0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views6 pages

Nur Hasan Bail Application April 2025

The document pertains to a bail application for Nur Hasan, accused in a case involving allegations of kidnapping and abetment of suicide under IPC and POCSO Act. Multiple previous bail applications have been rejected, and the case is set for report and production on April 17, 2025. The petitioner asserts innocence, claims the allegations are false, and requests release on bail, citing completed investigation and readiness for trial.

Uploaded by

abhik sinha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views6 pages

Nur Hasan Bail Application April 2025

The document pertains to a bail application for Nur Hasan, accused in a case involving allegations of kidnapping and abetment of suicide under IPC and POCSO Act. Multiple previous bail applications have been rejected, and the case is set for report and production on April 17, 2025. The petitioner asserts innocence, claims the allegations are false, and requests release on bail, citing completed investigation and readiness for trial.

Uploaded by

abhik sinha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

BEFORE THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE,

(DESIGNATED POCSO COURT) GANGARAMPUR AT BUNIADPUR,


DAKSHIN DINAJPUR,

REF:- SPECIAL NO- 25/2024.


.
State of West Bengal versus Nur Hasan@Nur Hasan Islam.

In the Matter of: ---


Gangarampur Police Station Case No:-
222/2024 dated 07/05/2024 U/S 363/365/306
IPC & RW-6 OF POCSO ACT.
AND: -
Next Date Fixed For report & production on
17/04/2025..
And
In the Matter of:-

NUR HASAN@ NUR HASAN ISLAM AGED ABOUT- 28 YEARS S/O- MAJIDUR
RAHAMAN OF VILLAGE- MADHABPUR (CHERAPARA) PO- CHAMPATALI,
PS-GANGARAMPUR, DAKSHIN DINAJPUR.
ACCUSED
PETITIONER.
Versus
1. STATE OF WEST BENGAL, SERVICE THROUGH THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, GANGARAMPUR AT BUNIADPUR, DAKSHIN DINAJPUR.
2. FAIJUR RAHAMAN S/O- HAZI YASUDDIN OF VILLAGE-
LALCHANDRAPUR, PO-SARBAMANGALA PS-GANGARAMPUR DISTRICT-
DAKSHIN DINAJPUR.
(DE-FACTO
COMPLAINANT).

And
In The Matter Of:-
AN APPLICATION FOR BAIL ON BEHALF OF THE
ACCUSED PETITIONER.

DETAILS OF PREVIOUS BAIL APPLICATION:-

1. That in connection with the above referred case accused


petitioner namely Nur Hasan@ Nur Hasan Islam filed one
application u/s 438 Cr.P.C before the District & Session
Judge, Dakshin Dinajpur at Balurghat vide Cri Misc Case
No-509/2024. That the Learned court was pleased to
ordered to rejected the Bail Application on 10/06/2024
being not pressed.(copy of order enclosed)

2. That in connection with the above referred case accused


petitioner namely Nur Hasan@ Nur Hasan Islam filed one
application u/s 438 Cr.P.C before the Learned Additional
District & Session Judge, Gangarampur at Buniadpur,
Page1

Dakshin Dinajpur vide Criminal Misc Case 80/2024,


1
which was rejected. On 24th June,2024. (Copy of order
annexed herewith)
3. That in connection with the above referred case accused
petitioner namely Nur Hasan@ Nur Hasan Islam filed one
application u/s 438 Cr.P.C before the Honourable
Calcutta High Court vide Criminal Misc Case CRM (A)
2734 of 2024, which was rejected on 12th August,2024.
(Copy of order annexed herewith).

4. That in connection with the above referred case accused


petitioner namely Nur Hasan@ Nur Hasan Islam filed one
application for Bail before the Learned Additional District
& Session Judge(POCSO),Gangarampur at Buniadpur
which was rejected on 21st February,2025. (Copy of
order annexed herewith).

5. That in connection with the above referred case accused


petitioner namely Nur Hasan@ Nur Hasan Islam filed one
application for Bail before the Learned Additional District
& Session Judge (POCSO), Gangarampur at Buniadpur
which was rejected on 12TH MARCH,, 2025. Wherein the
learned Court was pleased to ordered as

“Today is fixed for hearing bail application.


Compliance report regarding service of bail application is received. Defacto
complainant does not appear. Ld. Spl. P.P-in-charge is present.
The record is now taken up for hearing bail application.
It appears that the application for bail of this was rejected on 21-02-2025 and
since then there has been no change in circumstances from the date of earlier
rejection except for the fact that charge has been framed and now the case is
ready for trial. In such circumstances,
I am not inclined to grant bail to the accused at this stage without attempting to
record the evidence of the defacto complainant.”
(Copy of order enclosed)

