The document provides instructions for evaluating statements as TRUE, FALSE, or NOT GIVEN based on various reading passages. It covers topics such as programmable plants in synthetic biology, traditional navigation methods used by Mau Piailug, cultural customs for overseas students, the development of cuneiform writing, and the opposition to the Nagymaros dam project. Each section includes specific tasks to assess comprehension of the provided information.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views14 pages
Ielts Reading 5
The document provides instructions for evaluating statements as TRUE, FALSE, or NOT GIVEN based on various reading passages. It covers topics such as programmable plants in synthetic biology, traditional navigation methods used by Mau Piailug, cultural customs for overseas students, the development of cuneiform writing, and the opposition to the Nagymaros dam project. Each section includes specific tasks to assess comprehension of the provided information.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14
IELTS READING 5: TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN
YES / NO / NOT GIVEN
A. STEP-BY-STEP INSTRUCTION Task 1 a) Read these statements and find the words in italics in the passage. - The scientists are using a technique from electronics to control specific plant properties. - Some synthetic biologists work with genetic circuits of mammals. - Most of synthetic biologists work with mammals. b) Now decide if the statements above are TRUE, FALSE or NOT GIVEN according to the passage. Choose TRUE if the statement agrees with with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the information NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this Programmable plants In electronics, even the most advanced computer is just a complex arrangement of simple, modular parts that control specific functions; the same integrated circuit might be found in an iPhone, or in an aircraft. Biologists are creating this same modularity in – wait for it – plants, by designing gene "circuits" that control specific plant characteristics – color, size, resistance to drought, you name it. The relatively new, interdisciplinary field is synthetic biology – the design of genetic circuits, just like in electronics, that control different functions and can be easily placed in one organism or the next. Most of today's synthetic biologists work with simple microorganisms, like E. coli or yeast. A CSU team led by June Medford, professor of biology, and Ashok Prasad, associate professor of chemical and biological engineering, is doing the same thing, but in the much more complex biological world of plants. Task 2 a) Read the statements 1-7 below and: b) Decide if the statements are TRUE, FALSE, or NOT GIVEN 1 At the time of his voyage, Mau had unique navigational skills. 2 Mau was familiar with the sea around Tahiti. 3 Mau thought it would be difficult to use a compass and charts. 4 Mau’s grandfather was his only teacher. 5 Mau used stones to learn where each star was situated in the sky. 6 The first inhabitants of Hawaii could read and write. 7 Mau expected his students to memorise the positions of the stars. Mau Piailug, ocean navigator Mau sailed from Hawaii to Tahiti using traditional methods. In early 1976, Mau Piailug, a fisherman, led an expedition in which he sailed a traditional Polynesian boat across 2,500 miles of ocean from Hawaii to Tahiti. The Polynesiai Voyaging Society had organised the expedition. Its purpose was to find out if seafarers in the distant past could have found their way from one island to the other without navigational instruments, or whether the islands had been populated by accident. At the time, Mau was the only man alive who knew how to navigate just by observing the stars, the wind and the sea. He had never before sailed to Tahiti, which was a long way to the south. However, he understood how the wind and the sea behave around islands, so he was confident he could find his way. The voyage took him and his crew a month to complete and he did it without a compass or charts. His grandfather began the task of teaching him how to navigate when he was still a baby. He showed him pools of water on the beach to teach him how the behaviour of the waves and wind changed in different places. Later, Mau used a circle of stones to memorise the positions of the stars. Each stone was laid out in the sand to represent a star. The voyage proved that Hawaii’s first inhabitants came in small boats and navigated by reading the sea and the stars. Mau himself became a keen teacher, passing on his traditional secrets to people of other cultures so that his knowledge would not be lost. He explained the positions of the stars to his students, but he allowed them to write things down because he knew they would never be able to remember everything as he had done. B. PRACTICE I. TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN Exercise 1: Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Next to questions 1-8 write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the information NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this 1 People may sympathise with you about how difficult it is to study English. ................. 2 People will be angrier if you don’t understand their language than if you don’t understand their customs. ................. 