Week 10 Tutorial - Feedback
Week 10 Tutorial - Feedback
In advance of this tutorial please read through the key papers identified throughout the Week 10
lecture 1 session:
Based on your reading make notes on the following questions and come to the tutorial session
prepared to discuss:
Required:
1. Discuss the difference between tax planning, tax avoidance and tax
evasion.
Tax planning – Using tax reliefs for the purpose for which they were intended. So perfectly
legal and legitimate.
Tax avoidance – tax that is lost when a person claims to arrange their affairs to minimise tax
within the law in the UK, or in other countries. In other words, exploiting tax rules to gain an
advantage the parliament never intended. Involving artificial, contrived transactions.
Operating within the letter of the law but not of the spirit.
Tax evasion – tax lost when a person or company deliberately and unlawfully fails to declare
income that they know is taxable or claims expenses that are not allowed. Illegal activity
where businesses or individuals deliberately omit, conceal, or misrepresent information to
reduce their tax liabilities.
HMRC work with partners such as professional bodies, financial institutions, government
departments, law enforcement, international tax and customs authorities.
Encourage whistleblowing with Fraud Hotline
Aim to prosecute, convict, director or financial disqualification, impose sanctions, publicly
publish details of tax evaders, freeze assets.
BU40006 Week 10 Tutorial 2 2024-25
2. Discuss the reasons for and benefits of taxation and explain what is
meant by the tax base.
Taxation is the mechanism that Governments use to generate money from society to pay for
public goods and services.
The tax base is the total amount of income, property, assets, consumption, transactions, or
other economic activity subject to taxation by a tax authority
Low tax morale can result in tax avoidance/evasion which can move toward informal sector
and cause firms to revaluate investment decisions
Individuals:
Age, religion, culture, gender, satisfaction with public services, trust in governments
can influence tax morale
Organisations:
Varies across regions but challenges exist with transparency between firm and
revenue authority even if taxes paid on time
Risk of being caught and punished may be low (likelihood of prosecution/custodial sentence
only in extreme cases)
BU40006 Week 10 Tutorial 2 2024-25
BU40006 Week 10 Tutorial 2 2024-25
4. What does the literature say on regarding the motivations for low tax
morale and tax evasion
Murphy (2017) discusses consequences to society & economy from tax gap:
– Economic & societal instability, increased interest rates, austerity, breakdown of
trust in markets, increased failure in SME sector etc. (see P8)
– Murphy (2014) suggests tax avoidance largely undertaken by large business and high
net worth individuals who employ lawyers and accountants to find loopholes and
legally avoid paying tax
– Tax evasion mainly driven by shadow economy, criminal/fraudulent activity,
undeclared CGT & inheritance tax, offshore tax evasion
BU40006 Week 10 Tutorial 2 2024-25
5. Explain what is meant by the tax gap and the reasons why it exists .
Tax gap
The tax gap is the difference between the amount of tax that should be paid in the UK and
the amount of tax that is actually paid.
Difference between the amount of tax that should be imposed and the amount that is
actually reported and paid on timely filed returns (Murphy, 2017)
Murphy (2017): The tax gap is perceived to be an important indicator of the overall health and
effectiveness of the tax system:
Data
HM Revenue & Customs’ (HMRC’s) most recent estimate of the tax gap, the difference
between tax owed and tax that is actually paid, was £39.8 billion (4.8%) in 2022/23
However, we also know that international tax avoidance is not measured by the UK tax gap.
6. What implications does the tax gap and tax evasion have on the UK and
international economies?
There are a number of societal and economic implications of the tax gap:
Table from Murphy (2017) consequences and impact of the tax gap
BU40006 Week 10 Tutorial 2 2024-25
7. What is meant by BEPS and what is being done to address this and
other forms of international tax avoidance?
BEPS are “Tax planning strategies that exploit gaps and mismatches in touch rules to
make profit disappear for tax purposes or to shift profits to locations where there is
little or no real activity, but the taxes are low resulting in little or no overall
corporate tax being paid” (OECD)
The tax avoidance figures in the tax gap do not include BEPS (Base Erosion Profit
Shifting) arrangements that cannot be addressed under UK law and will be dealt
with through the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.)
Transfer Pricing – these will improve tax base but not designed to address the gap more
for multinationals, this will not directly this increases tax base
Thin Capitalisation
As interest on debt is tax deductible, there is a tax incentive for companies to finance their
operations through debt. There are concerns from government that companies may use this
mechanism to artificially inflate the amount of debt, interest payable to get a tax advantage,
therefore, deeming this as tax avoidance.
BEPS – 2.0
The first phase, BEPS 1.0, created 15 staged BEPS Actions to address cross-border taxation, with
(currently) 141 participating countries agreeing to minimum standards.
Now, BEPS 2.0 looks to go further, and deal with the challenges of taxing an increasingly digital
economy, split into two pillars.
Led by the OECD and G20 countries, the action plans were published in 2015 following a series of
revelations around aggressive tax planning and tax evasion.
limitation of BEPS 1.0 is that it does not comprehensively address digital transactions, which are
increasingly prevalent in almost all industries, particularly in service delivery and online retail.
BEPS 2.0 is intended to consolidate those unilateral taxation regimes into an overall consensus
between BEPS participant countries to avoid double taxation or inconsistent tax treatments.
There are two BEPS 2.0 pillars, which together comprise the global action plan:
Pillar 1 focuses on rules for taxing profits and rights, with a formula to calculate the
proportion of earnings taxable within each relevant jurisdiction.
Pillar 2 looks at global minimum tax levies of 15% to discourage companies from shifting
profits to lower-tax countries through international trading structures.
Pillar One involves a new taxation methodology aimed at digitised companies and consumer-serving
organisations that trade or communicate with customers through a digital format.
Revenues generated from consumers in one country or from consumer data extracted from that
country will be subject to tax regardless of whether the organisation has a physical presence in the
jurisdiction.
Pillar Two is equally far-reaching and introduces global tax reforms that aim to end the competition
between countries to offer the lowest possible corporation tax rates to attract foreign investment.
The primary factor in Pillar Two is a set of rules called GloBE (Global anti-Base Erosion).
The largest multinationals, with a revenue of €750 million or more per annum, should pay a
minimum effective tax of 15% in every jurisdiction in which they trade.
Countries will be permitted to apply top-up tax rates where a multinational in their jurisdiction is
taxed below the minimum threshold.
Along with additional parent company tax charges for low-taxed foreign revenue, Pillar Two allows
for taxation at source for low-tax paying organisations.
Compliance will also likely command greater investment in resources, resulting in increased budgets
spent on updating tax functions, which will impact both organisations and governmental tax offices.
BU40006 Week 10 Tutorial 2 2024-25
Although HMRC believes that reducing the tax gap is not a suitable annual performance
target and cannot be measured in a timely way, it does except that it should be assessed on
the movement of the tax gap overtime.
Academic research indicates that some of the factors affecting tax compliance are the
complexity of tax rules, customers’ knowledge of the tax system and individual perceptions
on the fairness of tax administration.
There are a number of key measures in place by HMRC to tackle different areas of the tax
gap:
Promote compliance
Prevent non-compliance
Respond to non-compliance
Strategies to achieve this:
More initiatives to make it straight forward for taxpayers to comply – emphasise
interventions earlier in the tax cycle
HMRC is focusing on factors that have helped reduce the tax gap in other countries:
One aim of HMRC’s strategy is to focus on helping small businesses to get their tax right
and make it harder for them to get it wrong
Within all of these points we need to think about areas of the tax gap that will be improved by the
above approaches. This is where the critical engagement for this type of question would really
come into the answer.
A major challenge for HMRC is to remain ahead of changes in non-compliant behaviour, for
example where taxpayers adopt new ways to avoid tax.
Over the past few years HMRC has introduced a variety of initiatives to tackle aggressive
tax planning
1. IR35 Rules
BU40006 Week 10 Tutorial 2 2024-25
4. HMRC’s compliance approach for Large Business (HMRC’s compliance approach for
Large Business - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk))
Developed an efficient risk-based approach to manage the tax compliance of the UK's largest
businesses.
The compliance approach for large businesses includes two main areas:
HMRC has developed a more strategic approach to tackling the tax gap
Other points that are not necessarily related to the UK Tax Gap but do potentially increase
the tax base: