0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views26 pages

Quantum Teleportation

Quantum teleportation is a method for transferring quantum information between a sender and a receiver without the need to know the specific quantum state being transmitted. It requires the use of entangled particles and classical communication to ensure the information is preserved and reconstructed, adhering to the no-communication theorem which prevents faster-than-light transmission. Since its theoretical proposal in 1993, quantum teleportation has been experimentally realized with increasing distances, achieving notable records such as 143 km in free space.

Uploaded by

rmyageri402
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views26 pages

Quantum Teleportation

Quantum teleportation is a method for transferring quantum information between a sender and a receiver without the need to know the specific quantum state being transmitted. It requires the use of entangled particles and classical communication to ensure the information is preserved and reconstructed, adhering to the no-communication theorem which prevents faster-than-light transmission. Since its theoretical proposal in 1993, quantum teleportation has been experimentally realized with increasing distances, achieving notable records such as 143 km in free space.

Uploaded by

rmyageri402
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Quantum teleportation

Quantum teleportation is a technique for


transferring quantum information from a sender
at one location to a receiver some distance away.
While teleportation is commonly portrayed in
science fiction as a means to transfer physical
objects from one location to the next, quantum
0:00
teleportation only transfers quantum information.
The sender does not have to know the particular
quantum state being transferred. Moreover, the Schematic video demonstrating individual steps of
location of the recipient can be unknown, but to quantum teleportation. A quantum state Q is sent from
complete the quantum teleportation, classical station A to station B using a pair of entangled particles
information needs to be sent from sender to created by source S. Station A measures its two
receiver. Because classical information needs to particles and communicates the result to station B,
be sent, quantum teleportation cannot occur which chooses an appropriate device based on the
received message. Due to the action of the device, the
faster than the speed of light.
state of the particle of station B turns into Q.

One of the first scientific articles to investigate


quantum teleportation is "Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual Classical and Einstein-
Podolsky-Rosen Channels"[1] published by C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres,
and W. K. Wootters in 1993, in which they proposed using dual communication methods to send/receive
quantum information. It was experimentally realized in 1997 by two research groups, led by Sandu
Popescu and Anton Zeilinger, respectively.[2][3]

Experimental determinations[4][5] of quantum teleportation have been made in information content –


including photons, atoms, electrons, and superconducting circuits – as well as distance, with 1,400 km
(870 mi) being the longest distance of successful teleportation by Jian-Wei Pan's team using the Micius
satellite for space-based quantum teleportation.[6]

Non-technical summary
In matters relating to quantum information theory, it is convenient to work with the simplest possible unit
of information: the two-state system of the qubit. The qubit functions as the quantum analog of the classic
computational part, the bit, as it can have a measurement value of both a 0 and a 1, whereas the classical
bit can only be measured as a 0 or a 1. The quantum two-state system seeks to transfer quantum
information from one location to another location without losing the information and preserving the
quality of this information. This process involves moving the information between carriers and not
movement of the actual carriers, similar to the traditional process of communications, as two parties
remain stationary while the information (digital media, voice, text, etc.) is being transferred, contrary to
the implications of the word "teleport". The main components needed for teleportation include a sender,
the information (a qubit), a traditional channel, a quantum channel, and a receiver. The sender does not
need to know the exact contents of the information being sent. The measurement postulate of quantum
mechanics – when a measurement is made upon a quantum state, any subsequent measurements will
"collapse" or that the observed state will be lost – creates an imposition within teleportation: if a sender
measures their information, the state could collapse when the receiver obtains the data since the state had
changed from when the sender made the initial measurement and in so making it different.

For actual teleportation, it is


required that an entangled
quantum state be created for the
qubit to be transferred.
Entanglement imposes
statistical correlations between
otherwise distinct physical
systems by creating or placing
two or more separate particles
into a single, shared quantum
state. This intermediate state
contains two particles whose
quantum states are related to An interactive simulation of quantum teleportation in the Virtual Lab by
each other: measuring one Quantum Flytrap,[7] available online (https://lab.quantumflytrap.com/lab/q
particle's state provides uantum-teleportation). In this optical setup, qubits are encoded using the
information about the polarization of light. Teleportation occurs between the source photon (set
measurement of the other to an arbitrary state) and one photon from an entangled pair. A Bell pair
particle's state. These measurement is performed on the source photon and one entangled
photon using a quantum CNOT gate, yielding two bits of classical
correlations hold even when
information. The target photon is then rotated with two controllable
measurements are chosen and
waveplates based on this information.
performed independently, out of
causal contact from one another,
as verified in Bell test experiments. Thus, an observation resulting from a measurement choice made at
one point in spacetime seems to instantaneously affect outcomes in another region, even though light
hasn't yet had time to travel the distance, a conclusion seemingly at odds with special relativity. This is
known as the EPR paradox. However, such correlations can never be used to transmit any information
faster than the speed of light, a statement encapsulated in the no-communication theorem. Thus,
teleportation as a whole can never be superluminal, as a qubit cannot be reconstructed until the
accompanying classical information arrives.

The sender will combine the particle, of which the information is teleported, with one of the entangled
particles, causing a change of the overall entangled quantum state. Of this changed state, the particles in
receiver's possession are then sent to an analyzer that will measure the change of the entangled state. The
"change" measurement will allow the receiver to recreate the original information that the sender had,
resulting in the information being teleported or carried between two people that have different locations.
Since the initial quantum information is "destroyed" as it becomes part of the entanglement state, the no-
cloning theorem is maintained as the information is recreated from the entangled state and not copied
during teleportation.
The quantum channel is the communication mechanism that is used for all quantum information
transmission and is the channel used for teleportation (relationship of quantum channel to traditional
communication channel is akin to the qubit being the quantum analog of the classical bit). However, in
addition to the quantum channel, a traditional channel must also be used to accompany a qubit to
"preserve" the quantum information. When the change measurement between the original qubit and the
entangled particle is made, the measurement result must be carried by a traditional channel so that the
quantum information can be reconstructed and the receiver can get the original information. Because of
this need for the traditional channel, the speed of teleportation can be no faster than the speed of light
(hence the no-communication theorem is not violated). The main advantage with this is that Bell states
can be shared using photons from lasers, making teleportation achievable through open space, as there is
no need to send information through physical cables or optical fibers.

Quantum states can be encoded in various degrees of freedom of atoms. For example, qubits can be
encoded in the degrees of freedom of electrons surrounding the atomic nucleus or in the degrees of
freedom of the nucleus itself. Thus, performing this kind of teleportation requires a stock of atoms at the
receiving site, available for having qubits imprinted on them.[8]

As of 2015, the quantum states of single photons, photon modes, single atoms, atomic ensembles, defect
centers in solids, single electrons, and superconducting circuits have been employed as information
bearers.[9]

Understanding quantum teleportation requires a good grounding in finite-dimensional linear algebra,


Hilbert spaces and projection matrices. A qubit is described using a two-dimensional complex number-
valued vector space (a Hilbert space), which are the primary basis for the formal manipulations given
below. A working knowledge of quantum mechanics is not absolutely required to understand the
mathematics of quantum teleportation, although without such acquaintance, the deeper meaning of the
equations may remain quite mysterious.

Protocol
The resources required for quantum teleportation are
a communication channel capable of transmitting two
classical bits, a means of generating an entangled Bell
state of qubits and distributing to two different
locations, performing a Bell measurement on one of
the Bell state qubits, and manipulating the quantum
state of the other qubit from the pair. Of course, there
must also be some input qubit (in the quantum state
) to be teleported. The protocol is then as follows:

1. A Bell state is generated with one qubit sent


to location A and the other sent to location B.
2. A Bell measurement of the Bell state qubit
and the qubit to be teleported ( ) is
Diagram for quantum teleportation of a photon
performed at location A. This yields one of
four measurement outcomes which can be
encoded in two classical bits of information. Both qubits at location A are then discarded.
3. Using the classical channel, the two bits are sent from A to B. (This is the only potentially
time-consuming step after step 1 since information transfer is limited by the speed of light.)
4. As a result of the measurement performed at location A, the Bell state qubit at location B is
in one of four possible states. Of these four possible states, one is identical to the original
quantum state , and the other three are closely related. The identity of the state actually
obtained is encoded in two classical bits and sent to location B. The Bell state qubit at
location B is then modified in one of three ways, or not at all, which results in a qubit
identical to , the state of the qubit that was chosen for teleportation.
It is worth noticing that the above protocol assumes that the qubits are individually addressable, meaning
that the qubits are distinguishable and physically labeled. However, there can be situations where two
identical qubits are indistinguishable due to the spatial overlap of their wave functions. Under this
condition, the qubits cannot be individually controlled or measured. Nevertheless, a teleportation protocol
analogous to that described above can still be (conditionally) implemented by exploiting two
independently prepared qubits, with no need of an initial Bell state. This can be made by addressing the
internal degrees of freedom of the qubits (e.g., spins or polarisations) by spatially localized measurements
performed in separated regions A and B where the two spatially overlapping, indistinguishable qubits can
be found.[10] This theoretical prediction has been then verified experimentally via polarized photons in a
quantum optical setup.[11]

