Eduqas Gcse GFT D T From 2017 PDF
Eduqas Gcse GFT D T From 2017 PDF
Introduction 3
Continuing Professional Development 3
Aims and objectives 4
Prior learning and progression 4
The Specification at a glance 5
Course overview 8
Component 1 – Design and Technology in the 21st Century 8
Component 2 – Design and make task 20
Component 2 – Further examples of informal sketch pad and formal 53
portfolio for the design and make
Further support and resources 87
Examinations and assessment 87
Suggested frameworks for delivery 91
Frequently asked questions 93
2
Introduction
The WJEC EDUQAS GCSE Design and Technology specification can be delivered and
assessed in:
all schools and colleges in England
schools and colleges in independent regions such as Northern Ireland, Isle of Man
and the Channel Islands
independent schools in Wales.
It will be awarded for the first time in summer 2018, using grades 9 to 1.
This specification meets the Conditions and Requirements for GCSE Design and
Technology Qualifications which set out the requirements for all new or revised GCSE
specifications developed to be taught in England from September 2017. Additionally, the
specification meets the requirements of the Approval Criteria for GCSE Design and
Technology (July 2016). WJEC EDUQAS has worked closely with teachers and outside
organisations in developing this qualification.
This guidance for teaching publication is one of a number of ways in which WJEC EDUQAS
provides assistance to teachers delivering this specification. This guide is to be used in
conjunction with, and as a supplement to the Specification and Sample Assessment
Materials (question papers and marking schemes). It is not intended as, and cannot be used
as, a replacement for either of these essential materials.
easy access to the specification and other key documents on the WJEC EDUQAS
website
CPD advice available via the WJEC EDUQAS website
face to face CPD at a range of venues
additional, free-to-access, digital resources
easy access, by telephone or email, to both the Subject Officer and Subject Support
Officer for GCSE Design and Technology
opportunities to become an examiner or moderator for the new specification
visiting moderation
Contact points for WJEC EDUQAS in GCSE Design and Technology are as follows:
CPD will be delivered to assist in explaining the WJEC EDUQAS GCSE in Design and
Technology qualification. WJEC EDUQAS will continue to deliver CPD in England for the life
of the qualification.
Please use the following link to search for CPD events and make bookings:
http://www.wjec.co.uk/cpd/
3
Aims and objectives
The WJEC EDUQAS GCSE specification in GCSE Design and Technology provides
opportunities for learners to follow a course that is inspiring, rigorous, coherent and
balanced.
demonstrate their understanding that all design and technological activity takes place
within contexts that influence the outcomes of design practice
develop realistic design proposals as a result of the exploration of design opportunities
and users’ needs, wants and values
use imagination, experimentation and combine ideas when designing
develop the skills to critique and refine their own ideas whilst designing and making
communicate their design ideas and decisions using different media and techniques, as
appropriate for different audiences at key points in their designing
develop decision making skills, including the planning and organisation of time and
resources when managing their own project work
develop a broad knowledge of materials, components and technologies and practical
skills to develop high quality, imaginative and functional prototypes
be ambitious and open to explore and take design risks in order to stretch the
development of design proposals, avoiding clichéd or stereotypical responses
consider the costs, commercial viability and marketing of products
demonstrate safe working practices in design and technology
use key design and technology terminology including those related to: designing;
innovation and communication; materials and technologies; making; manufacture and
production; critiquing; values and ethics.
This specification also gives learners an opportunity to produce extended written responses
and demonstrate the quality of their written communication, including appropriate use of
punctuation and grammar.
The learners will also have the opportunity to produce an extended piece of design work
based on contextual challenges where they will be expected to be creative, innovative and
solve problems that they have realised themselves. They will be able to use the iterative
design process in making real products that solve real problems identified by them.
www.eduqas.co.uk
There are no previous learning requirements for this specification. Any requirements set for
entry to a course based on this specification are at the school/college’s discretion.
This specification builds on subject content which is typically taught at key stage 3 and
provides a suitable foundation for the study of design and technology at either AS or A level.
In addition, the specification provides a coherent, satisfying and worthwhile course of study
for learners who do not progress to further study in this subject.
4
The specification at a glance
The subject content for Design and Technology is basically split into two parts.
Technical Principles
Core Requirements
In-depth Requirements
5
Designing and making principles
Core Requirements
Core knowledge and understanding that learners are required to Learners are required to cover all of the content in these ten
develop and apply is presented in ten clear topic areas: areas, to ensure they are able to apply a broad knowledge and
understanding design and technology practice understanding of design and technology principles within design
understanding user needs and make activities.
writing a design brief and specifications
investigating challenges
developing ideas
investigating the work of others
using design strategies
communicating ideas
developing a prototype
making decisions
In-depth Requirements
In-depth knowledge and understanding is presented in five clear topic Learners are required to cover all of the content in these five
areas: areas, in relation to at least one of the topic areas (a to f)
identified in the in-depth knowledge and understanding section of
selecting and working with materials and components technical principles.
marking out
using tools and equipment
using specialist techniques
using surface treatments and finishes
6
Technical principles
7
Course overview
Learners are expected to attempt all questions in Section A and one from Section B.
