Notes in Business Law Corporations
Notes in Business Law Corporations
Roberto C. Sicam and Agencia de R. C. Sicam, Inc. Corporation has the right of succession
vs. Lulu Jorge and Cesar Jorge
G.R. No. 159617, August 8, 2007 A corporation continues to exist perpetually or
for the period for which of the changes in which it
Facts: Lulu Jorge pawned several pieces of formed its membership. Its existence is the death,
jewelry with Agencia de R. C. Sicam to secure a loan insolvency, or incapacity of the individual members.
in the total amount of P59,500.00 on different dates This means the existence of a corporation is
from September to October 1987. The pawnshop independent from the existence of the stockholders or
receipts issued to Lulu Jorge bear the words "Agencia members.
de R. C. Sicam," thus indicating that the pawnshop
was owned by Roberto C. Sicam. On October 19, Corporation has the powers, attributes and
1987, two armed men entered the pawnshop and took properties expressly authorized by law or
whatever cash and jewelry that were found in the incidental to its existence.
pawnshop vault. On being informed of the loss of the
A corporation, being a mere creation of the
jewelry, Lulu V. Jorge requested Roberto Sicam to
law, operates under the doctrine of limited capacity.
prepare the pawned jewelry for withdrawal but the
Hence, it can only perform acts within the powers
former failed to return the jewelry. Thus, Lulu Jorge
expressly granted to it by its charter, those implied
and her husband Cesar filed a complaint against
from such powers expressly conferred, and those that
Sicam seeking, among other reliefs, indemnification for
are incidental to its existence Any act performed
the loss of the pawned jewelry. In his answer, Sicam
beyond the range of such powers is considered ultra
alleged, among other defenses, that he was not the
vires. (See Sec. 44, RCC)
real-party-in-interest, as the pawnshop was
incorporated on April 20, 1987, or about four months Similarities and distinctions between partnership
before the incident and that being so, he was not liable and corporation
as the corporation had a separate personality of its
own. 1. Similarities
Issue: Whether or not the corporate veil may
be pierced. a. Both have a separate juridical personality.
Held: Yes, the veil of corporate fiction may be b. Both are artificial persons, i.e., they have_no
pierced when used as a shield to perpetrate fraud bodily existence, and can only act through
and/or confuse legitimate issues. The theory of agents.
corporate entity was not meant to promote unfair c. Both are composed of a group of persons (with
objectives or otherwise shield them. The pawnshop the exception of a corporation sole and One
receipts issued to Lulu Jorge all bear the words Person Corporation (OPC).
"Agencia de R. C. Sicam," notwithstanding that the
pawnshop was allegedly incorporated in April 1987. d. A partnership, with the exception of a general
The receipts issued after such alleged incorporation professional partnership, is taxed as a
were still in the name of "Agencia de R. C. Sicam," corporation.
thus inevitably misleading, or at the very least, creating
the wrong impression to the Spouses Jorge and the 2. Distinctions
public as well, that the pawnshop was owned solely by
Sicam and not by a corporation. Even Sicam’s a. Manner of creation - A corporation is created
counsel, in his letter dated October 15, 1987 by operation of law, while a partnership is created
addressed to the Central Bank, expressly referred to by the mere agreement of the partners. (Sec. 18,
Sicam as the proprietor of the pawnshop Art. 1767)
notwithstanding the alleged incorporation in April 1987.
b. Number of organizers - A corporation may be dividends or allotments of surplus profits on the
formed singly or jointly with others, but the basis of the shares held. (Sec. 3, RCC)
number should not exceed 15. A partnership may
be formed by two or more persons. (Sec. 10; Art. b. Nonstock corporation - One no part of the
1767) income of which is distributable as dividends to its
members, trustees or officers. (Sec. 87, Ibid.)
c. Right of succession - A corporation has the
right of succession, while a partnership has no 2. As to the state or country under whose laws it
such right. (Sec. 2, Art. 1828) was created
d. Powers - A corporation can exercise only the a. Domestic corporation - One incorporated
powers expressly authorized by law, those under Philippine laws (or one operating within the
implied from the exercise. of such express country under whose laws it was incorporated).
powers, and those incidental to its existence. A
partnership may exercise any power. provided it b. Foreign corporation -One formed, organized
is authorized by the partners and it is not contrary and existing under any laws other than those of
to law, morals good customs, public order or the Philippines and whose laws allow Filipino
public policy. (Sec. 2, Art. 1306) citizens and corporations to do business in its
own country or State. (Sec. 140, Ibid.)
e. Management - A corporation acts through its
board of directors, while a partnership acts Tests to determine nationality of a
through all the general partners each one of corporation
whom is considered an agent of the partnership,
1) Incorporation-test - The nationality of a
unless otherwise agreed. (Sec. 23, Art. 1803)
corporation follows that of the country under
f. Liability of members for debts - The whose laws it was incorporated. This is the
stockholders or members are not liable for the test applied in our jurisdiction as can be
obligations of the corporation, while the general determined from the definition of a foreign
partners of a partnership are liable with their corporation under Sec. 140. Thus, a
separate property for partnership debts. (Sec. 2, corporation formed under the laws of Japan
Art. 1816) is a Japanese corporation or a corporation
formed under the laws of the Philippines is a
g. Commencement of existence - A corporation Philippine corporation.
commences to have juridical personality on the
date of the issuance of its certificate of 2) Control-test - The nationality of a
incorporation. A partnership, on the other hand, corporation follows that of the stockholders
commences to have juridical personality upon the owning the controlling interest. This is
execution of the partnership contract unless a applied during wartime for the purpose of the
different date is set by the partners. (Sec. 18, Art. security of the State. Thus, although a
1784) corporation has been formed under
Philippine laws but the controlling shares are
h. Transferability of interest - In a corporation, a owned by the citizens of X country with
stockholder can transfer his shares to another which the Philippines is at war, its nationality
person without the consent of the other is that of the citizens of X country.
stockholders. (Sec. 62) In a partnership, a partner Consequently, the corporation is considered
cannot transfer his interest to a third person for an enemy corporation and its assets may be
the purpose of making the latter a partner without confiscated to prevent its being used against
the consent of the other partners (Art. 1813), by our country. (See Filipinas Compania de
reason of the element of delectus personae which Seguros vs. Christern, Huenefeld & Co.,
is inherent in a partnership contract. Inc., 89 Phíl 54.)
i. Dissolution - A corporation cannot be 3) Business domiciliary test - The
dissolved without the consent of the State, while a nationality of a corporation is that of the
partnership may be dissolved by the partners. country where its principal business is
(Sec. 117-122, Art. 1830) conducted. Thus, under this test, a
corporation organized under the Iaws of the
United States of America shall be
(Note: Sections and articles pertain to provisions considered a Philippine corporation if its
of the Revised Corporation Code of the principal business is conducted in the
Philippines and the Civil Code of the Philippines, Philippines.
respectively.) (Note: As previously stated, the Philippines
applies the incorporation test, but the control
Classes of corporations
test may be applied.in times of war.)
1. In general Application of the "Grandfather Rule" to
determine nationality of a corporation for
a. Stock-corporation - One that has capital stock purposes of registration
divided into shares and is authorized to distribute
The "Grandfather Rule" is a method by control test or liberal rule. On the other hand, the
which the percentage of Filipino equity in second part of the DOJ
corporations engaged in nationalized and/or
partly nationalized areas of activities, Opinion which provides that "if the percentage of the
provided for under the Philippine Filipino ownership in the corporation or partnership is
Constitution and other nationalization laws, less than 60%, only the number of shares
is accurately computed, and the diminution corresponding to such percentage shall be counted as
of such equity prevented. (SEC Opinion, Philippine nationality" pertains to the stricter, more
1977), The presence of corporate stringent grandfather rule. (Italics supplied.)
stockholders with alien stockholding would 3. As to number of persons composing them
as a result diminish effective control of
Filipinos, if this were not applied. (Integrated
a. Corporation aggregate - One that is
Bar of the Philippines Journal, FQ 1989)
composed of more than one corporator.
The rule applies with respect to the
b. Corporation sole - One composed of only one
registration of the subsidiary if the capital
person, like a bishop or a rabbi, or a "One Person
structure of both the parent corporation and
Corporation".
its subsidiary does not comply with the
60%:40% Filipino to foreign ownership ratio 4. As to whether its purpose is public or private
(i.e., not less than 60% for Filipinos) as in
the illustration (Figure 1) where the foreign a. Public corporation - One that is organized for
ownership in the investing corporation the government of a portion of the State, like
exceeds 40%. In the illustration, a Philippine provinces, cities, municipalities and barangays.
corporation (owned 55% by Filipinos and
45% by foreigners) invests in 70% of the "The true criterion to determine whether a corporation
capital stock of a new corporation is public or private is found in the totality of the
(subsidiary). with foreign investors investing relation of the corporation to the State. If the
the balance of 30%. Thus, when the corporation is created by the State as the latter's own
subsidiary applies for registration, such agency or instrumentality to help it in carrying out its
application will not be given due course governmental functions, then that corporation is
because the Filipino equity will be considered public: otherwise, it is private. Applying the
diminished to as low as 38.5%. above test, provinces, chartered cities, and barangays
can best exemplify public corporations. They are
If both the parent and the subsidiary created by the State as its own device and agency for
corporations comply with the 60%:40% ratio, the accomplishment of parts of its own public works."
the "Grandfather Rule" will not be applied as (Philippine Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
the parent corporation will be considered Animals vs. Commission on Audit, G.R. No. 169752,
100% Filipino. Thus, the application of the September 25, 2007)
subsidiary for registration will be given due
course. b. Private corporation - One that is formed for a
private purpose or end, like San Miguel
Figure 1 Corporation.
Filipino equity in new corporation Private corporations include the following:
(55%x70%) 38.5% 1) Government-owned or controlled
Foreign equity in new corporation corporations - These refer to corporations
From Philippine corporation created by special law (Sec. 4, RCC) other
(45%x70%) 31.5% than those for the government of a portion of
the State, such as the Land Bank,
From foreign investors 30.0% Government Service Insurance System,
Philippine Postal Corporation, etc., and
Total foreign equity in new corporation 61.5% those formed under the Revised Corporation
Code, where the government owns at least a
Total equity 100.0%
majority of its outstanding voting capital
Case stock. They may be performing
governmental or proprietary function.
Narra Nickel Mining and Development Corp.
2) Quasi-public corporations - Those
vs. Redmont Consolidated Mines Corp. organized for profit which are granted a
franchise by the State to perform public
G.R. No. 195580, April 21, 2014 service, such as Meralco.
Held: The first part of paragraph 7, DOJ Opinion No. "The fact that a certain juridical entity is
020, Series of 2005, stating that "shares belonging to impressed with public interest does not, by
corporations or partnerships at least 60% of the capital that circumstance alone, make the entity a
of which is owned by Filipino citizens shall be public corporation, inasmuch as a
considered as of Philippine nationality, " pertains to the corporation may be private although its
charter contains provisions of a public the parent corporation, which has the power to
character, incorporated solely for the public elect its directors.
good. This class of corporations may be
considered quasi-public corporations, which 9. As to whether its shares may be held by the
are corporations that render public service, public or not
supply public wants, or pursue
eleemosynary objectives. While purposely a. Close corporation - One whose articles of
organized for the gain or benefit of its incorporation provide that its shares are limited to
members, they are required by law to a few, restricted as to their transfer, and not listed
discharge functions for the public benefit. in any stock exchange. (See Sec. 95, RCC.)
Examples of these corporations are utility,
b. Open corporation - One whose shares are
railroad, warehouse, telephone, telegraph,
open to the public, such as those whose shares
water supply corporations and transportation
are listed in the stock exchanges.
companies. A quasi-public corporation is a
species of private corporations, but the 10. Other classifications
qualifying factor is the type of service that
the former renders to the public: if it a. Corporation by prescription - One which has
performs a public service, then it becomes a exercised corporate powers for such a length of
quasi- public corporation". (Emphasis time without interference from the State and
supplied.) which, by fiction of law, is given the status of a
(Philippine Society for the Prevention of corporation, such as the Roman Catholic Church.