Experimental results and records


Work in 1998 verified the initial predictions,[2] and the distance of teleportation was increased in August
2004 to 600 meters, using optical fiber.[12] Subsequently, the record distance for quantum teleportation
has been gradually increased to 16 kilometres (9.9 mi),[13] then to 97 km (60 mi),[14] and is now 143 km
(89 mi), set in open air experiments in the Canary Islands, done between the two astronomical
observatories of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias.[14] There has been a recent record set (as of
September 2015) using superconducting nanowire detectors that reached the distance of 102 km (63 mi)
over optical fiber.[15] For material systems, the record distance is 21 metres (69 ft).[16]

A variant of teleportation called "open-destination" teleportation, with receivers located at multiple


locations, was demonstrated in 2004 using five-photon entanglement.[17] Teleportation of a composite
state of two single qubits has also been realized.[18] In April 2011, experimenters reported that they had
demonstrated teleportation of wave packets of light up to a bandwidth of 10 MHz while preserving
strongly nonclassical superposition states.[19][20] In August 2013, the achievement of "fully deterministic"
quantum teleportation, using a hybrid technique, was reported.[21] On 29 May 2014, scientists announced
a reliable way of transferring data by quantum teleportation. Quantum teleportation of data had been done
before but with highly unreliable methods.[22][23] On 26 February 2015, scientists at the University of
Science and Technology of China in Hefei, led by Chao-yang Lu and Jian-Wei Pan carried out the first
experiment teleporting multiple degrees of freedom of a quantum particle. They managed to teleport the
quantum information from ensemble of rubidium atoms to another ensemble of rubidium atoms over a
distance of 150 metres (490 ft) using entangled photons.[24][25][26] In 2016, researchers demonstrated
quantum teleportation with two independent sources which are separated by 6.5 km (4.0 mi) in Hefei
optical fiber network.[27] In September 2016, researchers at the University of Calgary demonstrated
quantum teleportation over the Calgary metropolitan fiber network over a distance of 6.2 km (3.9 mi).[28]
In December 2020, as part of the INQNET collaboration, researchers achieved quantum teleportation
over a total distance of 44 km (27.3 mi) with fidelities exceeding 90%.[29][30]
Researchers have also successfully used quantum teleportation to transmit information between clouds of
gas atoms, notable because the clouds of gas are macroscopic atomic ensembles.[31][32]

It is also possible to teleport logical operations, see quantum gate teleportation. In 2018, physicists at
Yale demonstrated a deterministic teleported CNOT operation between logically encoded qubits.[33]

First proposed theoretically in 1993, quantum teleportation has


since been demonstrated in many different guises. It has been
carried out using two-level states of a single photon, a single atom
and a trapped ion – among other quantum objects – and also using
two photons. In 1997, two groups experimentally achieved
quantum teleportation. The first group, led by Sandu Popescu, was
based in Italy. An experimental group led by Anton Zeilinger
Schematic of the quantum
followed a few months later. teleportation experiment performed
by Zeilinger's group in 1997. For
The results obtained from experiments done by Popescu's group details, see the text.
concluded that classical channels alone could not replicate the
teleportation of linearly polarized state and an elliptically
polarized state. The Bell state measurement distinguished between the four Bell states, which can allow
for a 100% success rate of teleportation, in an ideal representation.[2]

Zeilinger's group produced a pair of entangled photons by implementing the process of parametric down-
conversion. In order to ensure that the two photons cannot be distinguished by their arrival times, the
photons were generated using a pulsed pump beam. The photons were then sent through narrow-
bandwidth filters to produce a coherence time that is much longer than the length of the pump pulse.
They then used a two-photon interferometry for analyzing the entanglement so that the quantum property
could be recognized when it is transferred from one photon to the other.[3]

Photon 1 was polarized at 45° in the first experiment conducted by Zeilinger's group. Quantum
teleportation is verified when both photons are detected in the state, which has a probability of
25%. Two detectors, f1 and f2, are placed behind the beam splitter, and recording the coincidence will
identify the state. If there is a coincidence between detectors f1 and f2, then photon 3 is predicted
to be polarized at a 45° angle. Photon 3 is passed through a polarizing beam splitter that selects +45° and
−45° polarization. If quantum teleportation has happened, only detector d2, which is at the +45° output,
will register a detection. Detector d1, located at the −45° output, will not detect a photon. If there is a
coincidence between d2f1f2, with the 45° analysis, and a lack of a d1f1f2 coincidence, with −45°
analysis, it is proof that the information from the polarized photon 1 has been teleported to photon 3 using
quantum teleportation.[3]

Quantum teleportation over 143 km


Zeilinger's group developed an experiment using active feed-forward in real time and two free-space
optical links, quantum and classical, between the Canary Islands of La Palma and Tenerife, a distance of
over 143 kilometers. The results were published in 2012. In order to achieve teleportation, a frequency-
uncorrelated polarization-entangled photon pair source, ultra-low-noise single-photon detectors and
entanglement assisted clock synchronization were implemented. The two locations were entangled to
share the auxiliary state:[14]
La Palma and Tenerife can be compared to the quantum characters Alice and Bob. Alice and Bob share
the entangled state above, with photon 2 being with Alice and photon 3 being with Bob. A third party,
Charlie, provides photon 1 (the input photon) which will be teleported to Alice in the generalized
polarization state:

where the complex numbers and are unknown to Alice or Bob.

Alice will perform a Bell-state measurement (BSM) that randomly projects the two photons onto one of
the four Bell states with each one having a probability of 25%. Photon 3 will be projected onto , the
input state. Alice transmits the outcome of the BSM to Bob, via the classical channel, where Bob is able
to apply the corresponding unitary operation to obtain photon 3 in the initial state of photon 1. Bob will
not have to do anything if he detects the state. Bob will need to apply a phase shift to photon 3
between the horizontal and vertical component if the state is detected.[14]

The results of Zeilinger's group concluded that the average fidelity (overlap of the ideal teleported state
with the measured density matrix) was 0.863 with a standard deviation of 0.038. The link attenuation
during their experiments varied between 28.1 dB and 39.0 dB, which was a result of strong winds and
rapid temperature changes. Despite the high loss in the quantum free-space channel, the average fidelity
surpassed the classical limit of 2/3. Therefore, Zeilinger's group successfully demonstrated quantum
teleportation over a distance of 143 km.[14]

Quantum teleportation across the Danube River


In 2004, a quantum teleportation experiment was conducted across the Danube River in Vienna, a total of
600 meters. An 800-meter-long optical fiber wire was installed in a public sewer system underneath the
Danube River, and it was exposed to temperature changes and other environmental influences. Alice must
perform a joint Bell state measurement (BSM) on photon b, the input photon, and photon c, her part of
the entangled photon pair (photons c and d). Photon d, Bob's receiver photon, will contain all of the
information on the input photon b, except for a phase rotation that depends on the state that Alice
observed. This experiment implemented an active feed-forward system that sends Alice's measurement
results via a classical microwave channel with a fast electro-optical modulator in order to exactly
replicate Alice's input photon. The teleportation fidelity obtained from the linear polarization state at 45°
varied between 0.84 and 0.90, which is well above the classical fidelity limit of 0.66.[12]

Deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms


Three qubits are required for this process: the source qubit from the sender, the ancillary qubit, and the
receiver's target qubit, which is maximally entangled with the ancillary qubit. For this experiment,
ions were used as the qubits. Ions 2 and 3 are prepared in the Bell state
. The state of ion 1 is prepared arbitrarily. The quantum states of
ions 1 and 2 are measured by illuminating them with light at a specific wavelength. The obtained
fidelities for this experiment ranged between 73% and 76%. This is larger than the maximum possible
average fidelity of 66.7% that can be obtained using completely classical resources.[34]

Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation


The quantum state being teleported in this experiment is , where and are
unknown complex numbers, represents the horizontal polarization state, and represents the
vertical polarization state. The qubit prepared in this state is generated in a laboratory in Ngari, Tibet. The
goal was to teleport the quantum information of the qubit to the Micius satellite that was launched on
August 16, 2016, at an altitude of around 500 km. When a Bell state measurement is conducted on
photons 1 and 2 and the resulting state is , photon 3 carries this

desired state. If the Bell state detected is , then a phase shift of

is applied to the state to get the desired quantum state. The distance between the ground station and the
satellite changes from as little as 500 km to as large as 1,400 km. Because of the changing distance, the
channel loss of the uplink varies between 41 dB and 52 dB. The average fidelity obtained from this
experiment was 0.80 with a standard deviation of 0.01. Therefore, this experiment successfully
established a ground-to-satellite uplink over a distance of 500–1,400 km using quantum teleportation.
This is an essential step towards creating a global-scale quantum internet.[6]

Formal presentation
There are a variety of ways in which the teleportation protocol can be written mathematically. Some are
very compact but abstract, and some are verbose but straightforward and concrete. The presentation
below is of the latter form: verbose, but has the benefit of showing each quantum state simply and
directly. Later sections review more compact notations.

The teleportation protocol begins with a quantum state or qubit , in Alice's possession, that she wants
to convey to Bob. This qubit can be written generally, in bra–ket notation, as:

The subscript C above is used only to distinguish this state from A and B, below.

Next, the protocol requires that Alice and Bob share a maximally entangled state. This state is fixed in
advance, by mutual agreement between Alice and Bob, and can be any one of the four Bell states shown.
It does not matter which one.

.
,

In the following, assume that Alice and Bob share the state Alice obtains one of the particles in
the pair, with the other going to Bob. (This is implemented by preparing the particles together and
shooting them to Alice and Bob from a common source.) The subscripts A and B in the entangled state
refer to Alice's or Bob's particle.

At this point, Alice has two particles (C, the one she wants to teleport, and A, one of the entangled pair),
and Bob has one particle, B. In the total system, the state of these three particles is given by

Alice will then make a local measurement in the Bell basis (i.e. the four Bell states) on the two particles
in her possession. To make the result of her measurement clear, it is best to write the state of Alice's two
qubits as superpositions of the Bell basis. This is done by using the following general identities, which
are easily verified:

and

After expanding the expression for , one applies these identities to the qubits with A
and C subscripts. In particular,

and the other terms follow similarly. Combining similar terms, the total three particle state of A, B and C
together becomes the following four-term superposition:[35]
Note that all three particles are still in the same total state since no operations have been performed.
Rather, the above is just a change of basis on Alice's part of the system. This change has moved the
entanglement from particles A and B to particles C and A. The actual teleportation occurs when Alice
measures her two qubits (C and A) in the Bell basis

Equivalently, the measurement may be done in the


computational basis, , by mapping each Bell state
uniquely to one of
with the A simple quantum circuit that maps one
quantum circuit in the figure to the right. of the four Bell states (the EPR pair in the
picture) into one of the four two-qubit
computational basis states. The circuit
The result of Alice's (local) measurement is a collection of
consists of a CNOT gate followed by a
two classical bits (00, 01, 10 or 11) related to one of the
Hadamard operation. In the outputs, a
following four states (with equal probability of 1/4), after the and b take on values of 0 or 1.
three-particle state has collapsed into one of the states:

Alice's two particles are now entangled to each other, in one of the four Bell states, and the entanglement
originally shared between Alice's and Bob's particles is now broken. Bob's particle takes on one of the
four superposition states shown above. Note how Bob's qubit is now in a state that resembles the state to
be teleported. The four possible states for Bob's qubit are unitary images of the state to be teleported.

The result of Alice's Bell measurement tells her which of the above four states the system is in. She can
now send her result to Bob through a classical channel. Two classical bits can communicate which of the
four results she obtained. After Bob receives the message from Alice, he will know which of the four
states his particle is in. Using this information, he performs a unitary operation on his particle to
transform it to the desired state :

If Alice indicates her result is , Bob knows his qubit is already in the desired state
and does nothing. This amounts to the trivial unitary operation, the identity operator.
If the message indicates , Bob would send his qubit through the unitary quantum
gate given by the Pauli matrix

to recover the state.

If Alice's message corresponds to , Bob applies the gate


to his qubit.

Finally, for the remaining case, the appropriate gate is given by

Teleportation is thus achieved. The above-mentioned three gates correspond to rotations of π radians
(180°) about appropriate axes (X, Y and Z) in the Bloch sphere picture of a qubit.

Some remarks:

After this operation, Bob's qubit will take on the state , and Alice's
qubit becomes an (undefined) part of an entangled state. Teleportation does not result in the
copying of qubits, and hence is consistent with the no-cloning theorem.
There is no transfer of matter or energy involved. Alice's particle has not been physically
moved to Bob; only its state has been transferred. The term "teleportation", coined by
Bennett, Brassard, Crépeau, Jozsa, Peres and Wootters, reflects the indistinguishability of
quantum mechanical particles.
For every qubit teleported, Alice needs to send Bob two classical bits of information. These
two classical bits do not carry complete information about the qubit being teleported. If an
eavesdropper intercepts the two bits, she may know exactly what Bob needs to do in order
to recover the desired state. However, this information is useless if she cannot interact with
the entangled particle in Bob's possession.

Certifying quantum teleportation


When implementing the quantum teleportation protocol, different experimental noises may arise affecting
the state transference.[36] The usual way to benchmark a particular teleportation procedure is by using the
average fidelity: Given an arbitrary teleportation protocol producing output states with probability
for an initial state , the average fidelity is defined as: [37]

where the integration is performed over the Haar measure defined by assuming maximal uncertainty over

the initial quantum states , and is the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity.

The widely known classical threshold is obtained by optimizing the average fidelity over all classical
protocols (i.e. when the sender Alice and the receiver Bob can use just a classical channel to
communicate with each other). When teleportation involves qubit states, the maximal classical average
fidelity is .[38][39] In this way, a particular protocol with average fidelity is certified as useful if
.[6][12][14]

However, using the Uhlmann-Jozsa fidelity as the unique distance measure for benchmarking
teleportation is not justified, and one may choose different distinguishability measures.[40] For example,
there may exist reasons depending on the context in which other measures might be more suitable than
fidelity.[41] In this way, the average distance of teleportation is defined as:[42]
being a well-behaved (i.e. satisfying identity of indiscernibles and unitary invariance)
distinguishability measure between quantum states. Consequently, different classical thresholds exist,
depending on the considered distance measure (classical thresholds for Trace distance, quantum Jensen–
Shannon divergence, transmission distance, Bures distance, wootters distance, and quantum Hellinger
distance, among others, were obtained in Ref. [42]). This points out a particular issue when certifying
quantum teleportation: Given a teleportation protocol, its certification is not a universal fact in the sense
that depends on the distance used. Then, a particular protocol might be certified as useful for a set of
distance quantifiers, and non-useful for other distinguishability measures.[42]

Alternative notations

Quantum teleportation in its diagrammatic form.[43] employing Penrose graphical notation.[44] Formally, such a
computation takes place in a dagger compact category. This results in the abstract description of quantum
teleportation as employed in categorical quantum mechanics.

There are a variety of different notations in use that describe the teleportation protocol. One common one
is by using the notation of quantum gates.

In the above derivation, the unitary transformation that is the change of basis (from the standard product
basis into the Bell basis) can be written using quantum gates. Direct calculation shows that this gate is
given by

where H is the one qubit Walsh-Hadamard gate and is the Controlled NOT gate.

Entanglement swapping
Teleportation can be applied not just to pure states, but also mixed states, that can be regarded as the state
of a single subsystem of an entangled pair. The so-called entanglement swapping is a simple and
illustrative example.

If Alice and Bob share an entangled pair, and Bob teleports his particle to Carol, then Alice's particle is
now entangled with Carol's particle. This situation can also be viewed symmetrically as follows:
Alice and Bob share an entangled pair, and Bob
and Carol share a different entangled pair. Now
let Bob perform a projective measurement on his
two particles in the Bell basis and communicate
the result to Carol. These actions are precisely
the teleportation protocol described above with
Bob's first particle, the one entangled with Alice's
Quantum circuit representation for teleportation of a
particle, as the state to be teleported. When Carol
quantum state,[45][46] as described above. The circuit
finishes the protocol she now has a particle with consumes the Bell state and the qubit to teleport
the teleported state, that is an entangled state with as input, and consists of CNOT, Hadamard, two
Alice's particle. Thus, although Alice and Carol measurements of two qubits, and finally, two gates with
never interacted with each other, their particles classical control: a Pauli X, and a Pauli Z, meaning that
are now entangled. if the result from the measurement was , then the
classically controlled Pauli gate is executed. After the
A detailed diagrammatic derivation of circuit has run to completion, the value of will
have moved to, or teleported to , and will
entanglement swapping has been given by Bob
have its value set to either or , depending on the
Coecke,[47] presented in terms of categorical result from the measurement on that qubit.
quantum mechanics. This circuit can also be used for entanglement
swapping, if is one of the qubits that make up an
entangled state, as described in the text.
Algorithm for swapping Bell pairs
An important application of entanglement
swapping is distributing Bell states for use in entanglement distributed quantum networks. A technical
description of the entanglement swapping protocol is given here for pure Bell states.

1. Alice and Bob locally prepare known Bell pairs resulting in the initial state:

2. Alice sends qubit to a third party Carol


3. Bob sends qubit to Carol
4. Carol performs a Bell projection between and that by chance (all four Bell states are
possible and recognizable) results in the measurement outcome:

5. In the case of the other three Bell projection outcomes, local corrections given by Pauli
operators are made by Alice and or Bob after Carol has communicated the results of the
measurement.