Learners will write their responses in the space provided underneath each question. The
lined space provided is intended to give learners ample space to record their responses.
There is no expectation that learners will fill up all the space provided. However, extra lined
pages are provided within the question paper, and further continuation booklets will be
provided for learners if necessary.
8
Sample core question
The Product Life Cycle Curve below shows the sales of a mobile telephone at each
stage throughout its life cycle.
(a) (i) Underline what you believe to be the most appropriate unit of time for
the graph. [1]
Exemplar response: The product is introduced into the market and the
start of the sales is slow because people are not aware of the product.
9
(iii) Give three examples for the decline in sales of a product. [3]
The question asks for three examples for the decline of sales. Each
correct response will achieve 1 mark to a total of three.
(b) Recent energy legislation has meant that traditional light bulbs have been
phased out and replaced by newer LED bulbs.
(i) Explain why LED bulbs are now replacing the traditional light bulb.
Exemplar response: The consumer would gain because the life of the
bulb is longer than a traditional one without any reduction in the quality
of the light.
The question is specifically looking for a detailed reason. One mark
would be awarded for the reason and one mark would be for an
explanation or justification of the reason.
10
(iii) The table below shows the costs related to running each light bulb for
an average day.
Exemplar response:
6.97 x 365 = £25.4405 (1 Mark)
1.26 x 365 = £4.599 (1 Mark)
25.4405 – 4.599 = £20.8415 (1 Mark)
20.8415
× 100 = 81.9 𝑺𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈 (1 Mark for indication of method but the
25.4405
answer may be wrong). Final answer must be either 81.9% accept
82% (1 mark)
This question is a typical mathematics style of question. The marks
will be awarded for each correct stage or step in the calculations. The
learner must ensure that they show all workings.
(c) (i) Explain one disadvantage of using wind power to produce energy. [2]
11
(ii) Discuss how using energy panels on houses can have a positive
effect on the environment. [3]
12
Sample core question
The jacket pictured below has been made using a thermo-chromic smart material.
Unable to trace copyright, please contact us if you are the copyright holder.
Exemplar response: When the user wears the jacket, their body temperature
provides the heat to change the colour of the jacket; the action of a thermo-
chromic material. This gives an additional aesthetic feature to the jacket that
may attract a wider target market.
(b) (i) Medium density fibreboard (MDF), glass reinforced plastic (GRP) and
plywood are known as composite materials. Explain the meaning of a
composite material. [2]
13
(ii) The snowboarding helmet is made from a carbon fibre reinforced
polymer. Analyse why the material properties of carbon fibre make it a
particularly suitable material for the snowboarding helmet. [3]
© Surfdome http://bit.ly/2nr3D3G. This image is used for critical analysis and review purposes
under the fair dealings policy.
14
Sample in depth question
Fibres and textiles
(a) Study the pictures of the two cushions shown below and answer the
questions that follow.
Bolster cushion
Floor cushion
(i) State the name of the edge finish that has been used on both
cushions and give a reason for its use.
(ii) The main material used for both cushions is woven cotton. Give one
reason why a material with a woven construction is the most suitable
choice for these products. [1]
The woven material is more stable and will help give structure to the
cushions.
The learner has given a correct answer and with a justified reason. In
this question reference to cotton in the answer is not needed.
15
(iii) Explain why it is important to lay templates out following pattern
language in the construction of the two cushions. [2]
(iv) The pink flower design shown below needs to be appliquéd onto the
bolster cushion to co-ordinate the two cushions.
Describe how you would appliqué the flower design onto the bolster
cushion. [4]
Strengthen the top piece of material (in this case the patterned flower
shape) with bondaweb by ironing it to the back of the flower.
Peel off backing paper on the bondaweb and place it on the second
material (green background in this case).
16
(b) The finished diameter of the circular ends on the bolster cushion is 20cm as
shown below.
NB. The length of the bolster cushion is the same measurement as the width
of material.
Diameter plus seam allowance 20cm + 3cm (1.5cm +1.5cm) = 23cm (1)
= 72.3cm (1)
(Credit method based on: Radius plus seam allowance 10 + 1.5cm (1))
The circumference is calculated again this time without seam allowances for
one mark, which gives the length of the rectangular piece that will form the
cylindrical side. This measurement will need to be divided into 5m for the
number of pieces. The correct answer will need to be rounded down for the
second mark.
It is essential that the learner clearly shows all the processes/steps involved.
Any correct mathematical approach to the calculations will be acceptable.
Marks will be awarded for steps within the mathematical process. Learners
will be allowed to use calculators in the examination but a calculator will be
not be of any use if the learner does not realise that units may be different; as
in this case where the units are centimetres and metres. Credit will be given
to any appropriate approach in calculating the circumference and the number
of cylindrical sides that can be cut from the fabric.
17
(c) The cushions are to be sold under the fair trade logo. Analyse the impact on
communities and workers who benefit under this scheme. [5]
Indicative content
This content is not prescriptive and candidates are not expected to refer to all
the material identified below
The above list is indicative content that learners could refer to within their
answer. Credit would be given to alternative answers not listed but are
considered appropriate. Within the answer learners will need to demonstrate
an understanding of the term ‘analyse.’ It is expected that learners will apply
reasoning to any of the statements they make. Band descriptions will be
applied to questions with extended answers.
18
(d) It is important that designers consider the world we live in and the needs of
future generations. Evaluate how designers can lessen the impact on our
environment when designing new textile products. [6]
Indicative content
This content is not prescriptive and candidates are not expected to refer to all
the material identified below
Designers can lessen the impact on our environment when designing textile
products by:
Credit would be given to alternative answers not listed but are considered
appropriate. Within the answer learners will need to demonstrate an
understanding of the term ‘evaluate.’ It is expected that learners will show
evidence of appraising a situation and/or make judgements relating to any
facts they include within their answer.
19
Component 2 – Design and make task
Contextual Challenge
The contextual challenge requires learners to demonstrate, at GCSE level, their knowledge
and understanding of the following core designing and making principles, in the context of a
sustained design and make activity.
work within a context which will inform the outcome
identify and understand client and user needs
write a design brief and specification
identify opportunities and constraints that influence the processes of designing and
making
explore, develop, test, critically analyse and evaluate ideas
investigate and analyse the work of others
use different design strategies to generate initial ideas
develop, communicate, record and justify design ideas
design and develop at least one prototype* that is fit for purpose
make informed and reasoned decisions to identify the potential for further development
In the context of this component, ‘prototype’ is used to describe all working solutions
including products, models and systems.
20
NEA: A sustained design and make task, based on a contextual challenge set by WJEC
EDUQAS, assessing learners' ability to apply the iterative approach to:
Requirements
Three contextual challenges available June 1st in the year preceding the year in which the
qualification is awarded. Learners will choose to tackle one challenge. From the challenge
the learner will investigate and decide upon possible problems/issues before deciding on a
possible design task to tackle.
Note: Centres do not need to purchase an A4/A3 sketchbook and this does not have to be a
bound book. It could simply be a series of A3 pages stapled together, or it could be a series
of A3 and A4 pages loosely bound together with a treasury tag for example. How exactly the
work is presented is up to the individual centre. However, it is important to track the work
and record clearly where marks have been awarded against the marking criteria.
Make/practical outcomes
Final prototype (fully functioning high quality product) any supporting practical pieces
including models, jigs, formers, patterns, tests, trials, iterations must be included.
21
Assessment criteria for the design and make contextual challenge.
Note: You do need to clearly indicate the learner's name and the centre name and number
(a) Identifying and investigating 10 AO 1 The design context must be analysed critically
design possibilities. There will be a number of possible design tasks
identified
(b) Developing a design brief and 10
Detailed and relevant research will be evident
specification.
Consider the users
Analysis of existing products
(c) Generating and developing design 30 AO 2 Research into past / present professionals
ideas.
Total 100
22
A brainstorm might be the starting
point for some learners to gather
their thoughts about the context. It
is a good opportunity to explore
the divergent possibilities within
the context, and also generate
important areas for further
investigation/research. Mind maps
or brainstorms can allow learners
to record potential ideas,
questions, and tasks that can be
extended at a later date,
developed further during the
iterative design process, or parked
and not revisited.
Unable to trace copyright, please contact us if you are the copyright holder.
23
Evidence of critical analysis of users’ needs and wants, with investigation into the problem. Target market is considered and the problem is
understood fully.
24
Both pages show research into existing products, with the evaluation of features of existing designs on the market. All of the research is
focussed and relevant. There is analysis of information rather than just the presentation of information. Learners are reminded that their
evaluation and analysis of the research is the most important factor, not simply presenting raw research results.
25
Disassembling a product helps a learner see how typically similar products are manufactured and assembled.
26
Where appropriate, the
opportunity to look at
other designers,
manufacturers, design
movements and
practitioners can often
bring inspiration and
stimulate styles, colours,
forms and textures. This
research is then used to
inspire learners’ own
designing.
© http://bit.ly/XQ2KUa. This image is used for critical analysis and review purposes under the fair dealings policy
27
Band 4 Assessment Criteria - Identifying design possibilities
Undertaken thorough and effective identification of opportunities for the development of designs within the prescribed context.
Undertaken detailed, relevant research and investigation, clearly linked to the context and, where appropriate, the work of past/present
professionals and companies.
Undertaken detailed and effective analysis of information, reflecting the needs, wants and values of clients or potential users.
Identified a broad range of problems/opportunities to clearly inform the development of possible design briefs.
Learners meeting the four descriptors from Band 4 of the marking criteria deserve 9-10 marks.
(a) Identifying and investigating design 10 AO 1 Opportunities are carefully considered before final brief
possibilities. Understand the task and the needs and wants of users
A clearly defined design brief is evident
(b) Developing a design brief and 10
A detailed specification is generated to drive designing
specification.
Measurable criteria included
The specification is used throughout the designing
(c) Generating and developing design 30 AO 2 process
ideas.
(d) Manufacturing a prototype. 30
(e) Analysing and evaluating design 20 AO 3
decisions and prototypes.
Total 100
28
A clear final brief is presented as a result of the detailed, relevant and
focussed research, following the consideration of a number of possible
design tasks.
This is a detailed specification containing measurable criteria that will be used to drive designing and development. The specification must be used as a
design tool, and any ideas, models, tests, initial prototypes must be evaluated against the specification criteria. There are important features used as
headings with multiple statements within each heading to ‘split’ up the success criteria into manageable aspects. There is a hierarchy of importance and the
learner has split the criteria into Primary and Secondary which clarifies what must be included and what could be included in the final proposal.
29
This specification is slightly weaker than the previous example. The criteria are less developed. The statements do not include such specific details,
and therefore it will be more difficult to begin iterative designing because the content has not been pin pointed clearly. Using ‘….must be brightly
coloured…’ is not specific. There are many bright colours, learners need to name ‘lime green’ if that is what the needs and wants of the users require.
Avoiding basic and simplistic statements is crucial, often small, safe, cheap, aesthetically pleasing are often included in specification criteria, but these
terms offer no meaning in isolation. Sizes need to be in measurable data form, e.g. 250mm x 120mm x 30mm. Cost must include prices in numerical
values e.g. must cost no more than £12.00 to manufacture in a school workshop, and the end product must have a retail price of £18.99. The
development of specification criteria is critical, and will make designing, prototyping, testing and evaluating far easier to conduct.
30
Band 4 Assessment Criteria - Developing a design brief and specification
A learner who meets the descriptors above deserves to be awarded 9-10 marks in Band 4.
31
Assessment Criteria Marks Assessment objective Guidance
Total 100
This aspect of the NEA represents a large proportion of the overall mark allocation, and there will need to be a variety of types of evidence to
achieve high marks here. The iterative approach must allow learners to ‘unpick’ the problem and begin to come up with possible ideas for parts
of the potential solution. There must be a clear ‘think, create, test, evaluate’ cyclic approach to the activities that learners undertake as part of
their generating and developing of design ideas. This culminates in the presentation of the final prototype.
32
A learner could start with some initial ideas for the outcome. This might be an opportunity to think about the problem and possible solution as a
‘whole’.
33
Once a learner has an idea that has potential, it requires testing. Here the learner explores form, aesthetics and size issues in order to establish
a further understanding of the casing issues as part of the engineering design product. There are multiple models in card, foam and HIPS which
are fully evaluated against specification criteria. Refinements are made as a result of analysis, and further iterations are produced and tested.
The introduction of CAD is useful here and supports the modelling, testing, analysing and refining of possible ideas.
34
The function of the device is being developed here. Again in an iterative style, the learner designs, models, evaluates and improves a number
of possible flowcharts to control a PICAXE system for the nightlight. The learner has used a prototype pcb to run different iterations of the
flowchart to test whether the device functions as specified in the specification. Detailed commentary supports decision making.
35
Here the learner uses CAD to develop a pcb for the PICAXE system. There are several iterations showing how the pcb is developing, analysis
and decision making is evident. Analysis shows how the former will be constructed for the vacuum forming process. There are details of the
base, with holes included to ensure the air is removed and the shell fits the base accurately.
36
This page focusses on the construction of the product, the components required and possible costs. Size issues are considered, decisions
made are clearly referenced.
37
This page concentrates on construction of the shell, and how components fit together when assembled. Fine details such as battery pack
holders, holes for screws, and keyhole fittings are finalised. Speaker holes are included, alongside CAMM1 vinyl details for finishing. Again,
there is comprehensive analysis and decision making evident, with detailed annotation of all design decisions.
Within the NEA the learner may interperate the contextual challenges and decide to do a different form of project which may focus on different
content.
38
Initial design sketches for a mechanical toy money box. When a coin is placed inside the money box, the device moves forwards, with the head
oscillating.
39
Further mechanical designs for the possible movement of the tortoise’s The electro-mechanical device is being developed from ‘inside out’ which
head. Pulley systems, crank and sliders and cam and follower is an effective style of iterative designing for products with internal
mechanisms suggested, with detailed annotation and high quality control systems.
sketching.
