G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

STRUCTURAL DESIGN REPORT

CLIENT: ATO WUBYE SOLOMON

PROJECT: RESIDENTIAL BUILDING
LOCATION : ADDIS ABABA,ETHIOPIA
CONSULTANT: NIMONAH CONSULTING ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS AND
CONSTRUCTION Plc.

MAY, 2018

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 1

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

1. INTRODUCTION

This is a structural design report of G+3 residential building to be built in Addis Ababa city, Ethiopia. In general,
structural design deals with framework of building structures such as columns, beams, walls, and footings.

2. DESIGN BASIS AND METHODOLOGY

2.1 Code and standards

Serviceability limit state design method was used for member sizing and designing. The codes used are:
Ethiopian Building Code Standard (ES EN-1)
Ethiopian Building Code Standard (ES EN-8)
Ethiopian Building Code Standard (ESCP-1), and
Euro Code 2- 2004 (as used by the software), Similar to ES EN-2, 1992

2.2. Units
The following units have been used in the entire design and any values of length force or stress will be converted
to this system:
Length: m (meters)
Force: kN (kilo Newton)
Stresses: MPa (N/mm2)

2.3. Software & Interpretation

i. ETABS and MS-EXCELL
ETABS V9.7 was used for the analysis and design of the building by modeling as a 3-D space frame. This model
acts the same way as the real structure acts giving the exact deflection, member moments, stress, member forces
and reactions.
The major input data are:
Material property data (concrete & reinforcement bar)
 Concrete section property (definition of different sizes of beams, columns, and shell slab).
 Loading cases & Load combination.
The major outputs are:
 Frame out puts
 Beam reinforcement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 2

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

 Joint reactions
Note that: The reinforcement versus frame Ids' are to be referred to the graphical Ids' attached.
 Foundation reaction
Output & Interpretation
 Beams are designed by software and rechecked with the local code results.
 Columns are designed using Software and rechecked by frame outputs in combination with ES EN 1992
Charts.

ii. EXCEL -2010

This spread sheet program has been used:

i.) To perform analysis of the loading on the slab,
ii.) To analyze & design the concrete stair case,
iii.) To design Footing after an analysis result is obtained from ETABS software,

2.4. Design Criteria

2.4.1. Material
Steel Strength: The yield strength for deformed reinforcement bar shall be S-300 for diameter less than 10
and S-420 for diameter above 10 with minimum yield strength.
Concrete Strength: Concrete strength is classified according to minimum 28 days crashing compressive
strength of 150mm cubes in N/mm2. All Structural concrete members are designed with C-25 Concrete
comprehensive strength.

2.5. Geometrical Criteria

The structure is consisting of solid slab floor system supported by beams. Reinforced concrete column is
used to take all vertical and lateral loads and isolated footings are used as a foundation.
In brief, the structural system comprises:
• Solid slab: This solid slab system is used for all floor and C.I.S roof finish.
• Beam:
o Grade beams are with a depth of 400mm and width of 250mm
o Floor beams are with a depth of 400mm and width of 250mm.
o Landing beams are with a depth of 400mm and width of 250mm.
o Roof beams are with depth of 400mm and width of 250mm.

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 3

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

• Columns: Different size of column sections is used based on structural requirement.

• Stair: Stair designed here is a reinforced concrete structure.
The whole structure was analyzed as 3-D frame by modeling every structural member including the slab &
stairs.

2.6. Loading
Addis Ababa is located in the area of seismic zone (Zone 3) according to ES EN-8, 1992 earthquake loading
is considered in addition to vertical loading.
Vertical loading: - Dead Load (DL-Self Weight, partition Load and Finishing Load)
- Live load (LL)
Lateral loading: - Earthquake load (EQ) in the critical directions.
The above loadings make up a total of six different combinations.

No Combination Name Factored loading combination

Vertical Lateral
1. Combo1 1.35DL + 1.5LL -
2 .Combo2 DL +0.6LL + EQx +0.3EQy
3 .Combo3 DL +0.6LL + EQy -0.3EQx
4. Combo4 DL +0.6LL - EQx +0.3EQy
5. Combo5 DL +0.6LL - EQy +0.3EQx
6. Combo6 DL +0.6LL + EQx -0.3EQy -
7. Combo7 DL +0.6LL + EQy +0.3EQx -
8. Combo8 DL +0.6LL - EQy -EQy -
9. Combo9 DL +0.6LL - EQy -EQx -
10. Combo10 DL +LL
Out of the five combinations critical case was taken for the analysis and design of beams, slab and columns.
The footing was analyzed and designed for service load (combo 10) for Allowable bearing capacity 550 kpa
taken from geotechnical report.