Cruelty to Animals vs. Commission on Audit, b. Corporation by estoppel - One which is not in
supra) reality a corporation but is considered as one with
5. As to whether its purpose is religious or not respect to those who are precluded by their
admission or conduct from denying its existence.
(See Sec. 20, RCC.)
a. Ecclesiastical or religious corporation - One
formed for a religious purpose. Components of a corporation
b. Lay corporation - One formed for a purpose
other than ecclesiastical or religious. 1. Corporators - Those who compose a
corporation, whether as stockholders or
6. As to whether its purpose is charitable or not members.
2. Stockholders - Corporators of a stock
a. Eleemosynary corporation charity. One
corporation.
organized for public
3. Members - Corporators of a non-stock
b. Civil corporation - One organized for
corporation.
business or profit.
4. Incorporators - Those stockholders or
7. As to their legal right to corporate existence
members mentioned in the articles of
incorporation as originally forming and composing
a. De jure corporation - One that has been the corporation and are signatories of such
created in strict compliance with all the legal document.
requirements and whose right to exist as a
corporation cannot be successfully attacked in a One's name may be mentioned in the articles
direct proceeding for that purpose by the State. of încorporation, but if he is not identified as an
incorporator and is not a signatory thereto, he is mere
b. De facto corporation - One that is defectively subscriber or member. Or an individual may be a
created but there is an actual exercise of signatory to the articles of incorporation but is not an
corporate rights and franchise resulting from an incorporator if he is merely signing the articles to
attempt in good faith to incorporate on the part of represent an incorporator which is not a natural
the members. It has all the powers of a de jure person.
corporation but its due existence can be attacked
directly in a quo warranto proceeding. Promoter
8. As to their relation to another corporation or
1. Concept
other corporations
● A promoter is a person, natural or juridical, who
a. Parent or holding corporation - One which
usually discovers a prospective business and
owns the shares of another corporation and
brings persons interested to invest in it through
having the power, directly or indirectly, over the
the formation of a corporation. Although the law
latter including the election of the directors
does not require the services of a promoter as a
thereof.
precondition to incorporation, a promoter
b. Subsidiary corporation - One whose shares facilitates the creation of the corporation by
of stock are owned by another corporation, called negotiating contracts for its initial operations
including subscriptions to its capital stock,
incorporating the business, and helping e. Unissued capital stock - That part of the
management start operations. capital stock which is not issued or subscribed.
2. Promoter's liability on contracts 2. Legal capital
● A promoter is personally liable for contracts ● Refers to the total par value of all issued par
made for the benefit of the proposed corporation. value Legal capital - shares, or the total cash or
If the incorporation of the corporation does not consideration received for all issued no- par
materialize, the promoter remains personally value shares.
liable. If the corporation is formed, he remains
liable until the corporation ratifies or adopts such 3. Stated capital
contracts, or releases him from liability. The third
person must also agree to absolve him from ● The capital with which the corporation issuing
liability. shares without par value begins business,
increased by any additions thereto, or
3. Corporation's liability on contracts entered into diminished by any deductions therefrom.
by a promoter
d. Paid-up capital stock - The part of the (Note: The Revised Corporation Code
subscribed capital stock paid to the removed the minimum subscription and paid-in
corporation. capital requirements at the time of incorporation.
The above percentages on subscription and
payment are given only for purposes of
illustration. However, the subscription and paid-in 3) Participating preferred stock - Those
capital requirements of 25%:25% apply in case of that entitle the holder to participate with the
increase in capital stock.) holders of common shares in the surplus
profits after the amount stipulated has been
Share of stock paid to the holders of preferred shares.
b. If the exclusive right to vote and be voted for a. Voting and nonvoting shares.
in the election of directors is granted, it must
be for a limited period not to exceed (5) years b. Common and preferred shares.
from the date of incorporation. However, such
exclusive right shall not be allowed if its c. Par value and no-par value shares.
exercise will violate the "Anti-Dummy Law", the d. Classification to ensure compliance with
"Foreign Investments Act of 1991", and other constitutional or legal requirements.
pertinent laws.
Thus, a corporation may classify its shares into
c. The grant of such exclusive right to vote and Series "A", which can be subscribed only by
be voted for in the election of directors to the Filipinos, and Series "B", which can be
holders of founder’s shares will thus deprive subscribed by both Filipinos and foreigners. This
the other shares the right to vote in the classification may be resorted to in order that
election of directors during the term provided foreign stock ownership would not exceed the
for its exercise, although such other shares maximum, say 40%, as provided by law, for
may not be classified as "preferred" or certain corporations.
"redeemable". (See Sec. 6.)
2. The classification of shares, their corresponding
7. Treasury shares rights, privileges, or restriction, and their stated
● Those that have been issued and fully paid for, par value, if any, must be included in the articles of
but subsequently reacquired by the issuing incorporation.
corporation by purchase, redemption, donation
or through some other lawful means. (Sec. 9) 3. Except as otherwise provided in the articles of
incorporation and stated in the stock certificate,
Treasury shares have the following each share shall be equal in all respects to every
characteristics: other share. (This is referred to as the "doctrine of
equality of shares".)
a. They shall have no voting rights as long
as they remain in the treasury. (Sec. 56, 4. Limitations on the issuance of non voting
Ibid.) shares
b. Although they are part of the subscribed a. Only those classified as "preferred" or
capital stock, they are not considered as "redeemable" shares may be deprived of the
outstanding shares. (Sec. 173, Ibid.) voting right, unless otherwise provided in the
c. Since they are not outstanding for being Revised Corporation Code.
owned by the corporation, they are not An instance when shares may be deprived of the
entitled to dividends. (Sec. 42. Ibid) voting right although they are not classified as
d. They may again be disposed of for a "preferred" or "redeemable" is when founders’
reasonable price fixed by the board of shares are issued where the holders thereof are
directors. (Sec. 9, Ibid.) given the exclusive right to vote and be voted for
in the election of directors for a period of five (5)
The price may be less than the par value years.
or the issued price in case of no-par
shares provided it is reasonable. By b. There shall always be a series or class of
reason of this provision, the shares are not shares that have complete voting rights.
considered as watered stock. In other words, not all the shares may be
8. Watered stock deprived of the voting right.
● Those issued without consideration or for an c. Non Voting shares may nevertheless vote in
inadequate consideration. the following cases:
a. Subscriptions to no-par shares shall be This is to ensure that the name adopted by a
deemed fully paid and non-assessable and the corporation is distinguishable from that already
holder of such shares shall not be liable to the reserved or registered for the use of another
corporation or to its creditors in respect thereto. corporation, or is not one already protected by
law or which is contrary to existing law, rules and
Thus, there should be no "subscription regulations. (See Sec. 17, RCC.)
receivable" in the corporate books for no-par
shares subscribed. 2. Drafting and execution of the articles of
incorporation signed by the incorporators.
b. Shares without par value must be issued for a The articles of incorporation must comply with the
consideration of at least P5.00 per share. requirements provided for in Sections 13 and 14.
For par value shares, they may be issued for a 3. Filing of the articles of incorporation with
consideration lower than P5.00 per share, as in the SEC. together with the following documents:
the case of some mining shares which have a par
value of as low as one centavo (P0.01) per share. a. Verification Slip/Certificate authorizing the
use of the corporate name obtained in No. I
c. The entire consideration received for no-par above.
shares shall be treated as capital and shall not be
available for distribution as dividends. b. Treasurer's Affidavit to the effect that the
paid-up portion of the subscription in cash
Thus, when no-par shares are subscribed at a and/or property for the benefit and credit of the
price above the "issued price" (the minimum price corporation has been duly received.