Battery positions, pcbs, pivot points/levers, external input components all
being configured.
40
Finalising the individual component parts for the
moving money box.
The vacuum formed shell provides space for
internal electronic components and mechanical
parts to achieve the desired function.
41
This example shows final technical details of a proposal, with all CAD CAM data, power and speed settings, and
CAMM1 vinyl detailing.
The final transparency for PCB manufacture is presented, along with the final flowchart to program the pcb.
42
This is the final pictorial presentation of the prototype to be manufactured. A good attempt at generating a 3D drawing of
a complex product. The exploded diagram offers details of how components are assembled, and how electronic devices
are attached to the casing of the prototype.
43
A manufacturing specification page provides evidence of specific specialist tools, equipment and processing that will be
used to manufacture the product.
44
Band 4 Assessment Criteria ─ Generating and Developing Ideas
Considered a range of design strategies, techniques and approaches and applied an iterative design process to generate and communicate
a broad, complex and diverse range of initial ideas.
Identified and considered social, moral and economic factors which are relevant to the context and potential user(s).
Clear, effective and detailed use of testing to evolve ideas and to refine their design decisions.
Developed a detailed proposal, including comprehensive and relevant details of materials, dimensions, finishes and production techniques,
which clearly address all requirements of the design brief and specification.
Demonstrated sophisticated use of a range of skills/techniques to clearly communicate ideas and proposals to a third party.
45
A sequence of stages for the production of the prototype is presented. The stages need to include details about the materials, processes, tools
and equipment that will be used at each stage when making the prototype. Factors such as quality control are good indicators that learners are
mindful of the necessity for a high quality final proto type.
46
The final prototype is a neatly constructed vacuum formed HIPS shell. The learner has used a wood turning lathe to create the
former from layered mdf. There is a laser cut acrylic base so that the HIPS shell fits perfectly and tightly. The bottom layer of
acrylic has again been laser cut, with CAMM 1 vinyl used to create two eyes for the ladybird. Inside, the pcb is of a very high
quality. It has been developed accurately and constructed well with high level skills. There are no burn marks or defects. There
is a battery pack holder which has been cut from a HIPS sheet, heated using a line bender, and set at the desired angle. There
are three LEDs equally spaced and neatly positioned using a pillar drill to create the holes, with LED holders mounting the LEDs
in place. There is a series of holes drilled with a pcb drill to act as a speaker vent. The on/off toggle switch is located at the back
of the product. The LDR is mounted onto the surface of the ladybird and each leg fits through a small pcb drilled hole. CAMM 1
vinyl spots are used to create the spots for the ladybird. The device is fully programmed, works perfectly, to complete a high
quality pre-production prototype.
47
Band 4 Assessment Criteria – Manufacturing a prototype
Clearly communicated comprehensive and relevant details of a logical sequence and achievable timeline for the stages of production and
testing of their final prototype.
Selected and worked with appropriate materials and components to successfully complete the manufacture of their prototype to a defined
schedule.
Used a range of appropriate making skills and processes to produce a high quality functioning prototype that meets the requirements of the
design specification and is fit for purpose.
An excellent understanding of the working properties and performance characteristics of the specified materials and, where appropriate,
demonstrated consideration of surface treatments/finishes.
Selected and safely used specialist tools, appropriate techniques, processes, equipment and machinery with a high level of accuracy and
precision to enable the prototype to perform as intended and fully meet the user's requirements.
48
There are evaluative comments running
throughout the iterative development of the
proposals. The final analysis is clearly
linked to the brief and specification, and
critical and perceptive comments are
evident.
Opinions are sought from others, but there
is little evidence of this. The learner would
benefit from constructing a live user trial,
with photographic/video evidence of the
testing, together with the thoughts, opinions
and comments of those users.
49
There is some evidence of reflection on feedback here, where this learner offers further modifications. This needs to be a
designing/sketching based activity where learners do not simply point out faults, but offers solutions and further refinements
which would develop the final prototype further.
50
Band 4 Assessment Criteria - Analysing and evaluating design decisions and prototypes.
Undertaken a critical, objective analysis, evaluation and testing of their ideas and
decisions whilst applying iterative design processes.
Undertaken a critical and objective evaluation and testing of their final prototype, taking
into account the views of potential users.
Responded to feedback and clearly identified the potential for further development of
their prototype, with detailed suggestions for how modifications could be made.
The learner does not quite meet all of the descriptors here, so cannot be awarded the Band
4 level 16 – 20 marks. The learner deserves a Band 3 mark, which fits between 11 – 15
marks. There is some reference to users and testing, but due to the lack of evidence, and
depth of analysis, 13 marks would be a fair reflection.
Summary of what is required for the iterative design and make task
Final prototype
Informal A4/A3 Formal presentation A3
(fully functioning high quality
sketchbook portfolio
product)
http://www.eduqas.co.uk/qualifications/design-and-technology/gcse/
Design iteration
Definition: A design method based on the process of prototyping, testing, analysing, and
refining a product or process. It is not a method that will follow the traditional linear path to
create a desired outcome but a cyclic one.