3. Structural System Lay out

The structural system consists of solid slab with beam-column frame systems. Reinforced concrete columns of
different section were used to support all the loads from the beams and transfer to the foundation system. Floor
beams with section 250x400mm were used to support the slabs and transfer the load to the columns. Grade
beams with 250*400mm section were used to arrest lateral movement of the building in an event of an
DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 4
 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

earthquake and resist differential foundation settlement. The footings at1.7m depths from the ground floor level
were considered according to geotechnical recommendation.
ETABS Input Data and Frame lay out

Beam Vertical Loading (Graphical)

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 5

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 6

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 7

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 8

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 9

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 10

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

SLAB LOADING
Water Tanker Slab LL

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 11

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

3rd Floor Slab LL

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 12

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

1st & 2nd Floor Slab LL

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 13

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Water Tanker Slab FLOOR FINISH LOADING

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 14

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

3RD FLOOR SLAB FLOOR FINISH LOADING

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 15

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

1ST & 2ND FLOOR SLAB FLOOR FINISH LOADING

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 16

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Water Tanker Slab Roof LOADING

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 17

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

3rd FLOOR SLAB PARTITION LOADING

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 18

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

1ST & 2ND FLOOR SLAB PARTITION LOADING

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 19

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

4.2. Beam Lay out

Ground floor beam and slab layout

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 20

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

First foor beam & slab layout

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 21

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Second floor slab and beam layout

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 22

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Third floor slab and beam layout

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 23

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Roof beam layout

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 24

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

4.3.Column Section And Layout

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 25

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 26

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 27

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 28

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

SAMPLE BMD, SFD and AFD DIAGRAMS at Pd=1.3DL+1.6LL

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 29

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 30

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 31

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 32

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 33

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 34

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 35

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 36

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 37

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 38

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 39

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 40

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 41

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 42

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 43

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 44

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 45

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 46

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 47

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 48

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 49

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

RESULTS OF STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS & DESIGN for BEAMS and COLUMNS

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 50

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

COLUMN MAIN REINFORCEMENT

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 51

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 52

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 53

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 54

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Beam Flexural Reinforcement

Water Tanker Beam Flexural Reinforcement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 55

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Top Tie Beam Flexural Reinforcement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 56

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

3rd Floor Beam Flexural Reinforcement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 57

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

2nd Floor Beam Flexural Reinforcement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 58

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

1st Floor Beam Flexural Reinforcement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 59

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Ground Floor Beam Flexural Reinforcement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 60

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Beam Shear Reinforcement

Water Tanker Beam Shear Reinforcement Ratio

Top tie beam shear reinforcement ratio

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 61

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

3rd Floor Beam Shear Reinforcement Ratio

2nd Floor Beam Shear Reinforcement Ratio

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 62

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

1st Floor Beam Shear Reinforcement Ratio

Ground Floor Beam Shear Reinforcement Ratio

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 63

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Checking for normalized axial compression force for column

From ES EN 1998-1-1: 2015

For Column
Vd =Ned/(Ac*fcd)
Ac=300*350
fcd=11.333MPa
Ned= 1445
Let take the maximum axial load of the column,

Vd= (1445*1000/(11.333*300*350)
=1.22> 0.1 ……………………….ok

Damage limitation requirement

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 64

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Results of story drift from the ETABs out put

These are the largest value among all results of story drifts which the same as the largest point drifts.

Story Item Load Point X Y Z DriftX DriftY

2NDFR Max Drift X COMB2 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.003407
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB2 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.002734
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB3 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.003407
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB3 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.002734
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB4 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.003407
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB4 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.002734
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB5 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.003407
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB5 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.002734
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB6 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB6 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB7 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB7 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB8 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB8 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB9 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB9 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
1STFR Max Drift X RSAX 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.000824
1STFR Max Drift Y RSAX 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.000772
1STFR Max Drift X RSAY 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.006637
1STFR Max Drift Y RSAY 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.006217
1STFR Max Drift X COMB1 13 0 -0.9 5.2 0.000306
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB1 13 0 -0.9 5.2 0.00046
1STFR Max Drift X COMB2 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.002918
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB2 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.002752
1STFR Max Drift X COMB3 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.002918
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB3 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.002752
1STFR Max Drift X COMB4 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.002918
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB4 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.002752
1STFR Max Drift X COMB5 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.002918
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB5 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.002752
1STFR Max Drift X COMB6 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.006987
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB6 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.006564
1STFR Max Drift X COMB7 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.006987
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB7 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.006564
1STFR Max Drift X COMB8 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.006987
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB8 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.006564
1STFR Max Drift X COMB9 2 7.79 13.55 5.2 0.006987