6. Alice and Bob now have a Bell pair between qubits and

Generalizations of the teleportation protocol


The basic teleportation protocol for a qubit described above has been generalized in several directions, in
particular regarding the dimension of the system teleported and the number of parties involved (either as
sender, controller, or receiver).

d-dimensional systems
A generalization to -level systems (so-called qudits) is straight forward and was already discussed in the
original paper by Bennett et al.:[1] the maximally entangled state of two qubits has to be replaced by a
maximally entangled state of two qudits and the Bell measurement by a measurement defined by a
maximally entangled orthonormal basis. All possible such generalizations were discussed by Werner in
2001.[48]

The generalization to infinite-dimensional so-called continuous-variable systems was proposed by


Braunstein and Kimble[49] and led to the first teleportation experiment that worked unconditionally.[50]

Multipartite versions
The use of multipartite entangled states instead of a bipartite maximally entangled state allows for several
new features: either the sender can teleport information to several receivers either sending the same state
to all of them (which allows to reduce the amount of entanglement needed for the process)[51] or
teleporting multipartite states[52] or sending a single state in such a way that the receiving parties need to
cooperate to extract the information.[53] A different way of viewing the latter setting is that some of the
parties can control whether the others can teleport.

Logic gate teleportation


In general, mixed states ρ may be transported, and a linear transformation ω applied during teleportation,
thus allowing data processing of quantum information. This is one of the foundational building blocks of
quantum information processing. This is demonstrated below.

General description
A general teleportation scheme can be described as follows. Three quantum systems are involved. System
1 is the (unknown) state ρ to be teleported by Alice. Systems 2 and 3 are in a maximally entangled state ω
that are distributed to Alice and Bob, respectively. The total system is then in the state

A successful teleportation process is a LOCC quantum channel Φ that satisfies

where Tr12 is the partial trace operation with respect systems 1 and 2, and denotes the composition of
maps. This describes the channel in the Schrödinger picture.

Taking adjoint maps in the Heisenberg picture, the success condition becomes
for all observable O on Bob's system. The tensor factor in is while that of is
.

Further details
The proposed channel Φ can be described more explicitly. To begin teleportation, Alice performs a local
measurement on the two subsystems (1 and 2) in her possession. Assume the local measurement have
effects

If the measurement registers the i-th outcome, the overall state collapses to

The tensor factor in is while that of is . Bob then applies a corresponding


local operation Ψi on system 3. On the combined system, this is described by

where Id is the identity map on the composite system .

Therefore, the channel Φ is defined by

Notice Φ satisfies the definition of LOCC. As stated above, the teleportation is said to be successful if, for
all observable O on Bob's system, the equality

holds. The left hand side of the equation is:

where Ψi* is the adjoint of Ψi in the Heisenberg picture. Assuming all objects are finite dimensional, this
becomes

The success criterion for teleportation has the expression


Local explanation of the phenomenon
A local explanation of quantum teleportation is put forward by David Deutsch and Patrick Hayden, with
respect to the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. Their paper asserts that the two bits that
Alice sends Bob contain "locally inaccessible information" resulting in the teleportation of the quantum
state. "The ability of quantum information to flow through a classical channel [...], surviving
decoherence, is [...] the basis of quantum teleportation."[54]

Recent developments
While quantum teleportation is in an infancy stage, there are many aspects pertaining to teleportation that
scientists are working to better understand or improve the process that include:

Higher dimensions
Quantum teleportation can improve the errors associated with fault tolerant quantum computation via an
arrangement of logic gates. Experiments by D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang have determined that a
"Clifford hierarchy"[55] gate arrangement which acts to enhance protection against environmental errors.
Overall, a higher threshold of error is allowed with the Clifford hierarchy as the sequence of gates
requires less resources that are needed for computation. While the more gates that are used in a quantum
computer create more noise, the gates arrangement and use of teleportation in logic transfer can reduce
this noise as it calls for less "traffic" that is compiled in these quantum networks.[56] The more qubits
used for a quantum computer, the more levels are added to a gate arrangement, with the diagonalization
of gate arrangement varying in degree. Higher dimension analysis involves the higher level gate
arrangement of the Clifford hierarchy.[57]

Information quality
Considering the previously mentioned requirement of an intermediate entangled state for quantum
teleportation, there needs to be consideration placed on to the purity of this state for information quality.
A protection that has been developed involves the use of continuous variable information (rather than a
typical discrete variable) creating a superimposed coherent intermediate state. This involves making a
phase shift in the received information and then adding a mixing step upon reception using a preferred
state, which could be an odd or even coherent state, that will be "conditioned to the classical information
of the sender" creating a two mode state that contains the originally sent information.[58]

There have also been developments with teleporting information between systems that already have
quantum information in them. Experiments done by Feng, Xu, Zhou et al. have demonstrated that
teleportation of a qubit to a photon that already has a qubit worth of information is possible due to using
an optical qubit-ququart entangling gate.[4] This quality can increase computation possibilities as
calculations can be done based on previously stored information allowing for improvements on past
calculations.

See also
Superdense coding
Quantum complex network
Quantum mechanics
Introduction to quantum mechanics
Quantum computer
Quantum cryptography
Quantum nonlocality
Heisenberg uncertainty principle
Wheeler–Feynman absorber theory

References

Specific
1. Bennett, Charles H.; Brassard, Gilles; Crépeau, Claude; Jozsa, Richard; Peres, Asher;
Wootters, William K. (29 March 1993). "Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual
Classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Channels" (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevLet
t.70.1895). Physical Review Letters. 70 (13): 1895–1899. Bibcode:1993PhRvL..70.1895B (h
ttps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993PhRvL..70.1895B). CiteSeerX 10.1.1.46.9405 (https://
citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.46.9405).
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevLett.70.1895).
PMID 10053414 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10053414).
2. Boschi, D.; Branca, S.; De Martini, F.; Hardy, L.; Popescu, S. (9 February 1998).
"Experimental Realization of Teleporting an Unknown Pure Quantum State via Dual
Classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Channels". Physical Review Letters. 80 (6): 1121–
1125. arXiv:quant-ph/9710013 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9710013).
Bibcode:1998PhRvL..80.1121B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhRvL..80.1121B).
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1121 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevLett.80.1121).
S2CID 15020942 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15020942).
3. Bouwmeester, Dik; Pan, Jian-Wei; Mattle, Klaus; Eibl, Manfred; Weinfurter, Harald; Zeilinger,
Anton (1 December 1997). "Experimental quantum teleportation". Nature. 390 (6660): 575–
579. arXiv:1901.11004 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.11004). Bibcode:1997Natur.390..575B (ht
tps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997Natur.390..575B). doi:10.1038/37539 (https://doi.org/1
0.1038%2F37539). S2CID 4422887 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4422887).
4. Tianfeng Feng; Qiao Xu; Linxiang Zhou; Maolin Luo; Wuhong Zhang; Xiaoqi Zhou (2022).
"Quantum information transfer between a two-level and a four-level quantum systems".
Photonics Research. 10 (12): 2854. arXiv:2009.09421 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09421).
doi:10.1364/PRJ.461283 (https://doi.org/10.1364%2FPRJ.461283). S2CID 247011044 (http
s://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:247011044).
5. Chang, Kenneth (17 June 2004). "Scientists Teleport not Kirk but an Atom" (https://www.nyti
mes.com/2004/06/17/us/scientists-teleport-not-kirk-but-an-atom.html). New York Times.
6. Ren, Ji-Gang; Xu, Ping; Yong, Hai-Lin; Zhang, Liang; Liao, Sheng-Kai; Yin, Juan; Liu, Wei-
Yue; Cai, Wen-Qi; Yang, Meng; Li, Li; Yang, Kui-Xing; Han, Xuan; Yao, Yong-Qiang; Li, Ji;
Wu, Hai-Yan; Wan, Song; Liu, Lei; Liu, Ding-Quan; Kuang, Yao-Wu; He, Zhi-Ping; Shang,
Peng; Guo, Cheng; Zheng, Ru-Hua; Tian, Kai; Zhu, Zhen-Cai; Liu, Nai-Le; Lu, Chao-Yang;
Shu, Rong; Chen, Yu-Ao; Peng, Cheng-Zhi; Wang, Jian-Yu; Pan, Jian-Wei (7 September
2017). "Ground-to-satellite quantum teleportation". Nature. 549 (7670): 70–73.
arXiv:1707.00934 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934). Bibcode:2017Natur.549...70R (https://
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.549...70R). doi:10.1038/nature23675 (https://doi.org/1
0.1038%2Fnature23675). PMID 28825708 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28825708).
S2CID 4468803 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4468803).
7. Migdał, Piotr; Jankiewicz, Klementyna; Grabarz, Paweł; Decaroli, Chiara; Cochin, Philippe
(2022). "Visualizing quantum mechanics in an interactive simulation - Virtual Lab by
Quantum Flytrap". Optical Engineering. 61 (8): 081808. arXiv:2203.13300 (https://arxiv.org/a
bs/2203.13300). Bibcode:2022OptEn..61h1808M (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022O
ptEn..61h1808M). doi:10.1117/1.OE.61.8.081808 (https://doi.org/10.1117%2F1.OE.61.8.08
1808).
8. Barrett, M. D.; Chiaverini, J.; Schaetz, T.; Britton, J.; Itano, W. M.; Jost, J. D.; Knill, E.;
Langer, C.; Leibfried, D.; Ozeri, R.; Wineland, D. J. (2004). "Deterministic quantum
teleportation of atomic qubits". Nature. 429 (6993): 737–739. Bibcode:2004Natur.429..737B
(https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.429..737B). doi:10.1038/nature02608 (https://
doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature02608). PMID 15201904 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15201
904). S2CID 1608775 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:1608775).
9. Pirandola, S.; Eisert, J.; Weedbrook, C.; Furusawa, A.; Braunstein, S. L. (2015). "Advances
in quantum teleportation". Nature Photonics. 9 (10): 641–652. arXiv:1505.07831 (https://arxi
v.org/abs/1505.07831). Bibcode:2015NaPho...9..641P (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/20
15NaPho...9..641P). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphoton.20
15.154). S2CID 15074330 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15074330).
10. Lo Franco, Rosario; Compagno, Giuseppe (2018). "Indistinguishability of Elementary
Systems as a Resource for Quantum Information Processing". Physical Review Letters. 120
(24): 240403. arXiv:1712.00706 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00706).
Bibcode:2018PhRvL.120x0403L (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PhRvL.120x0403
L). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.240403 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevLett.120.240
403). PMID 29957003 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29957003). S2CID 49562954 (http
s://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:49562954).
11. Sun, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.-H.; Xu, X.-Y.; Xu, J.-S.; Li, C.-F.; Guo, G.-C.; Castellini, A.; Nosrati,
F.; Compagno, G.; Lo Franco, R. (2020). "Experimental quantum entanglement and
teleportation by tuning remote spatial indistinguishability of independent photons". Optics
Letters. 45 (23): 6410–6413. arXiv:2003.10659 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.10659).
Bibcode:2020OptL...45.6410S (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020OptL...45.6410S).
doi:10.1364/OL.401735 (https://doi.org/10.1364%2FOL.401735). hdl:10447/449875 (https://
hdl.handle.net/10447%2F449875). PMID 33258824 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33258
824). S2CID 227245593 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:227245593).
12. Ursin, Rupert; Jennewein, Thomas; Aspelmeyer, Markus; Kaltenbaek, Rainer; Lindenthal,
Michael; Walther, Philip; Zeilinger, Anton (18 August 2004). "Quantum teleportation across
the Danube" (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F430849a). Nature. 430 (7002): 849.
Bibcode:2004Natur.430..849U (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.430..849U).
doi:10.1038/430849a (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F430849a). PMID 15318210 (https://pubme
d.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15318210). S2CID 4426035 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:44
26035).
13. Jin, Xian-Min; Ren, Ji-Gang; Yang, Bin; Yi, Zhen-Huan; Zhou, Fei; Xu, Xiao-Fan; Wang,
Shao-Kai; Yang, Dong; Hu, Yuan-Feng; Jiang, Shuo; Yang, Tao; Yin, Hao; Chen, Kai; Peng,
Cheng-Zhi; Pan, Jian-Wei (16 May 2010). "Experimental free-space quantum teleportation".
Nature Photonics. 4 (6): 376. Bibcode:2010NaPho...4..376J (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/a
bs/2010NaPho...4..376J). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.87 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphoto
n.2010.87).
14. Ma, Xiao-Song; Herbst, Thomas; Scheidl, Thomas; Wang, Daqing; Kropatschek, Sebastian;
Naylor, William; Wittmann, Bernhard; Mech, Alexandra; Kofler, Johannes; Anisimova, Elena;
Makarov, Vadim; Jennewein, Thomas; Ursin, Rupert; Zeilinger, Anton (5 September 2012).
"Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active feed-forward". Nature. 489 (7415):
269–273. arXiv:1205.3909 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3909). Bibcode:2012Natur.489..269M
(https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Natur.489..269M). doi:10.1038/nature11472 (https://
doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature11472). PMID 22951967 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22951
967). S2CID 209109 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:209109).
15. Takesue, Hiroki; Dyer, Shellee D.; Stevens, Martin J.; Verma, Varun; Mirin, Richard P.; Sae
Woo Nam (20 October 2015). "Quantum teleportation over 100 km of fiber using highly
efficient superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors". Optica. 2 (10): 832–835.
arXiv:1510.00476 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.00476). Bibcode:2015Optic...2..832T (https://u
i.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Optic...2..832T). doi:10.1364/OPTICA.2.000832 (https://doi.o
rg/10.1364%2FOPTICA.2.000832). S2CID 55109707 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Corpu
sID:55109707).
16. Nölleke, Christian; Neuzner, Andreas; Reiserer, Andreas; Hahn, Carolin; Rempe, Gerhard;
Ritter, Stephan (2013). "Efficient Teleportation between Remote Single-Atom Quantum
Memories". Physical Review Letters. 110 (14): 140403. arXiv:1212.3127 (https://arxiv.org/ab
s/1212.3127). Bibcode:2013PhRvL.110n0403N (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013PhR
vL.110n0403N). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.140403 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRev
Lett.110.140403). PMID 25166964 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25166964).
S2CID 6597459 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6597459).
17. Zhao, Zhi; Chen, Yu-Ao; Zhang, An-Ning; Yang, Tao; Briegel, Hans J.; Pan, Jian-Wei (2004).
"Experimental demonstration of five-photon entanglement and open-destination
teleportation". Nature. 430 (6995): 54–58. arXiv:quant-ph/0402096 (https://arxiv.org/abs/qua
nt-ph/0402096). Bibcode:2004Natur.430...54Z (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natu
r.430...54Z). doi:10.1038/nature02643 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature02643).
PMID 15229594 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15229594). S2CID 4336020 (https://api.s
emanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4336020).
18. Zhang, Qiang; Goebel, Alexander; Wagenknecht, Claudia; Chen, Yu-Ao; Zhao, Bo; Yang,
Tao; Mair, Alois; Schmiedmayer, Jörg; Pan, Jian-Wei (2006). "Experimental quantum
teleportation of a two-qubit composite system". Nature Physics. 2 (10): 678–682.
arXiv:quant-ph/0609129 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609129).
Bibcode:2006NatPh...2..678Z (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006NatPh...2..678Z).
doi:10.1038/nphys417 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphys417). S2CID 18201599 (https://api.
semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:18201599).
19. Lee, Noriyuki; Hugo Benichi; Yuishi Takeno; Shuntaro Takeda; James Webb; Elanor
Huntington; Akira Furusawa (April 2011). "Teleportation of Nonclassical Wave Packets of
Light". Science. 332 (6027): 330–333. arXiv:1205.6253 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.6253).
Bibcode:2011Sci...332..330L (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Sci...332..330L).
CiteSeerX 10.1.1.759.1059 (https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.759.
1059). doi:10.1126/science.1201034 (https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.1201034).
PMID 21493853 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21493853). S2CID 206531447 (https://ap
i.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:206531447).
20. Trute, Peter. "Quantum teleporter breakthrough" (https://web.archive.org/web/20110418200
747/http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/pad/articles/2011/apr/Quantum_teleport_paper.html). The
University Of New South Wales. Archived from the original (http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/p
ad/articles/2011/apr/Quantum_teleport_paper.html) on 2011-04-18. Retrieved 2011-04-17.
21. Takeda, Shuntaro; Mizuta, Takahiro; Fuwa, Maria; van Loock, Peter; Furusawa, Akira (14
August 2013). "Deterministic quantum teleportation of photonic quantum bits by a hybrid
technique". Nature. 500 (7462): 315–318. arXiv:1402.4895 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.4895).
Bibcode:2013Natur.500..315T (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013Natur.500..315T).
doi:10.1038/nature12366 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature12366). PMID 23955230 (http
s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23955230). S2CID 4344887 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/C
orpusID:4344887).
22. Markoff, John (29 May 2014). "Scientists Report Finding Reliable Way to Teleport Data" (htt
ps://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/30/science/scientists-report-finding-reliable-way-to-teleport-
data.html). The New York Times. Retrieved 2014-05-29.
23. Pfaff W, Hensen BJ, Bernien H, van Dam SB, Blok MS, Taminiau TH, Tiggelman MJ,
Schouten RN, Markham M, Twitchen DJ, Hanson R (29 May 2014). "Unconditional quantum
teleportation between distant solid-state quantum bits". Science. 345 (6196): 532–535.
arXiv:1404.4369 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4369). Bibcode:2014Sci...345..532P (https://ui.a
dsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Sci...345..532P). doi:10.1126/science.1253512 (https://doi.org/
10.1126%2Fscience.1253512). PMID 25082696 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2508269
6). S2CID 2190249 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:2190249).
24. Commissariat, Tushna (27 February 2015). "Two quantum properties teleported together for
first time" (http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2015/feb/27/two-quantum-properties-tel
eported-together-for-first-time). PhysicsWorld.com.
25. Xi-Lin Wang; Xin-Dong Cai; Zu-En Su; Ming-Cheng Chen; Dian Wu; Li Li; Nai-Le Liu; Chao-
Yang Lu; Jian-Wei Pan (26 February 2015). "Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of
freedom of a single photon". Nature. 518 (7540): 516–519. Bibcode:2015Natur.518..516W
(https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.518..516W). doi:10.1038/nature14246 (https://
doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature14246). PMID 25719668 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25719
668). S2CID 4448594 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4448594).
26. Xia, Xiu-Xiu; Qi-Chao Sun; Qiang Zhang; Jian-Wei Pan (2018). "Long distance quantum
teleportation". Quantum Science and Technology. 3 (1). 014012.
Bibcode:2018QS&T....3a4012X (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018QS&T....3a4012X).
doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aa9baf (https://doi.org/10.1088%2F2058-9565%2Faa9baf).
S2CID 125240574 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:125240574).
27. Sun, Qi-Chao; Mao, Ya-Li; Chen, Sijing; Zhang, Wei; Jiang, Yang-Fan; Zhang, Yanbao;
Zhang, Weijun; Miki, Shigehito; Yamashita, Taro; Terai, Hirotaka; Jiang, Xiao; Chen, Teng-
Yun; You, Lixing; Chen, Xianfeng; Wang, Zhen; Fan, Jingyun; Zhang, Qiang; Pan, Jian-Wei
(19 September 2016). "Quantum teleportation with independent sources and prior
entanglement distribution over a network". Nature Photonics. 10 (10): 671–675.
arXiv:1602.07081 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07081). Bibcode:2016NaPho..10..671S (http
s://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NaPho..10..671S). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.179 (http
s://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphoton.2016.179). ISSN 1749-4893 (https://search.worldcat.org/iss
n/1749-4893). S2CID 126228648 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:126228648).
28. Valivarthi, Raju; Puigibert, Marcel.li Grimau; Zhou, Qiang; Aguilar, Gabriel H.; Verma, Varun
B.; Marsili, Francesco; Shaw, Matthew D.; Nam, Sae Woo; Oblak, Daniel (19 September
2016). "Quantum teleportation across a metropolitan fibre network". Nature Photonics. 10
(10): 676–680. arXiv:1605.08814 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08814).
Bibcode:2016NaPho..10..676V (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016NaPho..10..676V).
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.180 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphoton.2016.180). ISSN 1749-
4885 (https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1749-4885). S2CID 119163338 (https://api.semantics
cholar.org/CorpusID:119163338).
29. Valivarthi, Raju; Davis, Samantha I.; Peña, Cristián; Xie, Si; Lauk, Nikolai; Narváez, Lautaro;
Allmaras, Jason P.; Beyer, Andrew D.; Gim, Yewon; Hussein, Meraj; Iskander, George (4
December 2020). "Teleportation Systems Toward a Quantum Internet". PRX Quantum. 1 (2):
020317. arXiv:2007.11157 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.11157).
Bibcode:2020PRXQ....1b0317V (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020PRXQ....1b0317V).
doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.020317 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPRXQuantum.1.020317).
ISSN 2691-3399 (https://search.worldcat.org/issn/2691-3399). S2CID 220686903 (https://ap
i.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:220686903).
30. Tangermann, Victor (18 December 2020). "Researchers Achieve First "Sustained" Long
Distance Quantum Teleportation" (https://futurism.com/researchers-achieve-first-sustained-l
ong-distance-quantum-teleportation). Futurism. Retrieved 2021-06-06.
31. University of Copenhagen (13 June 2013). "Quantum teleportation between atomic systems
over long distances" (http://phys.org/news/2013-06-quantum-teleportation-atomic-distances.
html). Phys.Org.
32. Krauter, H.; Salart, D.; Muschik, C. A.; Petersen, J. M.; Shen, Heng; Fernholz, T.; Polzik, E.
S. (2 June 2013). "Deterministic quantum teleportation between distant atomic objects".
Nature Physics. 9 (7): 400. arXiv:1212.6746 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.6746).
Bibcode:2013NatPh...9..400K (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NatPh...9..400K).
doi:10.1038/nphys2631 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphys2631). S2CID 118724313 (https://
api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:118724313).
33. Chou, Kevin S.; Blumoff, Jacob Z.; Wang, Christopher S.; Reinhold, Philip C.; Axline,
Christopher J.; Gao, Yvonne Y.; Frunzio, L.; Devoret, M. H.; Jiang, Liang; Schoelkopf, R. J.
(2018). "Deterministic teleportation of a quantum gate between two logical qubits". Nature.
561 (7723): 368–373. arXiv:1801.05283 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05283).
Bibcode:2018Natur.561..368C (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.561..368C).
doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0470-y (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41586-018-0470-y).
PMID 30185908 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30185908). S2CID 3820071 (https://api.s
emanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3820071).
34. Riebe, M.; Häffner, H.; Roos, C. F.; Hänsel, W.; Benhelm, J.; Lancaster, G. P. T.; Körber, T.
W.; Becher, C.; Schmidt-Kaler, F.; James, D. F. V.; Blatt, R. (June 2004). "Deterministic
quantum teleportation with atoms". Nature. 429 (6993): 734–737.
Bibcode:2004Natur.429..734R (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.429..734R).
doi:10.1038/nature02570 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature02570). PMID 15201903 (http
s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15201903). S2CID 4397716 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/C
orpusID:4397716).
35. Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum
Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 26–27. ISBN 978-1-10700-217-3.
OCLC 43641333 (https://search.worldcat.org/oclc/43641333).
36. Knoll, Laura T.; Schmiegelow, Christian T.; Larotonda, Miguel A. (28 October 2014). "Noisy
quantum teleportation: An experimental study on the influence of local environments" (http
s://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042332). Physical Review A. 90 (4): 042332.
arXiv:1410.5771 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5771). Bibcode:2014PhRvA..90d2332K (https://
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014PhRvA..90d2332K). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042332 (htt
ps://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevA.90.042332). hdl:11336/29814 (https://hdl.handle.net/113
36%2F29814).
37. Pirandola, S.; Eisert, J.; Weedbrook, C.; Furusawa, A.; Braunstein, S. L. (October 2015).
"Advances in quantum teleportation" (https://www.nature.com/articles/nphoton.2015.154).
Nature Photonics. 9 (10): 641–652. arXiv:1505.07831 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07831).
Bibcode:2015NaPho...9..641P (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NaPho...9..641P).
doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphoton.2015.154). ISSN 1749-
4893 (https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1749-4893).
38. Massar, S.; Popescu, S. (20 February 1995). "Optimal Extraction of Information from Finite
Quantum Ensembles" (https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259). Physical
Review Letters. 74 (8): 1259–1263. Bibcode:1995PhRvL..74.1259M (https://ui.adsabs.harva
rd.edu/abs/1995PhRvL..74.1259M). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1259 (https://doi.org/10.11
03%2FPhysRevLett.74.1259). PMID 10058975 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1005897
5).
39. Vidal, G.; Latorre, J. I.; Pascual, P.; Tarrach, R. (1 July 1999). "Optimal minimal
measurements of mixed states" (https://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.60.126). Physical
Review A. 60 (1): 126–135. arXiv:quant-ph/9812068 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/981206
8). Bibcode:1999PhRvA..60..126V (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PhRvA..60..126
V). doi:10.1103/physreva.60.126 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2Fphysreva.60.126). ISSN 1050-
2947 (https://search.worldcat.org/issn/1050-2947).
40. Popescu, Sandu (7 February 1994). "Bell's inequalities versus teleportation: What is
nonlocality?" (https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.797). Physical Review
Letters. 72 (6): 797–799. Bibcode:1994PhRvL..72..797P (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/
1994PhRvL..72..797P). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.797 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysR
evLett.72.797). PMID 10056537 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10056537).
41. Ribeiro, G. A. P.; Rigolin, Gustavo (14 June 2024). "Finite-temperature detection of quantum
critical points: A comparative study" (https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.24512
2). Physical Review B. 109 (24): 245122. arXiv:2406.10178 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.1017
8). Bibcode:2024PhRvB.109x5122R (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvB.109x51
22R). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.245122 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevB.109.24512
2).
42. Bussandri, D. G.; Bosyk, G. M.; Toscano, F. (22 March 2024). "Challenges in certifying
quantum teleportation: Moving beyond the conventional fidelity benchmark" (https://link.aps.
org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.032618). Physical Review A. 109 (3): 032618.
arXiv:2403.07994 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07994). Bibcode:2024PhRvA.109c2618B (http
s://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024PhRvA.109c2618B). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.032618
(https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevA.109.032618).
43. Coecke, Bob (2009). "Quantum Picturalism". Contemporary Physics. 51 (2010): 59–83.
arXiv:0908.1787 (https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.1787). Bibcode:2010ConPh..51...59C (https://ui.
adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ConPh..51...59C). doi:10.1080/00107510903257624 (https://d
oi.org/10.1080%2F00107510903257624). S2CID 752173 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/C
orpusID:752173).
44. R. Penrose, Applications of negative dimensional tensors, In: Combinatorial Mathematics
and its Applications, D.~Welsh (Ed), pages 221–244. Academic Press (1971).
45. Williams, Colin P. (2010). Explorations in Quantum Computing. Springer. pp. 496–499.
ISBN 978-1-4471-6801-0.
46. Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum
Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 26–28. ISBN 978-1-10700-217-3.
OCLC 43641333 (https://search.worldcat.org/oclc/43641333).
47. Coecke, Bob (2004). The logic of entanglement (Preprint). arXiv:quant-ph/0402014 (https://a
rxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0402014).
48. Werner, Reinhard F. (2001). "All teleportation and dense coding schemes". J. Phys. A: Math.
Gen. 34 (35): 7081–7094. arXiv:quant-ph/0003070 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0003070).
Bibcode:2001JPhA...34.7081W (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001JPhA...34.7081W).
doi:10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/332 (https://doi.org/10.1088%2F0305-4470%2F34%2F35%2F
332). S2CID 9684671 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:9684671).
49. Braunstein, Samuel L.; Kimble, H. J. (26 January 1998). "Teleportation of Continuous
Quantum Variables" (https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:BRAprl98). Physical
Review Letters. 80 (4): 869–872. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..80..869B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.
edu/abs/1998PhRvL..80..869B). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.869 (https://doi.org/10.1103%
2FPhysRevLett.80.869).
50. Furusawa, A.; Sørensen, J. L.; Braunstein, S. L.; Fuchs, C. A.; Kimble, H. J.; Polzik, E. S.
(1998). "Unconditional Quantum Teleportation". Science. 282 (5389): 706–709.
Bibcode:1998Sci...282..706F (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Sci...282..706F).
doi:10.1126/science.282.5389.706 (https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.282.5389.706).
PMID 9784123 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9784123). S2CID 14269209 (https://api.se
manticscholar.org/CorpusID:14269209).
51. Dür, W. and Cirac, J. I. (2000). "Multiparty teleportation". J. Mod. Opt. 47 (2–3): 247–255.
Bibcode:2000JMOp...47..247D (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000JMOp...47..247D).
doi:10.1080/09500340008244039 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F09500340008244039).
S2CID 216116503 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:216116503).
52. Yeo, Ye; Chua, Wee Kang (2006). "Teleportation and Dense Coding with Genuine
Multipartite Entanglement". Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (6): 060502. arXiv:quant-ph/0510029 (http
s://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0510029). Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96f0502Y (https://ui.adsabs.harv