51
Interaction of Mind and Hand model Source: Modified from
The Design and Technology Association http://bit.ly/2BtDKJh
The following links are available for you to watch to support and develop your understanding of the iterative process.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16rGwTX4NcM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcFSZGvXtjA
You are allowed to guide/support the learner through the iterative process. The subject teacher should check that the learner selects a problem
that is appropriately challenging and provides the opportunity to address all the assessment criteria. For further details on teacher guidance
please refer to pages 38 – 41of the specification.
52
Component 2 – Further examples of informal sketch pad and formal portfolio for the design and make
53
Focussing on users Relevant research/product analysis
54
Design Brief: Using the concept of the 6R’s design and make a garment out of recycled materials and components for the teenage market.
The product can be casual but fashionable, it could be versatile. The garment could raise awareness of the millions of tonnes of textiles thrown
away each year and how to recycle your old materials.
55
Generating and developing design ideas: Informal sketch pad
A range of initial ideas that meet the design specification and brief – a good starting point. Ideas need to be evaluated and some will be
rejected.
First iteration for example could focus on form, shape and style.
First toile: evidence of modelling could be considered at this point.
56
Any starting point!
Another iteration
focussing on style
details:
Quick developmental
sketches with high
levels of appropriate
annotation.
On-going evaluation of
ideas with lots of ideas
rejected.
57
Good evidence of modelling the ideas:
Consider a mix of practical activity, sketching, CAD/CAM.
Analysis should be perceptive, with thorough testing against the specification.
Lean design: focussing on the most important details!
58
Another iteration
focussing on
functional
development:
Practical testing of
processes for the
construction of the
product. Quick
sketches and
alternative methods
need to be
considered.
Development needs
to be relevant.
59
Alongside the practical testing of construction processes, materials and components should be considered. Appropriate tests should determine
the suitability of materials for example: wash tests, shrinkage, stain resistance, durability and so on.
Decorative processes for example stitched embellishments such as appliqué and embroidery, paint effects, dyes could also be considered as
yet another iteration. Testing leads the way, ideas need to be analysed and developed further or rejected.
Another
iteration
focusses on
functional and
performance
testing.
Materials are
selected and
tested for
suitability. 3D
printing of
component
parts offer
additional
iterations in the
development of
the prototype.
After a number
of iterations
learners should
be drawing
closer to the
final iteration
and chosen
idea for
manufacture.
60
A final prototype before manufacture and opinions of users considered. All important details will have been considered for example: form and
style; dimensions and sizes; materials and components; construction and decorative process and techniques.
61
62
63
Evidence of the iterative process of design albeit at a simplistic level.
There is clear evidence of modelling and testing of ideas.
Some evaluative comments and rejection of ideas.
64
FORMAL PRESENTATION FOLIO
65
A fairly detailed
proposal has been
presented with most
critical dimensions
present.
Information needed on
this page includes:
CAD CAM CNC
data - if it is
appropriate.
Finishing
techniques and
processes.
All material and
component details
needed.
Learners should
consider whether a 3rd
party/manufacturer
could produce the
prototype from the
information provided.
66
Additional technical
details include:
Tools and
equipment for
manufacture.
Specialist
processes.
Quality Control
factors.
CNC/CAD CAM
details speeds
and settings if
appropriate.
All essential
production
information that
would be necessary
for a 3rd party to
manufacture the
same product.
67
Manufacturing a prototype.
68
Final Prototype
A high quality fully
functioning prototype
which demonstrates
highly appropriate
making skills.
The learner has an
excellent
understanding of the
manufacturing
process for this
product.
Specialist processes
and materials have
been used skilfully
with high levels of
accuracy achieved.
A precise outcome.
69
Analysing and evaluating design decisions and prototypes.
FORMAL
PRESENTATION FOLIO
Ongoing analysis is
essential throughout the
iterative process of design
and developing ideas.
70
FORMAL
PRESENTATION
FOLIO
This is an
opportunity for
further design
and
development
that would
improve the
product.
Learners should
respond to
feedback from
users when
considering
improvements.
In the example
shown some
modifications
have been
offered but lack
detail.
71
Identifying and investigating design possibilities.
72
Developing a design brief and specification.
The specification must be used as a design tool, and any ideas, models, tests, initial prototypes must be evaluated against the specification
criteria. There are important features used as headings with multiple statements within each heading to ‘split’ up the success criteria into
manageable aspects. There is a hierarchy of importance.
73
A clear final brief is presented as a result of the detailed, relevant and focussed research, following the consideration of a number of possible
design tasks.
74
Generating and developing design ideas.
INFORMAL Sketchpad
Initial ideas.
Basic concepts.
Scant information.