at which no- par shares may be issued as
provided in Sec. 61 of the RCC), the amount in c. Joint Affidavit of two incorporators to change
excess thereof shall likewise be treated as corporate name unless the undertaking to
capital. It is different in the case of par value change the corporate name is already stated
shares because any consideration received in in the articles of incorporation.
excess of the par value may be distributed as d. Endorsement/clearance from a department
stock dividends. (SEC Opinion) of the SEC or other government agencies, if
d. Banks, trust, insurance, and preneed applicable.
companies, public utilities, building and loan e. Payment of the filing, legal research and
associations, and other corporations authorized to other fees.
obtain or access funds from the public, whether
publicly listed or not, shall not be permitted to d. Issuance of the certificate of incorporation
issue no-par value shares of stock. by the SEC.
6. Limitations on the issuance of preferred shares This is the operative act that will confer
juridical personality on the corporation. A
a. Preferences in the distribution of dividends corporation commences its existence and
and in the distribution of corporate assets in juridical personality from the date stated in the
case of liquidation, or such other preferences certificate, which is actually the date of issue.
must be indicated in the articles of (See Sec. 18, RCC.)
incorporation.
(Note: Under Section 13 of the Revised
b. Preferred shares may be issued only with a Corporation Code, the articles of incorporation
stated par value. and applications for amendments thereto may
be filed with the SEC in the form of an
electronic document, in accordance with the 3. Incorporators who are natural persons must be of
SEC's rules and regulations on electronic legal age, and must sign the articles of
filing.) incorporation/bylaws. (Sec. 3, Ibid.)
3) The partnership name shall bear the word 1) The full name or surname of a person may
"Company" or "Co." and if it is a limited be used in a corporate or partnership name if
partnership, the word "Limited" or "Ltd." A he or she is a stockholder, member or partner
professional partnership name may bear the of the said entity and has consented to such
word "Company," "Associates," or "Partners," or use, if the person is already deceased, the
other similar descriptions; consent shall be given by his or her estate;
a. When the name of the corporation is similar to [Note: Quo warranto is a proceeding to
that of an existing corporation or one that is determine the right to the use or exercise of a
protected by law. franchise or office and to oust the holder from its
enjoyment, if his claim is not well-founded or if he
b. When an incorporator is incapable of giving has forfeited his right to enjoy the privilege.
consent. (Castro vs. Del Rosario, 19 SCRA 200)]
4. Some defects precluding the existence of a de Corporation by estoppel
facto corporation
1. Concept
a. Absence of articles of incorporation.
A corporation by estoppel is one which is not
b. Failure to file the articles of incorporation. in reality a corporation but is considered as one
c. Non-issuance of a certificate of incorporation with respect to those who are precluded by their
by the SEC. admission or conduct from denying its existence.
This holds true with respect to both the persons
d. A corporation formed for the exercise of a holding themselves as representing a corporation
profession which, under the law, is not allowed. or believing themselves to be dealing with a
corporation.
5. Illustration of de facto corporation
2. Liability of persons who assume to act as a
Alonzo, Benitez, Cabrera, Dominguez corporation
and Elcano are the incorporators of Superior
Corporation (Superior) whose certificate of All persons who hold themselves as
incorporation was issued by the Securities and representing a corporation knowing it to be
Exchange Commission on November 10, 2020. without authority to do so shall be liable as
On February 1, 2021, Superior granted a credit general partners for all debts, liabilities and
sale to Parcero. When Parcero failed to pay damages incurred or arising as a result thereof.
despite repeated demands, Superior filed a (Sec. 20, RCC)
complaint for collection against him. Parcero
alleged as a defense that Superior had no 3. Lack of corporate personality of ostensible
personality to sue claiming that it was a de facto corporation not a defense in suit
corporation because Alonzo, one of the CORPORATIONS
incorporators, was not of legal age at the time of
incorporation, as evidenced by the birth certificate When such ostensible corporation is sued on
of Alonzo which was presented to the court. The any transaction entered by it as a corporation or
trial court, on finding that Parcero's allegation was on any tort committed by it as such, it shall not be
true, dismissed the complaint against him. allowed to use as a defense its lack of corporate
personality. (Sec. 20, Ibid.)
a. Is Superior a de facto corporation?
