Notes Unit One
Notes Unit One
Department of Management
BBA VI Semester
NOTES
Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur (CG)
BBA VI
S.Code Subject Name Internal marks Sem Exam Marks Total Marks
127 Business policy and Strategy 10 90 100
Course Objectives: To help students formulate and strengthen the effective strategies of day
to day business
COURSE CONTENTS
Unit – I Nature and objectives of Business Policy, defining business purpose, mission and
objectives, strategic Intent.
Unit – III Strategy formulation; major types of strategies, determination of strategic plan.
References:
1. Azhar Kazmi, Business Policy & Strategic Management TMH, New Delhi. P.K.
Ghosh, Business Policy n- Strategic Planning and Management, Sultan Chand and
Sons, New Delhi.
2. VSP Rao, V Hari Krishna,Strategic Management Text and cases
Que 1 Define Strategy? Discuss the key role to be played by all levels of Management in
strategy formulations?
Que 3 What is Strategy? How it is different from business Policy? Explain Historical
Evolution?
Que 4 What is Strategic Intent? Who is the founder of this concept? Explain the Role of
Mission in Strategic Management?
Que 5 Differentiate between Mission and vision What are the possible pitfalls of not having a
mission of an organization?
Que 6 What are the different aspects of nature of business policy? discuss each type with
suitable example?
---000---
UNIT ONE
TOPICS
1 Strategy Introduction
2 Business Policy
The concept of strategy is ancient. Originally, the word ‘strategy’ is derived from the Greek
word ‘Strategeia’ which means ‘the art of the general’. It has been associated with first
determining the position of a military, business or political organization in relation to its
environment and then using the organization’s resources to reach its goals. The Greeks knew
that strategy was more than fighting battles. Effective generals have to determine the right
lines of supply, decide when to fight and when not to fight and manage the army’s
relationship with citizens, politicians and diplomats. Effective general not only had to plan
but had to act as well. These early military roots of strategy have, of course, expanded into
political and business arena a increased competition and environmental change have forced
organizations to plan more carefully for the future. A key aim of both business and military
strategy is to gain competitive advantage. In both, the organizations they try to use their own
strengths to exploit competitors’ weaknesses. The element of surprise provides great
competitive advantages in both military and business strategy.
According to David, a fundamental difference between military and business strategy is that
business strategy is formulated, implemented and evaluated with an assumption of
competition whereas military strategy is based on an assumption of ‘conflict.
BUSINESS STRATEGY
Definition
Business strategy can be understood as the course of action or set of decisions which assist
the entrepreneurs in achieving specific business objectives.It is nothing but a master plan that
the management of a company implements to secure a competitive position in the market,
carry on its operations, please customers and achieve the desired ends of the business.
“Strategy Is the determination of the basic long term Goal and objectives of an
organization and the adoption of the courses of action and the allocation of resources
necessary for carrying out the goals”
Alfred D-Chandler
Arthur Sharplin
In business, it is the long-range sketch of the desired image, direction and destination of the
organization. It is a scheme of corporate intent and action, which is carefully planned and
flexibly designed with the purpose of:
Achieving effectiveness,
Perceiving and utilizing opportunities,
Mobilizing resources,
Securing an advantageous position,
Meeting challenges and threats,
Directing efforts and behavior and
Gaining command over the situation.
A business strategy is a set of competitive moves and actions that a business uses to attract
customers, compete successfully, strengthening performance, and achieve organizational
goals. It outlines how business should be carried out to reach the desired ends.
The maximum part of the company’s present strategy is a result of formerly initiated actions
and business approaches, but when market conditions take an unanticipated turn, the
company requires a strategic reaction to cope with contingencies. Hence, for unforeseen
development, a part of the business strategy is formulated as a reasoned response.
LEVELS OF BUSINESS STRATEGY
Levels of Strategy Management of every organization follow some kind of process and can
be viewed in the context of strategic management concept. Different business organizations,
having some similar features, may have some differences according to size that relate to their
strategic behavior. There are also different levels or units within a business entity, and some
of those units can have strategic different from other. In brief, strategies are operated at
different levels in a organization.
Corporate level strategy is formulated by top management to oversee the interest and
operations of organization made up of more than one line of business. It occupies the highest
level of strategic decision-making and cover actions dealing with the objectives of firm,
Acquisition and allocation of resources, and coordination of strategies of various units. The
Major questions at this level are as follows –
-Growth Strategies
-Retrenchment Strategies
Business level strategy is concerned with managing the interests and operations of a
particular line of business. It refers to the managerial game plan for a single business. It
is mirrored in the pattern of approaches and moves crafted by management to produce
successful performance in one specific line of business. It deals with such questions as
Basically, business level strategy attempts to determine what approach to its market and
business should take and how it should conduct itself, given its resources and the
conditions of the market.
