2ND SEM., A.Y.

'23-'24 | POST-COURSE
EVALUATION
Congratulations for finishing this semester!

We would appreciate your feedback on the course/s that you just have completed this semester.
Your responses will help the seminary enhance the overall curriculum, make changes in
individual courses, strengthen instruction, improve the support we give you, and better align the
courses to seminary's mission and vision.

Please accomplish this 10-15-minute survey on or before May 17, 2024. Please be informed
that accomplishing this evaluation is part of your course requirements. Thank you!

Note: The anonymity of the respondents would be upheld, and the responses would be treated
with confidentiality.

Email*

Course Title or Name*

Spiritual Formation and Professional Growth

Course Faculty*
Aaron Smith
Adonis Gorospe
Aileen Alava-Orillaza (TF)
Alvin Bailon
Amanda Shao Tan
Annabel Manalo
Aristotle Peralta (TF)
Athena Gorospe
Blesscille Guerra-Termulo
Charles Ringma
Cristina Co
Emmanuel Luna
Fernando Lua
George Capaque
James Rodriguez
Joanna Feliciano-Soberano
Jojo Angeles
Jojo Manzano
Jorge De Ramos
Juliet Uytanlet
Kevin Yau
Leoncito Silva
Lorenzo Bautista
Maria Victoria Supan
Melchor Go
Michael Malessa
Noli Mendoza
Raniel Gallardo
Rene Chanco
Rolex Cailing
Ronald Hernandez
Samson Gopez
Samson Uytanlet
Samuel Sumaoang
Stephanie Reloj

Program*
Graduate Diploma in Biblical Languages

Next

Course & Faculty Evaluation

Formational Goals
In this section, you will evaluate the course based on its contribution to your personal formation.

General Areas of Formation*

Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly Agree
N/A
SPIRITUAL FORMATION. The course cultivated my love for God and others, my spiritual
disciplines, and my commitment to Christlike character and obedience.
BIBLICAL & THEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION. The course provided me with sound biblical and
theological bases to guide my thoughts, convictions, and actions as a Christian in the present.
MINISTRY & SKILLS ORIENTATION. The course developed in me servant-leadership, ministry
competence, attentiveness to my own and other's formational issues, and capacity for critical
reflection.
DISCERNMENT & ENGAGEMENT IN SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION. The course helped me to
become critically conscious about social realities and desire to participate in contributing to any
transformational work in our society.
Row 5
SPIRITUAL FORMATION. The course cultivated my love for God and others, my spiritual
disciplines, and my commitment to Christlike character and obedience.
BIBLICAL & THEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION. The course provided me with sound biblical and
theological bases to guide my thoughts, convictions, and actions as a Christian in the present.
MINISTRY & SKILLS ORIENTATION. The course developed in me servant-leadership, ministry
competence, attentiveness to my own and other's formational issues, and capacity for critical
reflection.
DISCERNMENT & ENGAGEMENT IN SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION. The course helped me to
become critically conscious about social realities and desire to participate in contributing to any
transformational work in our society.
Row 5

Do you have any additional feedback on the contribution of the course to your formation
as a follower of Jesus?
Your answer

Course
In this section, you will evaluate the course based on the Design of Instruction, Structure and
Organization, and Assessment.

Design of Instruction*
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
N/A
Learning objectives and outcomes are clearly defined.
Content is available in manageable segments or “chunks.”
Appropriate visual and auditory tools are integrated within course to achieve learning objectives.
Appropriate online instructional tools are used to encourage critical reflection and analysis of
content.
Content and requirements are equivalent to or surpass a face-to-face course.
Learning objectives and outcomes are clearly defined.
Content is available in manageable segments or “chunks.”
Appropriate visual and auditory tools are integrated within course to achieve learning objectives.
Appropriate online instructional tools are used to encourage critical reflection and analysis of
content.
Content and requirements are equivalent to or surpass a face-to-face course.

Structure and Organization*

Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
N/A
Course is clearly organized.
Content is presented in a logical progression.
Course materials are visually consistent throughout course.
Course materials are functionally consistent throughout course.
Course syllabus is available and provides clear expectations for the course.
Course is clearly organized.
Content is presented in a logical progression.
Course materials are visually consistent throughout course.
Course materials are functionally consistent throughout course.
Course syllabus is available and provides clear expectations for the course.

Assessment*
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
N/A
Assignments encourage me to think critically.
Assignments and learning objectives are closely aligned.
Assignments provide me with ample opportunities to practice and apply concepts and skills in
realistic and relevant ways.
Assignment expectations are explicitly communicated, including deliverables, guidelines, and
submission dates.
Assignments encourage me to think critically.
Assignments and learning objectives are closely aligned.
Assignments provide me with ample opportunities to practice and apply concepts and skills in
realistic and relevant ways.
Assignment expectations are explicitly communicated, including deliverables, guidelines, and
submission dates.

Overall*
Poor
 Fair
Satisfactory
Very good
Excellent
How would you rate this course overall?
How would you rate this course overall?

What aspects of this course were most useful or valuable?*

Your answer

What aspects of this course would benefit from some improvements?*

Your answer

Faculty
If the course is taught by more than one faculty, please rate them based on their team-teaching.

Teacher*
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
N/A
Teacher modeled a Christian character worthy of emulation.
Teacher inspired me to love God and others.
Teacher demonstrated mastery of the subject matter.
Teacher exhibited competence in terms of pedagogy.
Teacher was empowering.
Teacher was an effective communicator.
Teacher stimulated my interest.
Teacher answered my questions well.
Teacher was easy to contact.
Teacher modeled a Christian character worthy of emulation.
Teacher inspired me to love God and others.
Teacher demonstrated mastery of the subject matter.
Teacher exhibited competence in terms of pedagogy.
Teacher was empowering.
Teacher was an effective communicator.
Teacher stimulated my interest.
Teacher answered my questions well.
Teacher was easy to contact.

Are there areas where the teacher/s did particularly well?*

Your answer

Are there areas for improvement?*

Your answer

Back

Next

Virtual Learning Environment & Support

Virtual Learning Environment
The Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) is composed of the Learning Management System
(Moodle), videoconferencing tool (Zoom), and chat application (MS Teams/Messenger).

Usability*
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
N/A
It was easy to access the VLE.
It was easy to navigate through the VLE.
Color and texture are used consistently to enhance content, and do not overpower the course
information.
The Moodle desktop and/or mobile app were user-friendly.
The Learners' Guide Course was helpful in terms of getting me acquainted to online learning.
The VLE was maximized by the course.
The overall VLE positively impacted my learning experience.
It was easy to access the VLE.
It was easy to navigate through the VLE.
Color and texture are used consistently to enhance content, and do not overpower the course
information.
The Moodle desktop and/or mobile app were user-friendly.
The Learners' Guide Course was helpful in terms of getting me acquainted to online learning.
The VLE was maximized by the course.
The overall VLE positively impacted my learning experience.

What suggestions would you make to improve the VLE (Moodle, Zoom, MS Teams)?
Your answer

Learner Support
In this section, you will evaluate the assigned course support staff. Choose "N/A" if there is no
assigned course support staff.

Student Support Staff*

Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neutral
Agree
Strongly agree
N/A
Support staff was competent and knowledgeable.
Support staff ensured that my questions were answered.
Support staff was able to communicate effectively.
Support staff was efficient and met my needs.
Support staff was competent and knowledgeable.
Support staff ensured that my questions were answered.
Support staff was able to communicate effectively.
Support staff was efficient and met my needs.

Do you have any comments or recommendations for the Student Support staff?
Your answer

A copy of your responses will be emailed to the address you provided.