ard.edu/abs/2006PhRvL..96f0502Y). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.060502 (https://doi.org/1
0.1103%2FPhysRevLett.96.060502). PMID 16605974 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/166
05974). S2CID 5170837 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:5170837).
53. Karlsson, Anders; Bourennane, Mohamed (1998). "Quantum teleportation using three-
particle entanglement". Phys. Rev. A. 58 (6): 4394–4400. Bibcode:1998PhRvA..58.4394K (h
ttps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhRvA..58.4394K). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.58.4394 (h
ttps://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevA.58.4394).
54. Deutsch, David; Hayden, Patrick (1999). "Information Flow in Entangled Quantum
Systems". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering
Sciences. 456 (1999): 1759–1774. arXiv:quant-ph/9906007 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9
906007). Bibcode:2000RSPSA.456.1759D (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000RSPSA.
456.1759D). doi:10.1098/rspa.2000.0585 (https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frspa.2000.0585).
S2CID 13998168 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:13998168).
55. Gottesman, Daniel; Chuang, Isaac L. (November 1999). "Demonstrating the viability of
universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations". Nature. 402
(6760): 390–393. arXiv:quant-ph/9908010 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9908010).
Bibcode:1999Natur.402..390G (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Natur.402..390G).
doi:10.1038/46503 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F46503). ISSN 0028-0836 (https://search.worl
dcat.org/issn/0028-0836). S2CID 4411647 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:44116
47).
56. Luo, Yi-Han; Chen, Ming-cheng; Erhard, Manuel; Zhong, Han-Sen; Wu, Dian; Tang, Hao-
Yang; Zhao, Qi; Wang, Xi-Lin; Fujii, Keisuke; Li, Li; Liu, Nai-Le; Nemoto, Kae; Munro,
William; Lu, Chao-Yang; Zeilinger, Anton; Pan, Jian-Wei (7 September 2020). "Quantum
teleportation of physical qubits into logical code-spaces" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
articles/PMC8433538). PNAS. 118 (36). e2026250118. arXiv:2009.06242 (https://arxiv.org/a
bs/2009.06242). doi:10.1073/pnas.2026250118 (https://doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.20262501
18). PMC 8433538 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8433538).
PMID 34479998 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34479998).
57. de Silva, Nadish (2021). "Efficient quantum gate teleportation in higher dimensions".
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 477
(2251). arXiv:2011.00127 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00127).
Bibcode:2021RSPSA.47700865D (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021RSPSA.4770086
5D). doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0865 (https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frspa.2020.0865).
S2CID 226227346 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:226227346).
58. Pandey, Ravi; Prakash, Ranjana; Prakash, Hari (27 September 2021). "High success
standard quantum teleportation using entangled coherent state and two-level atoms in
cavities". Quantum Inf Process. 20 (10). 322. arXiv:2010.06829 (https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.0
6829). Bibcode:2021QuIP...20..322P (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021QuIP...20..322
P). doi:10.1007/s11128-021-03264-0 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11128-021-03264-0).
S2CID 222341312 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:222341312).
General
Review on theory and experiments:
Pirandola, S.; Eisert, J.; Weedbrook, C.; Furusawa, A.; Braunstein, S. L. (2015).
"Advances in Quantum Teleportation". Nature Photonics. 9 (10): 641–652.
arXiv:1505.07831 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.07831). Bibcode:2015NaPho...9..641P (htt
ps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NaPho...9..641P). doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.154 (h
ttps://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnphoton.2015.154). S2CID 15074330 (https://api.semanticsch
olar.org/CorpusID:15074330).
Theoretical proposal:
Bennett, Charles H.; Brassard, Gilles; Crépeau, Claude; Jozsa, Richard; Peres, Asher;
Wootters, William K. (29 March 1993). "Teleporting an Unknown Quantum State via Dual
Classical and Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen Channels". Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (13): 1895–
1899. Bibcode:1993PhRvL..70.1895B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993PhRvL..7
0.1895B). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevLett.7
0.1895). PMID 10053414 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10053414). S2CID 6599630
(https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6599630). This is the seminal paper that laid
out the entanglement protocol.
Vaidman, L. (February 1994). "Teleportation of Quantum States". Phys. Rev. A. 49 (2):
1473–1476. arXiv:hep-th/9305062 (https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9305062).
Bibcode:1994PhRvA..49.1473V (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994PhRvA..49.147
3V). doi:10.1103/physreva.49.1473 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2Fphysreva.49.1473).
PMID 9910380 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9910380). S2CID 8356637 (https://api.
semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8356637).
Shahriar, M.S.; Pradhan, P.; Gopal, V.; Morzinski, J.; Cardoso, G.; Pati, G.S. (2006).
"Wavelength locking via teleportation using distant quantum entanglement and Bloch–
Siegert oscillation". Optics Communications. 266 (1): 349–353.
Bibcode:2006OptCo.266..349S (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006OptCo.266..349
S). doi:10.1016/j.optcom.2006.04.072 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.optcom.2006.04.07
2).
Brassard, G; Braunstein, S; Cleve, R (1998). "Teleportation as a Quantum Computation".
Physica D. 120 (1–2): 43–47. arXiv:quant-ph/9605035 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/96
05035). Bibcode:1998PhyD..120...43B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998PhyD..12
0...43B). doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(98)00043-8 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fs0167-2789%
2898%2900043-8). S2CID 15178313 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:151783
13).
Peres, Asher (2003). "What is actually teleported?". arXiv:quant-ph/0304158 (https://arxi
v.org/abs/quant-ph/0304158).
Rigolin, Gustavo (2005). "Quantum teleportation of an arbitrary two-qubit state and its
relation to multipartite entanglement". Physical Review A. 71 (3): 032303. arXiv:quant-
ph/0407219 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0407219). Bibcode:2005PhRvA..71c2303R
(https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PhRvA..71c2303R).
doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.71.032303 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevA.71.032303).
S2CID 53941971 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53941971).
Shi-Biao Zheng (2004) "Scheme for approximate conditional teleportation of an unknown
atomic state without the Bell-state measurement", Phys. Rev. A 69, 064302
Cardoso, Wesley B.; Avelar, A. T.; Baseia, B.; De Almeida, N. G. (2005). "Teleportation of
entangled states without Bell-state measurement". Physical Review A. 72 (4). 045802.
arXiv:quant-ph/0604156 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0604156).
Bibcode:2005PhRvA..72d5802C (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PhRvA..72d58
02C). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.72.045802 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevA.72.0458
02). S2CID 11270460 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:11270460).
Leuenberger, Michael N.; Flatté, Michael E.; Awschalom, D. D. (2005). "Teleportation of
Electronic Many-Qubit States Encoded in the Electron Spin of Quantum Dots via Single
Photons". Physical Review Letters. 94 (10). 107401. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..94j7401L (htt
ps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005PhRvL..94j7401L).
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.107401 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevLett.94.10740
1). PMID 15783519 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15783519). S2CID 26932056 (http
s://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:26932056).
Pyrkov, Alexey N.; Byrnes, Tim (2014). "Quantum teleportation of spin coherent states:
Beyond continuous variables teleportation". New Journal of Physics. 16 (7). 073038.
arXiv:1305.2479 (https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.2479). Bibcode:2014NJPh...16g3038P (http
s://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014NJPh...16g3038P). doi:10.1088/1367-
2630/16/7/073038 (https://doi.org/10.1088%2F1367-2630%2F16%2F7%2F073038).
S2CID 118699151 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:118699151).
Wei, Yuchuan (2016). "Comment on 'Fractional quantum mechanics' and 'Fractional
Schrödinger equation' ". Physical Review E. 93 (6). 066103. arXiv:1607.01356 (https://ar
xiv.org/abs/1607.01356). Bibcode:2016PhRvE..93f6103W (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.ed
u/abs/2016PhRvE..93f6103W). doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.066103 (https://doi.org/10.11
03%2FPhysRevE.93.066103). PMID 27415397 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27415
397). S2CID 20010251 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:20010251).
First experiments with photons:
Bouwmeester et al. 1997
Boschi et al. 1998
Kim, Y.-H.; Kulik, S.P.; Shih, Y. (2001). "Quantum teleportation of a polarization state with
a complete bell state measurement". Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (7): 1370–1373. arXiv:quant-
ph/0010046 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0010046). Bibcode:2001PhRvL..86.1370K (ht
tps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001PhRvL..86.1370K).
doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1370 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevLett.86.1370).
PMID 11178086 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11178086). S2CID 6123495 (https://a
pi.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:6123495).
Marcikic, I.; Tittel, W.; Zbinden, H.; Gisin, N. (2003). "Long-Distance Teleportation of
Qubits at Telecommunication Wavelengths". Nature. 421 (6922): 509–513. arXiv:quant-
ph/0301178 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0301178). Bibcode:2003Natur.421..509M (htt
ps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Natur.421..509M). doi:10.1038/nature01376 (https://
doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature01376). PMID 12556886 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12
556886). S2CID 4303767 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4303767).
Ursin, Rupert; Jennewein, Thomas; Aspelmeyer, Markus; Kaltenbaek, Rainer;
Lindenthal, Michael; Walther, Philip; Zeilinger, Anton (August 2004). "Quantum
Teleportation Link across the Danube" (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F430849a). Nature.
430 (7002): 849. Bibcode:2004Natur.430..849U (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004
Natur.430..849U). doi:10.1038/430849a (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F430849a).
PMID 15318210 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15318210). S2CID 4426035 (https://a
pi.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4426035).
First experiments with atoms:
Riebe, M.; Häffner, H.; Roos, C. F.; Hänsel, W.; Ruth, M.; Benhelm, J.; Lancaster, G. P.
T.; Körber, T. W.; Becher, C.; Schmidt-Kaler, F.; James, D. F. V.; Blatt, R. (2004).
"Deterministic Quantum Teleportation with Atoms". Nature. 429 (6993): 734–737.
Bibcode:2004Natur.429..734R (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.429..734R).
doi:10.1038/nature02570 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature02570). PMID 15201903 (htt
ps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15201903). S2CID 4397716 (https://api.semanticscholar.o
rg/CorpusID:4397716).
Barrett, M. D.; Chiaverini, J.; Schaetz, T.; Britton, J.; Itano, W. M.; Jost, J. D.; Knill, E.;
Langer, C.; Leibfried, D.; Ozeri, R.; Wineland, D. J. (2004). "Deterministic Quantum
Teleportation of Atomic Qubits". Nature. 429 (6993): 737–739.
Bibcode:2004Natur.429..737B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.429..737B).
doi:10.1038/nature02608 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature02608). PMID 15201904 (htt
ps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15201904). S2CID 1608775 (https://api.semanticscholar.o
rg/CorpusID:1608775).
Olmschenk, S.; Matsukevich, D. N.; Maunz, P.; Hayes, D.; Duan, L.-M.; Monroe, C.
(2009). "Quantum Teleportation between Distant Matter Qubits". Science. 323 (5913):
486–489. arXiv:0907.5240 (https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5240).
Bibcode:2009Sci...323..486O (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Sci...323..486O).
doi:10.1126/science.1167209 (https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.1167209).
PMID 19164744 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19164744). S2CID 206516918 (http
s://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:206516918).