Marketing strategies
Finance strategies
Human resource strategy
1. Strategic Intent
An organization’s strategic intent is the purpose that it exists and why it will continue
to exist, providing it maintains a competitive advantage. Strategic intent gives a
picture about what an organization must get into immediately in order to achieve the
company’s vision. It motivates the people. It clarifies the vision of the vision of the
company.
Strategic intent differs from strategic fit in a way that while strategic fit deals with
harmonizing available resources and potentials to the external environment, strategic
intent emphasizes on building new resources and potentials so as to create and exploit
future opportunities.
M-MISSION
O-OBJECTIVES
S-STRATEGY
A-ACTION PLANS
MISSION VISION
Objectives WHERE?
WHY? Strategies
Action Plans
VISION
For instance
It gives us a reminder about what we attempt to develop. A vision statement is for the
organization and its members, unlike the mission statement which is for the
customers/clients. It contributes in effective decision making as well as effective
business planning. It incorporates a shared understanding about the nature and aim of
the organization and utilizes this understanding to direct and guide the organization
towards a better purpose. It describes that on achieving the mission, how the
organizational future would appear to be.
It must be unambiguous.
It must be clear.
It must harmonize with organization’s culture and values.
The dreams and aspirations must be rational/realistic.
Vision statements should be shorter so that they are easier to memorize
In order to realize the vision, it must be deeply instilled in the organization, being
owned and shared by everyone involved in the organization.
BENEFITS
MISSION STATEMENT
Mission statement is the statement of the role by which an organization intends to
serve its stakeholders. It describes
Mission statements always exist at top level of an organization, but may also be made
for various organizational levels. Chief executive plays a significant role in formulation
of mission statement. Once the mission statement is formulated, it serves the
organization in long run, but it may become ambiguous with organizational growth and
innovations.
Features of a Mission
STRATEGIC GOALS
Strategic goals are goals created to identify the intended accomplishment of a business
strategy. When companies create strategic goals, they directly identify what they see as the
outcome of their business efforts. Strategic goals are most commonly created when a
company is mounting a new strategy. For example, if a company adopts a new advertising
campaign in an attempt to draw buyers to their products, they may also create a strategic
goal, or desired endpoint, of their new advertising efforts.
Goal setting is a process of directing what an organization wants to accomplish and devising
a plan to achieve the result we desire. For entrepreneurs, goal setting is an important part of
business planning, business goal should be a part of an overall business plan or objectives,
when we create a business plan it is important to decide what we want our business to be and
how to define our product and target market
Features-
Example-
Business Objectives
Financial objectives
Profit Maximization
Wealth maximization
Marketing aobjectives
Increase sales
Improve product awareness
Establish yourself in industry
Brand management
Social objectives
Supply of quality goods at fair prices
Fair deal to worker
Fair deal ti suppliers and investors
Example
- To achieve 10% growth in EPS
- To achieve 20.25% return on Equity
- To achieve 27% return on capital employed
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
SUMMARY
BUSINESS POLICY
Business policies are the guidelines developed by an organization to govern its actions. They
define the limits within which decisions must be made. Business policy also deals with
acquisition of resources with which organizational goals can be achieved. Business policy is
the study of the roles and responsibilities of top level management, the significant issues
affecting organizational success and the decisions affecting organization in long-run.
The policy is also regarded as a mini-mission statement, is a set of principles and rules which
direct the decisions of the organization. Policies are framed by the top-level management of
the organization to serve as a guideline for operational decision making. It is helpful in
highlighting the rules, value and beliefs of the organization. In addition to this, it acts as a
basis for guiding the actions.
Policies are designed, by taking the opinion and general view of a number of people in the
organization regarding any situation. They are made from experience and basic
understanding. In this way, the people who come under the range of such policy will
completely agree upon its implementation.
Business policy basically deals with decisions regarding the future of an ongoing
enterprise. Such policy decisions are taken at the top level after carefully evaluating the
organizational strengths and weaknesses in terms of product price, quality, leadership
position, resources etc., in relation to its environment. Once established the policy
decisions shape the future of a company channel the available resources along desired
lines and direct the energies of people working at various levels towards predetermined
goals. In a way, business policy implies the choice of purposes, the shaping of
organizational identity and character the continuous definition of what is to be achieved
and the deployment of resources for achieving corporate goals.