3 Japanese people think it is impolite to blow your nose around other people. ................. 4 It’s a good idea to find out about the habits of the people where you are going to live. ................. 5 It’s impolite to use chopsticks with your left hand. ................. 6 Italian meals usually consist of several courses. ................. 7 Muslims will think you don’t know how to behave appropriately if you use your left hand for eating. ................. 8 In Britain, shaking hands is equally common in business and social situations. ................. Handy hints for overseas students and travellers A Studying abroad, or simply planning a nice trip to an exotic location? Unfortunately, while people might be understanding if you have problems with their language, they are less likely to be forgiving if you break the unwritten social rules. Did you know, for example, that in Japan it is considered rude to blow your nose in public (and heaven forbid you put your cotton handkerchief back in your pocket!)? You might also be studying (and socialising) with people from all over the world. A few helpful tips will ensure you avoid upsetting your hosts, or even your fellow students! B The best advice we can give you is to learn some of the local customs of the people you will be spending time with. Let’s say you have arrived in Asia and you’re sharing a meal with new-found friends. You might feel very satisfied with yourself if you can use chopsticks when you’re eating, but make sure you don’t point with them. Many Asians consider it rude. And don’t forget to check who should start the meal first: you or your hosts. Different countries have different ‘rules’ about this. Speaking of food, when eating in certain provinces of China, it is considered bad luck to turn over a cooked fish. And Italians like it when you show your appreciation of their cooking, so never refuse a second plateful! C Behaviour connected with the body can be confusing because of social differences. In Muslim cultures, for example, people avoid using the left hand to give and receive. Many people in these cultures eat only with the right hand and they might consider you impolite if you use your left. But if you are given a business card in a country like Singapore, and you don’t accept it with both hands, you’ll be showing disrespect and a lack of interest in the person giving the card. In Britain, shaking hands is common between business people but is becoming less common in social situations these days (and then often only the first time you are introduced). The Italians kiss and shake hands (but be careful, it’s twice – once on each cheek), the Belgians may kiss three times, alternating from cheek to cheek, and the French? Well, whole books have been devoted to the subject! Exercise 2: Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage? In boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet, write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the information NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this 1 Cuneiform tablets were produced in different shapes and sizes. 2 When Sumerian writers marked on the clay tablets, the tablets were dry 3 Cuneiform was often difficult to read because of its size. 4 A number of languages adopted cuneiform. 5 Cuneiform signs, can be found in some modern alphabets. An important language development Cuneiform, the world’s first known system of handwriting, originated some 6.000 years ago in Summer in what is now southern Iraq. It was most often inscribed on palm-sized, rectangular clay tablets measuring several centimetres across, although occasionally, larger tablets or cylinders were used. Clay was an excellent medium for writing. Other surfaces which have been employed - for example, parchment, papyrus and paper - are not long - lasting and are easily destroyed by fire and water. But clay has proved to be resistant to those particular kinds of damage. The word ‘cuneiform’ actually refers to the marks or signs inscribed in the clay. The original cuneiform signs consisted of a series of lines - triangular, vertical, diagonal and horizontal. Sumerian writers would impress these lines into the wet clay with a stylus - a long, thin, pointed instrument which looked somewhat like a pen. Oddly, the signs were often almost too small to see with the naked eye. Cuneiform signs were used for the writing of at least a dozen languages. This is similar to how the Latin alphabet is used today for writing English, French, Spanish and German for example. Before the development of cuneiform, tokens were used by the Sumerians to record certain information. For example, they might take small stones and use them as tokens or representations of something else, like a goat. A number of tokens, then, might mean a herd of goat. These tokens might then be placed in a cloth container and provided to a buyer as a receipt for a transaction, perhaps five tokens for five animals. It was not that different from what we do today when we buy some bread and the clerk gives us back a piece of paper with numbers on it to confirm the exchange. By the 4th century BCE, the Sumerians had adapted this system to a form of writing. They began putting tokens in a container resembling an envelope, and now made of clay instead of cloth. They then stamped the outside to indicate the number and type of tokens inside. A person could then ‘read’ what was stamped on the container and know what was inside. Gradually, Sumerians developed symbols for words. When first developed, each symbol looked like the concrete thing it represented. For example, an image which resembled the drawing of a sheep meant just that. Then another level of abstraction was introduced when symbols were developed for intangible ideas such as ‘female’ of ‘hot’ or ‘God’. Cuneiform, in other words, evolved from a way used primarily to track and store information into a way to represent the world symbolically. Over the centuries, the marks became ever more abstract, finally evolving into signs that looked nothing like what they referred to, just as the letters ‘h-o-u-s-e’ have no visual connection to the place we live in. At this last stage in the evolution of cuneiform, the signs took the form of tringles, which became common cuneiform signs. As the marks became more abstract, the system became more efficient because there were fewer marks a ‘reader’ needed to learn. But cuneiform also became more complex because society itself was becoming more complex, so there were more ideas and concepts that needed to be expressed. However, most linguists and historians agree cuneiform developed primarily as a tool for accounting. Of the cuneiform tablets that have been discovered, excavated and translated, about 75 percent contain this type of practical information, rather than artistic or imaginative work. Cuneiform writing was used for thousands of years, but it eventually ceased to be used in everyday life. In fact, it died out and remained unintelligible for almost 2.000 years. In the late 19th century, a British army officer, Henry Rawlinson, discovered cuneiform inscriptions which had been carved in the surface of rocks in the Behistun mountains in what is present-day Iran. Rawlinson made impressions of the marks on large pieces of paper, as he balanced dangerously on the surrounding rocks. Rawlinson took his copies home to Britain and studied them for years to determine what each line stood for, and what each group of symbols meant. He found that in the writing on those particular rocks every word was repeated three times in three languages: Old Persian, Elamite and Babylonian. Since the meanings in these languages were already known to linguists, he could thus translate the cuneiform. Eventually, he fully decoded the cuneiform marks and he discovered that they described the life of Darius, a king of the Persian Empire in the 5th century BCE. Exercise 3: Do the following statements reflect the claims of the writer in Reading Passage ? In boxes 1-5 on your answer sheet, write TRUE if the statement agrees with the information FALSE if the statement contradicts the information NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this 1 Janos Vargha predicted that the Nagymaros dam would wreck the natural atmosphere before it was built. 2 The Nagymaros dam’s project was managed by the Russians only. 3 The Danube Circle was an unauthorised group for opposing the dam. 4 The Politburo accepted Vargha as editor of the Hungarian edition. 5 The human rights Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia accepted green thoughts. The Nagymaros Dam When Janos Vargha, a biologist from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, began a new career as a writer with a small monthly nature magazine called Buvar, it was 9 years after the story behind the fall of the Berlin Wall had started to unfold. During his early research, he went to a beauty spot on the river Danube outside Budapest known as the Danube Bend to interview local officials about plans to build a small park on the site of an ancient Hungarian capital. One official mentioned that passing this tree-lined curve in the river, a popular tourism spot for Hungarians was monotonous. Also, it was to be submerged by a giant hydroelectric dam in secret by a much-feared state agency known simply as the Water Management. Vargha investigated and learned that the Nagymaros dam (pronounced “nosh-marosh”) would cause pollution, destroy underground water reserves, dry out wetlands and wreck the unique ecosystem of central Europe’s longest river. Unfortunately, nobody objected. “Of course, I wrote an article. But there was a director of the Water Management on the magazine’s editorial board. The last time, he went to the printers and stopped the presses, the article was never published. I was frustrated and angry, but I was ultimately interested in why they cared to ban my article,” he remembers today. He found that the Nagymaros dam was part of a joint project with neighbouring Czechoslovakia to produce hydroelectricity, irrigate farms and enhance navigation. They would build two dams and re-engineer the Danube for 200 kilometres where it created the border between them. “The Russians were working together, too. They wanted to take their big ships from the Black Sea right up the Danube to the border with Austria.” Vargha was soon under vigorous investigation, and some of his articles got past the censors. He gathered supporters for some years, but he was one of only a few people who believed the dam should be stopped. He was hardly surprised when the Water Management refused to debate the project in public. After a public meeting, the bureaucrats had pulled out at the last minute. Vargha knew he had to take the next step. “We decided it wasn’t enough to talk and write, so we set up an organization, the Danube Circle. We announced that we didn’t agree with censorship. We would act as if we were living in a democracy.” he says. The Danube Circle was illegal and the secret publications it produced turned out to be samizdat leaflets. In an extraordinary act of defiance, it gathered 10,000 signatures for a petition objecting to the dam and made links with environmentalists in the west, inviting them to Budapest for a press conference. The Hungarian government enforced a news blackout on the dam, but articles about the Danube Circle began to be published and appear in the western media. In 1985, the Circle and Vargha, a public spokesman, won the Right Livelihood award known as the alternative Nobel prize. Officials told Vargha he should not take the prize but he ignored them. The following year when Austrian environmentalists joined a protest in Budapest, they were met with tear gas and batons. Then the Politburo had Vargha taken from his new job as editor of the Hungarian version of Scientific American. The dam became a focus for opposition to the hated regime. Communists tried to hold back the waters in the Danube and resist the will of the people. Vargha says, “Opposing the state directly was still hard.” “Objecting to the dam was less of a hazard, but it was still considered a resistance to the state.” Under increasing pressure from the anti-dam movement, the Hungarian Communist Party was divided. Vargha says, “Reformists found that the dam was not very popular and economical. It would be cheaper to generate electricity by burning coal or nuclear power.” “But hardliners were standing for Stalinist ideas of large dams which mean symbols of progress.” Environmental issues seemed to be a weak point of east European communism in its final years. During the 1970s under the support of the Young Communist Leagues, a host of environmental groups had been founded. Party officials saw them as a harmless product of youthful idealism created by Boy Scouts and natural history societies. Green idealism steadily became a focal point for political opposition. In Czechoslovakia, the human rights of Charter 77 took up environmentalism. The green-minded people of both Poland and Estonia participated in the Friends of the Earth International to protest against air pollution. Bulgarian environmentalists built a resistance group, called Ecoglasnost, which held huge rallies in 1989. Big water engineering projects were potent symbols of the old Stalinism. II. YES / NO / NOT GIVEN Exercise 1: Read the following passage. Do the statements agree with the views of the writer? Write YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer NO if the statement contradicts what the writer thinks NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to know what the writer’s point of view is 1 Some journalists take the view that more British schoolchildren should study languages. 2 The number of English speakers worldwide makes it unnecessary for British tourists to learn languages. 3 Only British teenagers find languages boring. 4 British teenagers' reluctance to learn languages is linked to the availability of films and music in English. 5 In the past, studying French made it easier for British people to learn further languages. 6 The lack of linguistic skills within British companies has resulted in business being lost. 7 American business people are less interested in learning languages than British business people. An answer to the belief that British people cannot learn languages A Every so often, the educational supplements of our broadsheets devote an entire issue to the danger the British face of falling behind in Europe because so few of our schoolkids take up the study of foreign languages. Most recently, the German ambassador lambasted us for only ever speaking English, a rebuke echoed by his French and Spanish counterparts. B The truth is that foreign languages are phenomenally unpopular in secondary schools. Poor teaching and the late introduction of the subject are often cited as the main reasons youngsters arc so loath to study them. Another factor for our notorious laziness vis-a-vis other tongues has to be mat we are brought up to believe that the whole world speaks English, so why bother? Why indeed? Struggling to communicate in another language is, for all but the committed and enthusiastic linguist, a frustrating experience, which, if not necessary, is best avoided. And yes. when millions of Brits take their annual holidays abroad, local tourism, travel, catering, and retail staff are all trained in at least rudimentary English. So, again, there is little motivation to learn more than a couple of word for a few days' stay. All this is true, and yet illuminates only part of the picture. British teenagers are generally bored by French or German verbs, but (he underlying reasons are more complex than a vague assumption that they only need to speak English because everyone else does. Their leisure activities revolve around pop music, sport, computers, television, and films. These things are already in English; translations and subtitles are the exception. Furthermore, the most powerful country in the world happens to speak our language, and we absorb its cultural exports easily and readily So, for us, language is not a major issue. C Of course, should the world situation change, and the United States become a Hispanic country, as some boffins have predicted, the British would see the benefit of learning Spanish and do so. Not so long ago, knowledge of French was more widespread here, and eagerly acquired, when that language was of paramount international importance. D The belief that we will lag behind our European business partners also needs to be dissected. The canard here is that we lose out because our businessmen and women can't keep up with the local lingo. But surely, it's competitiveness and the attraction of lucrative offers that count. After all. American executives don't wring their hands at their lack of linguistic skills. Exercise 2: Read the following passage. Do the statements agree with the views of the writer? Write YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer NO if the statement contradicts what the writer thinks NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to know what the writer’s point of view is 1 The delay in the process used by the Kellogg brothers affected the final product. 2 Sir Alan Hodgkin is an example of someone whose work proceeded in a logical and systematic way. 3 Daguerre is an exception to the general rule of innovation. 4 The discovery of saccharin occurred by accident during drug research. 5 The company 3M should have supported Art Fry by funding his idea of Post-It Notes. The role of accidents in business In 1894 Dr John Kellogg and his brother. Will, were supervising a hospital and health spa in Michigan. The patients were on a restricted diet. One day, the brothers left cooked wheat untended for more than 24 hours. When they returned, they saw what they had done. It was no good to eat, but they decided to run the stale wheat through rollers, just to see how it would turn out. Normally, the process produced long sheets, but they were surprised to discover that this time the rollers created flat flakes. They baked them, and then tried the same thing with corn. From this accidental discovery came the cornflakes that generations have now been eating for breakfast. Accidents happen; there is nothing predictable and orderly about innovation. Nobel laureate Sir Alan Hodgkin, who discovered how nerve cells transmit electrical impulses between the skin and the brain, commented: 'I believe that the record of my published papers conveys an impression of directedness and planning which does not at all coincide with the actual sequence of events.’ The same rule applies in business. The mistake that gave US cornflakes keeps repeating itself in the history of disruptive innovation, the kind that transforms markets. Louis Daguerre, for, instance, discovered the technique that gave US photography in the 1830s, when drops of mercury from a shattered thermometer produced a photographic image. The microwave was discovered when Peroy Spender, a scientist with Raytheon, was testing a new vacuum tube and discovered that the sweet in his pocket had melted. The artificial sweetener, saccharin, was the unintentional result of a medical scientist’s work on a chemical treatment for gastric ulcers. While working for the firm 3M, researcher Art Fry had no idea he was taking the first steps towards Post- It Notes when he used bits of adhesive office paper that could be easily lifted off the page to replace the scrap paper bookmarks that kept falling out of his hymn book. Breakthrough and disruptive innovation are rarely driven by orderly process. Usually they come out of a chaotic, haphazard mess, which is why big companies, full of managers schooled in business programmes designed to eliminate random variation and mistakes, struggle with them. In these sorts of environments, accidents are called failures and are discouraged. It is no surprise then that research from the late British economist Paul Geroski and London Business School’s Constantinos Markides found that companies that were skilled at innovation were usually not that skilled when it came to commercialisation, and vice versa. Their book, Fast Second, divides businesses into 'colonists’ and 'consolidators’. Small and nimble, colonists are adept at creating market niches but are terrible institution builders. Consolidators, with their strong cultures of discipline and cost control, know how to take clever ideas from other firms and turn them into mass-market items. Microsoft is a prime instance of this. With companies spending hundreds of billions of dollars on research and development, US academics Robert Austin and Lee Devin examined how managers can encourage productive slip-ups. In their article Accident, Intention and Expectation in the Innovation Process, they argue that business processes actually prevent helpful mis-steps from occurring. According to their catalogue of accidents, not all false steps and mishaps are equal. Accidents, they say, come from unlikely mental associations such as memories and vague connections, looking for something and finding it in an unexpected way, looking for one thing and finding something else, and not looking for anything but finding something valuable. Accident-prone innovation, they say, requires companies to get outside the ‘cone of expectation’. It means throwing together groups from diverse backgrounds, and combining ideas in unpredictable ways, other strategies also include having systems that watch out for accidents and examine them for value, generating them when they do not happen often enough, seizing oil the useful ones, capturing their valuable features, and building on them to add value and give potential for useful accidents. All this, however, requires thinking that is often counter-intuitive to the way businesses operate. In other words, it is the kind of thinking that goes against the beliefs of most business managers. It runs counter to the notion frequently pushes by consultants that you can ‘harness’ creativity and direct it to line up with intention. ‘The cost of accidents business, people tend to call such efforts failure.’ There are tentative signs that more companies are starting to realise that failure can lead to commercial gain, and that this is part or the risk-talking that underpins innovation. Australia’s largest brewing company, for example, made a bad error when it launched a new beer called Empire Lager, pitched at younger consumers. Having spent a fortune creating a beer with a sweeter taste, designing a great-looking bottle and a television campaign, Foster’s was left with a drink that no-one wanted to buy. The target market was more interested in brands built up by word of mouth. Instead of wiping the unsuccessfull product launch, Fosters used this lesson learned to go on and develop other brands instead. One of them, Pure Blonde, is now ranked as Australia’s fifth-largest beer brand. Unlike Empire Lager, there has been almost no promotion and its sales are generated more by word of mouth. Other companies are taking similar steps to study their own slip-ups. Intuit, the company behind financial tools such as Quicken, holds regular ‘When Learning Hurts’ sessions. But this sort of transformation is never easy. In a market that focuses on the short-term, convincing employees and shareholders to tolerate failure and not play it safe is a big thing to ask. Exercise 3: Read the following passage. Do the statements agree with the views of the writer? Write YES if the statement agrees with the views of the writer NO if the statement contradicts what the writer thinks NOT GIVEN if it is impossible to know what the writer’s point of view is 1 Out of four Vedas, music is only described in samaveds. 2 Music is believed to have an effect on human body. 3 Indian classical music system is simple and sophisticated. 4 There are 7 basic notes and 12 semitones in Indian classical music. 5 Talas in the Indian music is derived from western music 6 Indian classical music could express in writing. 7 The composition used by Indian musicians was based on Devnagri script. 8 New script used for music had no symbols. Classical music over the centuries INDIAN CLASSICAL MUSIC The origins of Indian classical music can be found from the oldest of scriptures, part of the Hindus tradition, the Vedas. Samaveda, one of the four Vedas, describes music at length. Indian classical music has its origins as a meditation tool for attaining self realization. All different forms of these melodies (ragas) are believed to affect various “chakras” (energy centers, or “mood”) in the path of the Kundalini. However, there is little mention of these esoteric beliefs in Bharat’s Natyashastra , the first treatise laying down the fundamental principles of drama, dance and music. The Samadeva, one of the four Vedas, created out of riga-veda so that its hymns could be sung as Samagana, established its first pop. Indian classical music has one of the most complex and complete musical systems ever developed. Like Western classical music, it divides the octave s into 12 Semitones of which the 7 basic notes are Sa Re Ga Ma Pa Dha Ni Sa, replacing Do Re Mi Fa So La Ti Do. However, it uses the just intonation tuning (unlike western classical music which uses the equal temperament tuning system).
Indian classical music is monophonic in nature and based around a single
melody line which is played over a fixed drone. The performance is based melodically on particular rages and rhythmically on talas. NATIONAL SYSTEM Scholars of Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth century were enormed by Indian music. With no facility to record the sound they explored for some existing system that might exist system that express sounds in the composition. There were pointers to an ancient notations system which scholars had also translated into Persian: still’ complexity of Indian classical music could not be expressed in writing. Though some western scholars did record compositions in staff notation system, Indian musicians used Pt.Bhakhande system. Though more accurate, this relies on Devanagari script rather than symbols and hence is cumbersome at times. A new notation system has been proposed which uses symbols and offers instantaneous comprehension like staff notation system. It is with standardization of a notation system that hitherto unknown compositions would see the light of day. INSTRUMENTS Instruments typically used in Hindustani music include sitar, sarood,tanpura, bansuri, shehnai, sarangi, and table. Instruments typically used in carnatic music include flute, gottuvadyam, veena mridangam, kanjira, ghatam and violon.