LLMMM Project
LLMMM Project
Structured Abstract:
Purpose: This paper deals with some conceptual aspects of corporate governance in a descriptive
manner. It also tries to study the role of regulatory authorities of corporate governance in maintaining
the corporate governance standards in India.
Design / Methodology / Approach: This study is based on secondary sources of data, mainly
collected from different books, journals, related websites and newspapers. In the first phrase,
conceptual framework of corporate governance is highlighted and in the second, the provisions
relating to corporate governance in the Companies Act 2013 and the guidelines of SEBI under the
clause 35B and the revised clause 49 and its sub-clauses has been discussed and at the end this paper
concludes the observations.
Findings: In India, the important regulatory authorities like Companies Act, SEBI, ICAI, and ICSI
etc. are continuously framing various laws, rules, and regulations in order to have a good corporate
governance system in corporate sector. The new provisions in the Companies Act 2013 and the
guidelines of SEBI under the revised clause 49 and its sub-clauses will be more effective for good
corporate governance practices in India.
Originality / Value: The role of regulatory authorities of corporate governance has been considered
important to maintain the standards of corporate governance practices in India and this will
acquainted all the stakeholders about the benefits of good corporate governance.
Introduction
Any business entity i.e., firm is established by entrepreneurs or owners with the primary objectives
of investing their funds to earn a good return. For this firms has operates some primary functions
such as − organizing the required amount of funds, obtaining a good rate of return on investment,
maximizing the growth value of the firm and finally maximizing shareholders value. However, the
main aim of all the activities a firm undertakes is to maximize shareholders value because the
shareholder's value can be used as performance indictor for effectiveness of management actions.
The shareholders invest their hard earned money at the disposal of the managers or agents of the
company. It is expected that the managers will utilize such monetary resources with the primary aim
of maximizing the shareholder's wealth. This is however, does not happen many a times; since the
shareholders are not in a position to monitor or exercise control over the managers decisions or
performance, what exactly happens is that the managers utilize the money in a manner that serves
sometimes their own interest. As a result, there is a gap of understanding in fulfilling interest between
shareholders and the managers.
In a company, there are two groups of stakeholders−internal and external. The main external
stakeholders groups are shareholders, debt holders, suppliers, customers, communities, clients, etc.
whereas the internal stakeholders are the board of directors, executives, employees, officers, etc.
Corporate governance provides a relationship between all the stakeholders. These relationships
provide the framework through which the goals of the company are set and the methods of achieving
these as well as performance monitoring are determined. In recent times, corporate governance has
received increased attention because of occurrence of various scams or scandals involving abuse or
misuse of corporate power or funds and in some cases the criminal activities by corporate officers.
So it is the appropriate time to study about the corporate governance rules, regulations and laws for
corporate sector in .
INDEX
Corporate governance is defined as the set of rules, processes or laws by which business corporations
or companies are operated, regulated and controlled. It refers the relationship between all the
stakeholders in a company. According to the Kumara Mangalam Birla Committee, instituted by the
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in 1999, corporate governance may be defined as the
enhancement of long-term shareholders value, while at the same time, protecting the interests of
other stakeholders. “Corporate Governance is the system by which companies are directed and
controlled.” (The Cadbury Committee U.K.) It includes company’s accountability to shareholders
and other stakeholders such as employees, suppliers, customers and local community.
The structure of the triangle represents the governance model where good corporate governance a
balance equilibrium among the three participants. The board of directors is responsible for
overseeing the represents performance of their management team, who are guarded through their
performance. They also maintain a fiduciary relationship i.e., a relationship based on thrust with their
stakeholders. The management policies and structure should be transparent enough to adequately
disclose relevant information to their stakeholders and ensures timely payment of dividends for their
investment in the business. Good Corporate Governance relates to the adopted systems of disclosure
and transparency which provide regulators, shareholders and the economy at large, with precise
information regarding the financial, operational and other aspects of the organization. The bottom
line for good Corporate Governance involves the dual aim of pursuing profits and doing so in a
transparent and accountable manner. The most important aspect of corporate governance is therefore
to encourage a trustworthy and an ethical environment by ensuring accurate and transparent
disclosure of information at timely intervals.
❖ To understand the concept of corporate governance, its needs and the principles of good
corporate governance.
❖ To examine the role of regulatory authorities in maintaining Corporate Governance Standards
in India.
The study is based on secondary sources of data mainly from different books, journals and
newspapers. In order to enrich the study, the related websites have been searched as and when
required. Editing and classification of the above mentioned sources of data have been done as per
requirement of the study.
Change in ownership structure: In recent years, there has occurred a change in the ownership
structure of companies. Previously, large Indian companies were primarily owned by the Indian
promoters and the business used to run in families. However, a recent shift take place, wherein
foreign institutional investors are consolidating their holdings is quite evident. There is now an
increase in institutional ownership of the companies i.e., the mutual funds, banks, financial
institutions, insurance companies, foreign institutional investors etc. are the largest shareholders in
most of the large companies. These institutions compel the management to work efficiently,
profitably and transparently. Hence the changing ownership structure requires the need for good
corporate governance.
Globalization: In recent years, companies are doing business and selling their products globally. In
order to attract business from foreign customers, investors and companies, the foreign regulations are
to be complied with the expectation are to be met. In order to succeed in an over challenging foreign
environment, a good corporate governance practices has to be followed by the companies. We can
produce an example form one of the biggest corporate scam in India - Satyam Computer Services
Ltd. scam. On 7th January 2009, Mr. B. Ramalinga Raju, Chairman of Satyam Computer Services
Ltd., claimed in a letter to the board of directors that he had been manipulating the Company’s
accounting for a number of years since 2001 to inflate Profits and Cash flows. A glance of the
reported and actual figures of financial Statement for the 2 nd quarter ending 30.9.2008 will provided
the nature of the fraud (Table 1).
The Balance Sheet of Satyam Contained certain irregularities – First of all, there is non- existence of
cash and bank balance of Rs. 5040 Core, non-existent of accrued interest of Rs. 376 Core, overstated
debtors by Rs. 490 Core and understated liability of Rs1230 core. It is also stated that the reported
revenue of Rs. 2700 and an operating margin of Rs. 649 core whereas the actual figure was Rs. 2112
core and Rs. 61 core respectively. So there exists an over stated revenue and operating Profit as per
income statement of Satyam. Actually the case study of Satyam Computer Services Ltd. is an instance
of Poor Corporate governance in India. There may be several reasons behind the fraud but the fact is
that it has failed on every issues of corporate governance and neglects every government regulators
like SEBI, ROC and MCA.
Following are the principles for which it is necessary to study about corporate governance:
Transparency and Disclosures: Transparency refers to the ease with which a person or a group
outside the company is able to analyse and make a meaningful deduction of the company’s financial
as well as non-financial fundamentals. The company should make timely and accurately disclosure
of factual and clear information such as financial status, ownership, performance, etc. In short,
outsiders should be able to comprehend and construct an accurate picture of what actually happening
within the company.
Accountability: The managers in a company who are involved in decision making and taking actions
on important issues should be held accountable for their decisions and actions. There must be systems
and procedures in place within the company that compel the managers to be accountable for their
actions.
Companies Act 1956 and 2013: Companies Act 1956 provides the basic outline for administering
the companies. Ministry of corporate affairs made several revisions and amendments on corporate
governance practices of the concern. The companies Act 2013 inter-alia contains provisions relating
to board constitution, board meeting, independent directors, audit committee, corporate social
responsibility, internal auditor, related party transactions etc.
Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): SEBI is the regulatory of the securities market
and corporate governance standards which provides rules, regulations, guidelines to ensure
protection of investors. For companies whose shares are listed on the Stock Exchanges, by listing
agreement, it ensures that companies are following good corporate governance.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI): ICAI is an autonomous body which issues
accounting standards to ensure the better corporate governance. ICAI give lot of importance as it
leads to effective disclosure of accounting standards and reduces the gap between Indian and
International accounting standards.
The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (ICSI): ICSI is an autonomous body which issues
secretarial standards in terms of provisions of the new companies Act to maintain the good corporate
governance in corporate sector.
The benchmark of corporate governance in India was the development of various financial institutions
and the Companies Development and Regulation Act 1956. The financial institution such as IDBI,
IFCI, ICICI, etc. acted as intermediaries of financial markets. Their role is therefore to transfer funds
from investors to companies. In this way, the funds were made available for the overall industrial
development in the country. However with the passage of time, there occurred various scandals in
corporate sector and stock markets which included Harshad Mehta Securities Scam, allotment to
company shares to promoters at highly discounted prices etc. These serious scandals as well as the
opening up the corporate markets to competitive global players led to the setting up of various
committees with the aim of investigating various scandals. The committees provide various
recommendations for transparent and efficient corporate governance. Some of the Key Committees
recommendations are highlighted as follows:
Companies Act 2013 in Corporate Governance Standards: Companies Act 2013 has incorporated
a number of Provisions with a view to implement and improves the corporate governance framework
in Indian Corporate sector. The important provisions of this Act are:
Here we have mentioned some important provisions of this Act relating to corporate governance
standards: Sec. 149 states that it is the first time in the Companies Act to introduce independent
directors and women director in the composition of board of directors in the listed company. All listed
companies should have at least one–third of the board members as independent director. A company
whether private or public company will be mandatorily appoint at least one women director in cases-
it is a listed company and the paid up capital Rs. 100 crores or more and a turnover of Rs. 300 crores
or more. Sec 166 prescribed the duties of a director. This helps directors to have more clarity on their
duties and responsibilities .Sec 138 mandates appointment of internal auditor by prescribed class of
companies. It is an important aspect in the overall monitoring of the functions of a company. Sec.
135 deals with corporate social responsibility (CSR) which is mandatory for all profit making
companies to spend a fixed percentage (2%) of the average net profit towards social development
activities. A company has to constitute a board level committee to monitor such activities.
The Role of SEBI in Corporate Governance
To make corporate governance more effective, the SEBI since its set up in 1992 has taken up number
of initiatives appointed various Committees and has brought amendments to the clause 35B and the
clause 49 of listing agreement. Here the SEBI `s role in corporate governance is illustrated through
norms and provisions as stated these two clauses.
Clause 35B:Under the revised clause, the company has to provide e- voting facility in respect of
shareholders resolutions to be passed at general meeting or postal ballot facility to shareholder
The Company has to sent notices of meeting to all members, auditors and directors by post or
registered e-mail or courier and the same be placed in the official website of the company. The notice
of meeting should also mention that the company is providing facility for voting by electronic means
and postal ballot facilities to members. Through this provision, large number of shareholder participate
in selection of board members.
Revised Clause 49, its sub-clauses: The SEBI has replaced the existing clause 49 of the listing
agreement with a revised clause 49 (New clause). The new clause which was effective from October
1, 2014, is in alignment with the corporate governance norms as required under the new companies
Act 2013. This clause will also provide the details about the compliance of norms by the listed
companies but as per SEBI clarification, in future this clause will be applicable to non-listing
companies also. The amended clause 49 has 11 sub-clauses containing the provisions of compliances
under corporate governance norms. These are –
Clause 49 (i) – Corporate Governance Principles – Under this clause SEBI specify and explain
the rights of shareholders and other stakeholders, the responsibility of corporate to protect
stakeholder interest, duties and responsibility of the board. This clause also highlight that the
disclosure of accounting and non-accounting information’s must be made regarding proper
compliance of prescribed accounting standards.
Clause 49 (ii) Board of Directors – This sub-clause specifies the composition of board, inclusion
of restrictions on independent directors, the tenure, corporate code of conduct and whistle blowing
policy.
Board Composition – This sub-clause specifies optimum composition of board of directors where
at least 50% of the board members should be non-executive directors and there must be one women
director in the board, if chairman is an executive director, half of the board must comprise of
independent directors. However, if the chairman is a non-executive director, then 1/3rd board
members are independent directors
Code of Conduct – All board members and senior management personnel shall affirm compliance
with the code on an annual basis. The annual report of the company shall content a declaration to
this effect signed by the CEO. The board of directors is responsible to lay down a code of conduct
for all board members and senior management of the company and the same should be displayed in
the official website of the company.
Whistle Blowing – Whistle blowing policy will become mandatory under the revised clause 49 of
listing agreement and will be a radical step in maintaining the standards of corporate governance.
This gives protections to all stakeholders on all fraudulent activities in the company.
Clause 49 (iii) Audit Committee – As per the clause, the audit committee should have 3 members
out of which 2/3rd members be independent directors. All the members must be financially literate
and one must be an expert in accounting or related financial management. The committee has to
conduct meeting at least 4 times in a year with a gap of not more than 4 months in between two
meetings.
Clause (iv) Nomination and Remuneration Committee – There should be three members in the
nomination and remuneration committee and all members are non- executive directors and half of
them are independent directors. The role of the committee includes formulation of criteria for
determine qualifications, positive attributes and independence of a director and recommendation to
the board policies relating to remuneration of directors and employees, key managerial personnel.
Clause 49 (V) Requirements for Subsidiary Companies – This sub clause specifies the
responsibilities of listed and unlisted subsidiaries of listed holding companies.
a) at least one independent director of the holding Company should be director of the board of
directors of materially unlisted Indian Subsidiary Company.
b) the auditcommittee of the listed holding has to review the financial statements in particular
the investment made by the unlisted Subsidiary Company.
Clause (vi) Risk Management – The company through its board of directors shall constitute a Risk
Management Committee. The board shall defined the role and responsibilities of risk management
committee and may delegate monitoring and reviewing of the risk management plan to the committee
and such other functions as may deem fit.
Clause (vii) – Related Party Transactions – A related party transaction is a transfer of resources,
services or obligations between a company and a related party, regardless of whether a price is
changed. A related party is a person or entity that is related to the company. Parties are considered to
be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over
the other party directly or indirectly in making financial and or operating decisions. In this clause,
related party transactions information should be disclosed periodically in the form of summary before
the audit committee in the ordinary course of business. Related party transactions now require
shareholders’ approval instead of board’s approval as previously.
Clause 49 (viii) Disclosure Norms – This clause states the details of quarterly report should be
disclosed on all material facts, related party transactions along with compliance report on corporate
governance. It must be disclosed on companies website and a web link stated in its annual report.
Clause 49 (ix) – CEO / CFO Certificate – This sub-clause, states that Board of Directors, Chief
Executive Officer (ECO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has been made more responsible and
answerable. They must certify that they have reviewed the financial statements and cash flow
statements to the best of their knowledge.
Clause (x) and (xi) Compliance Certificate on Corporate Governance – Under this clause, SEBI
requires corporate to obtain the certificate of compliance on corporate governance from the auditor
of the company or from a practicing company secretary. Such certificate should be attached
separately in the annual report and the same to the Stock Exchange along with the annual report.
Conclusion
Corporate governance deals with laws, procedures and practices by which companies (firms) are
regulated, operated and controlled. It is actually the relationships between all the stakeholders in a
particular company, corporate governance has come in to focus due to occurrence of various scams
and scandals involving misuse of corporate funds. The corporate governance failures across the world
led to the development of corporate governance codes. High Profile Scams like Enron and WorldCom
in abroad and Satyam in India have shaken the Corporate World and implicated the need of strong
corporate governance mechanism. The main principles of good corporate governance are
transparency, disclosures, trusteeship and accountability. A sound corporate governance system will
increase the confidence of investors, attract foreign investment and maximize shareholders value.
In India, the important regulatory authorities like, SEBI, companies Act, ICAI and ICSI, etc. are
continuously framing various laws, rules and regulations in order to have a good corporate
governance system in corporate sector. The new provisions in the companies Act 2013 and the
guidelines of SEBI under the new clause 35B and the revised clause 49 and its sub-clauses will be
more effective for good corporate governance practices in India. No doubt the Companies Act and
SEBI have plays an important role in framing guidelines and power to make companies to follow
the corporate governance standards. But the can not only enforce and monitor the compliance of
corporate governance standards. Corporate governance is a long-term process and requires collective
efforts by all market players including regulators, institutional investors, creditors,directors,
shareholders and so on. Ethical value based corporate cultures are to be created within an
organization.
References
Contemporary issues in corporate governance – The management accountant. The Journal for CMAs,
Feb. 2019.
Fernando, A. C. (2014). Corporate governance principles, policies and practices (2nd ed.).
Pearson.
Gulati, Sumit., & Singh, Y. P. (2014). Financial management. Mc Graw Hill Education. Kumar,
Majumdar, A. K., Kapoor, G. K., & Dhamija, S. (2014). Company law & practice – A concise
commentary on companies Act 2013. Taxmannn.
Nandi, Devanjali., & Das, A. (2015). – Corporate governance practices in India – A critical evaluation
of select Indian firms. Indian Accounting Review (IAA), June 2015.
Websites
❖ http://www.mca.gov.in/
❖ https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/
❖ https://www.sebi.gov.in/