Unit-7 IPR
Unit-7 IPR
7.4.2 Trademark
7.4.3 Copyright
7.0 INTRODUCTION
We are living in an era of rapid technological advancements. Today development
and growth have been made possible by the outcomes of the human intellect
which need legal protection, worldwide. Such statutory protections provide
economic and financial rights to the originator in his or her intellectual creations.
They also promote creativity and encourage fair trading which contribute to the
economic and social development of the society as a whole.
We have briefly discussed IPR in previous units. In this unit we shall give you
a detailed overview of various aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR).
In the increasingly globalised world, it is important for you to be aware of this
very important law.
87
Information Ethics
and Laws 7.1 LEARNING OUTCOMES
After completing this unit, you should be able to:
● Discuss the concept, nature and the scope of IPR;
● Describe the evolution and growth of IPR;
● Acquaint yourself with WIPO and new trading system;
● Explain the important components under the IPR regime; and
● Enumerate the various legislations available for IPR.
7.4.1 Patent
John of Utynam is the recipient of the first known English patent, granted in
1449 by King Henry VI. John came to England to make the windows for Eton
College. The patent granted him a 20-year monopoly on the making of coloured
glass.
Patent is granted for inventions which have industrial and commercial value.
Any person, whose invention has novelty, involving inventive steps and is of
industrial application, can be granted a monopoly right for a specified period to
commercially exploit the invention and earn profit out of the invention. Novartis
v. Union of India decided by the Supreme Court of India in 2013 is a leading
case regarding patent rights. 95
Information Ethics 7.4.2 Trademark
and Laws
A trademark, as you are aware, is a distinctive sign that identifies certain goods
or services produced or provided by an individual or a company. Its origin dates
back to ancient times when craftsmen produced their signatures, or “marks”, on
their artistic works or products of a functional or practical nature. The system
helps consumers to identify and purchase a product or service based on whether
its specific characteristics and quality as indicated by its unique trademark
meet their needs. Trademark protection ensures that the owners of marks have
the exclusive right to use them to identify goods or services, or to authorise
others to use them in return for payment. The period of protection varies, but a
trademark can be renewed indefinitely upon payment of the corresponding fees.
Trademark protection can be legally enforced by courts.
For Example, in the case of Pidilite Industries Ltd SM Associates, decided
by the Bombay High Court in 2003, the plaintiff was registered proprietor of
trademark “M-SEAL”. The defendant adapted and used the mark “SM SEAL”,
with all essential characters of the trademark “M- SEAL”. The Bombay High
Court ruled that the defendant's use of impugned mark was causing confusion
and deception and restrained the defendants from using the mark.
7.4.3 Copyright
The subject matters of copyright are the literary, artistic, dramatic, musical,
cinematographic films, sound recording. Literary works now also include
computer programmes, tables, compilation including computer databases.
Mere idea without tangible expression is not granted legal protection. It is a
right granted to author or originator of certain literary or artistic production.
A copyright owner has sole and exclusive right of multiplying copies of the
original work and publishing and selling them for a specified period. For
example, downloading and sharing files of music, videos and games without
permission of the copyright owner amounts to copyright infringement. Another
example is the case of Celador Production Ltd v Gaurav Mehrotra, decided
by the Delhi High Court in 2002. The High Court found that the defendant’s
website using domain name “CrorepatiKaun.com” with logos and names and
identical photographs of plaintiff’s TV show Kaun Banega Crorepat was an act
of infringement of plaintiff’s copyright.
99