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 65

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

1STFR Max Drift Y COMB9 5 7.79 0 5.2 0.006564

1STFR Max Drift X COMB10 13 0 -0.9 5.2 0.000223
1STFR Max Drift Y COMB10 13 0 -0.9 5.2 0.000332

Story Item Load Point X Y Z DriftX DriftY

2NDFR Max Drift X COMB6 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB6 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB7 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB7 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB8 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB8 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
2NDFR Max Drift X COMB9 2 7.79 13.55 8.4 0.00764
2NDFR Max Drift Y COMB9 322 7.79 12.642 8.4 0.006642
So by using this point drift we can check damage limitation. The largest value in each direction is;
Max drift along x at 2nd floor= 0.00764
Max drift along y at 2nd floor=0.006642

story disp drift disp drift height of reduction v*dr/h v*dr/h x-direction y-direction
x(x) dr(m) y(y) dr(m) each story factor v x- y- v*dr/h<=0.005 v*dr/h<=0.005
direction direction
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
2NDFR 0.00764 0.006642 3.2 0.4 0.000955 0.0008303 OK! OK!
Interstory drift sensitivity

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 66

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Max and min Base shear for each story from ETABs output

Story Load Loc P VX VY T MX MY

ROOF-1 COMB1 Top 208.39 0 0 0 1687.954 -281.326
ROOF-1 COMB1 Bottom 213.45 0 0 0 1728.96 -288.16
ROOF COMB1 Top 836.51 0 0 0 5368.362 -2639.07
ROOF COMB1 Bottom 925.61 0 0 0 5874.612 -2978.94
3RDFR COMB1 Top 2903.34 0 0 0 18367.69 -11606.2
3RDFR COMB1 Bottom 3214.66 0 0 0 20257.07 -12256.5
2NDFR COMB1 Top 5293.43 0 0 0 33009.32 -21175.9
2NDFR COMB1 Bottom 5604.75 0 0 0 34898.7 -21826.2
1STFR COMB1 Top 7719.58 0 0 0 48207.55 -31153.1
1STFR COMB1 Bottom 8034.14 0 0 0 50132 -31820.4
GRFR COMB1 Top 8801.49 -3.8 6.24 18.726 55564.19 -35306.1
GRFR COMB1 Bottom 8860.22 -3.8 6.24 18.726 55903.75 -35544.6

But we take the maximum value

Story Load Loc P VX VY T MX MY

ROOF-1 COMB1 Bottom 213.45 0 0 0 1728.96 -288.16
ROOF COMB1 Bottom 925.61 0 0 0 5874.612 -2978.94
3RDFR COMB1 Bottom 3214.66 0 0 0 20257.07 -12256.5
2NDFR COMB1 Bottom 5604.75 0 0 0 34898.7 -21826.2
1STFR COMB1 Bottom 8034.14 0 0 0 50132 -31820.4
GRFR COMB1 Bottom 8860.22 -3.8 6.24 18.726 55903.75 -35544.6
Height of Vtot Vtot θ=(Ptot*drx)/ θ=(Ptot*dry)/
each x-direction y-direction displacement displacement (Vtotx*h) (Vtoty*h) x-direction x-direction
story Ptot(kN) story (m) (kN) (kN) drift x dr(m) drift y dr(m) x-direction y-direction θ<=0.1 θ<=0.1
ROOF-1 156.99 3.2 8.37 2.67 0.00764 0.006642 0.0447806 0.04665886 OK! OK!
ROOF 684.51 3.2 9.44 38.38 0.00764 0.006642 0.17312157 0.01254879 OK! OK!
3RDFR 2352.38 3.2 22.1 141.84 0.00764 0.006642 0.25413155 0.00498443 OK! OK!
2NDFR 4094.35 3.2 28.14 221.57 0.00764 0.006642 0.34737955 0.00436163 OK! OK!
1STFR 5867.23 3.2 32.14 262.9 0.00764 0.006642 0.43584355 0.00461207 OK! OK!
GRFR 6476.25 3.2 39.08 68.77 0.00764 0.006642 0.39565115 0.01600549 OK! OK!

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 67

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

5. Analysis and Design of solid Slabs

Analysis and Design of the slab panels were done using limit state design procedures and charts as shown
below in the excel sheet.

