3 2022CE11548 Aadya 6
3 2022CE11548 Aadya 6
Comments:
Grade: ___ / 20
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY DELHI
Department of Civil Engineering
Purpose: The purpose of this laboratory exercise is to determine the effect of confining stress on the
shear strength of clays and to determine total stress shear strength parameters (c, ϕ) of the clays.
Materials:
Triaxial Sample framer, wire saw, cradle Seamless rubber membrane and stretcher, O-rings, Triaxial
test cell, plastic end caps, Triaxial test apparatus, spatula, oil/grease, vernier calipers, tin cans,
weighing balance.
Results:
The results obtained are as follows:
1. Confining stress: 100 kPa
Deviatoric stress: 78.778 kPa
σ1 = 178.778 kPa
Strain: 6.182%
2. Confining stress: 200 kPa
Deviatoric stress: 46.087 kPa
σ1 = 246.087 kPa
Strain: 9.868%
3. Confining stress: 300kPa
Deviatoric stress: 58.467 kPa
σ1 = 358.467 kPa
Stain: 10.208%
c = 46.913 kPa
ϕ = 3.066o
Discussion:
The Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial (UU) test is a rapid testing method to determine the shear
strength of a soil sample. In this test, the sample remains unconsolidated, with no drainage occurring
during the process. It is primarily conducted on cohesive soils, such as clay, to evaluate their
undrained shear strength.
When the load is applied, it is distributed between the soil structure and the pore water pressure. Since
the test conditions are undrained, there is no dissipation of pore water pressure, which allows for only
the measurement of total stress, not effective stress. As a result, the UU test is tailored for Total Stress
analysis, and there is no requirement to measure the pore water pressure.
Initially, a linear relationship exists between stress and strain. As the test progresses, this relationship
becomes non-linear, with stress increasing to a peak value and then decreasing. This peak in the stress-
strain curve, known as the saddle point, signifies the point of failure. Beyond this point, additional
loading causes the soil to weaken, eventually reaching a residual strength level.
During our experiment, we observed a bulging (barrel-shaped) failure, where the sample expanded
outward at its center while largely retaining its shape at the ends.
However, the test results differed from theoretical expectations. Ideally, the tangent should align with
the x-axis, but we found the shearing angle to be 3.066°. Possible reasons for this discrepancy include:
1. Variations in moisture conditions across the three tests.
2. Use of different apparatus for each test.
3. Potential human errors during the experiment.
Summary:
We conducted the Unconsolidated Undrained test to evaluate the shear strength of saturated clay
samples and observed the failure pattern that developed in the specimen..
References:
IS 2720 (Part XI) – Determination of the shear strength parameters of a specimen tested in
Unconsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression without the measurement of pore water
pressure.
ASTM D2850-23 – Standard test method for unconsolidated undrained triaxial compression
test of cohesive soil.
Attachment/Appendices:
Table 1. Summary of sample dimensions, moisture content and measured shear strength.
Table 2. Stress-strain response during the UU test for different soil specimens.
Figure 1. Plot between axial stress (q) and axial strain (ε) in %.
Figure 2. Determination of the shear strength parameters (c, ϕ) using the Mohr Circles
for all the test specimens.
Appendixes/Attachments
Table 1. Summary of sample dimensions, moisture content and measured shear strength.
SPECIMEN
Specimen 1 Specimen 2 Specimen 3
SPECIFICATION
Initial diameter, Do (mm) 38
Figure 2. Determination of the shear strength parameters (c, ϕ) using the Mohr Circles for all the test
specimens.