4. Third persons contracting with ostensible
b. Was the court right in dismissing the complaint corporation
of Superior against Parcero?
Third persons believing themselves to be
Answers:
dealing with a corporation cannot resist
a. Yes, because all the requirements for the de performance of their obligation on the ground that
facto existence of Superior including the issuance there was in fact no corporation. (Sec. 20, Ibid.)
of a certificate of incorporation by the Securities
and Exchange Commission are present.
5. Examples acts preparatory to the fulfillment of its purpose, such
a. A, B, C, D and E distributed calling cards as entering into a contract of lease for its business site
identifying themselves as directors of "Summit and negotiating with prospective customers.
Corporation", to several individuals during a
Effects of continuous nonoperation for at least five
business conference. In reality, however, no such
(5) years after the corporation has commenced
corporation is registered with the Securities and
operations
Exchange Commission. X, who received a calling
card from A, granted a credit sale of goods If a corporation has commenced its business
amounting to P100,000.00 to "Summit but subsequently becomes inoperative for a period of
Corporation" believing that such a corporation at least five (5) consecutive years. the SEC may, after
really existed. When the supposed corporation due notice and hearing, place the corporation under
was unable to pay, X brought a court action delinquent status.
against it. "Summit Corporation" moved to have
the case dismissed against it on the ground that it A delinquent corporation shall have a period of
had no corporate personality. At that time two (2) years to resume operations and comply with all
"Summit Corporation" had assets of P40,000.00. requirements that the SEC shall prescribe. Upon
compliance by the corporation, the SEC shall issue an
1) Is "Summit Corporation" correct? order lifting the delinquent status. Failure to comply
2) Who, if any, will be liable for the debt? with the requirements and resume operations within
the period given by the SEC shall cause the revocation
Answers: of the corporation's certificate of incorporation. (Sec.
21, second and third paragraphs, RCC)
1) No, "Summit Corporation" is not correct. The
act of A, B, C, D and E of holding themselves as Notice to appropriate government agency prior to
a corporation although none existed estops them suspension or revocation of certificate of
from using as a defense its lack of corporate incorporation
personality to escape liability.
The SEC shall give reasonable notice to, and
2) The assets of "Summit Corporation" amounting coordinate with the appropriate regulatory agency prior
to P40.000.00 shall first be exhausted. Thereafter, to the suspension or revocation of the certificate of
A. B C. D and E. being liable as general partners, incorporation of companies their special regulatory
shall answer for the balance of P60,000.00 at jurisdiction. (Sec. 21, third paragraph, Ibid.)
P12,000.00 each from their respective separate
properties.
b. Refer to the same example. Assume that it was X Board of Directors/Trustees and Officers
who made a charge purchase from "Summit
Corporation". Later, X was unable to pay. As a Board of directors or trustees for a corporation
consequence, he was sued by "Summit
Corporation". X refused to pay on the ground that 1. Board of directors or trustees for a corporation,
"Summit Corporation" had no personality to sue. concept
Is X correct?
The board of directors or trustees is the top
Answer: governing body of a corporation. Although a
No, X is not correct. One who assumes an corporation is a person in contemplation of law, it can
obligation to an ostensible corporation as such, only act through human agents or individuals elected
cannot resist performance thereof on the ground by the stockholders or members. These human agents
that there was in fact no corporation. (Sec. 20. are known as directors or trustees. The directors or
Ibid.) trustees may manage the corporation only when they
are convened as a body The law emphasizes the
Effects of non-use of corporate charter value of decision-making at only after considering the
collective and personal the directors or trustees. For
If a corporation does not formally organize and this reason, a director or trustee cannot bind the
commence its business within five (5) years from the corporation in his individual capacity by virtue of his
date of its incorporation, its certificate of incorporation mere being a director or (rustee. A director, even if he
shall be deemed revoked as of the day following the owns substantially all the stocks of the corporation, or
end of the five-year period. (Sec. 21, first par., RCC) a trustee, canv act for the corporation or bind it in a
Here, the revocation is automatic, no hearing is contract, unless he is granted an authority to act
required. individually by the articles of incorporation, the bylaws,
or a resolution of the board of directors or trustees.
Formal organization includes the adoption of arrived judgments
the bylaws and filing the same with the SEC (if none
had been filed at the time of incorporation), election of 2. Powers of the board of directors, extent
directors, organizational meeting of directors to elect
the president, treasurer, secretary and other officers The board of directors of a corporation has the
provided in the bylaws. Commencement of the following powers:
transaction of its business includes the performance of
a. To exercise corporate powers. or misconduct similar to the those enumerated
in two foregoing paragraphs.
b. To conduct all business of the corporation.
The foregoing is without prejudice to
c. To control and hold corporate property. qualifications or other disqualifications, which
The board of directors must act in good faith and the SEC, the primary regulatory agency. ог the
exercise reasonable care and judgement in the Philippine Competition Commission, may
discharge of its functions. Generally, the board of impose in its promotion of good corporate
directors may perform any act to promote the governance or as a sanction in its
business for which the corporation was formed. administrative proceedings. (Sec. 26, Ibid.)
This authority, however, may be limited by the c. Other qualifications as may be provided in the
Revised Corporation Code itself or other statutes, by-laws. (Sec. 46, Ibid.), such as the prohibition of
the corporation's articles of incorporation or a stockholder whose business competes with the
bylaws, such as in the exercise of acts that corporation from running for seat in the board.
require ratification by the stockholders. (See Gokongwei, Jr. vs. Securities and Exchange
3. Qualifications of directors or trustees Commission, 89 SCRA 336.)
4. Number of directors or trustees
a. For stock corporations, a director must be the
owner of at least one (1) share of stock which For stock corporations, the number should not
share shall stand in his naine in the books of the be more than fifteen (15), while for nonstock
corporation while he is a director. corporations, the number may or may be more than
The bylaws, however, may validly provide for a fifteen (15), except with respect to nonstock
larger number of shares, such as fifty (50) shares educational corporations where the number of trustees
of stock, that one must own before he can qualify must not be less than five (5) nor more than fifteen
as director. [See Sec. 46, par. (f), RCC; (15), provided that the number shall be in multiples of
Government vs. El Hogar Filipino, 50 Phil 399.] A five (5), i.e., either five (5), ten (10), or fifteen (15).
director who ceases to be the owner of at least 5. Term of office of directors or trustees
one (1) share of stock or such higher minimum
number of shares as may be provided in the For stock corporations, directors shall be
bylaws for one to qualify as director, shall also elected for a term of one (1) year, while for nonstock
cease to be a director. corporations, trustees, in general, shall be elected for a
For nonstock corporations, a trustee must be a term not exceeding three (3) years. Each director or
member thereof, except with respect to trustee shall hold office until his successor is elected
independent trustees of nonstock corporations and qualified.
vested with public interest who may not be For nonstock educational corporations,
members of the corporation. (See Sec. 91, RCC) however, the trustees shall be elected for a term of five
Just like a director of a stock corporation being (5) years, with the first trustees so classifying
required to be a stockholder thereof, a trustee themselves that the term of one-fifth (1/5) of their
must also be a member of the corporation during number shall be expire every year, i.e., their terms are
his term. Accordingly. he ceases to be a trustee staggered.
when his membership in the corporation is
terminated by resignation or for any other cause
provided in the articles of incorporation or the
bylaws. (Sec. 91, RCC)
b. A director or trustee, within five (5) years prior
to his election or appointment, must not have
been:
1) convicted by final judgment:
a) of an offense punishable by imprisonment
for a period exceeding six (6) years; or
b) for violation of the Revised Corporation
Code; or
c) for violation of Republic Act No. 8799,
otherwise known as "The Securities
Regulation Code"; or
2) found administratively liable for any offense
involving fraudulent acts; or
3) found liable by foreign court or equivalent
foreign regulatory authority for acts, violations