External links
Loophole-free Bell test (https://web.archive.org/web/20180704082456/http://hansonlab.tudel
ft.nl/loophole-free-bell-test/) – Kavli Institute of Nanoscience
"Spooky action and beyond" (http://www.signandsight.com/features/614.html) – Interview
with Anton Zeilinger about quantum teleportation. Date: 2006-02-16
Quantum Teleportation at IBM (http://www.research.ibm.com/quantuminfo/teleportation/)
Archived (https://web.archive.org/web/20110107152340/http://www.research.ibm.com/quant
uminfo/teleportation/) 7 January 2011 at the Wayback Machine
Physicists Succeed In Transferring Information Between Matter And Light (http://www.space
daily.com/news/physics-04zi.html)
Quantum telecloning: Captain Kirk's clone and the eavesdropper (http://www.physorg.com/n
ews10924.html)
"Teleportation-based approaches to universal quantum computation" (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20081218105859/http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~amchilds/talks/pi03.ppt). Archived
from the original (http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~amchilds/talks/pi03.ppt) on 2008-12-18.
Riebe, M; Chwalla, M; Benhelm, J; Häffner, H; Hänsel, W; Roos, C F; Blatt, R (4 July 2007).
"Quantum teleportation with atoms: quantum process tomography". New Journal of Physics.
9 (7): 211. arXiv:0704.2027 (https://arxiv.org/abs/0704.2027). Bibcode:2007NJPh....9..211R
(https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007NJPh....9..211R). doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/7/211 (h
ttps://doi.org/10.1088%2F1367-2630%2F9%2F7%2F211).
Entangled State Teleportation (https://web.archive.org/web/20081218105900/http://www.imi
t.kth.se/QEO/qucomm/DelD19QuComm.pdf)
Oh, Sangchul; Lee, Soonchil; Lee, Hai-woong (27 August 2002). "Fidelity of quantum
teleportation through noisy channels". Physical Review A. 66 (2): 022316. arXiv:quant-
ph/0206173 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0206173). Bibcode:2002PhRvA..66b2316O (http
s://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PhRvA..66b2316O). doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.66.022316
(https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevA.66.022316). hdl:10203/1029 (https://hdl.handle.net/1
0203%2F1029).
TelePOVM – A generalized quantum teleportation scheme (https://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~tal
mo/CV/my-new-papers/BHM04-IBM.pdf)
Entanglement Teleportation via Werner States (https://web.archive.org/web/2008121810585
9/http://web.am.qub.ac.uk/users/m.s.kim/PRL04236.pdf)
Quantum Teleportation of a Polarization State (https://web.archive.org/web/2013021009055
0/http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~wilkins/writing/Assign/topics/Q-trans-prl.pdf)
Childress, David Hatcher (1999). The Time Travel Handbook: A Manual of Practical
Teleportation & Time Travel. Adventures Unlimited Press. ISBN 978-0-932813-68-8.
Riebe, M.; Häffner, H.; Roos, C. F.; Hänsel, W.; Benhelm, J.; Lancaster, G. P. T.; Körber, T.
W.; Becher, C.; Schmidt-Kaler, F.; James, D. F. V.; Blatt, R. (June 2004). "Deterministic
quantum teleportation with atoms". Nature. 429 (6993): 734–737.
Bibcode:2004Natur.429..734R (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Natur.429..734R).
doi:10.1038/nature02570 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature02570). PMID 15201903 (http
s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15201903).
Kim, Yoon-Ho; Kulik, Sergei; Shih, Yanhua (January 2002). "Quantum teleportation with a
complete Bell state measurement". Journal of Modern Optics. 49 (1–2): 221–236.
arXiv:quant-ph/0010046 (https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0010046).
Bibcode:2002JMOp...49..221K (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002JMOp...49..221K).
doi:10.1080/09500340110087633 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F09500340110087633).
"Welcome to the quantum Internet" (https://web.archive.org/web/20121130091556/http://ww
w.sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/34762/title/Welcome_to_the_Quantum_Internet). Science
News. 16 August 2008. Archived from the original (http://sciencenews.org/view/feature/id/34
762/title/Welcome_to_the_Quantum_Internet) on 2012-11-30. Retrieved 2008-08-14.
Quantum experiments – interactive. (http://www.QuantumLab.de)
A (mostly serious) introduction to quantum teleportation for non-physicists (http://lightlike.co
m/teleport/)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quantum_teleportation&oldid=1257660825"

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy