Out 4
Out 4
W
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Psychology
IE by
Amanda Crystal Robles Alonzo M.S.
EV
2023
PR
Approved by:
Nicole Gutierrez, PsyD, Chairperson
Rajeswari Natrajan-Tyagi, PhD
Dumayi Gutierrez, PhD
ii
Dedication
This is dedicated to my son James. Without you, this wouldn’t exist. You reminded me to
continue to follow my dreams and show the world that we belong in these spaces. I will never
forget that walk. I did this for you. I followed my dreams, thank you for that reminder.
James Quirino Robles: “But this is your dream, you can’t give up on your dream. You told me
W
that people like us can do this.”
IE
EV
PR
iii
Acknowledgements
Many people contributed to making this possible. I am forever grateful for my family.
My son who told me to never give up on my dream of getting my doctorate, who reminded me of
who I am and what I am capable of doing. To my husband who saw the strength in me and
continued to believe in me even when I struggled to believe in myself. To my baby brother who
helped hold me together and supported me daily to get me to the finish line. To my mother and
father who without their determination I wouldn’t even have had the opportunity or privilege to
attempt this journey. To my two sisters who continued to hold space for me even when I couldn’t
W
I would like to acknowledge and thank my entire dissertation committee. Thank you Dr.
IE
Rajeswari Natrajan-Tyagi and Dr. Dumayi Gutierrez for being a part of my committee and
seeing the importance of this research. I would like to especially acknowledge the role of my
EV
Committee Chair, Dr. Nicole Gutierrez. I am deeply grateful beyond words for the guidance,
patience, and most importantly the kindness she provided me throughout this process. Without
PR
that guidance I don’t think I would have made it to the finish line. The empathy and kindness
that my chairperson showed me throughout this process was so deeply appreciated more than
This journey has not been an easy one. I hope I can extend to others the love, kindness,
Abstract
The purpose of this transcendental phenomenological study was to describe the experiences of
Black, Brown, Indigenous, or other Persons of Color (BBIPOC) adult women diagnosed with
autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in a romantic relationship. The theory guiding this study was
critical disability theory (CDT). The CDT model (Siebers, 2011; Sztobryn-Giercuszkiewicz,
2020), was suitable for this study since it aims to embrace people with disabilities instead of
viewing them as a weakness that must be fixed. BBIPOC women with ASD are a seldom-studied
population, and as such it is important to understand the lived experiences of these women in
W
romantic relationships. Five themes emerged from the data analysis process: 1) Effects of ASD
study showed that BBIPOC autistic women in romantic relationships are affected by their ASD
EV
and by gendered cultural and societal expectations for women in romantic relationships. This
study may contribute to the current research and shape practical application by providing
PR
understanding of how BBIPOC women with autism describe their experiences in romantic
relationships.
v
Table of Contents:
Dedication ii
Acknowledgements iii
Abstract iv
List of Tables viii
List of Figures ix
CHAPTER I: Introduction 1
Statement of the Problem 6
Significance of the Study 7
Definition of Terms 7
Theoretical Framework 9
W
Statement of the Researcher (Epoche) 11
CHAPTER II: Literature Review IE 15
Gender Differences 15
Late Diagnosis of Women with Autism 17
EV
Autism in a Relational Setting 20
Understanding Intimacy in Relationships 21
Understanding Communication and Social Cues 22
PR
Participant Demographics 42
Data Collection Procedures 43
Data Analysis Procedures 44
Credibility and Trustworthiness 47
CHAPTER IV: Results 49
Findings 52
Theme One: Effects of ASD on Romantic Relationships 53
Sub-Theme: Benefits of ASD on Romantic Relationships 53
Sub-Theme: Drawbacks of ASD on Romantic Relationships 54
Theme Two: Effects of Romantic Relationships on Women with ASD 54
Sub-Theme: Benefits of Romantic Relationships on Women with ASD 54
W
Sub-Theme: Drawbacks of Romantic Relationships on Women with ASD 55
Theme Three: Effects of ASD on Other Relationships
IE 55
Theme Four: Culture and ASD 56
Sub-Theme: Cultural Expectations in Relationships and ASD 56
EV
Sub-Theme: Cultural Messages about ASD 57
Sub-Theme: Culture and ASD Proximity to Whiteness 57
Theme Five: Suggestions for Couples Therapists 58
PR
Summary of Themes 59
Research Question Responses 59
CHAPTER V: Conclusion 62
Summary of Findings 62
Implications of the Study 65
Theoretical 65
Research Implications 68
Clinical Implications 70
