The document contains reviewer comments and responses regarding a manuscript, addressing issues such as title length, accuracy of geographical references, and the inclusion of clarifications for terms and methods used. The authors have accepted the suggestions and made necessary corrections, including adding details about the study area, GIS software, and data resolution. Additionally, they have revised figures and tables for clarity and improved the overall writing based on the feedback received.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views2 pages
Contoh Table of Responses Review Jurnal
The document contains reviewer comments and responses regarding a manuscript, addressing issues such as title length, accuracy of geographical references, and the inclusion of clarifications for terms and methods used. The authors have accepted the suggestions and made necessary corrections, including adding details about the study area, GIS software, and data resolution. Additionally, they have revised figures and tables for clarity and improved the overall writing based on the feedback received.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2
Table of Responses
Lines Reviewer Comments/Suggest Answer
1-3 The Title is too long. I would suggest to shorten the Thank you for your review. We have agreed to accept length by removing the words remote sensing and GIS the suggestions and feedback for improving the technology and being replaced by “spatial”. manuscript. 33 Previously you mentioned Tangkahan National Park, Thank you for your review. Tangkahan Ecotourism is then later on you said Tangkahan Village in Central an ecotourism destination located within Gunung Kalimantan. Please check again the accuracy of this Leuser National Park. Therefore, we mentioned information. To my knowledge, Tangkahan is not a Gunung Leuser National Park and Tangkahan national park although it is located within (and Ecotourism in North Sumatra, which were already adjacent) to Leuser National Park. Also for Tangkahan included in the text. Regarding Tangkahan Village, Village, I think it should be Tangkahen. we made an error in writing, as it should refer to ecotourism located in Tangkahen Village in Central Kalimantan. Thus, we have corrected it based on your suggestion. 85 What is AHP? Please add the abbreviation for this. Thank you for your review. AHP stands for Analytical Hierarchy Process and has already been added to the manuscript. 84-88 Not all readers are familiar with the context of study Thank you for your review. We have added detailed area of studies cited here. Thus, I would suggest to add information about the locations of previous studies the country where this study was conducted. we used. 113-116 Are some part of Ujungalang Village located in Thank you for your review. No part of Desa Nusakambangan Island? If so, please add this Ujungalang is located on Nusakambangan Island. information, it not please leave it. 133 What is open land you referring to here? It might be Thank you for your review. The open land referred to useful to add few words in brackets to clarify this. in our study is unused vacant land. 182 Previously in the Introduction you said about AHP. Thank you for your review. This study does not use Did you used AHP in Data Analysis? If so, please the AHP method for weighting; instead, the explain how you used this methods. weighting is done using the ranking method proposed by Selamat (2015). 184 What GIS software you used here? ArcGIS, QGIS? Thank you for your review. All spatial analysis and data processing in our study were performed using ArcGIS 10.8 software. We have added this information to the manuscript. 200-202 I assumed that some of the spatial data are in the form Thank you for your review. The raster data used in of raster. If so, please clarify what is the resolution of this study includes DEM (slope and elevation), each raster data. MODIS (temperature), and Google Earth (land use). These datasets have been extracted in a consistent raster data format with the WGS 1984 Zone 49S projection system and a 30-meter pixel resolution. We have added this information to Table 1. 265-266 What do you mean of 45 species being certified? What Thank you for your review. Based on information certification are you referring to? from Pertamina's website (https://www.pertamina.com/id/news-room/news- release/kolak-sekancil-wisata-mangrove-terlengkap- di-indonesia), the diversity of mangroves in Segara Anakan is described as stated. However, there is no further information on this matter. Therefore, to avoid misinformation, we have removed the related sentence. 237-339 The explanation in the main text is related to Thank you for your review. We have corrected the information presented in Figure 3. But not all factors references to the figures in the manuscript. explained in the main text are annotated to the figure. For example, for land use, there is no explanation which figure number it referring to. Please add each factor in the main text the figure number it referring to, for example land use is annotated to Figure 3A and so on. 358 Please add note at the bottom of the table for each code Thank you for your review. We have added more provided in the coloumn, for example rj. information about the abbreviations used in the manuscript. 385-387 In the figure legend, it is not common to order medium Thank you for your review. We have corrected the class first then followed by high and low. I would order of the ecotourism potential index categories on suggest to put the high class in the first order. the corresponding map.
We accept all suggestions for writing improvements
in the form of sentence modifications. We have also revised the ecotourism potential index categories (Table 7).