The document discusses amendments to the CLC and Fund Conventions and the SOLAS-IMDG Code, detailing their objectives and effects on ship operations. The CLC convention ensures compensation for oil pollution damage, while the Fund Convention provides supplementary compensation, with both conventions encouraging responsible practices among ship owners. The IMDG Code, made mandatory in 2004, regulates the transport of dangerous goods by sea, establishing safety protocols for packaging, labeling, and handling these materials.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views3 pages
CLC Fund Convention
The document discusses amendments to the CLC and Fund Conventions and the SOLAS-IMDG Code, detailing their objectives and effects on ship operations. The CLC convention ensures compensation for oil pollution damage, while the Fund Convention provides supplementary compensation, with both conventions encouraging responsible practices among ship owners. The IMDG Code, made mandatory in 2004, regulates the transport of dangerous goods by sea, establishing safety protocols for packaging, labeling, and handling these materials.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
149
149. Highlight the following amendments to IMO Conventions and its
effects in ship operation thereof. Mention their date of entry into force (a) CLC and Fund Convention (b) SOLAS-IMDG Code An older version of CLC convention was adopted by IMCO in 1969 and came into force on 19-6-75. An amendment was adopted in 1992 and entered into force on 30th May 1996. In October 2002 another amendment, giving the new limits for liability was adopted and entered into force on 1-11-2003. Objectives:1. Ensure adequate compensation is available to persons who suffer from oil pollution by ships even if the owner is unable to pay the same. 2. Adopt uniform international rules & produces to determine civil liability etc., for losses due to pollution of oil from ships. (Note : civil liability means responsibility to compensation etc. in money. It does not include criminal liability may be finalized by fines and / or imprisonment etc.,) 3. To encourage government and others to feel more confident in taking early and decisive action in containing / minimizing the adverse effects of oil pollution . Salient features of this convention : The owner of every tanker is liable for pollution damage caused by his tanker (even though he may have taken all possible care and precautions) unless the damage is caused by reasons external to (i.e., not connected with) the ownership and operation of the tanker) This strict liability is based on the principle "polluter may pay. The owner of every tanker may limit his total liability in the following manner. For a ship not exceeding 500 gt liability is limited to 4.51 million SDR. For a ship 5000 to 140,000 gt liability is limited to 4.51 million SDR plus 631 SDR for each additional gross tonnage over 5000. For a ship over 140,000 gt liability is limited to 89.77 million SDR (1 SDR = 15 GF, 1 GF = 65.5 mg of Gold of 900 fineness). No claim can be made against the charter include Bare boat, master, pilot crew, salver or agent of the ship. After a pollution incident, if owner wishes to avail of the benefit of limitation as described above, he deposits a run equal to its maximum liability either with the court or with any other competent authority of the country. If the owner incurs any expenses to prevent or minimize pollution damage, then such expenses are deductible from the amount deposited by the owner in the same ratio as other claims on the fund. The object of this provision is to encourage immediate measures by the owner to minimize / contain damage and be willing to spend money therefore. Every tanker of 2000 GT and above has to maintain an insurance or other financial security (such as a bank guarantor) to ensure that the tanker can meet her pollution damage liabilities to the extent indicated above. The flag state shall issue a certificate to each ship after she has complied with the above condition regarding financial security. The certificate must be carried on the ship and must show the name of the insurer etc., giving security in respect of the ship certificates by all countries that have ratified the convention. The liability insurer (P & I clubs) of the ship owner usually provides the proof of insurance policy / financial security. On the basis of this document the flag state issues the "certificate of civil liability of oil pollution damage" (CLC certificate) The certificate shall not be valid beyond the validity of the insurance policy. Any one who suffers loss due to oil pollution from a ship may she either the owner of the V/L or even the insurer who has issued the policy within three years of the loss. Ever if the owner goes into liquidation, the insurer continuous to be liable to those who may have suffered a loss. Fund Convention was first adopted in 1971. This was amended and renamed in 1992. Entered into force 30-5-96. Aim of this convention is to provide compensation for losses due to pollution where the security provided by the 1992 CLC convention is inadequate. Fund provides supplementary compensation to oil pollution disasters. The fund convention is an attempt to ensure that losses due to oil pollution damage are borne not only by the shipping industry, but in part also borne by the cargo interests. Salient features : 1. All persons / companies in any country importing more than 150,000 tons of oil in any year shall make contributions to the fund. This fund is managed as an independent entity under the overall supervision of al director who is appointed by and responsible to IMO. 2. October 2000 amendments which entered into force in 1-11-2003 raised the max. amount of compensation to 203 million SDR as compared to 135 million SDR. However, if three states contribute to the fund receive more than 600 million tones of oil per annum, the maximum amount is raised to 300, 740,000 SDR. Effects of CLC and fund convention in ship operation : 1. After the implementation of CLC convention every tanker of 2000 GT and above has to maintain an insurance or other financial security and obtain a certificate of CLC for oil pollution damage based on that. 2. CLC convention fixed a upper limit to liability of ship owners in case of oil pollution from tankers so, ship owners were encouraged to invest in high risk venture like oil transportation. 3. Both CLC & fund convention ensured adequate compensation is available to parties who suffer from oil pollution by ships even if the owner is located in a country for away from the scene of disaster or he may not have sufficient financial resources to meet all the claims. 4. These conventions encourage government and others to take early and decisive action in containing or minimizing the adverse effects of oil pollution, because these conventions ensure adequate compensation. If owner incase any expenses to prevent of minimize pollution damage, then such expenses are deductible from his total liability. IMDG Code : The IMDG code was developed as a uniform international code for the transport of dangerous goods in packaged form by sea covering such matters pas packing, container traffic and stowage with particular reference to the segregation of in compatible substances. The IMDG code lays down basic principles; detailed recommendations for individual substances, materials and articles and a number recommendations for good operational practices including advice on terminology, packing, labeling, storage, segregation and handling and energy response action. The IMDG code was made mandatory from 1st Jan. 2004 by IMO, by adopting SOLAS chapter VII on 24 May 2002. This code applies to all ships carrying dangerous goods in packaged form. Provisions of this code do not apply to ships stores. Effects of IMDG code in ships operation. 1) In documents relating to the carriage of dangerous goods, a proper shipping name of this goods shall be used. 2) The transport document prepared by the shipper shall be included a signed declaration or certificate that the consignment is properly packaged mark, labelled and in proper condition for carriage. 3) The person responsible for loading a dangerous goods in a container shall provided a signed container packing certificate stating that cargo has been properly packed. 4) Ship shall have a detailed storage plan which identify by class and sets out the location of all dangerous goods onboard. 5) Administration shall issued detailed instruction on emergency response guide and medical first aid guide relevant to incidents involving dangerous goods.
Rashidul Hasan Course No: Name 449 ID: 1512027 Assignment Title: Role of MARPOL To Combat Against Shipsource Related Pollution in The Marine Environment