Limitations of the Study 72
Impact of the Study on the Researcher 72
Conclusion 73
References 75
vii
W
IE
EV
PR
viii
List of tables
Table 1. Demographics 43
W
IE
EV
PR
ix
List of Figures
Figure 1. DSM-IV-TR Classification of Separate Disorders 4
Figure 2. DSM 5 Autism Spectrum Disorder and Social Communication Disorder 5
W
IE
EV
PR
1
Chapter I
Introduction
The diagnosis autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has gone through many changes over the
years, from a diagnostic perspective and a societal perspective. It is important to understand the
spectrum that encompasses autism not only from an individual viewpoint but also a systemic
one. By understanding how a person with autism relates and interacts with the world we can also
begin to help the world interact with autistic individuals. Understanding autistic individuals on a
systemic level can allow support structures to be implemented so they are able to not just
W
survive, but fully thrive within their personal relationships and society. As with most groups
there are subgroups who are further marginalized, and the autistic community is no different.
IE
Women and girls with autism are diagnosed at an even lesser rate than men and boys, with males
being three times more likely to receive a diagnosis than females who are on the spectrum
EV
(Loomes et al., 2017). Girls and women of color are even less likely to receive an autism
diagnosis than their white counterparts. For example, according to Cutler et al. (2023), compared
PR
to non-Hispanic White residents in eight states in the United States, the prevalence of an autism
diagnosis was lower amongst non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and
American Indian/Alaska Native residents of these states. According to the same study the
prevalence of an autism diagnosis was also higher in boys in all eight US states (Cutler et al.,
2023) According to Roman-Urrestarazu et al. (2022), lower rates of occurrence of autism were
found in Asian, Black, and Chinese girls compared with White girls. Not receiving a diagnosis
translates to not being able to access resources that can be lifechanging for these females. The
disparity goes even further when we take race/ethnicity into consideration. In addition to gender
and race/ethnic disparities in diagnosis, resource provision, and research focus, the vast majority
2
of studies on autism are conducted by neurotypical researchers who do not have ASD, which
may contribute to further “othering”, pathologizing, and stigmatization of people of all genders
with ASD.
There has been a substantial increase in people who were diagnosed with ASD, especially
between the years 2000 and 2014. Beginning in the year 2000, 1 in 150 children were diagnosed
with autism, a rate that had increased to 1 in 59 children by 2014 (Center for Disease Control,
2020). According to Baio et al. (2018), 1 in 54 children are now estimated to have ASD.
Currently one percent of the population is diagnosed with ASD (American Psychiatric
W
Association, 2013). There is limited research on why there has been a recent increase in the
diagnosis of ASD, but there is much anecdotal speculation. While the increased prevalence has
IE
yet to be fully explained, there are four factors that are supported by empirical evidence:
diagnostic definition, diagnostic accretion and expansion, increased awareness of signs and
EV
symptoms of autism, and individual-level risk factors that have increased in frequency (Keyes et
al.,2011). The diagnostic definition for autism has expanded to include four other disorders
PR
(American Psychiatric Association, 2013). In regard to diagnostic accretion, the practices for
diagnosing autism have changed, and this change has led to over a quarter increase of the
diagnosis, specifically for those who may have previously been diagnosed with only mental
retardation (King & Bearman, 2009). Several environmental variables, including advanced
parental age, assisted reproductive technologies, dietary issues, maternal illnesses and disorders,
ambient pollutants and toxicants, medicines, and other circumstances, have been explored in
terms of ASD risk (Emberti Gialloreti et al., 2019). According to Keyes et al. (2011), some
research suggests that the primary causes of the rise in autism diagnoses include variables that
have increased linearly year over year, such as birth cohort composition and characteristics that
3
affect people with higher levels of functioning more severely than people with lower levels of
functioning. (Keyes et al., 2011). More research needs to be done to understand why there has
been an overall increase of autism over the years but until then we are left with hypotheses and
educated guesses.
Disorder’s (5th ed.; DSM-5) the essential characteristic of ASD is persistent impairment with
social communication and interaction. Additional characteristics include restricted and repetitive
W
behavior, interests, or activities (American Psychiatric Association; APA, 2013). ASD symptoms
become present in early childhood and can either limit or impair everyday functioning (APA,
IE
2013). There has been changes to the diagnosis of ASD recently, which as previously mentioned
may be related to the increase in prevalence rates. The DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2021) definition of
EV
ASD was split up into five different categories: Autistic disorder, Asperger’s disorder, Rett’s
disorders, childhood degenerative disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder (PDD). The
PR
DSM-5 (APA, 2013) consolidated four of the disorders (Autistic Disorder, Asperger’s Disorder,
Childhood Degenerative Disorder, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder) into what we now
know as Autism Spectrum Disorder, and a new disorder called Social Communication Disorder
was added. Not only were the subtypes all condensed into one disorder, but certain aspects of
the diagnostic criteria changed. The DSM-5 changed the onset criteria and created a broader
definition of when symptoms are to be presented: in the DSM-IV, the age of onset was specified
to be before 36 months, whereas now it is stated more broadly to be in early childhood (Vivanti,
et al., 2013). This change may account for some of the increased prevalence. Another crucial
change that was made was the addition of repetitive behaviors, as this criterion is the defining
4
difference between Social Communication Disorder and ASD (Vivanti, et al., 2013). Lastly,
another key difference between the DSM-IV and the DSM-5 is that if a child meets criteria for
other disorders, they can now be diagnosed with multiple disorders (Vivanti, et al., 2013). The
reason for the consolidation of multiple diagnoses into ASD was explained to improve the
understanding and the specifics of the criteria for the diagnosis of (American Psychiatric
Association, 2013). The changes made have left some confusion specifically with taking out
understanding what the changes mean and how to assist those who have the prior diagnosis what
their diagnosis is now. The changes in the DSM diagnosis that helped the autism community are
W
the functioning labels. The functioning labels have made it easier to understanding the support
IE
needs that an autistic person may have. The focus transitions to low and high support needs as
opposed to the previous high/low functioning levels (see Figure 1 and 2).
EV
Figure 1
DSM-IV-TR
Autistic disorder
Asperger’s disorder
Rett’s disorders
Figure 2
DSM 5 Autism Spectrum Disorder and Social Communication Disorder
DSM-5
Autism Spectrum Disorder: Persistent
impairment with social communication and
interaction; additional characteristics include
restricted and repetitive behavior, interests,
or activities.
Social Communication Disorder: Persistent
impairment with social communication and
interaction.
W
It is important to note that the European classification system continues to utilize the
IE
diagnosis PDD, because a lack of consistency between usage of the ASD diagnosis and lack of a
cross national definition can have a detrimental effect on research pertaining to ASD (Vivanti, et
EV
al., 2013). Mental health providers and researchers have to be cognizant in new research
regarding ASD as across the globe the diagnosis for ASD is not entirely agreed upon. Apart
PR
from medical and research implications in combining diagnoses, there are also cultural
implications to consider when seeking to understand the autistic community. For example, while
the DSM may have eliminated Asperger’s as a distinct diagnosis, according to Vivanti, et al.
(2013), many people with Asperger’s consider themselves as part of a community with their own
“Aspie” culture as opposed to having a disability, and very much continue to identify with the
term. Therefore, it is important to separate the medical diagnosis from the cultural or personal
identity of individuals in this community. There are many different factors to take into
consideration when understanding ASD and the changes made by the DSM-5.