Types of policies
financial policies,
production policies
personnel policies
Within each of these areas more specific policies are developed. For example, personnel
policies may cover recruitment, training, promotion and retirement policies. Viewed from a
systems angle, policies form a hierarchy of guides to managerial thinking. At the top of level
policy statements are broad. The management is responsible for developing and approving
major comprehensive company policies. Middle managers usually establish less critical
policies relating to the operation of their sub units. Policies tend to be more specific at lower
levels. The manager’s job is to ensure the consonance of these policies, each must contribute
to the objectives of the firms and there should be no conflict between sub system policies.
Business policies are important and affect everything from legal liabilities to
employee satisfaction and a positive public image.
Policies make sure everyone is on the same page when it comes to expectations of
certain things.
A business might have policies pertinent to different aspects of the company.
There may be safety policies, human resources hiring policies and anti-discrimination
policies.
There may also be policies that pertain to employees' dress code, lunch schedules,
time off and holidays.
Other policies are relevant to the customer experience including greeting customers,
phone call management and product delivery specifics.
All of these policies create a positive work environment. Employees who feel safe at
work from injury or discrimination are happier and more productive.
This is an important aspect of productivity that every business owner must consider.
When employees have specific directives on dress code, scheduling and requesting
time off, it levels the field and shields employees from favoritism.
Over the years, the practice of strategy has evolved through five phases
(each phase generally involved the perceived failure of the previous
phase):
In the 1960s, George Steiner did much to focus business manager’s attention
on strategic planning, bringing the issue of long-range planning to the
forefront. Managerial Long-Range Planning, edited by Steiner focused upon the
issue of corporate long-range planning. He gathered information about how
different companies were using long-range plans in order to allocate resources
and to plan for growth and diversification.
A number of other linear approaches also developed in the same time period,
including “game theory”. Another development was “operations research”, an
approach that focused upon the manipulation of models containing multiple
variables. Both have made a contribution to the field of strategy.
The Problem with Strategic Planning (Analysis): The fuel for the modern
growth in interest in all things strategic has been analysis. While analysis has
been the watchword, data has been the password. Managers have assumed that
anything which could not be analyzed could not be managed. The belief in
analysis is part of a search for a logical commercial regime, a system of
management which will, under any circumstances, produce a successful result.
Indeed, all the analysis in the world can lead to decisions which are plainly
wrong. IBM had all the data about its markets, yet reached the wrong
conclusions.
There are two basic problems with the reliance on analysis. First, it is all
technique. The second problem is more fundamental. Analysis produces a self-
increasing loop. The belief is that more and more analysis will bring safer and
safer decisions. The traditional view is that strategy is concerned with making
predictions based on analysis. Predictions, and the analysis which forms them,
lead to security. The bottom line is not expansion, future growth or increased
profitability-it is survival. The assumption is that growth and increased profits will
naturally follow. If, by using strategy, we can increase our chances of predicting
successful methods, then our successful methods will lead us to survival and
perhaps even improvement. So, strategy is to do with getting it right or, as the
more competitive would say, winning. Of course it is possible to win battles and
lose wars and so strategy has also grown up in the context of linking together a
series of actions with some longer-term goals or aims.
This was all very well in the 1960s and for much of the 1970s. Predictions and
strategies were formed with confidence and optimism (though they were not
necessarily implemented with such sureness). Security could be found. The
business environment appeared to be reassuringly stable. Objectives could be
set and strategies developed to meet them in the knowledge that the overriding
objective would not change.
Under MBO, strategy formulation was seen as a conscious, rational process. MBO
ensured that the plan was carried out. The overall process was heavily logical
and, indeed, any other approach (such as an emotional one) was regarded as
distinctly inappropriate. The thought process was backed with hard data. There
was a belief that effective analysis produced a single, right answer; a clear plan
was possible and, once it was made explicit, would need to be followed through
exactly and precisely.
In practice, the MBO approach demanded too much data. It became overly
complex and also relied too heavily on the past to predict the future. The entire
system was ineffective at handling, encouraging, or adapting to change. MBO
simplified management to a question of reaching A from B using as direct a route
as possible. Under MBO, the ends justified the means. The managerial equivalent
of highways were developed in order to reach objectives quickly with the
minimum hindrance from outside forces.
Henry Mintzberg’s book The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning was first
published in 1994. “The confusion of means and ends characterizes our age,”
Henry Mintzberg observes and, today, the highways are likely to be gridlocked.
When the highways are blocked managers are left to negotiate minor country
roads to reach their objectives. And then comes the final confusion: the
destination is likely to have changed during the journey. Equally, while MBO
sought to narrow object
ives and ignore all other forces, success (the objective) is now less easy to
identify. Today’s measurements of success can include everything from
environmental performance to meeting equal opportunities targets. Success has
expanded beyond the bottomline.