The document outlines various corporate governance codes from 1992 to 2011, detailing their focus areas and key recommendations. Key themes include the independence of non-executive directors, the separation of CEO and Chairman roles, enhanced financial reporting, and risk management practices. It also emphasizes the importance of board diversity, shareholder engagement, and ethical business conduct across different governance frameworks.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views4 pages
Codes
The document outlines various corporate governance codes from 1992 to 2011, detailing their focus areas and key recommendations. Key themes include the independence of non-executive directors, the separation of CEO and Chairman roles, enhanced financial reporting, and risk management practices. It also emphasizes the importance of board diversity, shareholder engagement, and ethical business conduct across different governance frameworks.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
Corporate Governance Codes – Summary Table
Code Year Focus Areas Key Recommendations
◾ Majority of non-executive directors (NEDs) Board structure, should be independent ◾ CEO & Chairman roles Cadbury Report 1992 financial reporting, and must be separate ◾ Audit committees should be accountability made up of independent directors ◾ Emphasized financial transparency ◾ Introduced Remuneration Committees (made up Executive of NEDs) ◾ CEO pay should be linked to Greenbury 1995 compensation, performance ◾ Shareholders should be informed Report shareholder rights about director pay ◾ Recommended greater disclosure on executive pay ◾ Advocated principles-based governance instead Principles-based of rigid rules ◾ Encouraged self-regulation rather Hampel Report 1998 governance, board than excessive legislation ◾ Favored greater effectiveness shareholder involvement ◾ Stressed board responsibility over governance ◾ Boards must ensure strong internal control Internal controls, risk systems ◾ Companies must assess & report risks in Turnbull Report 1999 management, annual reports ◾ Encouraged continuous corporate governance improvement in risk management ◾ Integrated risk assessment into business strategy Code Year Focus Areas Key Recommendations ◾ Boards must disclose NED attendance at meetings ◾ Executive directors cannot hold too Non-Executive Directors Higgs Review 2003 many NED roles elsewhere ◾ Boards must have a (NEDs), board diversity mix of skills, experience, and diversity ◾ Strengthened board evaluation processes ◾ Strengthened audit committees ◾ Emphasized Audit committees, independent oversight of financial reports ◾ Smith Review 2003 financial reporting Ensured shareholders trust financial statements ◾ integrity Recommended clearer reporting on audit processes ◾ Merged Cadbury, Greenbury, Hampel, Higgs, and 1998, Corporate governance Smith Reports ◾ Covered board composition, 2003, framework, board Combined Code independent NEDs, and risk management ◾ 2006, structure, risk Updated several times to improve governance ◾ 2008 management Stressed accountability and transparency ◾ Boards must understand & control financial risks Banking governance, ◾ Banks must have stronger risk management risk oversight, Walker Review 2009 frameworks ◾ Introduced the Stewardship Code for shareholder investor engagement ◾ Strengthened board-level engagement risk committees Code Year Focus Areas Key Recommendations ◾ Required annual re-election for FTSE 350 UK Corporate Corporate governance directors ◾ Boards must explain business risks & Governance 2010 principles, board strategy ◾ Executive pay must align with long-term Code leadership success ◾ Encouraged stronger board leadership and accountability ◾ Encouraged institutional investors to actively Shareholder engage with companies ◾ Required transparent UK Stewardship 2010 engagement, investor voting & investment policies ◾ Strengthened Code responsibility shareholder influence on governance ◾ Promoted long-term value creation ◾ FTSE 100 companies must aim for at least 25% Gender diversity, board female directors ◾ Companies should report gender Davies Report 2011 composition diversity annually ◾ Encouraged inclusive recruitment policies ◾ CEOs & CFOs must certify financial statements ◾ US corporate Created PCAOB (Public Company Accounting Sarbanes-Oxley 2002 accountability, financial Oversight Board) ◾ Restricted auditors from Act (SOX) fraud prevention consulting for the same firms they audit ◾ Increased penalties for corporate fraud Code Year Focus Areas Key Recommendations ◾ Introduced "Say on Pay" (shareholders vote on US financial regulations, CEO salaries) ◾ Banks must hold more capital to Dodd-Frank Act 2010 Wall Street reform, risk prevent bailouts ◾ Increased transparency & management accountability for financial institutions ◾ Restricted excessive risk-taking by banks ◾ Set international guidelines for corporate International corporate governance ◾ Covered shareholder rights, 1999, OECD Principles governance best transparency, and board duties ◾ Used as a 2004 practices reference for many national governance codes ◾ Emphasized ethical business conduct ◾ Created global banking governance rules ◾ Banking regulations, Stressed risk management & independent bank Basel 2006, risk management, boards ◾ Strengthened financial stability in global Committee 2010 financial stability markets ◾ Recommended better capital adequacy requirements for banks ◾ Introduced stronger shareholder rights & EU Corporate European shareholder independent boards ◾ Focused on internal controls 2001- Governance rights, corporate & risk management ◾ Aimed to harmonize 2011 Framework transparency governance rules across the EU ◾ Strengthened financial reporting standards