6
As noted previously,1 in 54 children are currently estimated to have ASD (Baio et al.,
2018; Maenner et al., 2020), and ASD is diagnosed more than four times as frequently in boys as
it is in girls (American Psychiatric Association, 2021). There is no general consensus in the field
as to precisely why these gender differences in prevalence rates exist (Loomes et al., 2017). For
example, these prevalence rates could be related to a variety of factors, including differences in
gender socialization and gender role expectations, different presentations of traits in males vs.
females, as well as biases amongst clinicians who are assessing for and/or administering mental
health diagnoses, and lack of understanding of the etiology of the disorder. While there is an
W
abundance of research on autism, most of the research is on children and males; there is less
IE
research on adults with autism, and little research that focuses specifically on adult females who
have been diagnosed with ASD (Cridland et al., 2013). There is also not a lot of research that
EV
explores cultural differences in perceptions of autism (Freeth et al., 2014; Maenner et al., 2020;
Matson et al., 2017; Tek & Landa, 2012) and even fewer studies that focus on the intersection of
gender and culture in the presentation of and relational implications of ASD. The problem is that
PR
little is known about Black, Brown, Indigenous, or other Persons of Color (BBIPOC) adult
women with autism in general and even less so in regard to how the experience of autism affects
The present qualitative phenomenological study seeks to understand the lived experiences
of adult BBIPOC women with autism, and the relational and cultural implications of their
diagnosis. The central research question is What are the lived experiences of adult BBIPOC
women with autism spectrum disorder in romantic relationships? Sub-questions include: 1) How
does having ASD affect adult BBIPOC women’s romantic relationships?, 2) How do the
7
romantic relationships of adult BBIPOC women with ASD affect their experience of ASD?, and
3) How do culture and cultural gender role expectations affect the experience of ASD in adult
This research may contribute to the present body of knowledge on ASD in that it can
provide BBIPOC adult women diagnosed with autism an opportunity to describe their
experiences with autism in the context of their culture and their relationships. There is a need to
better understand the experiences of women with autism in order to better serve this population
in clinical practice (Bargiela et al., 2016). The present study hoped to illuminate a new
W
dimension of how BBIPOC women with autism experience relationships: it can provide insight
IE
on how being autistic impacts their romantic relationships and how their relationships impact
their coping with the diagnosis. Significant others, family members, and friends of those with
EV
autism may benefit from this research as the study may provide them better insight into how to
support their loved ones with autism. The study may also benefit those in the mental health field
by providing information to assist clinicians and other healthcare providers in better supporting
PR
their clients who are experiencing relational issues from a more culturally aware perspective.
Definition of Terms
There are many important terms that are specific to ASD research and/or the ASD
cultural community. It is important from a clinical perspective to use the preferred language of
the client. For the purpose of research, the terms that are most widely understood either in the
literature or in the ASD community will be used throughout. For example, some people in the
community prefer to use person first language, such as a person with autism, whereas other
people in the community find this to be an ableist denial of an important aspect of who they are.
8
These people prefer to use the language Autistic, or, on the spectrum. Throughout this
manuscript both person first and diagnosis first language will be used in order to honor the
diversity of preference within the autism community. Other important terms that are essential for
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) - According to the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA;
2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder’s (5th ed.; DSM-5), autism spectrum
communication and social interaction as well as limited, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests,
or activities.
W
Asperger’s Syndrome (AS) – The DSM-IV defined Asperger’s Disorder as a manifestation of a
IE
Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) (Attwood, 2015). A person who would have been
previously diagnosed with Asperger’s Syndrome would now be classified as autism spectrum
EV
disorder (ASD) without language or cognitive impairment. The key features of Asperger’s
Syndrome are deficits in social comprehension, including difficulty establishing and keeping
friends, detection of social and emotional signals, emotional understanding and control, and
PR
capacity to recognize others' thoughts and feelings (Attwood, 2006). Communication and
conversational difficulties, as well as the person's proclivity to create areas of expertise and
High functioning autism – High functioning autism is not and was never a diagnosis. It is a term
used to describe individuals diagnosed autism that have typical intellectual abilities/no cognitive
impairments, which is now known as level one autism spectrum disorder (Ghaziuddin &
Mountain-Kimchi, 2004). High functioning autism also is sometimes used synonymously with
Neurodiversity – A group of people who are considered to have a wide variety of different
W
Zimmerman, 2020).
IE
Camouflaging- Strategies for helping people with autism adjust to social situations and conceal
characteristics that may stand out to people without autism (Milner et al., 2022).