 
Fck 20.00 Fcd 11.33 0
Fyk 360.00 Fyd 313.04

s1 0 S-1 1

Ratio
a for 2:1 a for 1:1 calc. a calc 0
30.00 40.00 1.07 39.29 1 -Continuous
Lx/4 1.27 0 -Discontinous

Panel Name S-1 D [mm]

Depth Lx [m] Ly [m] a calc d [mm] 140.00
5.09 5.45 39.29 121.77 140.00
Bitumen 5cm
D-Load asphalt Screed Weight Ceiling Plaster Other.D.Load
0.20 1.15 3.50 0.46 0.00
Wall Wall unit
Wall Load L(in) L(out) Height weight q
1.00 0.00 3.00 3.02 2.00
Total dead
load 7.31 Cover [mm]
Live Load 2.00 15.00
Design load 12.70
r values r1 r2 r3 r4 nd
0.00 1.33 0.00 0.00 3.00
Alpha values xs  ys  xf  yf 
0.00 0.059 0.05 0.044 0.20
Moment Mxs Mys Mxf Myf
0.00 19.42 16.46 14.48
k-value 10 1350 1150 1010 2
 0.00 0.46 0.39 0.34
Amin[sq.mm] 200 200 200 200
Ascal [sq.mm] 0 552 463 404
Asfinal
[sq.mm] 200 552 463 404
 # of bars # of bars # of bars # of bars
5 9 8 7
 10 10 10 10
S.max [mm] 280 280 280 280
S.calc[mm] 390.00 140.00 160.00 190.00
S.final [mm] 280.00 140.00 160.00 190.00
Load Transfer on Beams Ly/Lx= 1.07
Shear
coeffcient vcx vdx vcy vdy
0.35 0.00 0.33 0.00

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 68

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Load on
Beams Rcx Rdx Rcy Rdy
Total design
load 22.95 N.A. 21.34 N.A.
Live Load 3.61 N.A. 3.36 N.A.
Dead Load 13.21 N.A. 12.28 N.A.

Note:- N.A.-Means Not Applicable

Fck for C25 is 20Mpa

 
Fck 20.00 Fcd 11.33 1
Fyk 360.00 Fyd 313.04

1 S-3 0

Ratio
a for 2:1 a for 1:1 calc. a calc 0
30.00 40.00 1.38 36.24 1 -Continuous
Lx/4 0.93 0 -Discontinous

Panel Name S-3 D [mm]

Depth Lx [m] Ly [m] a calc d [mm] 120.00
3.70 5.09 36.24 95.96 140.00
Bitumen 5cm
D-Load asphalt Screed Weight Ceiling Plaster Other.D.Load
0.20 1.15 3.50 0.46 0.00
Wall Wall unit
Wall Load L(in) L(out) Height weight q
1.00 0.00 3.00 3.02 2.00
Total dead
load 7.31 Cover [mm]
Live Load 2.00 15.00
Design load 12.70
r values r1 r2 r3 r4 nd
1.33 0.00 1.33 0.00 2.00
Alpha values xs  ys  xf  yf 
0.072 0.045 0.054 0.034 0.35
Moment Mxs Mys Mxf Myf
12.52 7.83 9.39 5.91
k-value 870 550 660 420 2
 0.29 0.18 0.21 0.13
Amin[sq.mm] 200 200 200 200
Ascal [sq.mm] 347 214 258 160
Asfinal
[sq.mm] 347 214 258 200
 # of bars # of bars # of bars # of bars
6 5 5 5
 10 10 10 10
S.max [mm] 280 280 280 280
S.calc[mm] 220.00 360.00 300.00 390.00
S.final [mm] 220.00 280.00 280.00 280.00
Load Transfer on Beams Ly/Lx= 1.38
Shear vcx vdx vcy vdy

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 69

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

coeffcient
0.51 0.34 0.40 0.26
Load on
Beams Rcx Rdx Rcy Rdy
Total design
load 23.93 15.96 18.80 12.22
Live Load 3.77 2.51 2.96 1.92
Dead Load 13.77 9.18 10.82 7.03

Note:- N.A.-Means Not Applicable

Fck for C25 is 20Mpa


Fck 20.00 Fcd 11.33 1
Fyk 360.00 Fyd 313.04

0 S-2 0

Ratio
a for 2:1 a for 1:1 calc. a calc 1
30.00 40.00 1.16 38.43 1 -Continuous
Lx/4 1.10 0 -Discontinous

Panel Name S-2 D [mm]

Depth Lx [m] Ly [m] a calc d [mm] 130.00
4.40 5.09 38.43 107.62 140.00
5cm
D-Load Screed Weight Ceiling Plaster Other.D.Load
1.15 3.50 0.46 0.00
Wall Load L(in) L(out) Wall Height Wall unit weight q
2.00 2.00 3.00 14.00 2.00
Total dead
load 7.11 Cover [mm]
Live Load 2.00 15.00
Design load 12.44
r values r1 r2 r3 r4 nd
0.00 0.00 1.33 1.33 2.00
Alpha values xs  ys  xf  yf 
0.052 0.00 0.039 0.034 0.37
Moment Mxs Mys Mxf Myf
12.53 0.00 9.39 8.19
k-value 870 10 660 570 2
 0.29 0.00 0.21 0.19
Amin[sq.mm] 200 200 200 200
Ascal [sq.mm] 347 0 258 224
Asfinal
[sq.mm] 347 200 258 224
 # of bars # of bars # of bars # of bars
6 5 5 5
 10 10 10 10
S.max [mm] 280 280 280 280
S.calc[mm] 220.00 390.00 300.00 350.00

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 70

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

S.final [mm] 220.00 280.00 280.00 280.00

Load Transfer on Beams Ly/Lx= 1.16
Shear
coeffcient vcx vdx vcy vdy
0.44 0.00 0.00 0.26
Load on
Beams Rcx Rdx Rcy Rdy
Total design
load 23.90 N.A. N.A. 14.23
Live Load 3.84 N.A. N.A. 2.29
Dead Load 13.65 N.A. N.A. 8.13

Note:- N.A.-Means Not Applicable

Fck for C25 is 20Mpa

 
Fck 20.00 Fcd 11.33 0
Fyk 360.00 Fyd 313.04

0 S-4 1

Ratio
a for 2:1 a for 1:1 calc. a calc 1
30.00 40.00 1.37 36.30 1 -Continuous
Lx/4 0.68 0 -Discontinous

Panel Name S-4 D [mm]

Depth Lx [m] Ly [m] a calc d [mm] 90.00
2.70 3.70 36.30 69.92 140.00
5cm
D-Load Bitumen asphalt Screed Weight Ceiling Plaster Other.D.Load
0.20 1.15 3.50 0.46 0.00
Wall Load L(in) L(out) Wall Height Wall unit weight q
0.00 0.00 3.00 3.02 2.00
Total dead
load 7.31 Cover [mm]
Live Load 2.00 15.00
Design load 12.70
r values r1 r2 r3 r4 nd
0.00 1.33 0.00 1.33 2.00
Alpha values xs  ys  xf  yf 
0.072 0.045 0.054 0.034 0.35
Moment Mxs Mys Mxf Myf
6.67 4.17 5.00 3.15
k-value 460 290 350 220 2
 0.15 0.09 0.11 0.07
Amin[sq.mm] 202 202 202 202
Ascal [sq.mm] 180 111 134 84
Asfinal
[sq.mm] 202 202 202 202
 # of bars # of bars # of bars # of bars
6 6 6 6
 8 8 8 8

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 71

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

S.max [mm] 280 280 280 280

S.calc[mm] 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00
S.final [mm] 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00
Load Transfer on Beams Ly/Lx= 1.37
Shear
coeffcient vcx vdx vcy vdy
0.51 0.34 0.40 0.26
Load on
Beams Rcx Rdx Rcy Rdy
Total design
load 17.43 11.62 13.72 8.92
Live Load 2.74 1.83 2.16 1.40
Dead Load 10.03 6.69 7.89 5.13

Note:- N.A.-Means Not Applicable

Fck for C25 is 20Mpa

6. Analysis and Design of Stair

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 72

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

0.40 m 3.00 m 1.30 m

Riser = 15 cm
Thread = 30 cm
θ= 28.00 º
Stair
width = 1.2 m
θ HEIGHT= 1.6
NO OF
RISER= 10
Materials Used:
Concrete: C-25 fu= 25
Grade
Steel: 40 fyk= 300

Constants:  1.50 fcd= 11.33

 1.15 fctd= 1.03
fck= 20 fyd= 260.87

Depth Determination:  24 (EBCS 2 - 5.2.3)

æ f yk ö Lx 
d  çç 0.4 + 0.6 ÷÷ 
è 400 ø a

Required Provided
d = 166.46 d = 168.00 OK!
D= 190
Loading:

Dead load at Stair:

- Own wt. of slab (Inclined) = 6.46 KN/Stair Width(m)

- Due to steps per unit run = 2.25 KN/Stair Width(m)
- 3cm cement screed = 0.69 KN/Stair Width(m)
- 3cm terrazzo floor finish = 0.69 KN/Stair Width(m)
On thread = 1.66 KN/Stair Width(m)
On riser
= 0.75 KN/Stair Width(m)
- 1.5cm plastering = 0.47 KN/Stair Width(m)
Total Dead Load on Stair 11.58 KN/Stair Width(m)

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 73

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Live load
- = 3.00 KN/m2
Live load per unit meter = 3.60 KN/Stair Width(m)

Design Load = 1.3DL + 1.6LL

= 20.81 KN/Stair Width(m)

Dead load at Landing:

- Own wt. of slab = 5.70 KN/Stair Width(m)
- 3cm cement screed = 0.83 KN/Stair Width(m)
- 3cm terrazzo floor finish = 0.83 KN/Stair Width(m)
- 1.5cm plastering = 0.41 KN/Stair Width(m)
7.77 KN/Stair Width(m)

Live load
- = 3.00 KN/m2
Live load per unit meter = 3.60 KN/Stair Width(m)

Design Load = 1.3DL + 1.6LL

= 15.86 KN/Stair Width(m)

Modeling
20.81

15.86 15.86

RZ = RZ =
46.116 43.273

0.40 3.00 1.30

Design actions
Design Moment = 48.3499 KNm/Stair Width
Design Shear = 46.116 KN

Check for Deflection

w= 15.18 KNm/Stair Width

5wL 4
 max  L= 4.70 m
384EI E= 29.0 Gpa
I= 0.000686 m4
= 4.847537 mm

- According to EBCS-2 Sec. 5.2.2 The final deflection shall not exceed the value:

Le

200 = 23.50 mm OK!

Check for Shear

Capacity

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 74

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

fctd = 1.03  = 0.00125

K1= 1.06
K2= 1.43
Calculated Shear Capacity, Vc = 79.10 OK!

Reinforcement
calculation

 14
M = 48.35 KNm/Stair Width
mm2/Stair
Km = 38 Ks = 4.08 As = 1174.21 Width

Use F
Spacing Required = 14 @ 150 mm

- According to EBCS-2 Sec.7.2.2.2 the ratio of the secondary reinforcement to the

main reinforcement shall be at least equal to 0.2. Thus transverse reinforcement:

As =336.00
 8
Use F
Spacing Required = 8 @ 170 mm

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 75

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

9. FOOTING DESIGN
9.1. Bearing Capacity Recommendation and Foundation Selection
Bearing capacity recommendations: the allowable bearing capacity of soil is taken from geotechnical
Report which is all =440Kpa. Isolated footing was used as a foundation at a depth of 2 m from the Natural
ground level. Isolated footing is designed by using MS-EXCELL based on ETABs output.

471.64 kn

1.8 kn-m
F1
Col Size 0.30 x 0.25

t = 0.35
STEEL S- 360
CONCRETE C- 25
fck=0.8xc 20

d = 0.315 Critical Sections

1.20 m
d/2 = 0.1575

1.20 m

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 76

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Step 1 - Check Soil Pressure

Pressure from Self Weight of Ftg = 8.75 Kpa

Bearing capacity = 440 Kpa
Net Allowable Soil Pressure = 431.25 Kpa

e = 0.004 < L
6
P My
q ±
A I

P = 471.64 = 327.5 Kpa

A 1.44

My = y = 0.6 m

4
I I = 0.17 m

= 6.25 Kpa

q = 333.8 Kpa OK
q = 321.3 Kpa OK

Step 2 - Check Thickness

Check Punching Shear

Tributary Area for

Punching Shear

1.20 m
d/2 = 0.1575

1.20 m
Pressure = 327.53 Kpa
2
Trib. Area = 1.06 m
Shear = 347.76 KN

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 77

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Punching Shear Capacity of Footing

VRD  0.5 f ctd (1 + 50 )ud

Assumptions:
As =  12 spacing 280 mm
Critical Section Occurs at d/2 (Note: EBCS say critical section is at
1.5d, which contradicts all text books
Therefore, use d/2)

fctd = 1031.53 kpa

d = 0.315 m
 = 0.00128
u = 2.46

= 425.29 KN OK

Check one-way Action d = 0.315

Tributary Area for

one-way action

1.2 m

1.2 m

Calculate Shear @ Critical Section

321.3

333.8 Kpa

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.135 m

Pressure At Critical Section is = 332.3715 Kpa
Shear At Critical Section is = 54.85669 Kn

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 78

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Shear Capacity of Section

Vc  0.25f ctdk1k2bwd
fctd = 1031.53
K1 = (1+50)
 = 0.00128
= 1.06
d = 0.315
K2 = 1.6 -d = 1.285
bw = 1.20

= 133.29 Kn OK

Step 3 - Design for Flexure

321.3

333.8

Critical Section For Moment

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.45

Pressure At Critical Section is = 329.09 Kpa
Moment At Critical Section is = 33.6368 Kn - m/m

Calculate Reinforcement

1 é 2 mR n ù f M
 req  ê1 - 1 - ú m 
yd
Rn  u
2
m êë f yd úû ; f cd ; bd

fcd = 11333.33 Kpa

fyd = 313043.5 Kpa
d = 0.315 m
b = 1.00 m
m = 27.62
Rn = 339.00

= 0.0012500 use min Rho

As = 0.00039 = 3.482 Dia 12 bars

Use  12 @ 280

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 79

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

648.6 kn

5.9 kn-m
F2
Col Size 0.30 x 0.25

t = 0.40
STEEL S- 360
CONCRETE C- 25
fck=0.8xc 20

d = 0.365 Critical Sections

1.50 m
d/2 = 0.1825

1.50 m

Step 1 - Check Soil Pressure

Pressure from Self Weight of Ftg = 10 Kpa

Bearing capacity = 440 Kpa
Net Allowable Soil Pressure = 430 Kpa

e = 0.009 < L
6
P My
q ±
A I

P = 648.6 = 288.3 Kpa

A 2.25

My = y = 0.75 m

4
I I = 0.42 m

= 10.49 Kpa

q = 298.8 Kpa OK
q = 277.8 Kpa OK

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 80

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Step 2 - Check Thickness

Check Punching Shear

Tributary Area for

Punching Shear

1.50 m
d/2 = 0.1825

1.50 m

Pressure = 288.27 Kpa

2
Trib. Area = 1.81 m
Shear = 521.12 KN

Punching Shear Capacity of Footing

VRD  0.5 f ctd (1 + 50 )ud

Assumptions:
As =  12 spacing 230 mm
Critical Section Occurs at d/2 (Note: EBCS say critical section is at
1.5d, which contradicts all text books
Therefore, use d/2)

fctd = 1031.53 kpa

d = 0.365 m
 = 0.00135
u = 2.66

= 534.487 KN OK

Check one-way Action d = 0.365

Tributary Area for

one-way action

1.5 m

1.5 m

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 81

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Calculate Shear @ Critical Section

277.8

298.8 Kpa

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.235 m

Pressure At Critical Section is = 295.469 Kpa
Shear At Critical Section is = 107.8502 Kn

Shear Capacity of Section

Vc  0.25f ctdk1k2bwd
fctd = 1031.53
K1 = (1+50)
 = 0.00135
= 1.07
d = 0.365
K2 = 1.6 -d = 1.235
bw = 1.50

= 186.12 Kn OK

Step 3 - Design for Flexure

277.8

298.8

Critical Section For Moment

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.60

Pressure At Critical Section is = 290.36 Kpa
Moment At Critical Section is = 53.27253 Kn - m/m

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 82

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Calculate Reinforcement

1 é 2 mR n ù f M
 req  ê1 - 1 - ú m 
yd
Rn  u
2
m êë f yd úû ; f cd ; bd

fcd = 11333.33 Kpa

fyd = 313043.5 Kpa
d = 0.365 m
b = 1.00 m

m = 27.62
Rn = 399.87

= 0.0013007

As = 0.00047 = 4.198 Dia 12 bars

Use  12 @ 230

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 83

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

797.81 kn

3.44 kn-m
F3
Col Size 0.30 x 0.25

t = 0.45
STEEL S- 360
CONCRETE C- 25
fck=0.8xc 20

d = 0.415 Critical Sections

1.50 m
d/2 = 0.2075

1.50 m

Step 1 - Check Soil Pressure

Pressure from Self Weight of Ftg = 11.25 Kpa

Bearing capacity = 440 Kpa
Net Allowable Soil Pressure = 428.75 Kpa

e = 0.004 < L
6
P My
q ±
A I

P = 797.81 = 354.6 Kpa

A 2.25

My = y = 0.75 m

I I = 0.42 m4

= 6.12 Kpa

q = 360.7 Kpa OK
q = 348.5 Kpa OK

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 84

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Step 2 - Check Thickness

Check Punching Shear

Tributary Area
for
Punching Shear

1.5 m
d/2 = 0.2075

1.5 m
Pressure = 354.58 Kpa
Trib. Area = 1.74 m2
Shear = 616.54 KN
Punching Shear Capacity of Footing