The humble petitioner most respectfully submits that:--


(a) That the accused petitioner is the permanent resident of
within the
Jurisdiction of this Honourable Court and small farmer
by
profession.
(b) That the allegation against the petitioner is that – on
07/05/2024 Faijur Rahaman lodged one written
complaint before the Gangarampur Police Station that he
along with his wife & two daughter resided at Delhi. His
daughter ****************aged about- 16+ residing in
the house of the accused Nur Hasan Islam.
He further alleged that accused accompanied her
Page2

daughter at DIGHA on 19/04/2024 & returned from

2
there on 26/04/2024. That the de-facto complainant
further alleged that they left for Delhi subsequently
along with his daughter ***************. And he further
alleged that due to the threat over telephone his
daughter committed suicide at Delhi on 04/05/2024.
Those upon the strength of the written complaint lodged
by the defacto complainant Gangarampur Police Station
Case No:-222/2024 dated 07/05/2024 U/S 363/365/306
IPC & 6 of POCSO Act initiated against the accused
petitioner.
(c) That the present accused petitioner humbly submits that
he is innocent & no way connected with the present
case.
(d) That the complainant in his written complain in every
line narrated false & fabricated third story.
(e) That the accused no point of time accompanied the
victim girl with him alone. And he had not made any
threat /abetment for committing suicide.
(f) That the accused Petitioner is innocent & permanent
resident within the Jurisdiction of this Honourable Court.
(g) That the investigation of the case already been
completed as already more than 8 months elapsed & for
the purpose of investigation accused detention is no
longer required.
(h) That the accused petitioner voluntarily surrendered
before this Learned Court on 2nd January, 2025. And is in
Judicial Custody for 93 days as on 5th April, 2025.
(i) That previously no other Bail application (except the Bail
application stated herein above beginning of this
application) has been filed in respect of the present
accused petitioner before any Higher Court including
Calcutta High Court/Supreme Court of India.
(j) That the accused is totally innocents and are not guilty
of any of the offence as alleged by the complainant.
(k) That the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish the
necessary sureties as may be directed by this Honorable
Court & also bind himself as to the any conditions as
imposed by the Honorable Court .
(l) And for which the above named accused petitioner
prayed for an order for Bail.
It is therefore prayed that this Honorable
Court May be pleased to direct the
release of the petitioners on Bail in
Page3

3
Gangarampur Police Station Case No:-
222/2024 dated 07/05/2024 U/S
363/365/306 IPC & 6 of POCSO Act, and
to pass any such other or further or
orders as Honorable Court May deem fit
and proper in the circumstances of the
case.

BEFORE THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT &


SESSION JUDGE,(POCSO COURT), GANGARAMPUR AT
DAKSHIN DINAJPUR,
REF: - SPECIAL 25 OF 2024.
State of West Bengal versus Nur Hasan Islam
AFFIDAVIT
I, Joyjit Sarkar S/O- Niranjan Sarkar of village-
Korial, PO-Jalalpur, PS_Gangarampur, Dakshin
Dinajpur, by profession-ADVOCATE, do hereby
solemnly declares that..
1. I am the engaged Junior Advocate of the above
referred Bail application.
2. That the statements made in paragraph …to
………be true to my knowledge and best of my
belief.
3. That previously no other Bail application
(Except mentioned beginning of the
application) u/s 437/439 Cr.P.C/ U/S 478/483
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,2023, has
been filed in respect of the present accused
petitioner before the Learned District & Session
Judge, Dakshin Dinajpur or any Higher Court
including Calcutta High Court/Supreme Court of
India.
4. That no other Bail petition (Except mentioned
beginning of the application) has been filed by the
accused petitioner on any occasion, & no such bail
petition is pending in any Higher Court.
5. That the statements made in the rest paragraph are
humble submission before the Honorable Court.

I, Joyjit Sarkar S/O- Niranjan Sarkar of village- Korial, PO-


Jalalpur, PS_Gangarampur, Dakshin Dinajpur, do hereby
solemnly affirm that the statements made in above are
true to my knowledge & best of my belief.
Page4

4
DEPONENT.

Lawyer:-Abhik Sinha.
Mobile No-7718329734/9475226780. (Whatsapp)
Email id: lalabhik2@gmail.com.

BEFORE THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE,


(DESIGNATED POCSO COURT) GANGARAMPUR AT BUNIADPUR,
DAKSHIN DINAJPUR,
REF:- SPECIAL NO- 25/2024.

State of West Bengal versus Nur Hasan@Nur Hasan Islam.

In the Matter of: ---


Gangarampur Police Station Case No:-
222/2024 dated 07/05/2024 U/S 363/365/306
IPC & RW-6 OF POCSO ACT.

AND: - SPECIAL NO- 25/2024.


Next Date Fixed For report On
17/04/2025..
And
In the Matter of:-

NUR HASAN@ NUR HASAN ISLAM AGED ABOUT- 28 YEARS S/O- MAJIDUR
RAHAMAN OF VILLAGE- MADHABPUR (CHERAPARA) PO- CHAMPATALI,
PS-GANGARAMPUR, DAKSHIN DINAJPUR.

ACCUSED PETITIONER.
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL, SERVICE THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
GANGARAMPUR AT BUNIADPUR, DAKSHIN DINAJPUR.

APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE ACCUSED PETITIONER FOR PUT UP


THE CASE RECORD:-

That in connection with the above referred case the accused


named above filed one Bail application & also filed the copy
of Bail application for causing Notice to the defacto
complainant. That for hearing of said application filed by the
accused petitioner the case record required to be called for.

And for which, this accused petitioner most respectfully


Page5

prayed for PUT UP the case record.


5
And for which, Your Honor may be order as to
the same & may pass any other order as Your
Honor may deem fit & proper for the ends of
Justice.
Dated :- 5th APRIL,2025.
Page6

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy