Ceng Guide
Ceng Guide
cabeengc 1
Contents
Section 1 – Before You Apply 3
About this guide 3
CABE and CEng 3
Competency for Specialist Building Engineers 3
Eligibility 3
Routes to Registration 4
Annex D – Fees 13
It details the criteria you will need to meet in order to be eligible for CEng registration.
Registration for CEng requires you to demonstrate your competency based on the CEng Competencies in the
United Kingdom Standard for Professional Engineering Competence (UK-SPEC) which governs all engineering
institutions.
UK-SPEC is published by the Engineering Council, and provides a framework for assessment and the
requirements that must be met to register as a professional engineer. It is important that, before you apply, you
understand the current requirements for becoming a Chartered Engineer and are confident you meet them.
Please ensure you have read the relevant CEng section of the UK-SPEC.
Eligibility
To be eligible to apply, you will need to be a current Chartered Building Engineer or Fellow of CABE.
2. Individual Case Procedure (ICP) Assessment – members with qualifications not accredited with
the Engineering Council or those requiring further training/learning may still be assessed on a
case-by-case basis through the Individual Case Procedure (ICP) assessment to see whether their
qualification can benefit them in this process. This will be assessed by the CABE Academic Panel.
STAGE 1
Submit Current
Standard CV and Academic Individual
Qualifications
STAGE 2
*ICP Assessment STAGE 2
Application form and Approved for ICP Approved for Application form,
supporting documents *Only required if academic
as requested on the Academic Route qualifications require Technical Report supporting documents
as requested on the checklist
checklist individual assessment Route & submission of synopsis
STAGE 3 STAGE 3
Pre-Professional Pre-Professional
Review Interview Review Interview
Assessment Assessment
STAGE 4 STAGE 4
Professional Review Submission of
Interview Technical Report
STAGE 5 STAGE 5
Technical Report
MPSC Ratification Assessment, if satisfactory
you will be invited to a
2-stage interview
STAGE 6
STAGE 6 Technical Report Interview
if a pass is awarded
Outcome proceed to Professional
Review Interview
STAGE 7
MPSC Ratification
STAGE 8
Outcome
Stage 2 – Application
Complete and submit the application form (Annex A) along with all of the necessary supporting information.
See Section 3 for guidance.
Stage 6 – Outcome
CABE will notify you in writing of the outcome of the PRI process, including any relevant feedback within a
period of no longer than three months.
Stage 2 – Application
Complete and submit the application form (Annex A) along with all of the necessary supporting information and
your professional synopsis. You should submit a synopsis of up to 1,000 words outlining the content and projects
to be contained in your full Technical Report. The synopsis will be assessed by the panel and feedback provided
to allow you to complete your Technical Report to demonstrate that you meet the CEng competencies.
See Section 3 for guidance.
TRR applicants will need to prepare and submit a Technical Report, which will be used as the basis for assessing
the member’s competency. It will be assessed by the Professional Review Interview panel prior to the interview
itself. If the Technical Report (TR) is assessed as satisfactory, a date for a Technical Report Interview will be set and
proceeding to the PRI will be provisional until successfully completing the Technical Report Interview.
The aim of the report is to provide an opportunity for you to demonstrate the depth and breadth of your
knowledge, skills, understanding, experience and competency in your chosen discipline.
The first stage of the interview will consist of a Technical Report Interview (Stage 7 – see below). Where the
outcome of this stage is satisfactory by the interview panel you will move to a second stage Professional Review
Interview (Stage 7 – see below) which will be on the same day.
You will then be invited back into the interview room and informed of the outcome of the Technical Report
Interview. If you have demonstrated the necessary competency, the interview will proceed to the Professional
Review Interview.
If, on completion of your Technical Report Interview, the panel is not satisfied of your competency, you will not
proceed to the PRI and feedback will be provided of areas for improvement.
The Professional Review Interview will further examine your professional competencies and will last
approximately 40-50 minutes (see guidance on Professional Review Interview in Annex C).
Stage 7 – MPSC
Recommendations from the PRI Panel are passed to the MPSC for ratification.
Stage 8 – Outcome
CABE will then notify you in writing of the outcome of the PRI process, including any relevant feedback within a
period of no longer than three months.
Registration
Following successful completion of the CEng Professional Review Interview process, members will be registered
with the Engineering Council through CABE.
The report may be based upon a design or project case study, a report of original work or on other previously
published works of the candidate’s own authorship, but in the case of joint authorship, the candidate’s
contribution should be made clear. Candidates should note that in the Technical Report they will not be required
to demonstrate their professional competence e.g. management experience and skills.
The candidate will be expected to offer an ordered and critical exposition of some aspects of industry-related
engineering, defining the problems or development aims involved, and demonstrating their resolution or
achievement by the application of building engineering principles and knowledge. Historical reviews should
not be undertaken, except where necessary as an essential background to the subject. Most candidates will find
it more profitable to concentrate in-depth on a recent building engineering achievement for which they had
technical responsibility than to attempt to cover a wider field.
The Technical Report should contain more descriptive matter than could be assembled from published material.
It should contain reasoned analysis, assessment and synthesis. There should also be discussions on the validity
of the applications of basic knowledge to the development of the subject of the paper.
In many topics, cost-effectiveness and optimisation could be introduced beneficially as fundamentals of good
engineering where they support the technical content of the report. Consideration should also be given to safety
and environmental aspects where they support the technical aspects of the project.
The Technical Report should be written in the first person to demonstrate what you –
the candidate – have achieved.
Where appropriate, the Technical Report should contain mathematical calculations to demonstrate the basic
building engineering principles involved in the design, or consideration, of the subject matter. It should also
contain references to standards and published guidance that may be used.
Where appropriate, the text should be illustrated by clearly drawn sketches and/or diagrams and a reference list
should be provided if the candidate makes use of any source material.
A covering statement must be included in the report to state that the Technical Report is the candidates own
work and that any works from external sources are clearly shown within the report and/or appendices. This is to
prevent plagiarism.
Report Structure
If the Technical Report is based on a design or project case study or report, the documents submitted may take a
variety of forms but, in every case, should be such as to illustrate the candidate’s understanding and application
of building engineering principles. Commentary and calculations illustrating the lines of thought followed
should accompany drawings covering a design, assessment or feasibility study. Papers or reports published or
unpublished, of which the candidate is the author may be used provided the subject is original work for which
the candidate was responsible and that is industry-related engineering.
The Technical Report should be self-contained and not refer to other papers unless they are provided in
appendices. The report should flow logically and be possible for an engineer to read and understand without
prior knowledge of the subject. Typical sub-divisions might be as follows (not all need be included):
1. Title
2. Contents list
3. Personal Statement – this is a declaration that the work is original and by the candidate
4. Introduction
• what the report is about
• could include synopsis, if applicable.
6. Background
This sets the scene
• purpose; and
• sets out aims and objectives.
9. Conclusions
• in relation to the application of engineering principles
• summary of the report drawing argument together in a logical manner
• lessons learnt – successes and failures
• recommendations
• outcomes
• feasibility
• future/current application; and
• management of paper (report).
10. Appendices
This may contain the following to support the report:
• drawing
• graphs
• schematics
• project management charts
• financial aspects
• environmental
• sustainability
• health and Safety
• risk assessment
• detail calculations; and
• glossary of terms.
The appendices should only contain supplementary information which does not form part of the main content of
the report.
11. References
A summary of numbered references used throughout the report to indicate sources of information.
12. Bibliography
A general acknowledgement and list of books and papers used for research.
Knowledge
• building engineering principles
• appropriate application of a scientific approach
• design concepts including solutions to problems; and
• analytical methods and tools.
Understanding
• application of technical standards
• use of relevant building engineering standards
• knowledge of limits of any process/es; and
• appropriate design methods including the use of IT.
Abilities
• creativity and innovation
• use of theoretical principles to solve problems; and
• communication skills (including presentation of), and content of Technical Report.
The assessors may require minor modification of, or additions to the candidate’s Technical Report. If the paper is
regarded as inadequate, the assessors may suggest modifications to overcome specific shortcomings.
A candidate whose Technical Report is deemed adequate for further consideration will be required to attend
an interview. A fee is payable for this interview and the interviewers may be the same people who assessed the
Technical Report. A member of staff or an internal auditor may be present during the interview to observe the
process, but will not play any part in it.
Notes
The Technical Report serves as a means for both assessors at the interview to determine that the candidate’s
knowledge of the underlying industry-related, fundamental engineering principles satisfies the educational
requirements of CABE and Engineering Council.
The PRI is obligatory for all CEng registration applicants. The PRI will be conducted by two suitably experienced,
qualified and trained interviewers. The PRI will be conducted in English, subject to the provisions of the Welsh
Language Act 1993.
The interviewers will complete an assessment sheet and a summary report with a recommendation for each
applicant. The report will cover the competence and commitment standards and reflect the interviewers’
professional judgement of whether the required competence and commitment has been satisfactorily
demonstrated.
The panel will consider the technical report (applicable for the TRR only) for the professional review and will
make the final decision on whether to confirm the recommendation.
• provide the interviewers with ‘hard evidence’ and may be in the form of design studies,
assessments, data sets, calculations, drawings, defect investigations, project plans, artefacts,
photographs, computer programmes; and
• be of the candidates own work; or larger pieces of work in which the candidate’s personal
contribution is identified and substantiated.
Registration is not narrow and job-specific; it requires a breadth of experience and an ability to transfer
capability from one area of work to another. Therefore, a candidate also needs to show a reasonable range of
work.
1. Authenticated records will save much nugatory work at the Professional Review Interview. Even
if career directions have changed several times, it should still be possible to map ‘old’
achievements to ‘new’ criteria and demonstrate their continued validity.
2. A candidate may well have to approach former colleagues, clients or managers and ask them
formally to certify work which has been done in the past. These referees will not be asked to
make a judgment on the candidate, but only to confirm (usually in writing) whether certain
‘outcomes’ were achieved and, if so, with what degree of reliability, repeatability etc. It is
the Professional Review interviewers who make an holistic judgment and come to a registration
recommendation. This is based on all evidence; any single piece will rarely provide sufficient
basis for a decision.
3. No matter what retrospective evidence and records are presented for the Professional Review
Interview, there will always be a requirement for evidence of reflection upon past work,
evaluation of future needs and some form of action planning. The candidate must be prepared to
discuss their future development strategy with the interviewers.
4. No matter how much original material is available, it will only be valuable if it is indexed, cross-
referenced and organised against the A1 to E5 criteria.
5. A key to any acronyms used must be included.
At Interview
During the PRI, candidates may choose to give a short career overview presentation to the interviewers,
highlighting the pertinent areas of responsibility and responsible experience which support their case for
registration with the Engineering Council.
The presentation may be in the form of a PowerPoint© presentation or a verbal presentation with documentary
evidence. Anticipate searching questions to confirm your knowledge and involvement; verbal evidence alone will
not be accepted.
The candidate should also have evidence to demonstrate all aspects of their Continuing Professional
Development (CPD), which should include the planning and recording of CPD activities. The CABE CPD template
can be downloaded from the CABE website. Visit: cbuilde.com/cpd_template.
Both routes will be subject to an annual registration fee fixed by Engineering Council.
Chartered Association of Building Engineers is a company incorporated by Royal Charter, registered in London, No. RC000867