VRD  0.5 f ctd (1 + 50 )ud

Assumptions:
As = f 12 spacing 210 mm
Critical Section Occurs at d/2 (Note: EBCS say
critical section is at 150
1.5d, which contradicts all text books
Therefore, use d/2)

fctd = 1031.53 kpa

d = 0.415 m
 0.00130
u = 2.86

= 651.88 KN OK

Check one-way Action d = 0.415

Tributary Area
for
one-way action

1.5 m

1.5 m

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 85

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Calculate Shear @ Critical Section

348.5

360.7 Kpa

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.185 m

Pressure At Critical Section is = 359.1893 Kpa
Shear At Critical Section is = 101.3721 Kn

Shear Capacity of Section

Vc  0.25f ctdk1k2bwd
fctd = 1031.53
K1 = (1+50r)
 0.00130
= 1.06
d = 0.415
K2 = 1.6 -d = 1.185
bw = 1.50

= 202.57 Kn OK

Step 3 - Design for Flexure

348.5

360.7

Critical Section For Moment

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.60

Pressure At Critical Section is = 355.81 Kpa
Kn -
Moment At Critical Section is = 64.63205 m/m

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 86

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Calculate Reinforcement
; ;

1 é 2 mR n ù f M
 req  ê1 - 1 - ú m 
yd
Rn  u
2
m êë f yd úû f cd bd
fcd = 11333.33 Kpa
fyd = 313043.5 Kpa
d = 0.415 m
b = 1.00 m

m = 27.62
Rn = 375.28

= 0.0012500 use min Rho

As = 0.00052 = 4.587 Dia 12 bars

Use f 12 @ 210

1184.53 kn

12.1 kn-m
F4
Col Size 0.30 x 0.25

t = 0.55
STEEL S- 360
CONCRETE
C- 25
fck=0.8xc 20

d = 0.515 Critical Sections

1.70 m
d/2 = 0.2575

1.70 m

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 87

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Step 1 - Check Soil Pressure

Pressure from Self Weight of Ftg = 13.75 Kpa

Bearing capacity = 440 Kpa
Net Allowable Soil Pressure = 426.25 Kpa

e = 0.010 < L
6

P = 1184.53 = 409.9 Kpa

A 2.89

My = y = 0.85 m
I I = 0.70 m4

= 14.78 Kpa

q = 424.6 Kpa OK
q = 395.1 Kpa OK

Step 2 - Check Thickness

Check Punching Shear

Tributary Area for

Punching Shear

1.70 m
d/2 = 0.2575

1.70 m

Pressure
= 409.87 Kpa
Trib. Area
= 2.23 m2
Shear
= 912.28 KN

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 88

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Punching Shear Capacity of Footing

VRD  0.5 f ctd (1 + 50 )ud

Assumptions:
As =
f 12 spacing 170 mm
Critical Section Occurs at d/2 (Note: EBCS say critical section is at
1.5d, which contradicts all text books
Therefore, use d/2)

fctd = 1031.53 kpa

d = 0.515 m
 0.00129
u = 3.26

= 921.85 KN OK

Check one-way Action d = 0.515

Tributary Area for

one-way action

1.70 m

1.70 m

Calculate Shear @ Critical Section

395.1

424.6 Kpa

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.185 m

Pressure At Critical Section is = 421.4329 Kpa
Shear At Critical Section is = 137.1881 Kn

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 89

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

Shear Capacity of Section

Vc  0.25f ctdk1k2bwd
fctd = 1031.53
K1 = (1+50r)
 0.00129
= 1.06
d = 0.515
K2 = 1.6 -d = 1.085
bw = 1.70

= 260.79 Kn OK

Step 3 - Design for Flexure

395.1

424.6

Critical Section For Moment

Critical Section From Edge of Footing is = 0.70

Pressure At Critical Section is = 412.48 Kpa
Moment At Critical Section is = 103.0452 Kn - m/m

Calculate Reinforcement

1 é 2 mR n ù f M
 req  ê1 - 1 - ú m 
yd
Rn  u
2
m êë f yd úû ; f cd ; bd

fcd = 11333.33 Kpa

fyd = 313043.5 Kpa
d = 0.515 m
b = 1.00 m

m = 27.62
Rn = 388.52

= 0.0012631

As = 0.00065 = 5.752 Dia 12 bars

Use f 12 @ 170

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 90

 G+3 Residential Building Structural Analysis and Design Report

DESIGNED BY MUHAMMED TAFA. Page 91