of business on such day and at the place at which the promise ought to be performed.
Example:
A promises to deliver goods at B’s warehouse on the 1st January. On that day A brings the goods
to B’s warehouse, but after the usual hour for closing it, and they are not received. A has not
performed his promise.

When a promise is to be performed on a certain day, and the promisor has not undertaken
to perform it without application by the promisee, it is the duty of the promisee to apply for
performance at a proper place and within the usual hours of business.

When a promise is to be performed without application by the promisee, and no place is fixed
for the performance of it, it is the duty of the promisor to apply to the promisee to appoint a
reasonable place for the performance of the promise, and to perform it at such place.
Example:
A undertakes to deliver a thousand maunds of jute to B on a fixed day. A must apply to B to
appoint a reasonable place for the purpose of receiving it, and must deliver it to him at such
place.

The performance of any promise may be made in any manner, or at any time which the promise
prescribes or sanctions.
Example:
B owes A ` 2,000. A desires B to pay the amount to A’s account with C, a banker. B, who also banks
with C, orders the amount to be transferred from his account to A’s credit, and this is done by C.
Afterwards, and before A knows of the transfer, C fails. There has been a good payment by B.

There are situations where in a single contract there may be multiple promises and both the parties
need to perform with a sequence.

When a contract consists of reciprocal promises to be simultaneously performed, no promisor

need perform his promise unless the promisee is ready and willing to perform his reciprocal promise.
Example:
A and B contract that A shall deliver goods to B to be paid for by B on delivery. A need not deliver
the goods, unless B is ready and willing to pay for the goods on delivery. B need not pay for the
goods, unless A is ready and willing to deliver them on payment.
Where the order in which reciprocal promises are to be performed is expressly fixed by the contract,
they shall be performed in that order; and, where the order is not expressly fixed by the contract,
they shall be performed in that order which the nature of the transaction requires.
Example:
A and B contract that A shall build a house for B at a fixed price. A’s promise to build the house

must be performed before B’s promise to pay for it.

When a contract contains reciprocal promises, and one party to the contract prevents the
other from performing his promise, the contract becomes voidable at the option of the party so
prevented; and he is entitled to compensation from the other party for any loss which he may
sustain in consequence of the non-performance of the contract.
Example:
A and B contract that B shall execute certain work for A for a thousand rupees. B is ready and
willing to execute the work accordingly, but A prevents him from doing so. The contract is voidable
at the option of B; and, if he elects to rescind it, he is entitled to recover from A compensation for
any loss which he has incurred by its non-performance.

When a contract consists of reciprocal promises, such that one of them cannot be performed, or
that its performance cannot be claimed till the other has been performed, and the promiser of
the promise last mentioned fails to perform it, such promisor cannot claim the performance of the
reciprocal promise, and must make compensation to the other party to the contract for any loss
which such other party may sustain by the non-performance of the contract.
Example:
A contracts with B to execute certain builder ’s work for a fixed price, B supplying the scaffolding
and timber necessary for the work. B refuses to furnish scaffolding or timber, and the work cannot
be executed. A need not execute the work, and B is bound to make compensation to A for any
loss caused to him by the non-performance of the contract.

Where persons reciprocally promise, firstly, to do certain things which are legal, and, secondly,
underspecified circumstances, to do certain other things which are illegal, the first set of promises
is a contract, but the second is a void agreement.

When a party to a contract promises to do a certain thing at or before a specified time, or certain
things at or before specified times, and fails to do any such thing at or before the specified time,
the contract, or so much of it as has not been performed, becomes voidable at the option of the
promisee, if the intention of the parties was that time should be of the essence of the contract.

Effect of such failure when time is not essential — If it was not the intention of the parties that
time should be of the essence of the contract, the contract does not become voidable by the failure
to do such thing at or before the specified time; but the promisee is entitled to compensation from
the promisor for any loss occasioned to him by such failure.

Effect of acceptance of performance at time other than that agreed upon — If, in case of a
contract
voidable on account of the promisor’s failure to perform his promise at the time agreed, the
promise accepts performance of such promise at any time other than that agreed, the promisee
cannot claim compensation for any loss occasioned by the non-performance of the promise at
the time agreed, unless, at the time of such acceptance, he gives notice to the promisor of his
intention to do so.

Application of Payment where debt to be discharged is indicated (Section 59)

Where a debtor, owing several distinct debts to one person, makes a payment to him, either with
express intimation, or under circumstances implying that the payment is to be applied to
the discharge of some particular debt, the payment, if accepted, must be applied accordingly.
Illustrations
(a) A owes B, among other debts, ` 1,000 upon a promissory note which falls due on the first June.
He owes B no other debt of that amount. On the first June A pays to B ` 1,000. The payment is
to be applied to the discharge of the promissory note.
(b) A owes to B, among other debts, the sum of ` 567. B writes to A and demands payment of this
sum. A sends to B ` 567. This payment is to be applied to the discharge of the debt of which
B had demanded payment.

Application of payment where debt to be discharged is not indicated (Section 60)

Where the debtor has omitted to intimate and there are no other circumstances indicating to
which debt the payment is to be applied, the creditor may apply it at his discretion to any lawful
debt actually due and payable to him from the debtor, whether its recovery is or is not barred by
the law in force for the time being as to the limitation of suits.

Application of Payment where neither party appropriates (Section 61)

Where neither party makes any appropriation the payment shall be applied in discharge of the
debts in order of time, whether they are or are not barred by the law in force for the time being
as to the limitation of suits. If the debts are of equal standing, the payment shall be applied in
discharge of each proportionately.