EV
Masking- The suppression of autistic behaviors, such as refraining from lengthy conversation on
a given subject or mastering the art of looking someone between the eyes to simulate eye contact
Theoretical Framework
The conceptualization of this study was influenced by Critical disability theory (CDT),
which is a contemporary theoretical framework for studying and analyzing disability issues.
Disability studies is a multidisciplinary field of social and political research that straddles
disciplines including sociology, social policy, political science, literary theory, history, and
philosophy (Mladenov, 2014). Critical Disability Theory states that in research and in practice
one should consider ableist societal norms that permeate all systems of interaction, and how
these norms can privilege able bodied and neurotypical people and disenfranchise cognitively or
10
research and clinical practice, the researcher and/or clinician should directly address the
discourses that marginalize disabled people. For example, clinicians who are not aware of their
ableist biases may not assess sexual satisfaction in clients who are disabled because it does not
occur to them that disabled people have active sex lives just like their able-bodied clients do.
Similarly, able bodied and neurotypical researchers may approach research on disabled
communities from the lens that intervention is needed within these communities to support them
in assimilating to ableist expectations of functionality rather than considering ways in which the
privileged groups can better accommodate, normalize, and represent physical disabilities and
W
neurodiversity. There are three intertwined goals of Critical Disability Theory (Siebers, 2011).
IE
First, it seeks to include ability/disability as an interesting factor of diversity in conversations
about critical and cultural theory. Secondly, it seeks to directly acknowledge the disabled body
EV
which allows for representation and challenges ableist discomfort around disability. The third
goal is to have disability be conceptualized in the literature as a minority identity with unique
qualities that can contribute to the progress of minority studies as a whole (Siebers, 2011).
PR
disabilities (which are more often physical disabilities) to the less visible or even invisible
neurocognitive disabilities. The hope in conceptualizing autism from the perspective of CDT is
that it will help challenge misconceptions about those who are on the spectrum from a deficit
driven worldview (Glynne-Owen, 2010). CDT accepts diversity in all aspects, including ability,
as a natural occurrence that should be appreciated and respected, rather than seeing disabilities as
undesirable qualities to be eradicated (Siebers, 2011). Despite the fact that autism is
a neurological disorder, few researchers have employed CDT as a theoretical framework for
11
understanding people with ASD (APA, 2013). The present study sought to assist in filling that
gap. In 2010 critical autism studies emerged out of CDT to address the need to reframe
concentrating on the impairments associated with autism, CDT embraces the neurodiversity of
autism as a sequence of strengths rather than weaknesses (O’dell et al., 2016). From a CDT lens
late diagnosis can lead to increased systemic inequities experienced as a result of not having
access to resources and accommodations that become available upon diagnosis. Late diagnosis
may also be the result of ableist gender biases about ASD symptoms in girls and women, which
can put undue pressure on these BBIPOC girls and women to develop strengths and resilience
W
out of a need to cope with the world around them that is not adjusted to accommodate them.
IE
Reviewing CDT has impacted my worldview regarding all abilities but has especially influenced
the way that I conceptualize autism in both personal relationships and clinical practice. The
EV
present study was informed by CDT in that it seeks to depathologize and destigmatize the adult
woman with autism and aims give a platform for participants to talk about their lived experiences
This research will be conducted with the hopes of gaining a deeper understanding of how
women with autism experience romantic relationships. As a Latina woman with autism raising a
Latino son with autism, I have always wondered about the experiences of other women with
autism in their relational settings. Through raising my son, I have gained an in-depth crash
course on how autism can affect a family system from the perspective of the parent. With my
own late diagnosis of autism, I came to understand my own struggles and the effect autism has
had on my family system and romantic relationships from the perspective of the person on the
12
spectrum. It is important to also address the intersection of my Latina ethnicity and my diagnosis
of autism because that adds a layer onto my lived experiences with the diagnosis. When I was
first diagnosed as an adult and was searching for information to help me learn about my own
neurodiversity, I was keenly aware that much of the information I came across was directed
toward parents of children on the spectrum (rather than adults on the spectrum themselves), or it
was largely derived from the experiences of males with autism, and/or the information came
from a cis gendered white male perspective. Most of the information I initially encountered on
autism did not represent me or my experiences as an adult Latina woman. This lack of
information of what autism looks like in BBIPOC females is why I suspect my diagnosis went
W
unnoticed for so long. My mom had concerns for me at a very young age but they were
IE
dismissed due to oldwives tales in my culture and a lack of being able to have access to doctors.
Due to my lack of speech my mom thought I was deaf until the age of 4. I was put in speech
EV
classes in school because even the school recognized I was delayed but it was dismissed as
anything other than the school thinking English was my second language (even though they were
informed it wasn’t). Being a quite Latina female growing up wasn’t viewed as abnormal, even
PR
into adulthood those same stereo types persisted. In basic training my sergeant made me and
another Latina stand in front of our unit and pointed out how ‘Latina’s struggle with eye contact
and speaking up’, in the military eye contact and a loud commanding voice were essential. These
are just a few of my experiences that I believe attributed to being undiagnosed until adulthood. It
wasn’t until my son was diagnosed that my family system even knew about and understood what
autism was.
I am currently a licensed marriage and family therapist with my own private practice, and
I work with adults who are on the spectrum. Through this clinical work, my interest in autism
13
research has deepened even more. Through my work with my adult clients who are autistic, I
have seen the struggles my clients have had when attempting to gain support from their
significant others. I have witnessed their stories and their challenges and have often wondered if
the struggles for women with autism are always so similar; it seemed like there were many
similarities in the stories that I heard, but all I had to go off of were anecdotes. Hearing the
stories of my clients is what motivated me to conduct this research, and I felt as though it would
be important to contribute to the field of autism research specifically as a woman of color who is
While my own experiences give me insight regarding the experience of a woman on the
W
spectrum, I am aware of how my own biases may impact the way I conduct this research. For
IE
example, my own experiences with masking in romantic relationships has shaped the way I
culture and late diagnosis, such as my symptoms of autism being dismissed as old wives’ tales
can also lead me to assume all BBIPOC women experienced cultural challenged in a similar
PR
regard. Another instance would be because I struggled to cope with my diagnosis, I may also
participants. One way that I will deal with this issue will be to constantly and consistently check
in with myself through a reflexive journaling process. I did so throughout the proposal process of
this study and continued to evaluate my self-of-the-researcher experiences and potential biases
with my dissertation chair throughout the data collection and analysis stages as well. I answered
my interview questions in a reflection process with my chair in order to further bracket out my
14
biases and identify my assumptions about the phenomenon, this research is important to me on
multiple levels, and I believe that qualitative research conducted by those who are members of
the community that experience the phenomenon in question can add an incredible amount of
value to the research. My hope is that this study will potentially benefit the lives of those living
with autism, and that it will add representation of diverse voices in autism research.
W
IE
EV
PR
15
CHAPTER II
Literature Review
There is a breadth of research on ASD that largely focuses on prevalence and treatment
of the diagnosis. The treatment of autism typically focuses on assisting autistic people in
assimilating their behavior to fit the dominant neurotypical cultural norms. Because the
phenomenon of interest for this study was the cultural and relational experiences of BBIPOC
autistic women from a Critical Disability Theory perspective, the literature review will focus
mostly on research that has attended to gender, culture, and relational impacts of the diagnosis,
rather than intervention. A more in-depth application of CDT as it applies to autism research will
W
also be included.
Gender Differences
IE
We know that more people are becoming aware of what autism is and are seeking
EV
services as a result (Keyes et al., 2011). We know that there is a racial gap that continues to
persist amongst ASD diagnosis (Cutler et al., 2023). There also continues to be a gender gap, as
PR
a diagnosis of ASD is three to four times more common amongst boys than girls (APA, 2013;
Baio et al., 2018). Studies on women and girls with a diagnosis of autism are extremely limited.
The reason for limited research may be due to girls being diagnosed less frequently than their
presentation is difficult to research. The last twenty years of autism research does, however,
show a slight decrease in male predominance (Cridland et al., 2013). According to the DSM-5
(APA, 2013) in clinical samples, females diagnosed with ASD are more likely to have an
intellectual disability, which suggests that females who are diagnosed tend to be on the higher
end of the severity spectrum. Females without an intellectual disability or language delay may go
Reproduced with permission of copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.