Starting point.
Lots of ideas
rejected.
Shape/form/
aesthetics.
75
Any starting point!
Think, model, test,
reflect.
Variety of ideas
based on
Specification criteria.
Quick
developmental
sketching.
Annotation provides
details.
Decision making
supports
developmental
iterations.
76
Good evidence of
modelling.
Testing v Spec.
Analysis is perceptive.
Clear decision making.
A mix of practical activity,
sketching, CAD, reflecting.
Dynamic development!
Lean design.
77
Functional development.
CAD used effectively.
Analysis supports
change.
Physical testing.
Full understanding
demonstrated.
Testing leads the way.
78
Re-think based on
testing and
outcomes.
Opinions of users?
Introduce
prototyping.
Solid modelling.
CAD/simulations
Functional/perform
ance testing.
3D printing.
79
FORMAL PRESENTATION FOLIO
80
Detailed proposal.
All dimensions
present.
CAD CAM CNC
data.
Finishing techniques.
Could a 3rd
party/manufacturer
produce the
prototype?
Sophisticated skills
evident here.
81
Manufacturing a prototype.
Details of a
sophisticated
logical
sequence.
Achievable
timeline for
manufacture.
Supports the
manufacture.
82
Here the learner
indicates clearly
sizes and machine
setting for the
making and cutting
of the parts of the
final product.
83
Final Prototype
84
Analysing and evaluating design decisions and prototypes.
85
Both evaluations discuss and reflect on the specification. There should be evidence of modifications which should have been done using
sketches and detailed diagrams of the changes.
86
Further support and resources
There are a free range of digital resources available for centres which can be found on:
http://resources.eduqas.co.uk/Pages/ResourceByArgs.aspx?subId=8&lvlId=0
Command words
To assist teachers when preparing learners for the examination they may like to consider the
following information.
This table is intended to define the command words used in papers and explain how they
are used and what is expected from the learner.
Command Marks Comments
words
Give 1 mark These command words will feature in the early parts of questions.
State These are designed to ease the learner into the question. They need a
simple statement or a short phrase. They do not need elaboration or
Name explanation in the answer.
Describe 2 marks These command words will be commonly used on the paper and will
feature in many questions.
Outline
These questions ask the learner to describe something in detail. The
answer will be in sentences and/or in a list. There is a need for detail in
the answers with elaboration of the answer.
Explain 2 or more These command words will be commonly used on the paper and will
marks feature in many questions.
Justify
These questions are asking the learner to respond in detail to the
question providing a full answer with an explanation. Full and detailed
sentences will be required and will often contain the word "because". A
short phrase will not be acceptable, the learner will need to make a valid
point and justify it.
Evaluate 2 or more These command words will feature towards the end of some questions.
marks
Analyse Evaluate could involve assessing or appraising a situation or
product or material giving reasons to support their answers.
Analyse means examining and dissecting a situation or product
giving thoughtful appropriate reasons to support the answer. It
could include finding logical chains of reasoning.
These questions are designed to test, stretch and challenge the more
able learner. The question requires the learner to make a well-balanced
argument involving both advantages and disadvantages. Extended
writing will be required.
87
Banded descriptors
This form of assessment will be associated with the questions that specifically require an extended answer. It will also be used in questions
where the quality of written communication is to be assessed.
Incorrect/no answer. 0
The following are general examples of questions with information about how they would be marked.
Examples
Question 1
88
The question is a straightforward "give" question so short statements or phrases are needed
and they do not need justification.
Weak answer
Here the learner gives one relevant answer. However they have not attempted to state a
second reason. It is vital that all parts of questions are answered.
Good answer
Reason 1: Makes the paper stronger. (1)
Reason 2: Protects the paper. (1)
Question 2
Eight card handles for a carrier bag can be CAM cut from one A3 sheet of card.
Describe one advantage to the manufacturer of doing this. [2]
What is required?
The question asks the learner to describe an advantage that the manufacturer would gain
from cutting more than one handle from each sheet of card. Short statements or phrases will
not be adequate. A clear description with justification using a sentence or sentences is
needed.
Weak answer
It is cheaper because the handles can be made in batches which reduces costs. (1)
Here the learner gives a relevant answer but the learner does not give any detail of the
advantage.
Good answer
It reduces the cost of making the handles, as there will be less waste material than
cutting one handle from each piece of card. (2)
Here the learner gives a full and detailed answer in a well-constructed sentence.
Question 3
Explain why it is necessary to score printed card that is 500 microns thick before folding it to
make a package [3]
What is required?
The question asks the learner to explain the reasons for having to score card
before folding.
Short statement will not be adequate.
A clear explanation using a sentence or sentences is needed clearly stating a
reason and then elaborating the answer with appropriate reasons.
89
Weak answer
500 micron printed card will not fold easily so scoring the card makes the card able to be
folded. (1)
Here the learner gives a relevant answer but does not give any detail to support their
assertion.
