C791 Paper
C791 Paper
Implementing a Health Information System (HIS) That Meet Current HITECH and
Amber Sulin
Health and personal information are a significant part of each person’s life. This
information is significant for ongoing well-being and vital for an individual to protect their
personal information. The HIS encompasses all aspects of an individual’s health and
personal information, thereby requiring the HIS to safeguard the protected health and
System (HIS) requires meeting current HITECH and HIPAA security and privacy
decisions. Five interconnected fields make up the HMIS including, data, hardware, process,
usability is defined by its effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction in completing a desired
task. An advantage to HMIS usability is the opportunity for users to perform task swiftly and
with little input. However, the fixed data fields can become difficult to navigate for users with
limited HMIS experience. “Interoperabilty is concerned primarily with the challenge of linking
software and systems being developed and implemented with diverse platforms and languages
when required information has to be shared conveniently and securely among multiple providers
and users” (Payton, 2017). Interoperability on a large-scale allows the HMIS to utilize different
systems and technology applications in one intercommunicating platform. Difficulty arises when
there is a breakdown in the system communication due to program coding. For a HMIS to have
Advanced Information Management and the Application of Technology 3
scalability, it must be capable of parallel growth with the organization. Scalability allows for
future facilities to implement the same Electronic Health Record or EHR. Disadvantage to
scalability is the cost factor of implementing a system in a facility that does not require such a
largescale platform. When a HMIS has compatibility, it is capable of running all systems on one
infrastructure independently. A system high level of compatibility prevents loss of data. When a
system has a low level of compatibility, varied software operates on different platforms.
With the development of HIS, nurses are better equipped to provide patient-centered care.
The biggest problem nurses face with HIS is the usability and interface difficulties. It is
theorized, the usability and interface difficulties are a result of the HIS being developed by non-
medically trained professionals. When faced with barriers to use, nurses will utilize
workarounds, creating points for potential error. Ideally, HIS should assist the nurse by
Patient care is impacted by the use of HIS through the loss of individual and meaningful
patient interaction. This occurs when the nurse enters data into the system at the bedside. Their
focus is diverted from the patient to the HIS, creating a barrier to patient-centered care. The
burden is on the nurse to recognize this missed opportunity and focus on providing
Integrating clinic information systems or CIS into the EHRs, provides a comprehensive
system for nurses and benefits documentation through “easy access [to] patient data at the point
of care; structured and legible information that can be searched easily and lends itself to data
mining and analysis; and improved patient safety, especially the prevention of adverse drug
Advanced Information Management and the Application of Technology 4
reactions and the identification of health risk factors, such as falls” (McGonigle, 2017). Having
the EHR as a safety check, assist the nurse in preventing medication errors, missed procedures
and communication with the care team. Additionally, documented care, supply use and
A review of the nurse’s perspective of HIS reports, accessing information via a HIS
results in improved care outcomes and less anxieties with care coordination and patient safety
(McGonigle, 2017). Nurses also reported improved staff communication and less medication
errors. A nurse’s ability to readily access all the patient’s health data at the bedside allows for
continued care through review of care notes and lab data. For example, if a patient is on a fluid
restriction, the nurse can easily access the patient’s intake for the last 24 hours or even further.
She can then form her plan of care based off that data. Additionally, any care provider can access
the patient’s PHI from any location in the hospital. If for instance, the patient is in radiology and
experiences a seizure event. The staff in radiology can access the patient’s MAR, review ordered
recue medications and safely administer without the need to track down the patient’s nurse or
doctor.
QI data collection for a pediatric physician transfer center addressing transfers from
outlying facilities to a pediatric hospital is critical in identifying, analyzing and drafting strategic
Advanced Information Management and the Application of Technology 5
initiatives for measurable service improvement. One such data point is the length of time for
provider connection, meaning the amount of time it takes for a referring provider to be connected
with a pediatric specialist. For at risk pediatric patients such as neonatal transfers, status
epilepticus transfers, etc., every minute of delayed care compounds to poor patient outcomes.
Utilizing multiple data fields, the nurse informaticist can identify barriers to provider connection,
analyze the effect on patient outcomes and draft a proposal or workflow adjustment to reduce
department, allows for interdepartmental quality improvement initiatives. One such initiative is
the proposal for full time pediatric transport units dedicated to inbound pediatric transfer from
outlying facilities. Through data collection from the pediatric physician transfer center, the nurse
informaticist can collect data points on patient outcomes related to delays in transport, poor care
outcomes related to adult care transport units with limited pediatric capabilities and limited
communication with pediatric specialist during transport. After analyzing the data, the team is
able to draft a proposal for full time pediatric transport units and their direct correlation to
All members of the healthcare team within an organization are tasked with protecting the
privacy, confidentiality and security of protected health information or PHI (Payton, 2017). A
federal law set into place for the healthcare organizations that implement information
technologies is the HITECH act. It requires organizations to establish policy for the utilization
and application of information technology. After the implementation of the HITECH act,
Advanced Information Management and the Application of Technology 6
healthcare saw a wide adoption of the Electronic Health Record or EHR. The U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
(HIPAA) law, established guidelines, standards and consequences for healthcare organizations to
utilize and implement healthcare information exchanges. All healthcare entities are governed by
HIPAA law, including providers, facilities, organizations, insurance companies, HMOs and
government programs like Medicaid and Medicare (Kruse, 2016). HIPAA federally mandates
treatment reports, progress notes, recommendations, and even conversations with personal
caregivers. It also safeguards the information that is processed into computer systems used by
care providers for billing, medication, clinical evaluation reports, radiological images and
reports, laboratory test results, and any information collected by individuals or organizations that
The accuracy and consistency of data that is stored, processed and retrieved is maintained
throughout the process of design, implementation and utilization. This maintenance of data
throughout its lifecycle is referred to as data integrity. HMIS design, implementation and
evaluation hinges on data security. Without protection, the integrity of data may be compromised
and open the healthcare organization to federal investigation under HIPPA. The protection of
data comes with a hefty price tag for individual organizations, but it is crucial to prevent attacks
on HMIS. Safeguarding access to the HMIS can be assigned to a separate group for the
For an organization to have success in data protection and maintaining data integrity,
procedures must be in place for potential disaster recovery. This is achieved through the process
of data backup. Data backup is an ongoing process of duplicating programs, files and databases
Advanced Information Management and the Application of Technology 7
for storage in a separate location. The data is continually monitored for transactions, lost data,
incomplete fields and system failures. Every organization should have a plan for system
downtime to maintain functionality and operation. System permanency and dependability can be
As a result of the HIPPA law, federal government can provide assurance to healthcare
consumers that their PHI is safe and accessible. All healthcare organizations and entities are held
accountable for the integrity and protection of patient data through implementation of dedicated
HIPAA and HMIS staff, guidelines, procedures, technology security and safekeeping.
Organizations not in compliance with HITECH and HIPPA standards are investigated and
As with any information technology system and HIS, the infrastructure can be built to
include safety and security measures. Preventing security incidents is a top priority for health
care organizations and providers. Providers are obligated and under federal law required to
protect PHI from security attacks by unauthorized persons, contamination of data, deletion of
data and interference with HIS operations. The health organization facilitates the providers
obligation to protect PHI by following annual guidance to secure health information as set forth
by the HITCH Act (McGonigle, 2017). HIS safeguard access to PHI through “encryption,
shredding and other forms of complete destruction, or electronic media sanitation” (McGonigle,
2017). If a provider does not follow the policies for information technology implementation, the
documentation, reducing waste, increasing productivity and human and capital resource savings.
HIS provides a shared platform for management of patient care across various providers, thus
Standardization creates an opportunity to link various EHR systems, thereby creating increased
labor cost for interoperability. Benefits of waste reduction include reducing medical errors by
removing paper charting; delays in test and treatments due to expediting order entry and
exchange among providers; and duplication related to multiple test orders for existing results.
Cost reduction occurs through fewer material waste by reduced duplications, paper consumption
limitation and shortened length of stay due to increase efficiency. Increasing provider
productivity is a pillar of organizational efficiency. With HIS, patient data can be accessed
instantly from a computer preventing wasted provider time searching for paper charts or data
from another facility. However, HIS places a requirement on providers to enter orders and notes
electronically, thereby creating anxiety, wasted time finding embedded functions and uncertainty
on provider protection. Reduction in human capital occurs through increased care efficiency,
limiting time spent on charting and retrieving data, and eliminating duplication through shared
data. Resources shifted from direct patient care to information technology personnel increase
human and capital resource cost for development, implementation and maintenance of the HIS
(Payton, 2017).
Team Member “roles” (job duties), “expertise” (what qualifies the individual?) and why they
Clinical “Direct users of the system” and partners in the responsibility for HIS success.
Provider Providers are direct participants in the design process of the HIS due to their
expertise in the field. Provider health intelligence is merged into the HIS
(Payton, 2016).
Application “Takes a completely supportive role in the e-health system because it has a
Vendors direct benefit from developing an e-health platform” (Payton, 2016). Vendors
Hospitals Primary investment entity and provider of facilities and physical infrastructure.
Hospitals have wide-ranging knowledge of HIS. “If the hospitals and providers
have access to the same types and amounts of information and are not
advantages, they may turn their attention, time, and effort to focus on improving
Third-party Indirectly perform as a source of funding for programs like HIS through patient
As the largest philanthropic organization in the US, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
RWJF works to advance the health and care for Americans. In an effort to improve healthcare,
RWJF offers grants and funds research. An ongoing project funded by RWJF is the Quality and
Safety for Education for Nurses (QSEN) project. QSEN focuses on advancing nursing education
and promoting core competencies for educators. Two such competencies for nursing informatics
include:
“Use data to monitor the outcomes and processes and use improvement methods to
design and test changes to continuously improve the quality and safety of healthcare
HIS possess multiple systems tailored to address both QSEN nursing informatics
availability to all healthcare providers in the system. Error is reduced by the safety checks
and embedded alerts triggered in the HIS. Decision making is supported by the data
analytics provided by the HIS. Quality improvement projects and strategic initiatives are
supported by the data collected, distributed and analyzed from the HIS.
professional organization standards will be based on an established plan. The plan will
extract data from the HIS to analyze healthcare quality and safety improvement. This can be
done by evaluating the trend of a few metrics upon which data is comparable across multiple
patient and provider entries. Example of such metrics include reduction of hospital acquired
After the data metrics are mined from the HIS, comparisons can be made against the same
metrics prior to HIS implementation. In order for the metrics to be comparable, data must
exist for each metric prior to implementation. If the data post implementation displays a
trend in the positive direction for each metric, then it is fair to claim the HIS implementation
was a success against the QSEN core competencies for nursing informatics.
References
Advanced Information Management and the Application of Technology 12
Cronenwett, L., Sherwood, G., Barnsteiner, J., Disch, J., Johnson, J., Mitchell, P., Sullivan, D.
T., & Warren, J. (2007). Quality and Safety Education for Nurses. Nursing outlook, 55(3),
122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006
Home. (2020, July 15). Retrieved July 26, 2020, from https://www.rwjf.org/
Kruse, C. S., Kothman, K., Anerobi, K., & Abanaka, L. (2016). Adoption Factors of the
Electronic Health Record: A Systematic Review. JMIR medical informatics, 4(2), e19.
https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.5525
McGonigle, K.G.M. D. (2017). Informatics for Health Professionals, Custom WGU Edition.
from https://wgu.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284155402/
Payton, J.T.F. C. (2017). Adaptive Health Management Information Systems: Concepts, Cases,
from https://wgu.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781284138696/