Satisfactory answer
It makes the card easy to fold because it makes a dent in the card where it is to be
folded. (2)
Here the learner gives a relevant answer and does give some detail to support their
assertion. The detailed reason is rather superficial, as it does not explain why the card is
easier to fold.
Good answer
It makes the card easy to fold because it makes a dent in the card where it is to be
folded. This dent stretches some of the fibres and squashes others into a U shape so
that they are ready to fold. (3)
Here the learner gives a full and detailed answer in well-constructed sentences. They show
a detailed understanding of the reasons that allow the process to work.
90
Suggested frameworks for delivery
This GCSE in Design and Technology is designed to be taken by 16 year-old learners following a two-year programme of study
comprised of 120 guided learning hours (GLH). This is reflected in the breadth, depth and challenge of the content that learners will
be assessed against.
Note: Alessi is not part of the specification, it is purely a theme used in the design of the key fob.
91
92
Frequently asked questions
Question Answer
Does this qualification count in performance tables? Yes. This qualification counts within performance tables.
What is the split in the qualification for the exam and coursework 50% for each unit (Exam and Non-exam assessment).
units?
How will the units be assessed? Exam unit – Externally examined (2 hours, 100 marks).
Non-exam assessment (NEA) – Internally marked and externally
moderated (approx. 35 hours, 100 marks).
Will there be any resources available? We are currently working on a website which will include useful
resources, such as information on materials and processes, plus
quizzes for learners. This will be ready for the start of the new
specification.
Does WJEC provide a Scheme of Work for delivering the new We will provide a basic guide to schemes of work but it will be up to
specifications? centres to apply to their own timetable structure.
How is the exam structured? A mix of short answer structured and extended writing questions. All
questions are compulsory.
Forms of questions? The learner will be expected to write formal structured answers, use
diagrams to support answers, complete diagrams etc.
93
How many assessment criteria is the NEA split into? 5 assessment criteria:
- Identifying and investigating design possibilities (10 marks)
- Developing a design brief and specification (10 marks)
- Generating and developing design ideas (30 marks)
- Manufacturing a prototype (30 marks)
- Analysing and evaluating design decisions and prototypes
(20 marks)
Will there be a prescribed workbook for learners to work on? There is no prescribed workbook. Learners are to use a formal portfolio
and an informal sketchbook. This will be to encourage an iterative
approach to design and development of their work.
What should be included within the sketchbook and portfolio? The iterative process is essential to NEA. It is anticipated that centres
will be providing evidence on:
Can the portfolio be purely digital? Yes, the portfolio can be entirely digital. If this is appropriate for the
work undertaken and enables the learner to fully and successfully
address all aspects of the Assessment Objectives. Drawing can be
included, for example, through the use of a stylus and graphics tablet or
by simply scanning hand drawn sketches. There must though be
evidence of a range of design strategies within the e-portfolio.
Will there be set briefs? There will be three contextual challenges made available from 1 st June
in the year prior to the award. They will be designed so that learners
can go down the route of their area of interest. Centres are encouraged
to let the learner decide upon their own design brief.
94
How will the design and make unit be assessed? Internally marked and externally moderated. A WJEC EDUQAS
moderator will visit the centre and look at the sample generated by
the online mark input system. Verbal feedback will be provided
(marks will not be discussed) as well as a written report made
available on results day.
What paper size should be used? We are suggesting that A4 or A3 paper size should be used. Our
recommendation is no more than 20 x A3 (approximately). Please note
this is a recommendation, what we don't want to see is that centres are
making learners do more and more sheets because volume creates
more marks. This will not be the case, it is the quality of the work that is
submitted that will decide upon the marks.
Are teachers able to give guidance? Essential at the start of the NEA, to ensure that the learner does not set
a problem that is unachievable in the time limit.
Can work be taken home? Yes. The majority of the work should be done within the school to
ensure that the assessor is able to authenticate the work as being the
learner's own. We suggest that you only allow the learners to take home
what they are working on and leave the rest of the work in a secure
place within the school.
Are writing frames allowed? No. As soon as you add in framed boxes onto pages it is classified as
leading the learner, which is not allowed.
95
Can a specific making process be done by an outside company? Where a specific making process needs to be done outside the
school or college, each learner must produce their final prototype
or prototypes under 'immediate guidance or supervision'. This
means the prototype(s) have to be produced either:
(i) with the simultaneous physical presence of the learner and the
supervisor, or
(ii) remotely by means of simultaneous electronic communication.
In most cases supervision will be of the form described in (i), but
in some circumstances, for example, if the learner is carrying out a
specialist process away from the centre, (ii) may be more
appropriate.
Can practical work be done at home? All practical work should be completed within the school or college
under the guidance or supervision of the teacher. The final prototype
should be completed within the school or college and not be allowed to
be taken home at any point.
96